Reviewed by: Remaking New Orleans: Beyond Exceptionalism and Authenticity ed. by Thomas Jessen Adams and Matt Sakakeeny Alexandra Giancarlo Remaking New Orleans: Beyond Exceptionalism and Authenticity. Edited by Thomas Jessen Adams and Matt Sakakeeny. (Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press, 2019. Pp. [x], 358. Paper, $28.95, ISBN 978-1-47800287-1; cloth, $104.95, ISBN 978-1-4780-0182-9.) [Due to an editorial error, the following review was published in the May 2020 issue attributed to the incorrect reviewer. It is published here again, with the correct reviewer's name. The editor apologizes to Dr. Giancarlo and regrets the error.] The claim that New Orleans is an exceptional place is nothing new. Especially for those who "discovered" the city after Hurricane Katrina—perhaps as volunteers, volunteers-turned-transplants, or one of the city's millions of tourists per year, all of which are categories of analysis featured in this collection—the city seems set apart from the mundane and removed from [End Page 766] the constricting social mores typical of the rest of the United States. This exceptionality, perhaps epitomized by a laissez-faire attitude toward sexuality and alcohol consumption, is as old as the city itself, but it has evergreen relevance for today's residents, visitors, scholars, and policy makers. In the edited collection Remaking New Orleans: Beyond Exceptionalism and Authenticity, contributors attack New Orleans's supposed distinctiveness on multiple fronts and not only call into question the city's exceptionality (which, admittedly, would be somewhat of a superficial critique on its own) but also examine how the city's posturing as singular occludes analyses that do not fit the tourist-oriented mold of authenticity. Importantly, the authors take aim at how New Orleans's so-called exceptionality obscures its role in capitalist political economic structures. Their complex analyses suggest that, in fact, the promotion of the city's uniqueness is "integral to the hegemony of capitalist social relations. The attachment to exceptionalism and authenticity is at the very heart of neoliberalism, positing difference rather than exploitation as the central injustice of the contemporary world" (pp. 7–8). The book is divided into four chronological sections. Part 1, "Constructing Exceptional New Orleans," focuses on how writers, travelers, and historians in the colonial period contributed to the early construction of the city and its denizens as exceptional—"the invention of a romanticized New Orleans" (p. 13). Part 2, "Producing Authentic New Orleans," examines how various social actors and groups within the city—such as the Zulu Social Aid and Pleasure Club, fans of the first black professional wrestling headliner Junkyard Dog, and white volunteers after Hurricane Katrina—negotiated the fraught terrain of authenticity. The chapters in Part 3, "What Is New Orleans Identity?," introduce considerable nuance into commonly held narratives about the city's historical sexual permissiveness, race and class, and Vietnamese belonging. Part 4, "Predictive City?," provides the volume's most incisive critiques of the city's postindustrial neoliberal orientation, which has only accelerated since Hurricane Katrina, exacerbating socioeconomic inequality, slashing the government safety net, and disenfranchising exactly those groups—primarily working-class black residents—on whom much of the city's touristic allure depends. An introductory chapter aptly outlines the book's premises and describes its theoretical orientation. The book is strongest in the later sections as the narrative moves from past to present. The editors have marshaled an admirably gender, discipline, and race diverse group of scholars to cover the book's more than three centuries' time span. Although the overall package is polished and feels cohesive, the chapters vary in quality and theoretical robustness (par for the course with multipleauthor anthologies). Many chapters offer truly original insights in their capturing of lesser-known cultural, political, or historical aspects of the city. Vern Baxter and Maria Casati's examination of the controversy surrounding the building of Pontchartrain Park (chapter 9), a black suburb built in the early 1950s, is one such example of a lesser-explored part of the city's history. Baxter and Casati capture the history of "'boring black people'"—terminology invoked by Helen A. Regis in chapter 6 to describe middle-class African American residents who cannot boast affiliation with...
Read full abstract