Kinesin and dynein walking on microtubules are the two main drivers of long-distance intracellular transport in a huge variety of systems, from neurons to melanophores. These motors, however, are oppositely directed, with (most) kinesin driving cargos towards the plus-ends of microtubules, while dynein drives cargos towards the minus-ends.1 There are only two types of dynein, cytoplasmic and axonemal, with only cytoplasmic dynein being used for organelle transport.2 In this review, when we use the term dynein, we are referring to cytoplasmic dynein. Dynein is generally associated with a large multi-subunit complex, dynactin, in vivo, which appears to be necessary for many types of transport.3 Kinesins make up a large family of motors involved in organelle transport, ranging from conventional kinesin (kinesin-1), which is a typical processive, plusended directed kinesin, to NCD, a non-processive, minus-end directed kinesin.4 In addition to dynein and kinesin, there is a third motor, myosin, which walks on actin. Oftentimes, myosin is also present on the cargo and the cargo is made to switch between microtubules and actin; the latter is often for final placement of the cargo.5 In this review we will describe experimental systems at multiple levels of complexity, including: single motor type in vitro assays, multimotor in vitro assays, purified organelle in vitro assays, and finally, in vivo cellular assays (Fig. 1). This spread of experiments allows an unprecedented view of the transport complex, as kinesin and dynein can be observed with differing components of the transport complex, i.e., different levels of accessory proteins, and in different environments. By combining measurements at all these levels of complexity, the ability to parse out the function of parts of the transport complex, and reconstitute it in vitro, becomes a real possibility. Open in a separate window Figure 1 Molecular motor interactions at different levels of complexity. A. The simplest level of complexity is a single motor with a cargo or label attached, and a microtubule track, in an in vitro environment. This has been the predominant type of experiment in the study of molecular motors. It has revealed their stepping behavior, stall force, and other characteristics. However it has little to say about motor-motor interactions. B. Complexity can be increased by adding extra motors, either multiple kinesins, dyneins or kinesin-and-dynein. This is the most basic way to study motor-motor interactions, and has been used to study the cooperativity of groups motors. Knowing the absolute number of each motor can be difficult. C. Adding in accessory proteins and parts of the transport complex, like dynactin, is the next level of complexity. How accessory proteins and signaling molecules (like cAMP or a kinase) modulate kinesin-dynein interactions can be studied in this system. D. The living cell is the most complex system in which to study motor-motor interactions. Cellular gradients, accessory proteins, Microtubule Associated Proteins (MAPs), organelles, and filament meshes are just a few of the things present that could affect transport. This complexity makes it very difficult to isolate specific causes of transport behavior, but also allows the study of motor-motor interactions in their native settings.