556 Reviews specifics: the 'archaeology of perception' in the Italian travelogue (Irmgard Egger), a comparison between Moritz and Piranesi on the role of perspective (Renata Gam bino), theminimalism of the illustrations in theGotterlehre (Ulrike Miinter) as well as their reception in the early nineteenth century (Gertrud Platz-Horster), history painting as the key to interpretingUber die bildendeNachahmung des Schonen (Clau dia Sedlarz), Die neue Cecilia in itsaesthetic context (Alexander Kosenina), Moritz's ideas on the relationship between pictorial representation and its linguistic descrip tion (Tomishige Yoshio), his conception of allegory (Achim Geisenhansliuke), his reflectionson the aesthetic potential of everyday life(Iwan D'Aprile), his Italienische Sprachlehre (Ute Tintemann), and his Vorlesungen iiberdenStyl (Justus vonHartlieb). The emphasis on aesthetics and related issues validates Moritz as a significant literary figure in his own right.But that significance isnot substantiated here, per haps because, as a discipline develops, it breaks its subject's substance down into ever smaller elements, in this caseMoritz's last four years. Certainly the journey to Italymade a lasting impression, but the life is one thing, thework another, and it needs tobe seen formally,structurally, in itsentirety rather than as a function of bio graphy. The twomost successful contributions to thevolume-on Moritz's interest in language (Adrian Aebi) and on walking along meandering paths and findinghigh vantage-points as a basic figure in Moritz's works (Anthony Krupp)-do illuminate its structure.Otherwise one gleans atmost a few furtherhints on some illuminating primary or archive literature or some further references to the secondary literature: monitor-displays of vital signs but not vitality itself.The book conveys neither the pathos of thework nor the everyday psychopathology ofwhat could be a pathetic, hypochondriac figurewho saw the formal self-sufficiencyof beauty as redemption or compensation. (Significantly, D'Aprile's discussion of 'kleinscheinende Umstinde', the stuffof everyday life, relies on phenomenology rather than psychology.) Instead, contributors vindicate Moritz's language by seeing it as both modern and present day (Yoshio, p. 125) and his theories by stressing their relevance to current aesthetic debates (Geisenhansliike, p. 139), by theircapacity to transcend 'dieGrenzen seiner Zeit' (Gambino, p. 35). But these assertions resemble attempts at artifical resuscita tion.After all, classical works are not limited by time nor do they need history to endorse them. They impose themselves, asMoritz realized, by their aesthetic pre sence; theirvitality, like Moritz's, thriveson our aesthetic (not technical) response. UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER MARTIN L. DAVIES Ungastliche Gaben: Die 'Xenien' Goethes und Schillers und ihre literarischeRezeption von I796 bis indie Gegenwart. By FRIEDER VONAMMON. (Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, I23) Tiibingen: Niemeyer. 2005. ix+ I47 pp. E74. ISBN 978-3-484-32I23-6. This informative study of theXenien examines Goethe's and Schiller's aggressively provocative epigrammatic poems as an independent, innovative genre. It is in two parts. The firstfocuses on the immanent poetics, structural organization, and seman tic implications of a genre established in the Musen-Almanch auf dasjahr I797. The second probes a selection of nineteenth- and twentieth-century texts continuing the narrow but barbed poetic tradition.The most prominent of these are Ludwig Feuer bach's Theologisch-satirische Xenien (I830), Georg Herwegh's Xenien (I843), Adolf Glassbrenner's and Daniel Sanders's Xenien der Gegenwart (I850), and Johannes Bobrowski's Literarisches Klima: Ganz neueXenien, doppelteAusfuihrung (I 977). In von Ammon's reading theXenien are 'unklassische Klassik'. Although clearly indebted to Martial's Xenia and Apophoreta, theywere calculated from the very be ginning to reach beyond traditional satire, to transgress poetic boundaries, to annoy MLR, 102.2, 2007 557 and irritate. In the literary exchanges of the day theywere designed to serve as un welcome gifts, the author argues, 'ungastliche Gaben', reversing the friendlygifting of theHomeric epic, inwhich xeineia are offered as a sign of friendship and respect. They were also designed tobe forgotten,a one-time disruptive poetic event. But this was not tobe the case. Instead, contemporary responses to thepoems served, among other things, to establish them as a new minor epigrammatic genre within German poetry.Goethe's own Zahme Xenien participated in theproductive reception. Later writers, especially up through the mid-nineteenth century, found good use for thedis tinctivepoetic vehicle. Despite Goethe's and Schiller's...
Read full abstract