The procedural end point of electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been debated extensively. After identifying the PVs as the dominant arrhythmogenic site of paroxysmal AF, 2 fundamentally different approaches to the interventional treatment of AF were introduced. Haissaguerre et al developed a technique to electrically isolate the PVs by targeting electrophysiological (EP) breakthroughs from the left atrium to the PVs guided by a circular mapping catheter. In contrast, Pappone et al implemented an anatomical approach that used circumferential ablation lines around the PVs guided by a 3-dimensional mapping system. This latter approach used the procedural end point of local electrogram amplitude reduction on the line and assessment of voltage maps within the encircled area but not the demonstration of PV isolation. For a considerably long time, these 2 different approaches separated the EP community in terms of AF ablation into 2 fractions according to their affinity to either of these techniques. Subsequently, 2 independent groups performed each a prospective randomized trial comparing the 2 approaches. However, these 2 studies ultimately did not clarify which one of the approaches is the more effective and therefore more appropriate technique. In contrast, the completely divergent results of the 2 studies further heated up this debate. Interestingly, although no additional clarifying data were published afterward, the 2007 Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society consensus documents recommended for the first time that in AF ablation approaches targeting the PVs, complete electrical isolation should be the goal. With this statement, discussions on whether electrical isolation should be used as the EP end point of PV ablation abated subsequently. The contemporary approach to PV isolation consolidates the combination of both techniques, a wide circumferential linear ablation around the ipsilateral PVs with the end point of electrical isolation guided by a circular PV mapping catheter. Recently, the German Gap-AF (AFNET 1) study demonstrated
Read full abstract