Reviewed by: This Ghostly Poetry: History and Memory of Exiled Spanish Republican Poets by Daniel Aguirre-Oteiza Lori Mele Hawke Aguirre-Oteiza, Daniel. This Ghostly Poetry: History and Memory of Exiled Spanish Republican Poets. U of Toronto P, 2020. Pp. 392. ISBN 978-1-487-50381-9. In his latest book, This Ghostly Poetry: History and Memory of Exiled Spanish Republican Poets, Daniel Aguirre-Oteiza presents an engaging analysis of not only exile and poems written in exile, but also the relationships that exist between exilic writing, literary history, and national culture. Characterizing exilic poems as "acts of textual resistance" to conventional understandings of Spanish literary history, which affect a recuperative attitude toward the cultural productions of exiles, Aguirre-Oteiza proposes reading practices that expose the ways in which exilic poems "resist and disrupt" historical narratives about national culture (3). He identifies a tension between reading practices that focus on "intentional, representational, referential elements" and those that attend to the "border-crossing, non-chronological, plurivocal, and plurilingual patterns" present in exilic poetry. His exploration of that tension through textual analysis supports the author's argument that the conventional formation of the Spanish literary canon is a "reductive framework for elucidating the discursive complexity of exilic poems" (8–9), and demonstrates the advantages of This Ghostly Poetry's approach. In chapter 1, "Introduction: On Forewords and Historical Ghosts," Aguirre-Oteiza presents his argument while situating the book within and explaining its contributions to the field of Spanish literary criticism, establishing the study's theoretical framework, defining the reading strategies the book will employ, and summarizing the chapters that follow. Though he undoubtedly accomplishes these ambitious intentions, the writing is overly complicated at times. This chapter is dense with readings and applications of theoretical and critical works, and lays the foundation for the reading practices that will be demonstrated in the following chapters. Aguirre-Oteiza's investigation of the concept of ghostliness in the poetry of Spanish Republican exiles builds on existing themes of ghosts and the ghostly in exilic writing and its critical studies. These are explored in "Part One: Exiles in Literary History," which encompasses the second and third chapters. In chapter 2, "Re-engaging with Ghosts in the Poetic Machine," the author turns his attention to the Spanish Civil War and its aftermath, and the prominence of [End Page 721] poetry during this time. He chooses four poems that are especially representative of that period to examine in chapter 3, "Writing the War, Re-writing the Nation, Embodying the Voice of the People," and continues to leverage hermeneutics and post-structuralist theories to delineate his concept of poetic memory and his characterization of exilic poetry. "Part Two: Exiles in Poetic Memory" houses chapters 4–7 and is a series of case studies that "explore exilic texts as modes of disruption" with regard to national cultural history (11). Aguirre-Oteiza explains that his selection of poets (Juan Ramón Jiménez, Luis Cernuda, Max Aub, and Tomás Segovia) was strategic and twofold: First, their status as canonical writers "makes their exilic poetry amenable to being productively read … as … disruptive" with regard to conventional understandings of literary history (8). Second, these writers all wrote about each other, so there exists a fascinating interconnectedness (a "revealing constellation") among them, and examining each's writing in relation to the others' allows for a unique lens through which to consider their work within the context of Spanish literary history (11). It should be noted that Aguirre-Oteiza states directly that This Ghostly Poetry is a restricted and focused study rather than a survey or anthology of Spanish Republican exilic poetry (17). Though readers may regret that the selection of poets in his case studies was not more diverse—he did not include any women poets, for example—he does provide reasoned justification for his decision to focus on Jiménez, Cernuda, Aub, and Segovia, and on the specific examples of their writing that he has selected. The thoughtful organization of part 2 is one of This Ghostly Poetry's notable brilliances: Aguirre-Oteiza presents the four poets in order of increasing complexity with respect to the dimensions of exile that figure in their...
Read full abstract