ABSTRACT Tottel's Miscellany disseminated in print a model of male courtly and cultivated behaviour in which the writing of aphoristic and amorous verse was central. This model produced a proliferation of printed miscellanies of verse in the early Elizabethan period, both single-author collections and anthologies, in which male courtly behaviour is defined in terms of the potentially contradictory ideals of elegant amorousness and well-framed virtue. Women overwhelmingly appear in such collections as figures of glamorous instability or sexual betrayal. Only occasionally, most notably in the collections of Isabella Whitney, does one find traces of the central importance, and active participation of women, in the earlier manuscript production of courtly verse. This essay will consider the plethora of printed miscellanies of short secular verse that appeared in the 1560s and 1570s in the wake of Richard Tottel's hugely successful Songes and Sonettes, written by the right honorable Lord Henry Haward late Earle of Surrey, and other, first printed in 1557, but with multiple editions until the end of the century. (1) My argument will be that by their selection and presentation in print of courtly verse, Tottel and his successors helped to erase in print the centrality of women in the production of such verse, whether as readers and performers, as instigators and answerers, or, on occasion, no doubt, as composers and adaptors of such verse. For the mid-century miscellanists, the writing of courtly verse was primarily a gentlemanly activity in which the active participants were almost exclusively male, and in which the attitudes and gestures marketed as socially desirable contributed to the construction of a desirable mid-century masculine self, humanist-educated and socially aspiring. (2) Surviving manuscripts of early Tudor verse, such as the 'Devonshire MS', used by a number of female courtiers associated with Anne Boleyn and Lady Margaret Douglas, niece of Henry VIII, or the 'Findern MS', belonging to, and used by, women as well as men of a Derbyshire gentry family in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, contain, as well as misogynist verse and poems blaming women, a number of poems in women's voices, giving female perspectives on the fashionable topics of love and fidelity. (3) Even an early Tudor manuscript that appears to have been compiled and used mainly by men such as the 'Blage MS' makes clear that the 'answer' poem, with its witty ripostes, often in female voices, to male attacks on women, was a popular topic implying a potential role and voice for women in courtly verse exchange. (4) Of course, we cannot assume that female-voiced poems were always or even usually composed by women, but in a culture of open copying, adaptation, and appropriation of manuscript verse, the relatively frequent occurrence of poems giving a sympathetic female perspective suggests the centrality of women's participation and the perceived need to provide a variety of voices for them. (5) Tottel's Miscellany, by the act of printing such verse, transformed its context and effect from witty or graceful gestures in a system of elite manuscript exchange and social pastime into exemplary models of an approved and refined style, designed in the words of Tottel in his prefatory epistle 'to the Reader' to 'exhort the vnlearned, by reding to learne to be more skilfull, and to purge that swinelike grossenesse, that maketh the swete maierome [marjoram] not to smell to their delight' (i, 2). The prominence of Surrey's name enhanced the social glamour of the Miscellany, leading to a particular association of its verse with Surrey and to the assumption, on the part of some readers at least, that most, if not all the poems it contained were his (ii, 67). As a number of scholars have argued, Tottel's Miscellany and its imitators 'marketed exclusivity [... they] functioned as conduct books [...] because they demonstrated to more common audiences the poetic practices entertained by graceful courtly readers and writers'. …