Style to idea is li\e enamel to tooth.-Victor Hugo, quoted by Edgar Allan Poe, Critical Notices, Southern Literary Messenger (1835)1[RJeally valuable ideas can only be had at price of close attention.-Charles Sanders Peirce, How to Make Our Ideas Clear (1992)2There is no indifference to material reality in Edgar Allan Poe's writing, despite an older critical tradition that took his well-known opposition to the heresy of Didactic to suggest otherwise.3 Poe's protagonists-his lovers, his criminals, his cadavers and near-cadavers-almost always suffer from a variation of nervous intensity of that leads Egaeus to fixate with ultimately disastrous consequences on teeth of his eponymous beloved in Berenice, tale at center of my analysis in this essay.4 In his cosmological essays and his tales of mesmerism, Poe's narrators and dialogists evince what Agathos, in The Power of Words, describes as a deep in dizzying connectedness of material universe.5 In his critical essays and reviews, too, Poe displays an abiding concern with ways that readers invest, sustain, and are rewarded for their in reading, material response to which he names the poetic effect. In all these instances of interest in Poe's work, foundations of disinterested aesthetic contemplation are being unsettled. But, as I will argue in this essay, Poe's critique of disinterested contemplation should be read as a conformation or adaptation of category of aesthetic rather than a rejection of it. If, as Friedrich Schlegel observed near end of eighteenth century, aesthetic turn toward das Interessante was coeval with historical emergence of novel, Poe goes a step further by celebrating, in his own analyses of psychological implications of Modernity on literary form, forceful brevity and unity or totality of effect associated with short prose tale:6 During hour of perusal, he explains in a review of Nathaniel Hawthorne's tales, the soul of reader is at writer's control.7 Readerly interest-and not disinterest, more famous prerequisite of aesthetic judgment- turns out to be key term for engaging Poe's aesthetics of literary commodity.Some Poe scholars, including Meredith McGill and Terence Whalen, have minimized significance and originality of Poe's aesthetic theories, focusing instead on ways his work responded to market instabilities, cultures of piracy and reprinting, and other contingencies of antebellum authorship, as a kind of corrective to long-running (and mostly Continental) trend of viewing Poe as an aesthete and an isolato (to borrow Herman Melville's descriptor of himself and Hawthorne).8 Without contesting any of these historicizations, however, I'd like to suggest that Poe's most enduring and innovative responses to what Jonathan Elmer calls figure of mass print culture are aesthetic ones-that is, responses that treat aesthetic as a field for experimentation with new circumstances of authorship in antebellum United States.9 This essay argues that Poe's theory of interest-which he develops through a pattern of counterpoints to Kantian disinterest-constitutes one such significant structure of response to bewildering state of aesthetic contemplation in mass culture. Poe's writing can be figured, then, at nexus of eighteenth-century aesthetic discourses that are grounded through Immanuel Kant's disinterested and subjectively universal power of judgment and an emergent nineteenth-century aesthetics of that is antifoundational and more differentiable in its effects than Kantian scheme.A surprising consequence of Poe's aesthetic adaptations, which I also examine, is that his theory of ends up resonating with some of later-nineteenth- and twentieth-century developments in American thought that have come to be grouped as Pragmatism; pragmatists' recurring attention to interest, in this sense, can be understood as continuous-both conceptually and historically-with Poe's own interested manipulations of eighteenth-century category of aesthetic. …