Policy Areas Research Articles

Understanding Impacts of Neighbourhood Micro-Renewal Through a Lens of Place Value: A Case Study of Wuhan, China

Neighbourhood micro-renewal (NMIR) plays a critical role in the renewal landscape of urban China. However, an oversight in post-occupancy evaluation (POE) impedes the comprehensive understanding of NMIR’s impact and post-implementation efficacy. This research addresses this gap by leveraging the lens of place value to examine NMIR’s outcomes. Using Wuhan, China, as a case study, 10 Delphi consultations and 28 interviews were conducted among five stakeholder groups: local government, planning professionals, academics, community workers, and residents. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) were combined to identify and rank potential indicators. A total of 6 primary and 22 secondary indicators were identified. The indicators were derived from four key policy areas—health, society, economy, and environment—highlighting the relationship among NMIR initiatives, their contribution to place quality, and alignment with policy goals. AHP and FCE results reveal substantial enhancements in environmental quality, residential properties, and public infrastructure. Nevertheless, the analysis exposes varied satisfaction levels and divergences in the perceived relevance of indicators among the government, professionals, and the residents, particularly concerning social cohesion. These disparities underscore the layered impacts of NMIR. This research recommends integrating resident feedback with expert insights to enhance place quality in NMIR projects by balancing physical upgrades with social considerations. It also advocates for a continuous, adaptable post-occupancy evaluation system to monitor and support place value over time. This system should be flexible and context-specific, allowing NMIR initiatives to adapt to diverse urban settings globally, thus supporting long-term sustainability and thriving urban communities.

‘Social defence’ and the resilience of the domestic war on terror: A genealogy of social security, national security, and defence

Abstract Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has moved attention within International Security back to Great Power Politics and interstate war, and away from phenomena like ‘foreign terrorist fighters’ and lone actor terrorism. Is the War on Terror paradigm receding? This paper argues that counter-radicalisation imaginaries and counter-extremism programming will all remain stubbornly present despite the shift back to interstate war. The resilience of domestic War on Terror policies will stem from their integration within local municipality activity and social policy during the second decade of the 21st century. These policy areas and levels are detached from the international security community, meaning that shifts in attention at the global level will have little effect upon localised national security practices. The paper then interrogates how counterterrorism agendas have so successfully entered the world of social policy and local public administration, using genealogical methods to trace how social security and crime prevention were historically prefaced upon defence. The paper traces the policy paradigm of ‘social defence’ which dominated mid-20th century international organisations, targeting non-criminal juveniles with pre-emptive interventions to prevent ‘dangerous persons’ imperilling society. Effectively, this untold history of crime prevention in Europe demonstrates the profound interlocking of national security, social policy and defence across the 20th century, with implications for the resilience of this triad.

A certain idea of space: France, Germany, and the question of geopolitics in Europe

ABSTRACT Given the traditional centrality of their bilateral relationship, France and Germany face calls to lead the way towards more integrated EU geopolitics, but meanings and implications remain vaguer than in other policy areas. What is geopolitics, and why seem France and Germany to be struggling to cooperate? To answer these questions, the article opts for an etymologically narrower definition than most contributions, focusing on the territorial politics of influence spheres. Tracing the evolution of distinct national intellectual traditions from the late-nineteenth century to the present day, France’s geopolitical orientation is interpreted as longitudinal, seeking a separate influence sphere between western and eastern powers, reaching across the Mediterranean into the Sahel. Germany’s traditional orientation is characterised as latitudinal, looking towards Eurasia and across the Atlantic. Bridging critical and classical geopolitics, the article argues that current tensions arise where France’s traditional spatial orientation reflects today’s growing challenges to German conceptions, and vice-versa.

Gender-sensitive and intersectionality-informed health indicators for health reporting: a scoping review protocol

IntroductionGender is a well-established social determinant of health and health (in)equality. Gender-sensitive health indicators for health monitoring and health reporting can support gender mainstreaming in relevant policy areas and inform...

What are the main factors of fuzzy inequality in Chad?

The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of multidimensional (fuzzy) inequalities and marginal changes on the Gini coefficients of various factors. This allows a range of social policies to be specifically targeted to reduce broader inequalities, but these policies are focused primarily on health, education, housing, sanitation, energy and drinking water. It is necessary to target policy areas that are unequally distributed, such as those with access to unevenly distributed drinking water policies. The data are from the Household and Consumption Survey of 6695 households in 2003 and 9259 households in 2011. This paper uses Lerman and Yitzhaki’s method. The results revealed that the main contributors to inequalities over the two periods were health and education. These sources have a potentially significant effect on total inequality. Health increases overall inequalities, but sources such as housing, sanitation and energy reduce them. This article provides resources to disadvantaged and vulnerable target groups. Multiple inequalities are analyzed for different subgroups of households, such as place of residence and the gender of the head of household. Analyzing fuzzy poverty inequalities makes it possible to develop targeted measures to combat poverty and inequality. This study is the first to investigate the sources of Gini’s fuzzy inequality in Chad via data analysis techniques, and in general, it is one of the few studies in Saharan Africa to be interested in this subject. Some development policies in sub-Saharan Africa should therefore focus on different sources (negative effect), sources (positive effect) and the equalization effect.

Challenges for social cohesion after de-occupation: social and political reintegration and attitudes toward residents of temporarily occupied territories

The future reintegration of the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine requires social cohesion in Ukrainian society: both for those who survived the occupation and those who lived in the governmentcontrolled territories. This article aims to determine the attitudes of residents of the government-controlled territories toward those who remain under occupation and to identify to what extent the issues of elections and (un)restriction of voting rights, the economic and cultural support programs, and the recognition of education certificates obtained in the occupied territories may hinder social cohesion after de-occupation. The study is based on the results of two waves of a nationwide survey conducted in October 2023 and March 2024. The paper analyses the survey results using descriptive statistics methods, and the linear regression analysis is conducted to test the hypothesis regarding the relations between the attitudes toward residents of occupied territories and having close relatives there. The study shows that Ukrainians’ attitudes toward the residents of the temporarily occupied territories are rather neutral than positive, which may indicate future lines of social tension. The support for reintegration policies varies depending on the duration of the occupation and the policy area. If the benefits and resources the policy addresses are perceived as scarce, the support for such policy is lower, as is the case of special university admission programs for school graduates from occupied territories. Also, Ukrainians’ positions differ in scenarios for restoration of local governance after de-occupation depending on the territories in question. Immediate restoration is a preferred scenario for territories occupied in 2022, while for territories occupied since 2014, the intermediate period of five years is envisioned.

MODERNIZATION OF STATE POLICY IN THE FIELD OF STATE CONTROL (SUPERVISION) OVER ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

The article analyzes the essence of modernization of the State policy in the field of control (supervision) over economic activity with due regard for the changing political and economic situation in the country. The author examines the main conceptual approaches to the definition of basic terms, and also identifies the features and purpose of state control (supervision) in the economic sphere. It is found that the state of the system of control (supervision) over economic activity does not always correspond to the realities of today. Hence, the author concludes that the control system is not always relevant and effective. The author identifies the main problems on the way to modernization of legislation in the field of control (supervision) over economic activity. The author proposes to use adequate means of regulating and controlling economic activity during a special period caused, for example, by a pandemic, military operations on the territory of Ukraine, etc. The author examines the key areas of state policy in the field of legal regulation of control (supervision) over economic activity. The author defines the system of regulatory and legal support of the state policy in the field of control over economic activity at different stages of economic development of the country. The author analyzes the legal acts adopted under the legal regime of martial law aimed at stabilizing the situation in the economic system of our country.

Protecting nutrition in a food crisis.

Food insecurity and malnutrition are rising worldwide due to disruptions in food systems related to interconnected health-, climate- and conflict-related crises. Although governments globally are committed to addressing nutritional challenges, policy responses have increasingly focused on food security and, particularly, on food affordability. However, these short-term measures often overlook the necessity of integrating nutritious foods into the food system to ensure improved long-term nutrition. By drawing on the United Nations Committee on World Food Security's Voluntary guidelines on food systems and nutrition, this article outlines opportunities for policy-makers to integrate nutrition into key elements of the crisis response. Key policy areas where nutrition could be further integrated include social protection, agricultural investment, trade policy and urban planning. Strengthening the focus of nutrition in these measures will be essential to establish long-term incentives that support food systems transformation for improved nutrition. Drawing on theories of the policy process, I propose that stronger governance and cross-sectoral dialogue will be critical to achieve sustained nutritional outcomes. Health policy-makers can play a leadership role in supporting cross-sectoral policy change by carefully framing the policy issues, advocating for institutional structures that promote collaboration across sectors to prioritize nutrition, and strengthening the management of conflicts of interest in food system policy-making.

TRENDS IN DEVELOPMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION OF EXPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN

The article analyzes the dynamics of Uzbekistan's exports of goods and services from 2010 to 2023. It assesses the diversification of both the commodity structure and the geographic distribution of exports using the export product concentration index and the export diversification index. Statistical analysis of trends in Uzbekistan's exports during this period highlights the urgent need to accelerate diversification in both the structure and geography of exports. It emphasizes increasing the share of finished goods with high added value in the export portfolio, as well as diversifying and expanding services exports and enhancing regional export activities. To achieve this faster export diversification, a comprehensive set of interrelated measures is required across various areas of economic policy. This includes improvements in trade, investment, and industrial policies, along with deeper institutional reforms.

Extent of Locally Sourced Feed Ingredients and Performance of Feed Mill Entreprises in Southwest, Nigeria

Promoting local sourcing of raw materials for firms in Nigeria has become one of the critical areas of government policies. In achieving this, the government introduced a ban on the importation of grains/cereals, which are critical ingredients in feed production for the feed mill industry. Hence, this study examines the extent (share) of locally sourced feed ingredients and its implications on the performance of feed mills in Southwest, Nigeria. Primary data used for this study was analysed using descriptive statistics and fractional probit regression. Firm’s age, quantity of feed produced and location of the feed mills significantly determined the share of locally sourced feed ingredients in feed production of feed mills in the region while level of education of feed mill operators, firm’s age, quantity of feed produced and proportion of locally sourced feed ingredients had significant effect on the performance (profitability) of feed mill entreprises in the area. It was therefore recommended that policies on improving infrastructure, production of feed ingredients, and addressing insecurity should be prioritised rather than promoting a ban on the importation of critical feed ingredients for the feed mill industry in Nigeria.

From Data to Decisions: Analyzing PaRIS for Health Policy Insights

Abstract To inform countries on how well they perform from the perspective of people living with chronic conditions in comparison with other countries, we propose an analytical framework for the data collected in the PaRIS survey, detailing how the data will be analysed in a multilevel approach for cross-country comparison. The data structure of the PaRIS survey represents three levels: countries/health systems, primary care practices and patients. Multilevel analysis is used because of its accuracy in estimating country-level outcomes, its flexibility in modelling relationships, and its opportunities in connecting to relevant policy questions. Country-level outcomes will be estimated to facilitate cross-country comparison and (future) within-country comparison over time. A first indication for areas for cross-country learning and policy making is the distribution of variation over patients, care providers and countries. Characteristics of patients that potentially explain variation in patient-reported outcomes and experiences can be linked to primary care practice and country/health system characteristics. The second indication for areas for cross-country learning and policy making is the variation in the slope of the association between patient and practice characteristics and patient-reported outcomes and experiences. This makes it possible to address policy-relevant questions relating, e.g., to whether some health systems or providers are better able to produce positive outcomes and experiences for (e.g.) older patients, and to the impact of chronic care management on patients with a specific chronic condition. To ensure fair cross-country comparisons, all outcomes will be estimated for an OECD (age and sex standardised) reference population, also including case-mix adjustment where necessary. Analyses will be repeated using a country-specific standard population.

Health impacts methodology in the European Commission

Abstract The state of play in the implementation of health impacts methodology within European Commission impact assessments reveals both advancements and challenges. The Commission has acknowledged the significance of assessing health impacts and has provided a generic methodological description, as outlined in Tool #32 of the Better Regulation guidelines. However, translating this guidance into practical application encounters obstacles stemming from challenges intrinsic to the policy in question, a lack of skills and knowledge, data gaps, and complexities in establishing causal links. In EU policymaking, health impacts are consistently appraised in relevant Impact Assessments across various policy areas, but the methodological intricacy varies. In the fields of public health, occupational safety, and environmental protection, econometric modelling is often employed to quantify potential health impacts rigorously. This involves sophisticated analytical tools designed to capture the complexity of the interactions. Conversely, in areas where the link between policies and health outcomes is less direct (e.g. food safety) or where data limitations pose challenges, a more qualitative appraisal is applied. This acknowledges the limitations in precisely quantifying health impacts and focuses on providing a nuanced understanding of potential health effects based on available information.

10.C. Scientific session: Shifting the focus of health and economic policies: Investing in sustainable health and well-being

Abstract The main theme of the 18th European Public Health Conference, to be held in Helsinki in 2025, is ‘Investing for sustainable health and well-being.’ The theme emphasizes the concept that improving population health and well-being is an investment rather than an expenditure, benefiting society as a whole and contributing to a more sustainable economy. This workshop will introduce the thematic areas of the 2025 European Public Health Conference through three presentations. First, we will highlight the approach of public health policy drawing on the economy of well-being and its application in wider societal policymaking. Second, we will explore how EU policies can contribute towards a Wellbeing Economy and how to ensure health and wellbeing remain on policy-making agendas. Third, we will present an economic case for investing in health and health systems and highlight the co-benefits it brings to other policy areas and sustainable development goals. Finally, we will discuss the future expectations for European public health policy. The workshop will conclude with a general discussion, providing the audience with an opportunity to propose topics for inclusion in the programme of the European Public Health Conference in 2025. Key messages • Improving population health and well-being is an investment rather than an expenditure. • Investing in the population’s health and well-being brings co-benefits to other public policy areas.

Public Health Challenges for 2050 in the Netherlands

Abstract Every 4 years, the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) carries out the Dutch Public Health Foresight Study, commissioned by the Ministry of Health. The ninth edition (PHFS-2024) compiles an outlook on future public health and the health care system in the Netherlands. It combines a business-as-usual Trend Scenario with literature study and a range of qualitative and mixed-methods approaches. The Trend Scenario comprises projections up to 2050 for a broad range of epidemiological indicators. Such as (healthy) life expectancy, disease burden, life style factors. The qualitative and mixed methods approaches supported an incremental intersubjective process. Methods were a focus groups study, stakeholder sessions and workshops. An important innovation in this study was the Citizen Council and Panel. The outcomes show that demographic development, in particular growth of the group people at high age with multimorbidity, will lead to high pressure on the formal and informal health care system but also on e.g. mental health. A life course approach applied shows that decreasing mental health of youth will have long term consequences. Also, overweight will deeply impact older people’s health in the future. Lastly, climate change in combination with e.g. energy transition will deeply affect our society and living environment. Next to these challenges, there will also be opportunities to improve health. Building a climate-proof living environment that also stimulates healthy life styles and social interaction is one of them. However, improving health has linkages with policy areas outside the traditional public health domain as well and requires, firstly, a Health in/for All Policies approach. Secondly a whole-of-society approach in which companies and civil organizations take action is needed. All these efforts can only be effective if people and communities are put at the core of all health policies.

The potential of EU policies for achieving wellbeing economies

Abstract The environmental crisis, growing levels of social inequalities and rising levels of non-communicable diseases are all symptoms of economic systems that are failing to generate wellbeing. There is increasing support for the notion that addressing these crises requires shifting the focus from economic growth to a broader range of measures that reflect wellbeing, through more comprehensive, consistent and integrated policy approaches to deliver this. This presentation explores to what extent the concept of the Wellbeing Economy is being applied at the EU level, by tracking changes in some of the EU’s key policies and strategies over the past 10 years and in the Semester process, as a mechanism to implement them. It concludes that while progress towards more integrated policy approaches have been made, it is limited by the continuing emphasis on economic, over other policy areas. Recommendations will be made for an even more comprehensive EU Strategy that enables policy sectors to deliver wellbeing objectives in a more coordinated manner and on how to ensure health and wellbeing remain on policy-making agendas.

3.F. Round table: Legal action & capacity building: essential for climate action to protect and promote public health

Abstract The climate crisis is the single biggest threat to global health, peace and security, a crisis multiplier, and a significant driver of health inequalities within and between countries. In many areas of public health policy, legal action and litigation have delivered significant and long-lasting impacts. Court action is a strong domain of legal policy and practice to address climate change and related air pollution in many countries, and increasingly in international courts and tribunals. Examples include the 2021 landmark UK Coroners Report on the asthma-related death of Ella Kissi-Debrah, the 2023 UN General Assembly Request for an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice on states’ obligations to address climate change, and the 2024 European Court of Human Rights decision in Klimanseniorinnen v. Switzerland. Climate litigation also creates opportunities for public scrutiny and debate by raising awareness of inaction or harm caused by governments or private sector polluters, generating wider community mobilisation for action. Since 2021, the EUPHA Law and Public Health Section, Faculty of Public Health (UK), Aletta Jacobs School of Public Health, Global Network for Academic Public Health, ASPHER and other partners have collaborated to build ethicolegal competence and capacity of public health professionals for climate action. Initiatives have also included research, advocacy, and resource development, and exploring opportunities for legal action and litigation, including at the International Conference on Strategic Litigation and Public Health (Liverpool, 2023). The roundtable will present key findings from an evaluation of the course on climate change organised by the ASPHER and the Global Consortium on Health and Climate Education (GCHCE), and learnings and feedback from the publication ‘From analysis to action: climate change litigation. A guide for public health professionals’, which was launched at the 16th European Public Health Conference. The expert panel will also reflect on whether the nature of current educational materials, means and methods in curriculum and training initiatives are effective, appropriate, adequate, and sufficient. Should climate change be part of One Health and Planetary Health programmes rather than a distinct entity? What is the role of, and what are the opportunities for, public health professionals to be engaged in climate litigation? What are the gaps and opportunities through strategic networking with environmental and legal experts, and affected communities? The roundtable will be interactive and invite input and insights from the participants to explore opportunities to further advance the agenda. Key messages • Public health professionals have a key and increasing role in climate law and litigation: interdisciplinary collaboration is essential. • Public health professionals have multiple avenues for capacity building on opportunities to address climate and environmental impacts on public health through law. Speakers/Panelists David Patterson University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands Farhang Tahzib Faculty of Public Health, Haywards heath, UK Liz Green Public Health Wales, Wrexham, UK Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes University College London, London, UK

10.F. Skills building seminar: How public health professionals can use the right to health to advance climate action and justice

Abstract The climate crisis is the single biggest threat to global health, peace and security, a crisis multiplier, and a significant driver of health inequalities. In many areas of public health policy, legal action and litigation have delivered significant and long-lasting impacts. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that Switzerland had violated the right to health of older women in Switzerland by failing to meet its past greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets and set future GHG targets. State-of-the-art public health evidence provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change were vital to the Court’s decision, which has implications for all Council of Europe member states, and globally. Rigorous scientific evidence of health harms, including but not limited to heat stress, can inform other climate litigation grounded in the right to health. Public health researchers and practitioners are essential to this litigation. In recognition of this emerging role, in November 2023 the Faculty of Public Health (UK) and the Aletta Jacobs School of Public Health launched ‘From analysis to action: climate change litigation. A guide for public health professionals’ at the 16th European Public Health Conference. The guide was also endorsed by ASPHER, ASPPH, EUPHA, Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education, Global Network for Academic Public Health, Lancet Countdown, Public Health Ethics and Law Global Network, and WFPHA. This workshop will familiarise participants with recent rights-based climate litigation and explore the role of public health professionals in identifying, collecting, storing, assessing and presenting this evidence in a form that is accessible to court officials without medical training. First, there will be short presentations on 1) the role of the law in climate action and the role of scientific evidence of health harms in human rights litigation, and 2) How to collect and use scientific evidence of health harms in climate litigation (15 minutes). Small group discussions will follow, addressing questions such as: The health harm of climate change-related heat stress was a major factor in the 2024 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in KlimaSeniorinnen v. Switzerland: What other health harms could support future cases? In what population groups? What opportunities do you see today for public health researchers and practitioners to compile such evidence to make the most compelling case? How can public health researchers and practitioners work more closely with legal experts and affected communities to bring this evidence to court? (20 minutes) The workshop will conclude with a plenary discussion of these questions and the small group responses. (25 minutes) As a result of the workshop, participants will be better prepared to identify opportunities to contribute compelling evidence of health harms in climate litigation. Key messages • Rigorous scientific evidence of climate change-related health harms is proving central to success in rights-based climate litigation. • Public health professionals have a key role in identifying and presenting compelling evidence of health harms in climate litigation. Speakers/Panelists David Patterson University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands Farhang Tahzib Faculty of Public Health, Haywards Heath, UK

Legal perspectives on climate change and inequalities

Abstract In many areas of public health policy, litigation has delivered significant, long-lasting impacts. Examples include tobacco control, increasing access to treatments for HIV, and addressing air pollution and climate change. Litigation is an established part of public health’s advocacy toolbox in national courts, and increasingly in international courts and tribunals. In responding to climate change, in addition to potential policy and law reform, climate change litigation creates opportunities for public scrutiny and debate by raising awareness of inaction or harm caused by governments or private sector polluters, and sparking wider community mobilisation for climate action. Where climate change litigation is based on human rights claims, credible science-based evidence of the health and other human rights impacts of climate change is essential. Public health professionals are increasingly involved in assembling and presenting such evidence, often focusing on vulnerable populations. However, the multiple intersecting identities of vulnerable populations have not been sufficiently explored. For example, how does intersectional disadvantage influence the ways in which evidence of the impact of climate change is assembled and assessed? How are these issues addressed in the courts? Examples include older women (KlimaSeniorinnen v. Switzerland), young people, from both the global South and global North, in urban or remote areas, or with different pre-existing health conditions (Sacchi et al. v. Argentina et al), and Indigenous people, including women and children (Daniel Billy and others v. Australia; Teitiota and others v. New Zealand). Multiple identities can compound vulnerability. For example, young people may be more vulnerable both due to their physical immaturity and due to eco-anxiety and other mental health impacts. This presentation will explore these issues, and the critical role of public health professionals in legal action to address climate change.

Luton, a Marmot town – using a whole-system approach to tackle health equity

Abstract Issue Luton has high deprivation and health inequalities. We have a borough-wide vision that no one should live in poverty by 2040, and have become a health equity town - committed to Marmot policy objectives and recommendations across all we do. Description Luton is 70th most deprived local authority in England, with stark health inequalities. To deliver the 2040 ambition, 5 pillars have been established, including tackling health inequalities. Luton has become the first Marmot Town in the UK, working with the Institute of Health Equity to develop recommendations and actions relating to the Marmot Policy objectives. Cross-sector system partnership has been key -NHS, businesses, housing, voluntary sector, university. Year 1: we mapped the Marmot recommendations to existing workstreams; completed a mixed-methods evaluation to understand system views of the approach and establish our impact measures. We established steering groups: Children and young people; Housing; Employment and skills; Net zero, they continue to embed recommendations using logic models. We have an overarching strategic approach, alongside smaller scale programmes, to create a movement. Including: grant funding; regular newsletter; training; case studies repository and annual celebration event. Results We have established 15 impact measures across Marmot policy areas to review annually. Qualitative evaluation findings built into work plans include: improved governance and accountability; workforce development across the system; use of logic models; Learning from best practice; sharing knowledge and learning. Lessons The wider agenda of Luton 2040 has enabled health inequalities to be embedded into strategic discussions; improved evidence base and clear narrative to support priorities is helpful; clear focused recommendations helps move work forwards; shared understanding of how we will measure long term impact is vital, communicating to the system is key, and long-term ism challenging. Speakers/Panelists Lee Watson East of England Public Health Training Programme, Luton, UK Ramya Ravindrane East of England Public Health Training Programme, Luton, UK Chimeme Egbutah Luton Borough Council, Luton, UK Nasreen Ali University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK

Impact Assessments - existing procedures and potentials for health and health equity

Abstract Impact assessment tools are used in policy making all over Europe, some have a legal foundation, others were performed voluntarily for certain measures. Usually, impact assessment procedures are dedicated to specific policy areas or political fields. As policies often have impacts in more than one political area, an interlinkage of impact assessments would be appropriate - also to foster co-benefits of policy making. To follow this approach of a more integrated way of impact assessment, it is necessary to gain an overview and understanding of different procedures in place on national level. As policy making is important for designing healthy living environments, a specific task in the EU Joint Action Prevent NCD is focussing on fostering health and well-being through impact assessment procedures. Therefore, an assessment of the existing impact assessments in the participating member states will be performed in 2024. By using a document analysis of guiding material like guidelines, standards or web applications for the specific impact assessment types, it will be investigated how health and health equity aspects are already included. A qualitative comparison of the results can deliver similarities and differences but also promising practices in the member states. The preliminary results of this analysis will be presented. By learning about the different impact assessment procedures in place, potential synergies and entry points for health and health equity could be found. In a next step, a comprehensive checklist for health and health equity should be developed and piloted in the member states. The final version of checklist should be a guiding material that could be included in various Impact Assessment procedures. Key messages • Impact assessment procedures are important for policy making and can foster co-benefits in various political fields. • By learning about the different impact assessment procedures in place, potential synergies and entry points for health and health equity could be found.