Pollen Thieves Research Articles

Consequences of pollen defense compounds for pollinators and antagonists in a pollen-rewarding plant.

Plants produce an array of defensive compounds with toxic or deterrent effects on insect herbivores. Pollen can contain relatively high concentrations of such defense compounds, but the causes and consequences of this enigmatic phenomenon remain mostly unknown. These compounds could potentially protect pollen against antagonists but could also reduce flower attractiveness to pollinators. We combined field observations of the pollen-rewarding Lupinus argenteus with chemical analysis and laboratory assays to test three hypotheses for the presence of pollen defense compounds: (1) these compounds are the result of spillover from adjacent tissues, (2) they protect against pollen thieves, and (3) they act as antimicrobial compounds. We also tested whether pollen defense compounds affect pollinator behavior. We found a positive relationship between alkaloid concentrations in pollen and petals, supporting the idea that pollen defense compounds partly originate from spillover. However, pollen and petals exhibited quantitatively (but not qualitatively) distinct alkaloid profiles, suggesting that plants can adjust pollen alkaloid composition independently from that of adjacent tissues. We found no relationship between pollen alkaloid concentration and the abundance of pollen thieves in Lupinus flowers. However, pollen alkaloids were negatively associated with bacterial abundance. Finally, plants with more alkaloids in their pollen received more pollinator visits, but these visits were shorter, resulting in no change in the overall number of flowers visited. We propose that pollen defense compounds are partly the result of spillover from other tissues, while they also play an antimicrobial role. The absence of negative effects of these compounds on pollinator visitation likely allows their maintenance in pollen at relatively high concentrations. Taken together, our results suggest that pollen alkaloids affect and are mediated by the interplay of multiple interactions.

Secondary pollen presentation: More than to increase pollen transfer precision

AbstractPollination precision and efficiency have been deemed to be important driving forces in floral evolution. Herkogamy reduction is a main mechanism to increase pollination precision. Secondary pollen presentation (SPP), by which pollen is presented on other floral organs especially pistils, has been widely accepted as a special mechanism to increase pollen transfer precision through spatial reduction of the anther–stigma distance, that is, minimized herkogamy. This overlooks a potential driving force, that is expanding the pollination niche through converting pollen thieves and nectar robbers into effective pollinators. We selected two species as study models with typical pistillate SPP, Pavetta hongkongensis Bremek. (Rubiaceae) and Scaevola taccada (Gaertn.) Roxb. (Goodeniaceae). In both species, two distinct pollinator functional groups were recognized. Short‐tongued bees and flies fed on pollen on stigmas but also stole pollen from anthers and robbed nectar, whereas long‐tongued hawkmoths and butterflies only collected nectar. Emasculation had no influence on long‐tongued pollinators, but significantly decreased the visitation frequency of short‐tongued visitors and fruit set, compared to intact flowers, demonstrating short‐tongued visitors did not effectively pollinate and acted merely as pollen thieves or nectar robbers when SPP was absent. Data from the two plant species clearly indicated pistillate SPP has additional adaptive advantages of converting ineffective visitors into pollinators and consequently widening the pollination niche, which could help plants overcome environmental stochasticity. Our results suggest that multiple selective forces drive the evolution of SPP and the minimization of herkogamy.

To bee or not to bee: The ‘raison d'être’ of toxic secondary compounds in the pollen of Boraginaceae

Abstract While the presence of secondary compounds in floral nectar has received considerable attention, much less is known about the ecological significance and evolutionary origin of secondary ‘toxic’ compounds in pollen. It is unclear whether the presence of these compounds in pollen is non‐adaptive and due to physiological ‘spillover’ from other floral tissues, or whether these compounds serve an adaptive function related to plant–pollinator interactions, such as protection of pollen against pollen thieves. Combining an experimental approach with phylogenetic comparative methods, and using western Palaearctic Boraginaceae as a model system, we investigate how pollen secondary metabolites influence, and are influenced by, relationships with bees, the main functional group of pollen‐foraging pollinators. We found a significant relationship between the levels of secondary compounds in the corollas and those in the pollen in the investigated species of Boraginaceae, suggesting that baseline levels of pollen secondary compounds may partly be due to spillover from floral tissues. At realistic levels, pollen secondary compounds showed significant detrimental effects on bee pre‐imaginal development, in agreement with previous egg‐transfer experiments showing that in some cases Boraginaceae pollen did not support pre‐imaginal development in bees not specialized on these plants. We also show that phylogenetically independent Boraginaceae taxa rewarding pollinators with pollen in addition to nectar exhibit significantly lower levels of toxic compounds in the pollen than taxa where the main reward is postulated to be nectar. Lastly, in contrast to our predictions, there was no positive association between toxin levels in the pollen of a given plant taxon and the number of bee species specialized on this taxon. We integrate all these findings and formulate an evolutionary scenario to account for the presence of toxic compounds in the pollen of Boraginaceae. We suggest that baseline levels of toxic compounds may be found in pollen due to spillover from other floral tissues and not primarily because of bee–flower interactions. Since pollen toxins can have detrimental effects on bees, we propose that selection acts to lower pollen toxin levels in plants where pollen, in addition to nectar, serves as a reward to bees. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

The long spur of Impatiens macrovexilla may reflect adaptation to diurnal hawkmoth pollinators despite diversity of floral visitors

Many tropical and subtropical Impatiens species possess conspicuously long and narrow spurs and have been assigned to the butterfly pollination syndrome in investigations of floral evolution of this genus. However, this contradicts some previous studies documenting abundant hawkmoth visitors rather than butterflies. In this study, we explored the pollination ecology of Impatiens macrovexilla, a long-spurred species in Asia. We investigated a series of floral traits, tested the breeding system and contributions of different floral visitors to reproductive success, observed floral visitors and compared the spur length with the proboscis length of the nectar-collecting floral visitors. I. macrovexilla shows floral traits that cannot clearly be associated with a certain group of long-proboscid insects. Results showed that the species was visited by large nectar-collecting bees, diurnal hawkmoths, small pollen-collecting insects and rarely butterflies at different sites and in different years. Pollination treatments indicated that I. macrovexilla is self-compatible (Self-Incompatibility Index = 0.02) but completely relies on floral visitors for pollination. A treatment which excluded hawkmoths but permitted pollen-collecting insects to visit flowers revealed that diurnal hawkmoths contributed considerably to reproductive success of this species but that pollen-collecting insects acted as pollen thieves. Large bees firmly contacted anthers and stigmas when visiting flowers so probably also act as pollinators. The proboscises of large bees were shorter than half of the spur of I. macrovexilla in length, suggesting that they could only access the nectar accumulated near the mouth of the spur. However, hawkmoths can access most or all of the nectar because their proboscides match the length of the floral spur. Thus, the long nectar spur presumably reflects adaptation to diurnal hawkmoths. Using evidence from multiple lines of investigation, our study is the first to confirm the role of diurnal hawkmoths as pollinators in Impatiens.

Morphological specialization of heterantherous Rhynchanthera grandiflora (Melastomataceae) accommodates pollinator diversity.

The tropical Melastomataceae are characterized by poricidal anthers which constitute a floral filter selecting for buzz-pollinating bees. Stamens are often dimorphic, sometimes with discernible feeding and pollinating functions. Rhynchanthera grandiflora produces nectarless flowers with four short stamens and one long stamen; all anthers feature a narrow elongation with an upwards facing pore. We tested pollen transfer by diverse foraging bees and viability of pollen from both stamen types. The impact of anther morphology on pollen release direction and scattering angle was studied to determine the plant's reproductive strategy. Medium-sized to large bees sonicated flowers in a specific position, and the probability of pollen transfer correlated with bee size even among these legitimate visitors. Small bees acted as pollen thieves or robbers. Anther rostrum and pore morphology serve to direct and focus the pollen jet released by floral sonication towards the pollinator's body. Resulting from the ventral and dorsal positioning of the short and long stamens, respectively, the pollinator's body was widely covered with pollen. This improves the plant's chances of outcrossing, irrespective of which bee body part contacts the stigma. Consequently, R. grandiflora is also able to employ bee species of various sizes as pollen vectors. The strategy of spreading pollen all over the pollinator's body is rather cost-intensive but counterbalanced by ensuring that most of the released pollen is in fact transferred to the bee. Thus, flowers of R. grandiflora illustrate how specialized morphology may serve to improve pollination by a functional group of pollinators.

Effectiveness of native nectar-feeding birds and the introduced Apis mellifera as pollinators of the kangaroo paw, Anigozanthos manglesii (Haemodoraceae)

Plants pollinated by vertebrates are often visited by native and exotic insects foraging for pollen and nectar. We compared flower visitation rates, foraging behaviour, and the contribution to reproduction of nectar-feeding birds and the introduced honeybee Apis mellifera in four populations of the bird-pollinated Anigozanthos manglesii (Haemodoraceae). The behaviour of floral visitors was quantified with direct observations and motion-triggered and hand-held cameras. Pollinator access to flowers was manipulated by enclosure in netting to either exclude all visitors or to exclude vertebrate visitors only. Apis mellifera was the only insect observed visiting flowers, and the most frequent flower visitor, but primarily acted as a pollen thief. Although birds visited A. manglesii plants only once per week on average, they were 3.5 times more likely to contact the anther or stigma as foraging honeybees. Exclusion of birds resulted in 67% fewer fruits and 81% fewer seeds than flowers left open and unmanipulated. Unnetted flowers that were open to bird and insect pollinators showed pollen-limitation and a large variation in reproductive output within and between sites. Although honeybees have been shown to pollinate other Australian plants, compared to birds, they are highly inefficient pollinators of A. manglesii.

Defence compounds in pollen: why do they occur and how do they affect the ecology and evolution of bees?

Pollen plays two important roles in angiosperm reproduction, serving as a vehicle for the plant's male gametes, but also, in many species, as a lure for pollen-feeding animals. Despite being an important food source for many pollinators, pollen often contains compounds with known deterrent or toxic properties, as documented in a growing number of studies. Here we review these studies and discuss the role of pollen defensive compounds in the coevolutionary relationship between plants and bees, the preeminent consumers of pollen. Next, we evaluate three hypotheses that may explain the existence of defensive compounds in pollen. The pleiotropy hypothesis, which proposes that defensive compounds in pollen merely reflect physiological spillover from other plant tissues, is contradicted by evidence from several species. Although plants may experience selection to defend pollen against poor-quality pollinators, we also find only partial support for the protection-against-pollen-collection-hypothesis. Finally, pollen defences might protect pollen from colonisation by antagonistic microorganisms (antimicrobial hypothesis), although data to evaluate this idea are scarce. Further research on the effects of pollen defensive compounds on pollinators, pollen thieves, and pollen-colonising microbes will be needed to understand why many plants have chemically defended pollen, and the consequences of those defences for pollen consumers.

Pollination biology and breeding system of Desmodium grahamii (Fabaceae, Papilionoideae): functional aspects of flowers and bees

This study aims to understand the role of floral traits in determining the pollination and reproduction of Desmodium grahamii (Fabaceae, Papilionoideae) with explosive floral mechanism in populations occurring in a natural reserve and botanical garden in southern Mexico City. We assessed the breeding system by quantifying floral and pollinator activity, compatibility, pollination, and reproductive success, assisted by field and laboratory analyses. Results showed that cross-pollination and self-pollination coexist, but bees are required for fruit and seed set. Flower colour is the primary attractant. Floral scent is also likely important because the petals were covered with papillae, although no scent was perceptible. Morphological and functional observations of D. grahamii exhibit simultaneous pollen release and stigma receptivity when the flower is activated by a pollinator and there is no secondary pollen presentation; this contrasts with what has been reported on other species of Desmodium. Pollen is the pollinators’ only reward, and its deposition and collection must be done synchronically, occurring when a bee lands and introduces its proboscis in the flower. In this study, we identified seven floral visitors: five bee pollinators and two syrphid flies as pollen thieves. On some occasions, Apis mellifera also behaves as a pollen thief. Fruit and seed set of flowers that were isolated from visitors may indicate a delayed pollination mechanism. Pollination results also suggest that Apis bees and syrphid flies may contribute to fruit and seed production when they forage on flowers at post-anthesis.

Breeding system, floral biology and pollinators of Sagittaria montevidensis subsp. montevidensis Cham. et Schlech. (Alismataceae)

Sagittaria montevidensis is a common marsh species with showy flowers and of interest to humans; however, its sexual reproduction is mostly unknown. The floral biology, pollination and breeding system were studied in two coastal populations of De La Plata river in Argentina. Blooming and fruiting occurred throughout the year. The staminate (more abundant) flowers (with pistillodes, empty or with rudimentary ovules) and the pistillate flowers (with staminodes), are usually located in distinct whorls. Protogyny was common and all the floral pieces showed hydrophobicity.Both flower types experienced three stages during the three days of anthesis. The staminodes and staminal filaments had nectar secretory papillae, and nectar accumulated at the base of the petals. Osmophores in the reproductive organs and petals emitted sweet and light aroma. In the visible spectrum, petals appeared white, with a dark reddish spot widening towards the region of nectar accumulation; in the UV spectrum, reflecting nectariferous regions contrasted with the other floral parts. Both flower types exhibited similar visual patterns, the less osmophore-bearing and nectar producing pistillate flowers resembled the more rewarding (pollen and nectar producing) staminate ones. The bowl-type flowers were pollinated by four species of medium-sized bees from two families and visited by nectar and pollen thieves, florivores and frugivores from five Insect orders. The low degree of self-compatibility and high reproductive success by open pollination confirmed that sexual reproduction was frequent.

Does the morphological fit between flowers and pollinators affect pollen deposition? An experimental test in a buzz-pollinated species with anther dimorphism.

Some pollination systems, such as buzz‐pollination, are associated with floral morphologies that require a close physical interaction between floral sexual organs and insect visitors. In these systems, a pollinator's size relative to the flower may be an important feature determining whether the visitor touches both male and female sexual organs and thus transfers pollen between plants efficiently. To date, few studies have addressed whether in fact the “fit” between flower and pollinator influences pollen transfer, particularly among buzz‐pollinated species. Here we use Solanum rostratum, a buzz‐pollinated plant with dimorphic anthers and mirror‐image flowers, to investigate whether the morphological fit between the pollinator's body and floral morphology influences pollen deposition. We hypothesized that when the size of the pollinator matches the separation between the sexual organs in a flower, more pollen should be transferred to the stigma than when the visitor is either too small or too big relative to the flower. To test this hypothesis, we exposed flowers of S. rostratum with varying levels of separation between sexual organs, to bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) of different sizes. We recorded the number of visits received, pollen deposition, and fruit and seed production. We found higher pollen deposition when bees were the same size or bigger than the separation between anther and stigma within a flower. We found a similar, but not statistically significant pattern for fruit set. In contrast, seed set was more likely to occur when the size of the flower exceeded the size of the bee, suggesting that other postpollination processes may be important in translating pollen receipt to seed set. Our results suggest that the fit between flower and pollinator significantly influences pollen deposition in this buzz‐pollinated species. We speculate that in buzz‐pollinated species where floral morphology and pollinators interact closely, variation in the visitor's size may determine whether it acts mainly as a pollinator or as a pollen thief (i.e., removing pollen rewards but contributing little to pollen deposition and fertilization).

Floral biology, nectar secretion pattern and fruit set of a threatened Bignoniaceae tree from Brazilian tropical forest

Zeyheria tuberculosa, a Bignoniaceae tree that occurs in a broad latitudinal range in Brazilian forests, is a threatened species of seasonal tropical forest. It is crucial to enhance the knowledge on this species’ floral biology, since interactions related to reproduction of plants are critical for the long term maintenance of their populations. Thus, we investigated the sexual reproduction and floral biology of Z. tuberculosa, including nectar features, aiming to understand the ecological processes associated to this mutualistic plant-animal interaction in the current modified landscape. For this, we performed experiments under natural conditions and in the laboratory. All the evaluated plants were self-incompatible. Zeyheria tuberculosa was pollinated by Bombus pauloensis, a medium-sized bee, and offered hexose-rich nectar as resource. Flowers were also visited by small-sized bee species, Trigona spinipes, that acted as pollen thief, and Pseudoaugochlora pandora and P. graminae that acted as nectar thieves. These three bee groups exhibited temporal separation in the peak of visits throughout the day. The peak of pollinator visits occurred firstly, which may allow the pollinator to access nectar and pollen loads before they are exploited by thieves. However, bee pollinator visits were scarce, and this fact, associated to the self-incompatibility of Z. tuberculosa, may explain the low fruit set registered in the studied plants. It could be of special concern for this threatened species maintenance in the medium and long term, which depends on the offspring originated by sexual reproduction.

High incidence of pollen theft in natural populations of a buzz-pollinated plant

More than 20,000 angiosperm species possess non-dehiscent anthers that open through small pores at the anther’s tip. These flowers are visited by bees that use vibrations to remove pollen, a phenomenon known as buzz pollination. However, some floral visitors fail to transfer pollen efficiently, either through a mismatch of flower and insect size, or because they are unable to buzz-pollinate. These visitors collect pollen, but provide little or no pollination, behaving as pollen thieves. Although pollen theft is widespread in plants, few studies have quantified the incidence of pollen thieves for buzz-pollinated plants. We use observations of natural populations and floral manipulations of Solanum rostratum (Solanaceae) to investigate the incidence of pollen theft, find morphological and behavioural differences between pollinators and thieves, measure the pollination efficiency of visitors, and characterize the reproductive ecology of this herb. We found that most visitors act as thieves, with <20 % of all bees contacting the stigma. Insect visitors that regularly failed to contact the stigma (illegitimate visitors), included buzzing and non-buzzing bees, were significantly smaller, visited fewer flowers per bout, and stayed longer in each flower than (legitimate) visitors that regularly contact the stigma. Few flowers visited solely by illegitimate visitors set fruit. Our results show that S. rostratum requires insect visitation to set seed and natural populations experience moderate pollen limitation. We conclude that insect size, relative to the flower, is the main determinant of whether a visitor acts as a pollinator or a pollen thief in S. rostratum.

Polinização de Camaridium ochroleucum Lindl. (Orchidaceae: Maxillariinae)

This paper describes the floral biology and pollination of Camaridium ochroleucum Lindl. It is an epiphyte on trees and fallen logs in campina and campinarana forming large clusters of individuals, however isolated individuals can also be observed. It has many of osmophores located on the lip. With ammonium hydroxide the lip acquired an intense color yellow. Melipona ilustris and Trigona fulviventris are flower visitors able to remove the pollinia. Depending on where deposited these species are able to remove the pollinarium during body cleaning. Pollen thieves were also observed, such as Tetragona handlirschii and Apidae 1. The species is self-incompatible and has low fruit set in natural conditions. Keywords: Amazonian; Maxillarinae; Melipona; Trigona; trichomes food.

Biología floral de &lt;i&gt;Passiflora foetida&lt;/i&gt; (Passifloraceae)

Un experimento reproductivo muestra que Passiflora foetida es autocompatible. Observaciones de las características florales y de los visitantes durante la antesis, más el análisis del polen transportado, permitieron identificar el síndrome floral (melitofilia) y las funciones de cada visitante. La antesis ocurre desde las 6 hasta las 11 hs. Se identificaron 3 fases ílorales: 1) estigmas por encima de las anteras, 2) estigmas a la altura de las anteras, 3) estigmas por encima de las anteras; los radii, los pétalos y los sépalos se incurvan. Los estigmas están receptivos durante toda la antesis. La concentración de azúcares del néctar es 34 %. El color predominante en el espectro visible es el blanco. En el espectro UV, los estambres y el gineceo contrastan con el limen y el an droginóforo; pueden ser una - guía de néctar. Tres· especies de himenópter-os fueron los· visitantes más frecuentes y constantes: Ptiloglossa larsata (Colletidae) siempre contactan las anteras y los estigmas cuando liban, transportan un alto porcentaje de polen de P. foetida y visitan flores en fase 1 y 2; pue den ser considerados los principales polinizadores. Pseudilugochloropsis sp. (Halictidae) raramente contactan las anteras o los estigmas cuando perforan el limen para acceder al néctar y visitan flores en fase 2 y 3; son ladrones de néctar que raramente polinizan. Augochlorella sp. (Halictidae) recolectan polen sin tocar los estigmas y visitan flores en fase 2 y 3; son hurtadores de polen.

Long‐tongued insects promote disassortative pollen transfer in style‐dimorphic Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae)

Summary In hermaphroditic flowers, reciprocal herkogamy, for example heterostyly, enhances pollen transfer between floral morphs (disassortative pollination) while avoiding self‐interference between sexual organs. By contrast, disassortative pollination might be compromised in style‐dimorphic flowers, which lack perfect reciprocity between the two floral morphs. This suboptimal functioning has been considered to explain why stylar dimorphism is rare in nature. Some style‐polymorphic species receive a wide array of floral visitors, including long‐tongued insects that feed on nectar and short‐tongued insects that feed on pollen. Differences in the morphology and behaviour of these two insect types could be manifested as different pollination patterns in each floral morph. By observing individual pollinators and pollen deposition and delivery in small field‐based experimental arrays with emasculated and intact flowers, we studied pollination patterns mediated by different insect types (long‐ and short‐tongued) in the two floral morphs (long‐ and short‐styled) of the style‐dimorphic Narcissus papyraceus. We investigated the patterns of pollen transfer between and within style morphs in cross‐pollinations, as well as self‐pollination and pollen removal rates, for each floral morph mediated by each insect type. Long‐tongued insects were efficient pollinators of both floral morphs as they removed little pollen from the anthers but deposited comparatively large amounts on the stigmas. Although disassortative pollen transfer and assortative pollen transfer were equally high to the long‐styled morph, the former prevailed in the short‐styled morph. Short‐tongued insects removed large amounts of pollen from the anthers but deposited only a few pollen grains on the long‐styled stigmas and a negligible number of grains on short‐styled stigmas regardless of the morph of the donor. Synthesis. In this study, we provide empirical support for the hypothesis that, under the action of long‐tongued pollinators, pollen transfer patterns in the stylar‐dimorphic Narcissus papyraceus resemble in part those of heterostylous species. In addition, we found that short‐tongued insects act mostly as pollen thieves, thereby limiting the male fitness of both style morphs, besides depleting the female fitness of S‐morph plants. In view of these results, we propose that the differing pollination efficiencies of floral visitors, in addition to their frequency, are key in determining the morph ratio of populations in this Narcissus.

TWO VIGNA SPECIES NATIVE TO ARGENTINA WITH ORNAMENTAL POTENTIAL

Fil: Hoc, Patricia Susana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Cs.exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biologia Experimental. Laboratorio del Grupo de Est.de Plantas Vasculares; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Micologia y Botanica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Micologia y Botanica; Argentina

Reproductive biology of pointleaf manzanita (&lt;i&gt;Arctostaphylos pungens&lt;/i&gt;) and the pollinator-nectar robber spectrum

Floral visitor species are often assumed to act either mutualistically towards plants (as pollinators) or to exploit them (as nectar-robbers or as nectar or pollen thieves). We investigated the reproductive biology of pointleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos pungens K. Kunth), a regionally abundant North American shrub, in relation to the wide spectrum of behaviours displayed by its flower-visiting insects. We recorded A. pungens population-level flowering phenology and nectar standing crop, and conducted experiments documenting its breeding system, in an Arizona upland habitat in 1998 and 1999. Floral visitors were observed over 38 hr. We recorded frequencies of six foraging behaviours within and among individuals of each visitor species.Arctostaphylos pungens flowers in late winter. During this period it is the only abundant floral resource for a diverse array of generalist insects in its habitat. We observed 1206 floral visits by 46 taxa. Most floral visitors pursued mixed behaviours: at the species and/or individual level, they foraged both legitimately and as nectar-robbers or thieves. The most commonly mixed behaviours were legitimate pollen collection (which likely resulted in pollen transfer) and secondary nectar-robbing (which was highly unlikely to do so). As A. pungens was found to be largely self-incompatible, robbing and thieving visits should be detrimental to reproductive success.Although theoretical analyses often assume that exploiters must be punished or excluded for mutualism to persist evolutionarily, exploitation is in fact ubiquitous within cooperative interactions in nature. In manzanita, very few floral visitor species could be classified as exclusively beneficial or detrimental to plants: rather, they exhibited multiple foraging strategies, with no evidence of plant control. Such pollinator-nectar robber spectra appear to be common, and constitute an important challenge to current understanding of how mutualism can persist.NOTE: Supporting information to this article may be found in the left menu.

Native pollen thieves reduce the reproductive success of a hermaphroditic plant, Aloe maculata

Pollen is unique among floral rewards in functioning as both a carrier of gametes and an attractant and nutritious resource for floral visitors. Animals that collect pollen without pollinating (pollen thieves) could reduce siring success of thieved plants and cause pollen limitation of seed set at the population level; however, such impacts on plant reproduction have not been demonstrated experimentally. To test these effects we added hives of native honey bees (Apis mellifera scutellata) to populations of a primarily bird-pollinated plant, Aloe maculata, in eastern South Africa. In field and aviary trials, bee addition increased pollen removal from anthers but decreased pollen deposition on stigmas, and so reduced both male and female pollination components. Further, total seed production decreased with hive addition in the aviary experiment and in three of four field populations, indicating that population-level pollen theft can also compromise reproductive success. In the field, naturally occurring allodapine bees also seemed to act as pollen thieves, outweighing the effect of honey bee hive addition at one of the four aloe populations. Our results highlight the importance of social bees as pollen thieves, even of plants that have evolved in their presence, and the role of dichogamy in promoting pollen theft. Given the commonness of both social bees and dichogamy, pollen theft is likely a much more common influence on floral ecology and evolution than suggested by the sparse literature.

Sistema reprodutivo e polinização de Senna multijuga (Fabaceae) em Mata Atlântica Montana

Resumo O conhecimento da biologia reprodutiva e polinização de árvores neotropicais vêm aumentando nas últimas décadas. No entanto, ainda é incipiente para a Mata Atlântica e muitas questões persistem, por exemplo, sobre a prevalência de autoincompatibilidade. A biologia floral, o sistema reprodutivo e os visitantes florais de Senna multijuga foram estudados, com o objetivo de verificar a ocorrência de autoincompatibilidade e determinar seus polinizadores. A espécie apresenta características florais típicas do gênero, como flores assimétricas, enantiostilia, heteranteria e deiscência poricida. A antese é diurna e a viabilidade do pólen não diferiu entre os morfos de anteras. Os polinizadores foram abelhas dos gêneros Bombus, Epicharis, Centris e Xylocopa e abelhas menores atuaram como pilhadores de pólen. A reprodução sexual em S. multijuga depende da transferência de pólen pelos polinizadores, pois não foram formados frutos por apomixia ou autopolinização. Este último resultado pode ser devido à depressão por endogamia ou a um mecanismo de autoincompatibilidade de ação tardia, uma vez que houve aborto uniforme de pistilos e penetração de tubos polínicos nos óvulos após autopolinização. Diferença na fecundidade após polinização manual e em condições naturais indica que a limitação polínica afeta o sucesso reprodutivo feminino, assim como a disponibilidade de recursos.

Insect flower visitors and pollinators of cacti from the southwest USA

Summary: The present study focuses on flower visitors and pollinators of some globular cacti and opuntias of the southwestern USA. Flowers of these cacti are predominantly melittophilous, and medium-sized to large bees are their most important and most efficient pollinators. A brief summary of the most common bee genera visiting cactus flowers in southwestern USA is given. Other common visitors of the cactus flowers are nitidulid beetles that are very poor pollinators and can be considered pollen thieves. Two other unexpected cactus flower visitors were identified during this study: true flies of the genus Triploechus from Pediocactus bradyi flowers and hawk moth (Hyles lineata) from a flower of Echinomastus johnsonii.