John Wilson was profoundly affected by his first reading of Lyrical Ballads. At age sixteen in June, 1802, he wrote a remarkably insightful letter to Wordsworth praising volume--to which Wordsworth replied [William Wordsworth's Letter to John Wilson, 1802: A Corrected Version, ed. John O. Hayden, TWC, XVIII (1987)33-38]. This sensitivity to Wordsworth's poetic philosophy was rare at time, and began a relationship, which, despite controversy, was always marked by Wilson's high regard for Wordsworth's poetry. Many years later in an essay in Blackwood's Magazine, Wilson, as his alter-ego Christopher North, describes praise he has courted from all corners of earth, for his role in extending and promoting Wordsworth's reputation from the banks of Mississippi to the Ganges. In same essay North claims that in Scotland in early 1800s, there not twenty copies [of Lyrical Ballads]--we question if there were ten (Stroll to Grasmere, Collected Works). Despite his youth, Wilson's exuberant letter marks him out as a vigorously independent thinker and clearly able to extrapolate some of key concepts in Wordsworth's Preface. He conceives of poet's readers as connected by a delightful sympathy of Souls; a union of common interest in spontaneous appreciation of poetry. This system of philosophy, is embodied in poetry that, Wilson writes, flash on our Souls a conviction of immortality. Crucially here, Wilson recognises and responds to poet's intention. In his Preface to 1802 edition of Lyrical Ballads Wordsworth makes claim for poems that their purpose is to illustrate manner in which our feelings and ideas are associated in a state of excitement ... to follow fluxes and refluxes of mind when agitated by great and affections of our nature. Wilson is excited by Wordsworth's radical views on duty of poet and he even embraces tone of his writing. letter opens effusively praising Wordsworth's simple and forcible language in rhetoric that bears all hallmarks of an imagination profoundly coloured by Lyrical Ballads and its Preface. Once he graduated and moved to Lake District, Wilson became a friend of both Wordsworths and Coleridges. At one point he was assisting Coleridge's research for Friend by running errands to library at Calgarth Park, home of Richard Watson, Bishop of Llandaff. Wordsworths were frequent visitors to Wilson's home at Elleray, which was far more comfortable than their own. It is not unlikely either that two friends, Coleridge and Wordsworth, would have discussed their young acolyte's earlier letter. After all, it was a rare critical correspondence that had elicited an equally uncharacteristic reply, especially on subject of The Idiot Boy. Wilson's lucid comments on poem in 1802 are so clearly articulated that it may well be with them in mind, some fifteen years later, that Coleridge refers to only plausible objections, which I have heard to that fine one is, that author has not, in poem itself, taken care to preclude from reader's fancy, disgusting images of ordinary, morbid idiocy, which yet it was by no means his intention to represent. He has even by 'burr. burr, burr,' uncounteracted by any preceding description of boy's beauty, assisted in recalling them. other is, that idiocy of boy is so evenly balanced by folly of mother, as to present to general reader rather a laughable burlesque on blindness of anile dotage, rather than an analytic display of maternal affection in its ordinary workings. (Biographia Literaria, xvii) Wilson is torn between his genuine admiration for poet and his uncertainty that design of poem achieves its motive. He questions validity of subject as a suitable vehicle for moral intention of poem. …