Point-of-care Ultrasound Studies Research Articles

Evolution and Impact of a Diagnostic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program in a PICU.

To evaluate the impact of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use on clinicians within a PICU and to assess infrastructural elements of our POCUS program development. Retrospective observational study. Large academic, noncardiac PICU in the United States. Patients in a PICU who had diagnostic POCUS performed. None. Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, 7201 diagnostic POCUS studies were ordered; 1930 (26.8%) had a quality assurance (QA) record generated in an independent POCUS QA database. The cardiac domain was most frequently imaged (81.0% of ordered studies, 81.2% of reviewed studies). POCUS images changed clinician understanding of pathophysiology in 563 of 1930 cases (29.2%); when this occurred, management was changed in 318 of 563 cases (56.5%). Cardiac POCUS studies altered clinician suspected pathophysiology in 30.1% of cases (472/1568), compared with 21.5% (91/362) in noncardiac studies ( p = 0.06). Among cases where POCUS changed clinician understanding, management changed more often following cardiac than noncardiac POCUS ( p = 0.02). Clinicians identified a need for cardiology consultation or complete echocardiograms in 294 of 1568 cardiac POCUS studies (18.8%). Orders for POCUS imaging increased by 94.9%, and revenue increased by 159.4%, from initial to final study year. QA database use by both clinicians and reviewers decreased annually as QA processes evolved in the setting of technologic growth and unit expansion. Diagnostic POCUS imaging in the PICU frequently yields information that alters diagnosis and changes management. As PICU POCUS use increased, QA processes evolved resulting in decreased use of our initial QA database. Modifications to QA processes are likely necessary as clinical contexts change over time.

Effect of Departmental and Physician-Selected Interventions on Point-of-Care Ultrasound Documentation Completion.

Background Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been disruptive to many experienced emergency physicians as it requires competence in a new physical skill, real-time image interpretation, and navigation of novel software for submission to the electronic health record (EHR). Incomplete documentation of a performed POCUS study used for clinical decision-making represents a potential medicolegal liability, may expose the patient to repetitive or potentially unnecessary imaging, and is a missed opportunity for reimbursement. Identifying effective facilitators of ED POCUS documentation completion requires additional investigation. Methods In the first part of this mixed-methods study, eligible attending physicians were stratified into levels of use ("high"/"low"/"never") based on recent POCUS documentation performance. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with high and low utilizers to explore their perceptions of the POCUS submission workflow and their receptivity to various proposed interventions. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic analysis that explored perceived usefulness and usability. The second part of the study consisted of two intervention phases. First, physicians achieving minimum POCUS documentation numbers were rewarded with additional shift scheduling flexibility. In the second phase, the intervention that garnered the most interview support, daily documentation reminder emails, was implemented. The primary outcome was the individual POCUS documentation rates calculated as all studies submitted divided by all studies performed (submitted plus unsubmitted) per month. Provider-level monthly data was aggregated into a departmental rate. Results Interviews were conducted with 12 physicians, six from the highest and six from the lowest documentation quartiles. Both groups supported the same two proposed interventions: reminder emails ranked first, then monetary rewards ranked second. High utilizers emphasized the clinical utility of POCUS, whereas low utilizers expressed concerns over "double billing" and exposure to medicolegal liability with uncertain scan interpretations. For low utilizers, a documentation decision could be dependent on the performing resident physician's displayed confidence. Both groups voiced frustration with the need to use a separate program, Qpath (Telexy Healthcare, Inc, Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada), for POCUS documentation. During intervention phase one, the aggregate departmental documentation rate increased from 44.6% to 60.1% with the introduction of the schedule request incentive. This improvement was seen across all documentation quartiles. The departmental rate remained stable and did not improve further following the addition of the daily documentation reminder emails in intervention phase two. When reminder emails ceased yet the day-off request incentive continued, the departmental rate did not drop. Conclusions The implementation of a non-financial shift scheduling incentivecorrelated with the largest increase in departmental POCUS documentation rate. Interviewees incorrectly predicted that email reminders would be the most influential intervention highlighting a mismatch between physician perception and effective drivers of behavior change.Further investigation may focus on determining the size and longevity of the isolated impact of a schedule request incentive, as one might expect diminishing marginal utility.

Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus.

Despite the growing use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in contemporary medical practice and the existence of clinical guidelines addressing its specific applications, there remains a lack of standardization and agreement on optimal practices for several areas of POCUS use. The Society of Point of Care Ultrasound (SPOCUS) formed a working group in 2022 to establish a set of recommended best practices for POCUS, applicable to clinicians regardless of their training, specialty, resource setting, or scope of practice. Using a three-round modified Delphi process, a multi-disciplinary panel of 22 POCUS experts based in the United States reached consensus on 57 statements in domains including: (1) The definition and clinical role of POCUS; (2) Training pathways; (3) Credentialing; (4) Cleaning and maintenance of POCUS devices; (5) Consent and education; (6) Security, storage, and sharing of POCUS studies; (7) Uploading, archiving, and reviewing POCUS studies; and (8) Documenting POCUS studies. The consensus statements are provided here. While not intended to establish a standard of care or supersede more targeted guidelines, this document may serve as a useful baseline to guide clinicians, leaders, and systems considering initiation or enhancement of POCUS programs.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Detection, Severity and Mechanism of Significant Valvular Heart Disease and Clinical Management.

Early diagnosis of significant valvular heart disease (VHD) enables appropriate implementation of the best therapeutic strategy and follow-up. Cardiac auscultation remains suboptimal in early detection of VHD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for early detection of VHD and its severity. All consecutive patients with VHD who did not have a standard echocardiogram prior to first outpatient cardiology consultation underwent history and physical examination followed by POCUS study by an experienced physician in a general cardiology clinic from June 2017 to August 2022 at our institution. Subsequent standard transthoracic echocardiography (sTTE) was performed as the gold standard. Comparison was performed between POCUS and sTTE for the presence and severity of VHD. sTTE was performed by registered cardiac sonographers and interpreted by another cardiologist blinded to the POCUS results. A total of 77 patients were studied (ge 72 ± 11 years, 58.4% males). A total of 89 significant valvular abnormalities were diagnosed. There were 39 (43.8%) cases of regurgitant VHD, 16 (18.0%) of stenotic VHD and 34 (38.2%) had evaluation for prosthetic valve function. The sensitivity (90.9%; 82.4%; 83.3%; 100%) and specificity (100%; 96.7%; 100%; 100%) were high for detecting ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation (AR), mitral regurgitation (MR), aortic stenosis (AS) and prosthetic valvular abnormality, respectively. The weighted κ coefficient between POCUS and sTTE for the assessment of ≥ moderate MR, AR and AS was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.65-0.97), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.84-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.76-1.0), respectively, indicating excellent agreement. POCUS can identify patients with significant VHD and may serve as a powerful screening tool for early detection of significant VHD in the outpatient clinical practice with downstream impact on clinical management of significant VHD.

Quantifying Clinically Meaningful Point-of-Care Ultrasound Interpretation Discrepancies Using an Emergency Department Quality Assurance Program.

Emergency medicine professional associations recommend that quality assurance (QA) programs be implemented wherever emergency department (ED) point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is in use. The purpose of this study is to identify the rate of clinically meaningful interpretation discrepancies between initial ED POCUS interpretation and a gold standard using a QA program in a Canadian academic ED. All POCUS examinations completed in our ED are subject to a QA process. The results of all POCUS examinations undergoing this process from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. Four blinded abstractors collected data with a standardized tool after a training session. Information regarding patient demographics, POCUS indication, emergency physician initial POCUS interpretation, physician POCUS expertise, the presence of an interpretation discrepancy, and whether the discrepancy was clinically meaningful was abstracted. The proportion of interpretation discrepancies, clinically meaningful discrepancies, discrepancies requiring remedial action, and differences in discrepancy rates between non-expert and expert sonographers were analyzed. A total of 2,869 POCUS studies were included for review, with 2,668 in the final data set after exclusions. In total, only 1.4% of all scans contained an interpretation discrepancy. The rate of clinically meaningful discrepancies was 0.5%, and the rate of scans requiring remedial action was 0.1%. Overall, 85.5% of all scans were performed by four POCUS expert physicians, with the remainder by a non-expert. Scans performed by non-expert sonographers were significantly more prone to discrepancies than those performed by experts. No single scan indication was more prone to discrepancy. The overall ED POCUS interpretation discrepancy rate and clinically meaningful discrepancy rate identified using our QA process were very low. The findings are limited by the small group of expert sonographers completing most scans.

A Real-World Experience: Retrospective Review of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Utilization and Quality in Community Emergency Departments.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is commonly used in the emergency department (ED) as a rapid diagnostic tool. Emergency medicine (EM) has been an early adopter of POCUS with indications expanding over the last 10 years. While the literature describes widespread use among academic sites, there is little data on clinical POCUS utilization at non-academic EDs. We sought to describe community emergency physician (EP) use of POCUS by quantifying the number and type of studies performed, characteristics of the performing physician, and quality metrics. Prior to the study period, all EPs underwent a standardized training and credentialing program. A retrospective review of all POCUS studies across 11 non-academic EDs from October 1, 2018-September 30, 2020 was performed by fellowship-trained physicians, who identified physician, exam type, and residency graduation year. The studies were then cross-referenced with quality review reports that assessed image acquisition, image interpretation, and image labeling. We performed descriptive statistics. During the study period, 5,099 POCUS studies were performed by 170 EPs. Exams most frequently performed were cardiac (24%), focused assessment of sonography in trauma (21.7%), and pregnancy (16.2%). Recent EM residency graduates (<10 years) were higher utilizers of POCUS with a group mean of 1.3 exams per 100 patients. Of the studies done, 86% had no quality issues. Community POCUS demonstrates a heavy focus on core exams performed by recent EM residency graduates with minimal quality issues after a standardized training program. This study is the first to quantify actual community POCUS use in multiple EDs and may impact credentialing and skills maintenance requirements.

Pediatric Residents' Perceptions of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Collaboration With Emergency Medicine.

Background Pediatric residencies expanding their point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) education face barriers, including a lack of established curriculum and qualified educators. Prior studies report partnerships between pediatrics and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM); however, many non-PEM emergency medicine (EM) physicians with POCUS fellowship training also have experience with pediatric POCUS and represent an alternate educational partner. Objectives To improve pediatric residents' POCUS skills through collaborative education with EM and evaluate perceptions of the teaching format and instructors. Methods First through third-year pediatric residents attended a half-day didactic and hands-on session about renal, lung, and musculoskeletal (MSK) POCUS. These educational sessions were led by EM faculty with POCUS fellowship training and assisted by EM residents. Post-session surveys were administered to pediatric residents to assess prior POCUS experience, changes in confidence in acquiring and interpreting renal, lung, and MSK POCUS images, and opinions about the educational format. Statistical analyses of the post-session survey data were performed using SPSS. Results Thirty-nine pediatric residents attended the session and completed the survey of 45 total residents in the program (86.7%), with 89.7% completing 10 or fewer POCUS studies. Residents' comfort level with performing lung POCUS increased from 5.1% to 82.1% (p< .001), renal POCUS from 10.3% to 76.9% (p< .001), and MSK POCUS from 7.7% to 84.6% (p< .001). 87.2% rated the educational format as effective, and 94.9% (37/39) rated emergency medicine faculty as 'very effective' in providing ultrasound education relevant to the practice of pediatrics. Conclusion Pediatric resident POCUS education taught by EM faculty with POCUS fellowship training was well-received by pediatric residents and significantly improved confidence in acquiring and interpreting POCUS.

FAST skill assessment from kinematics data using convolutional neural networks

FAST is a point of care ultrasound study that evaluates for the presence of free fluid, typically hemoperitoneum in trauma patients. FAST is an essential skill for Emergency Physicians. Thus, it requires objective evaluation tools that can reduce the necessity of direct observation for proficiency assessment. In this work, we use deep neural networks to automatically assess operators' FAST skills. We propose a deep convolutional neural network for FAST proficiency assessment based on motion data. Prior work has shown that operators demonstrate different domain-specific dexterity metrics that can distinguish novices, intermediates, and experts. Therefore, we augment our dataset with this domain knowledge and employ fine-tuning to improve the model's classification capabilities. Our model, however, does not require specific points of interest (POIs) to be defined for scanning. The results show that the proposed deep convolutional neural network can classify FAST proficiency with 87.5% accuracy and 0.884, 0.886, 0.247 sensitivity for novices, intermediates, and experts, respectively. It demonstrates the potential of using kinematics data as an input in FAST skill assessment tasks. We also show that the proposed domain-specific features and region fine-tuning increase the model's classification accuracy and sensitivity. Variations in probe motion at different learning stages can be derived from kinematics data. These variations can be used for automatic and objective skill assessment without prior identification of clinical POIs. The proposed approach can improve the quality and objectivity of FAST proficiency evaluation. Furthermore, skill assessment combining ultrasound images and kinematics data can provide a more rigorous and diversified evaluation than using ultrasound images alone.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Children With Medical Complexity

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have significant chronic health conditions that involve congenital or acquired multisystem disease associated with medical fragility, functional limitations, dependence on technology, and high health care utilization. The objective of this study was to describe the indications, applications, and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) findings in this population. A descriptive study of POCUS scans performed for clinical purposes in CMC admitted to a single pediatric postacute care hospital. All children for whom a POCUS was requested by a medical team provider were eligible for inclusion. One hundred and four POCUS evaluations were performed for 33 patients. Diagnostic groups for the 33 patients included multiple congenital anomalies (41%), neurologic or neuromuscular (31%), prematurity (25%) and cardiac (3%). Lung, cardiac, and diaphragmatic ultrasound accounted for 57% of POCUS requested. POCUS was abnormal in 82% of diaphragmatic, 73% of lung, and 11% of cardiac ultrasounds. Twenty-three percent of POCUS studies were requested to answer a specific clinical question, 56% for follow-up information, and 21% for baseline evaluation. Lung, diaphragmatic, and cardiac ultrasound were the most prevalent POCUS studies requested in a postacute care hospital. POCUS may offer an expanded role in such patients and settings by answering clinical questions and by providing baseline and follow-up information.

Retraction: Salame et al. Is Increasing Age Associated with Higher Rates of Intercostal Arteries Vulnerable to Laceration? A Point of Care Ultrasound Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5788.

The journal retracts the article, 'Is Increasing Age Associated with Higher Rates of Intercostal Arteries Vulnerable to Laceration [...].

Left ventricular ejection fraction using a simplified wall motion score based on mid-parasternal short axis and apical four-chamber views for non-cardiologists

BackgroundThere is a need for a convenient, yet reliable method to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with point-of-care ultrasound study (POCUS). We aim to validate a novel and simplified wall motion score LVEF based on the analysis of a simplified combination of echocardiographic views.MethodsIn this retrospective study, transthoracic echocardiograms of randomly selected patients were analysed by the standard 16-segments wall motion score index (WMSI) to derive the reference semi-quantitative LVEF. To develop our semi-quantitative simplified-views method, a limited combination of imaging views and only 4 segments per view were tested: (1) A combination of the three parasternal short-axis views (PSAX BASE, MID-, APEX); (2) A combination of the three apical views (apical 2-chamber, 3-chamber and 4-chamber) and (3) A more limited combination of PSAX-MID and apical 4-chamber is called the MID-4CH. Global LVEF is obtained by averaging segmental EF based on contractility (normal = 60%, hypokinesia = 40%, and akinesia = 10%). Accuracy of the novel semi-quantitative simplified-views WMS method compared to the reference WMSI was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis and correlation was assessed in both emergency physicians and cardiologists.ResultsIn the 46 patients using the 16 segments WMSI method, the mean LVEF was 34 ± 10%. Among the three combinations of the two or three imaging views analysed, the MID-4CH had the best correlation with the reference method (r2 = 0.90) with very good agreement (mean LVEF bias = − 0.2%) and precision (± 3.3%).ConclusionsCardiac POCUS by emergency physicians and other non-cardiologists is a decisive therapeutic and prognostic tool. A simplified semi-quantitative WMS method to assess LVEF using the easiest technically achievable combination of mid-parasternal and apical four-chamber views provides a good approximative estimate for both non-cardiologist emergency physicians and cardiologists.

Acquisition and retention of lung ultrasound skills by respiratory therapists: A curriculum for respiratory therapists.

Lung point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a versatile bedside tool. The utility of POCUS has grown during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, as it allows clinicians to obtain real-time images without requiring transport of the patient outside the intensive care unit. As respiratory therapists (RTs) are involved in caring for those with respiratory failure, there is a good rationale for their adoption of lung ultrasound. However, no training standards have been defined. Our objective was to develop and implement a training programme for RTs to achieve and sustain competence in lung ultrasound. This was a single-centre, prospective, single-cohort observational study. A total of 10 RTs completed our curriculum and were tasked with independently completing and interpreting 10 initial lung ultrasound exams and 3 subsequent exams after a 6-week interim period. All exams were blindly overread by a local expert in lung ultrasound. After completing the curriculum, RTs were able to acquire and accurately interpret their images over 85% of the time. They were more successful in the upper lung zone image acquisition and interpretation compared with the lower lung zones. After 6 weeks, the RTs' lung POCUS skills remained stable, and their lower lung zone image interpretation improved. The RTs reported that their confidence improved throughout the study. The RTs in our study have demonstrated competence in acquisition and interpretation of upper lung zone images. They have also reported confidence in acquiring and interpreting upper lung zone images. More experience appears to be required to gain competence and confidence in lower lung zone ultrasound. Next steps would be to repeat the present study with a higher number of RTs completing at least 20 lung POCUS studies.

376 Point-of-Care Ultrasound-First for the Evaluation of Urolithiasis in Patients Who Fit Choosing Wisely Criteria: National Cost Savings and Length of Stay Reduction

Study ObjectivesChoosing Wisely guidelines recommend against ordering non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for patients with suspected urolithiasis who are under the age of 50 and have a history of recurrent kidney stones. Our primary objective was to estimate the annual national cost savings and reduction in emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) from using a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-first approach for patients with urolithiasis meeting Choosing Wisely criteria.MethodsWe created and ran 1,000 trials of a Monte Carlo simulation. The study population included all patients who presented to the ED and were diagnosed with urolithiasis. Using this simulation, we modeled national cost savings in averted advanced imaging from a POCUS-first approach for urolithiasis. The model assumes that patients with indeterminate or negative POCUS studies underwent NCCT for further evaluation. We applied the same Monte Carlo model to estimate the reduction in ED LOS.ResultsUsing this model, a POCUS-first approach in our select patient population for diagnosing urolithiasis was estimated to save a mean (±SD) of $25.5 million (±$2.7 million) by avoiding 203,000 (±21,000) NCCT scans. This resulted in a national cumulative decrease of 205,000 (±874,000) ED bed-hours.ConclusionsIf adopted widely, a POCUS-first approach for suspected urolithiasis in patients who meet Choosing Wisely criteria could yield significant cost savings and reduction in ED LOS. Further research is needed to explore drivers of the lack of widespread adoption of this clinical workflow.No, authors do not have interests to disclose Study ObjectivesChoosing Wisely guidelines recommend against ordering non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for patients with suspected urolithiasis who are under the age of 50 and have a history of recurrent kidney stones. Our primary objective was to estimate the annual national cost savings and reduction in emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) from using a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-first approach for patients with urolithiasis meeting Choosing Wisely criteria. Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend against ordering non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for patients with suspected urolithiasis who are under the age of 50 and have a history of recurrent kidney stones. Our primary objective was to estimate the annual national cost savings and reduction in emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) from using a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-first approach for patients with urolithiasis meeting Choosing Wisely criteria. MethodsWe created and ran 1,000 trials of a Monte Carlo simulation. The study population included all patients who presented to the ED and were diagnosed with urolithiasis. Using this simulation, we modeled national cost savings in averted advanced imaging from a POCUS-first approach for urolithiasis. The model assumes that patients with indeterminate or negative POCUS studies underwent NCCT for further evaluation. We applied the same Monte Carlo model to estimate the reduction in ED LOS. We created and ran 1,000 trials of a Monte Carlo simulation. The study population included all patients who presented to the ED and were diagnosed with urolithiasis. Using this simulation, we modeled national cost savings in averted advanced imaging from a POCUS-first approach for urolithiasis. The model assumes that patients with indeterminate or negative POCUS studies underwent NCCT for further evaluation. We applied the same Monte Carlo model to estimate the reduction in ED LOS. ResultsUsing this model, a POCUS-first approach in our select patient population for diagnosing urolithiasis was estimated to save a mean (±SD) of $25.5 million (±$2.7 million) by avoiding 203,000 (±21,000) NCCT scans. This resulted in a national cumulative decrease of 205,000 (±874,000) ED bed-hours. Using this model, a POCUS-first approach in our select patient population for diagnosing urolithiasis was estimated to save a mean (±SD) of $25.5 million (±$2.7 million) by avoiding 203,000 (±21,000) NCCT scans. This resulted in a national cumulative decrease of 205,000 (±874,000) ED bed-hours. ConclusionsIf adopted widely, a POCUS-first approach for suspected urolithiasis in patients who meet Choosing Wisely criteria could yield significant cost savings and reduction in ED LOS. Further research is needed to explore drivers of the lack of widespread adoption of this clinical workflow.No, authors do not have interests to disclose If adopted widely, a POCUS-first approach for suspected urolithiasis in patients who meet Choosing Wisely criteria could yield significant cost savings and reduction in ED LOS. Further research is needed to explore drivers of the lack of widespread adoption of this clinical workflow.

Is Increasing Age Associated with Higher Rates of Intercostal Arteries Vulnerable to Laceration? A Point of Care Ultrasound Study.

Ultrasound-guided pre-procedural planning decreases complications from bedside thoracentesis. Although rare, intercostal artery (ICA) laceration is a serious complication that occurs when vulnerable intercostal arteries (VICA) are no longer protected by the superior rib. We sought to determine if increasing patient age is associated with greater odds of encountering a VICA. Randomly selected in-patients underwent pre-procedural planning for a mock posterior bedside thoracentesis. ICAs were categorized as vulnerable if they were visible within the corresponding intercostal space (ICS). We recorded where the VICA entered and exited the ICS as well as its unshielded length. A total of 40 patients (20 male) were enrolled and 240 ICS (6 ICS per patient) were scanned. Within this cohort, 25% of patients were noted to have at least one VICA. We could not demonstrate any relationship between the patient’s age or location of the ICS, with the odds of encountering a VICA (odds ratio (OR) = 1.0, p = 0.76; OR = 0.85, p = 0.27, respectively). Given the haphazard nature of VICA distribution and poor outcomes associated with inadvertent laceration, we recommend that ICA screening at the site of needle insertion be routinely performed prior to thoracentesis.

Consensus Terminology for Point of Care Ultrasound Studies with Incomplete Documentation and Workflow Elements.

Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) use by emergency physicians has grown in both breadth and depth of clinical use [1-3]. POCUS workflow is different from a traditional imaging-based specialist workflow because a single clinician orders, obtains images, interprets, and reports the exam results. Traditionally, multiple individuals participate in the workflow: the clinician places the order; an ultrasound technologist reconciles order and identifiers and acquires images; lastly an imaging specialist interprets the exam and creates a report. hese contrasting approaches has led to unique challenges in streamlining POCUS workflows and identifying disruptions, errors and potential corrections given the differences from radiology focused workflow and resources.

Growth and globalization of point‐of‐care ultrasound publications in emergency medicine

Since the introduction of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in emergency medicine (EM), the applications, indications, and training for POCUS have grown. POCUS training in EM residency is standard and POCUS fellowships are common. We sought to quantify and characterize changes in POCUS publications over time with a scoping review of the literature METHODS: We conducted a structured keyword search of high impact EM journals according to 2019 journal citation reports and other journals publishing POCUS studies between 2000-2019. Two abstractors recorded whether the publication was POCUS related, the type of publication, and author affiliation by department and country. We included studies with at least one author affiliated with a department of EM. Agreement between abstractors was tested. The number of POCUS-related publications grew from a mean of 8.8 publications/year 2000-2004 to 134.8 publications/year from 2015-2019. The most common publication type was case reports or series (44%). The proportion of publications from outside the United States (US) decreased over time. Between 2000 and 2004 89% of publications came from authors affiliated with US institutions; from 2015-2019 this had decreased to 64%. Agreement between abstractors was excellent (Cohen's k=0.89) CONCLUSIONS: POCUS publications increased substantially between 2000-2019. The most common type of publication was a case report, which was consistent throughout the study period. Authorship from outside the US increased. Publications yielding high-quality evidence from observational or controlled studies represented a low proportion of the total number of studies.

Describing the learning curve of novices for the diagnosis of paediatric distal forearm fractures using point-of-care ultrasound.

The learning curve of nurse practitioners (NPs) to accurately diagnose paediatric distal forearm fractures using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was investigated. Each NP's learning curve was calculated as cumulative diagnostic accuracy against a number of scans performed. The curve's plateau represented the attainment of competency. Secondary outcomes were the comparisons before and after this cut-off of diagnostic accuracy, classification of diagnostic errors, pain scores, duration and preference. Five NPs performed 201 POCUS studies with diagnostic accuracy plateauing at 90%, providing a 'cut-off' point at scan 15. Accuracy of POCUS scanning before and after the fifteenth scan was 81% (95% CI 70%-89%) and 90% (95% CI 84%-94%), respectively, demonstrating 9% improvement (P = 0.07). There was a 10% reduction in image interpretation errors. After fifteen scans, POCUS became faster (mean difference (MD) 2.6 min [95% CI 2.0-3.3], P < 0.001), less painful (MD 0.61 points FPSR scale [95% CI 0.04-1.18], P = 0.04) and more preferred by NPs (63% vs 77%, P = 0.03). The learning curve of POCUS-novice NPs independently scanning paediatric distal forearm injuries plateaued with mean diagnostic accuracy of 90% after 15 scans, suggesting competency was attained at this cut-off, supported by higher accuracy, being faster, less painful and more preferred by NPs. Future training packages in forearm POCUS should further address image interpretation and provide ongoing expert feedback. The findings from this study suggest that competency in paediatric distal forearm POCUS can be attained by novices after a short training course and approximately 15 scans.

Factors Associated With Point-of-Care Ultrasound Use by Recent Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Graduates.

The aims of this study were to describe point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use by recent pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship graduates and identify associations between frequency and breadth of POCUS use with variations in POCUS training and current clinical practice environment. This was a cross-sectional online survey of recent PEM fellowship graduates. Chi-square and nonparametric tests were used to compare POCUS use among physicians with varying types of POCUS training and varying clinical practice environments. Eighty-two percent of 143 respondents reported using POCUS in their past 10 shifts. There was no association between the methods of POCUS education and frequency or breadth of POCUS use. Pediatric emergency medicine fellowship graduates with additional POCUS fellowship training performed more scans and used more applications than those who completed a pediatrics or medicine-pediatrics residency before PEM fellowship only [median 15 (9, 20) vs 2 (1, 5) (P < 0.01) and median 11 (6.5, 13) vs 2 (1, 3) (P < 0.01), respectively]. Participants who worked in academic emergency departments performed more ultrasounds than those who did not [3.5 (1, 8) vs 1 (0, 2), P < 0.01] and used a greater breadth of applications [3 (1, 5) vs 1 (0, 3), P < 0.01]. Physicians who billed for POCUS studies were more likely to use POCUS (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.3) with greater frequency [5 (2.3, 10) vs 2 (0.8, 5), P < 0.01] and use a broader range of applications [3 (2,6) vs 2 (0.8, 3.3), P < 0.01]. Most respondents report recent POCUS use in practice. Point-of-care ultrasound fellowship training, working in an academic emergency department, and having the ability to bill were associated with increased POCUS use.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training and Credentialing for mid-late Career Emergency Physicians: Is it worth it?

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is becoming more prevalent in community emergency medicine (EM) practice with the current American College of Emergency Physician guidelines recommending POCUS training for all graduates from United States based residency programs as well as support for POCUS privileging by the American Medical Association. However, in a recent survey of nonacademic EDs, it was found that most providers lack US training, credentialing, and quality assurance (QA) assessments of their POCUS studies. In 2017, our healthcare system embarked on a system-wide credentialing process for POCUS to credential community physicians with little to no POCUS training.

Intravenous Fluid Bag as a Substitute for Gel Standoff Pad in Musculoskeletal Point-of-care Ultrasound.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a tool undergoing expanding use in military medicine, including routine inpatient, outpatient, and operational environments. Specific musculoskeletal POCUS examinations require additional equipment in the form of a standoff assist device to maximize image acquisition. These devices may not be readily available to POCUS users in more austere or resource-constrained environments. We devised a study to determine if intravenous fluid bags of various volumes could be substituted for standard standoff devices in musculoskeletal POCUS. Sequential images of a soft tissue foreign body model, an interphalangeal joint, and a chest wall were taken using a gel standoff pad or water bath and compared to images acquired using three different sizes of intravenous fluid bags after removing excess air from the bags. Images were de-identified and scored for quality using a visual analog scale. We used a two-factor analysis of variance without replication to analyze the differences in image quality between standoff devices, with a P-value less than.05 considered statistically significant. We performed 13 POCUS studies and had a group of eight POCUS-trained physicians and physician assistants score these studies, resulting in 104 total quality scores. There was no significant difference in image quality between standoff devices for chest (P-value.280) and hand (P-value 0.947) images. We found a significant difference in image quality between standoff devices for the soft tissue foreign body model (P-value 0.039), favoring larger intravenous fluid bag standoff over standard devices. In the absence of a standard commercial gel standoff device or water bath, intravenous fluid bags of 50, 100, and 250 mL can facilitate quality image acquisition for musculoskeletal POCUS.