ABSTRACT The two-decade-long Turkish experience shows that the populism-diplomacy relationship, contrary to the common wisdom, does not have to be hostile. The existing literature characterize often this relationship as adversarial, emphasizing the repressive measures used by populists to weaken diplomatic institutions and disrupt foreign policy continuity. This perspective suggests that populist leaders undermine diplomatic services to pursue their unorthodox agendas. However, this study challenges this binary view, arguing that the interaction between populists and diplomats is more complex and multifaceted. By combining insights from populism literature with diplomacy studies, this study demonstrates how diplomats navigate and adapt to populist rule. Using Turkey as a case study, this article shows how diplomats implement, shape, and, on rare occasions, resist populist policies. Consequently, diplomats under populist regimes can reassure international partners, support populist policies as confirmatory agents, and engage in damage control.
Read full abstract