SESSION TITLE: Chest Infections SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Poster PRESENTED ON: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 at 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM PURPOSE: Pleural infection represents a common diagnosis encountered in clinical practice. It is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and increased hospital costs. Optimal management of patients with pleural infection varies depending on individual factors and co-morbidities but usually includes antibiotics, tube thoracostomy, intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy, and thoracoscopy (medical or video-assisted). Patients with pleural infection with non-expandable lung, who are not candidates for decortications have limited treatment options. These include open window thoracostomy (i.e. Clagett window, Eloesser flap or chronic chest tube drainage). Unfortunately, these procedures are associated with significant morbidity as they often lead to chest deformity and chronic pain. Tunneled pleural catheters (TPC) might represent a feasible, minimally invasive alternative for such patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2011 and 2016. Consecutive patients with pleural infection and a non-expandable lung initially treated with antibiotics, tube thoracostomy and intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy who were not fit for surgery, were included. RESULTS: Five catheters were inserted in five patients. All patients were discharged from the hospital within 6 days of TPC placement (range: 1-6 days, mean: 4 days). Following discharge, TPC drainage was performed daily in three patients and once every other day in the remaining two cases. Two patients received one dose of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy into the TPC due to catheter blockage. These catheters were removed after 57 and 62 days due to auto-pleurodesis and successful complete drainage, respectively. The remaining three patients had advanced malignancy and the TPC continued to drain for as long as they were followed. These cases were followed for 10, 33 and 109 days after TPC insertion. No further adverse events related to TPC were reported during these periods. CONCLUSIONS: TPCs are safe and effective when used for drainage of patients with infected pleural space and a non-expandable lung. They should be considered a treatment option to complement adequate antibiotic therapy, in non-surgical candidates. This technique may favor prompt hospital discharge and ambulatory management, particularly benefiting patients with limited life expectancy. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: TPCs provide an alternative option to drain patients with infected pleural space and non-expandable lung, who are not fit for surgery. DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Andres De Lima, Fayez Kheir, Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy, Mihir Parikh, Alex Chee, Adnan Majid No Product/Research Disclosure Information