Politics Of Retrenchment Research Articles

Exiting the Gulf: Britain's Withdrawal from East of Suez: The Politics of Retrenchment . Jeffrey Pickering.

Exiting the Gulf: Britain's Withdrawal from East of Suez: The Politics of Retrenchment . Jeffrey Pickering.

Shorter notice. Britain's Withdrawal from East of Suez. The Politics of Retrenchment. J Pickering

Shorter notice. Britain's Withdrawal from East of Suez. The Politics of Retrenchment. J Pickering

Shorter notice. Britain's Withdrawal from East of Suez. The Politics of Retrenchment. J Pickering

Shorter notice. Britain's Withdrawal from East of Suez. The Politics of Retrenchment. J Pickering

‘Beyond Left and Right’: The New Partisan Politics of Welfare

The ‘new politics of the welfare state,’ the term coined by Pierson (1996) to differentiate between the popular politics of welfare expansion and the unpopular politics of retrenchment, emphasizes a number of factors that distinguish countries' capacities to pursue contentious measures and avoid electoral blame. Policy structures, vested interests, and institutions play a prominent role in accounting for cross‐national differences in leaders' abilities to diffuse responsibility for divisive initiatives. One important omission from the ‘new politics’ literature, however, is a discussion of partisan politics. ‘Old’ conceptualizations of the political right and left are implicitly taken as constants despite radical changes in the governing agenda of many leftist parties over the last decade. Responding to this oversight, Castles (1998) has recently probed the role of parties with respect to aggregate government expenditures, only to concludethat parties do not matter under ‘conditions of constraint.’ This article contends that parties are relevant to the ‘new politics’ and that, under specified institutional conditions, their impact is counterintuitive. In some notable cases the left has had more effect inbruising the welfare state than the right. One explanation for these cross‐cutting tendencies is that parties not only provide a principal source of political agency, they also serve as strategies, thereby conditioning opportunities for political leadership. By extension, they need to be situatedwithin the ‘new politics’ constellation of blame‐avoidance instruments.

Welfare State Retrenchment – The Case of Japan

The purpose of this article is to examine the implications for welfare state retrenchment of central-local financial relations. In the post-war period, welfare state expansion has been a dominant theme in the development of central-local government relations in advanced industrial democracies. By the 1980s, however, nearly all OECD member countries had resorted to deficit financing as stagnant tax revenues combined with political pressure for increased public services. Faced with the urgent necessity of fiscal reconstruction, conservatives in advanced industrial democracies have favoured cutting public services throughout the 1990s. As always in times of retrenchment, elected officials have needed to win the goodwill of voters and interest groups for these unpopular cutbacks. There is no doubt that the politics of retrenchment is distinctively different from that of growth. Despite this new stage in the development of the welfare state, few systematic attempts have been made to analyse the impact of retrenchment politics on central-local financial arrangements. This article contributes to the new debate on comparative theories of retrenchment by analysing the impact of welfare state retrenchment in the context of Japan's recent fiscal reconstruction.

Britain's withdrawal from East of Suez: the politics of retrenchment

Britain's withdrawal from East of Suez: the politics of retrenchment

Jeffrey Pickering. Britain’s Withdrawal from East of Suez: The Politics of Retrenchment. (Contemporary History in Context.) New York: St. Martin’s Press. 1998. Pp. xi, 231. $65.00. ISBN 0-312-21436-7.

Jeffrey Pickering. Britain’s Withdrawal from East of Suez: The Politics of Retrenchment. (Contemporary History in Context.) New York: St. Martin’s Press. 1998. Pp. xi, 231. $65.00. ISBN 0-312-21436-7. - Volume 31 Issue 3

Paul Pierson: DismePauntling the Welfare State?Regan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment

Paul Pierson: DismePauntling the Welfare State?Regan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment

Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment

Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment

Against the Odds: Retrenchment in Agriculture in France and the United States

This article extends recent work on a comparative theory of retrenchment in social policy by asking whether the politics of retrenchment travels well across policy areas, with policy feedback remaining a crucial variable for explaining government success or failure. The article analyzes policy change in agriculture in the United States and France, a natural choice for an extension of retrenchment theory because agricultural policy resembles social policy in some respects but also provides telling points of contrast. The article finds that the call for new theories focusing on retrenchment is justified: the politics of agricultural retrenchment differs from that of expansion, and success at retrenchment varies by program.The analysis shows, as well, that retrenchment has been significant both in the U.S. and in France and the European Union. Variations in policy feedback help explain why these policy changes occurred. Moreover, the France-U.S. comparison highlights how systemic institutional factors shape the politics of retrenchment. Finally, focusing on agriculture, a policy sector in which international developments have a greater direct importance than they do in social policy, the article identifies an additional systemic retrenchment strategy: constraining domestic programs through international agreements.

BOOK REVIEWS

Book reviewed in this article: Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe, by A. B. Atkinson. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment, by Paul Pierson. Managing Policy Change in Britain: The Politics of Water, by William A. Maloney and Jeremy Richardson. Professional Correctness: Literary Studies and Political Change, by Stanley Fish. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, by Will Kymlicka. The Rights of Minority Cultures, edited by Will Kymlicka. Globalisation in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, by Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson. Economic Growth and Political Change in Asia, by Graham Field. American Exceptionalism: A Double‐edged Sword, by Seymour Martin Lipset. Neither Right nor Left: Fascist Ideology in France, by Zeev Sternhell, trans. David Maisel. Strategies for Self‐Govemment: The Campaigns for a Scottish Parliament, by James Mitchell. The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, by Norbert Elias, edited by Michael Schröter, translated from the German and with a preface by Eric Chinning and Stephen Mennell.

Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.Paul Pierson

<i>Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.</i>Paul Pierson

Book Review Essay

Book reviewed in this article:Mary Jo Bane and David T. Ellwood. Welfare Realities: From Rhetoric to Reform.Sheldon Danziger, Gary D. Sandefur, and Daniel H. Weinberg, eds.Paul Pierson. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.

Dismantling the welfare state?: Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment

Introduction: Conservatives and the Welfare State Part I. Analytical Foundations: 1. The logic of retrenchment 2. The context for retrenchment politics Part II. The Politics of Programmatic Retrenchment: 3. Retrenchment in a core sector: old age pensions 4. Retrenchment in a vulnerable sector: housing 5. Retrenchment in a residualized sector: income support Part III. The Embattled Welfare State: 6. Reagan, Thatcher and the welfare state 7. Social policy in an era of austerity.

Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.

Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.

Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.Paul Pierson

<i>Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.</i>Paul Pierson

Paul Pierson, Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press1994.

Paul Pierson, Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press1994.

The Federal Welfare State and the Politics of Retrenchment in Canada

A common theme in analysis of the federal welfare state is that it shares with its Anglo-American counterparts a “liberal-residualist” orientation. Federal social programs, however, are also based on processes of inter-regional redistribution that are centrally important for the legitimacy of the federal state apparatus and strongly resistant to the market-based logic of both liberal-residualism and neo-conservatism. As a result these processes have been crucial in contributing to the relatively lower and more inconsistent attack on the federal welfare state in Canada.

The Politics of Retrenchment: How Local Governments Manage Fiscal Stress.

'Levine, Rubin, and Wolohojian's study is an important addition to the urban politics and administration literature...The book fulfills its purpose; it is valuable for both urban administrators and students of urban administration.' -- Perspective, March 1983 '...provides valuable insights for urban theorists with a sociological interest in the political economy of retrenchment.' -- Contemporary Sociology, Vol 12 No 6, November 1983

Review: The Politics of Retrenchment: How Local Governments Manage Fiscal Stress, by Charles A. Levine, Irene S. Rubin, and George G. Wolohojian

Review: <i>The Politics of Retrenchment: How Local Governments Manage Fiscal Stress</i>, by Charles A. Levine, Irene S. Rubin, and George G. Wolohojian