ABSTRACT The attitudes that one country’s citizens hold toward a dominant neighboring country can influence the dominant country’s foreign policy, international relations, and its political leaders’ wielding of “soft power.” The dynamics of these attitudes, however, are not well understood. Where the dual-process model is often used to describe how citizens react to elite endorsements and policy-relevant information pertaining to domestic issues, its usefulness regarding attitudes on foreign leaders and policies is an open question. Do citizens react predictably to foreign leaders’ cues and foreign policy content, or is it the case that this theory is unable to explain the formation of these attitudes? Using data from a survey experiment fielded in Mexico, we argue that Mexicans’ attitudes toward specific U.S. foreign policies align with previous work, suggesting that people respond predictably to elite cues and foreign policy information. On the other hand, our data suggest that the dual-process model does not accurately describe the dynamics of Mexicans’ attitudes toward the U.S. More specifically, Mexicans’ attitudes toward the U.S. display remarkable stability such that elite cues and policy content have no discernible effects. We close with a discussion that weaves together literatures on American public opinion and international relations, ultimately arguing that theories of political behavior that have been tested extensively on the American mass public can be used, in some situations, to inform work on mass-level behavior in international relations.
Read full abstract