Pleural Mesothelioma Research Articles

1916P Methylation subtypes correlate with tumor immune contextures and outcome to ICI therapy of pleural mesothelioma (PM) patients: The NIBIT EPI-MESO study

1916P Methylation subtypes correlate with tumor immune contextures and outcome to ICI therapy of pleural mesothelioma (PM) patients: The NIBIT EPI-MESO study

1915P Phase I trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab after radiation therapy for lung-intact malignant pleural mesothelioma

1915P Phase I trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab after radiation therapy for lung-intact malignant pleural mesothelioma

1920P Multiomics analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma and the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors

1920P Multiomics analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma and the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors

1914P Nintedanib(N) as switch maintenance treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (NEMO): A double-blind randomized phase II trial (EORTC-08112-LCG)

1914P Nintedanib(N) as switch maintenance treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (NEMO): A double-blind randomized phase II trial (EORTC-08112-LCG)

Targeting DNA Damage Response Deficiency in Thoracic Cancers.

Thoracic cancers comprise non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) and malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPM). Collectively, they account for the highest rate of death from malignancy worldwide. Genomic instability is a universal feature of cancer, which fuels mutations and tumour evolution. Deficiencies in DNA damage response (DDR) genes amplify genomic instability. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), resulting from BRCA1/BRCA2 inactivation, is exploited for therapeutic synthetic lethality with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancers, as well as in prostate and pancreatic cancers. However, DDR deficiency and its therapeutic implications are less well established in thoracic cancers. Emerging evidence suggests that a subset of thoracic cancers may harbour DDR deficiency and may, thus, be effectively targeted with DDR agents. Here, we review the current evidence surrounding DDR in thoracic cancers and discuss the challenges and promise for achieving clinical benefit with such therapeutics.

ASO Author Reflections: Postoperative Peritoneal Dissemination Recurrence of Pleural Mesothelioma has a Poor Prognosis.

ASO Author Reflections: Postoperative Peritoneal Dissemination Recurrence of Pleural Mesothelioma has a Poor Prognosis.

Diagnosis of Pleural Mesothelioma: Is Everything Solved at the Present Time?

Ranked high in worldwide growing health issues, pleural diseases affect approximately one million people globally per year and are often correlated with a poor prognosis. Among these pleural diseases, malignant pleural mesothelioma (PM), a neoplastic disease mainly due to asbestos exposure, still remains a diagnostic challenge. Timely diagnosis is imperative to define the most suitable therapeutic approach for the patient, but the choice of diagnostic modalities depends on operator experience and local facilities while bearing in mind the yield of each diagnostic procedure. Since the analysis of pleural fluid cytology is not sufficient in differentiating historical features in PM, histopathological and morphological features obtained via tissue biopsies are fundamental. The quality of biopsy samples is crucial and often requires highly qualified expertise. Since adequate tissue biopsy is essential, medical or video-assisted thoracoscopy (MT or VATS) is proposed as the most suitable approach, with the former being a physician-led procedure. Indeed, MT is the diagnostic gold standard for malignant pleural pathologies. Moreover, this medical or surgical approach can allow diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: it provides the possibility of video-assisted biopsies, the drainage of high volumes of pleural fluid and the administration of sterile calibrated talcum powder under visual control in order to achieve pleurodesis, placement of indwelling pleural catheters if required and in a near future potential intrapleural therapy. In this context, dedicated diagnostic pathways remain a crucial need, especially to quickly and properly diagnose PM. Lastly, the interdisciplinary approach and multidisciplinary collaboration should always be implemented in order to direct the patient to the best customised diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. At the present time, the diagnosis of PM remains an unsolved problem despite MDT (multidisciplinary team) meetings, mainly because of the lack of standardised diagnostic work-up. This review aims to provide an overview of diagnostic procedures in order to propose a clear strategy.

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for the M Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma

IntroductionThe International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed a global multicenter database to propose evidence-based revisions for the ninth edition of the TNM classification of pleural mesothelioma (PM). This study analyzes the M category to validate eighth edition M category recommendations. MethodsCases were submitted electronically or by transfer of existing institutional databases for patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed PM. The presence and number of metastases (single versus multiple) in each of eight organ systems were reported for patients with M1 disease at diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in OS were assessed by log-rank test. ResultsOf 7338 submitted cases, 3598 were eligible and 3221 had sufficient data for clinical staging; 228 cases (7%) were M1. Median overall estimated survival was inferior for M1 compared with M0 patients: 10.5 months versus 21.5 months, respectively (p < 0.0001); estimated 1-year survival was 46% versus 71%, respectively. OS differences between M categories were preserved within histologic subgroups. Among 158 patients with organ-specific documentation of M1 disease, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between those with intrathoracic versus more distant metastatic disease (14.4 mo versus 10.9 mo, p = 0.64). No significant survival difference was detected between patients with metastatic disease in a single-organ system versus multiple-organ systems (12.6 mo versus 8.8 mo, p = 0.45). ConclusionsThis evidence-based analysis of the M category for PM conforms with the eighth edition M descriptors. No changes are proposed in the ninth edition of the mesothelioma M category.

New Treatment for Pleural Mesothelioma

New Treatment for Pleural Mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: A scourge of a disease – An audit of a single South African tertiary center

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: A scourge of a disease – An audit of a single South African tertiary center

Are there features that can predict the unresectability of pleural mesothelioma?

The current clinical staging of pleural mesothelioma (PM) is often discordant with the pathologic staging. This study aimed to identify clinical and radiological features that could help predict unresectability in PM. Twenty-two descriptive radiologic features were retrospectively evaluated on preoperative computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) performed in patients with presumably resectable PM who underwent surgery. Measurements of maximum and sum pleural thickness at three levels of the thorax (upper, middle, and lower) were taken and stratified based on the cutpoints provided by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Clinical and radiological features, including clinical-stage, were compared between resectable and unresectable tumors by univariate analysis and logistic regression modeling. Of 133 patients, 69/133 (52%) had resectable and 64/133 (48%) had unresectable PM. Asbestos exposure (p = 0.005), neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.001), clinical T-stage (p < 0.0001), all pleural thickness measurements (p < 0.05), pleural thickness pattern (p < 0.0001) and degree (p = 0.033), lung invasion (p = 0.004), extrapleural space obliteration (p < 0.0001), extension to subphrenic space (p = 0.0004), and two combination variables representing extensive diaphragmatic contact and/or chest wall involvement (p = 0.002) and mediastinal invasion (p < 0.0001) were significant predictors at univariate analysis. At multivariable analysis, all models achieved a strong diagnostic performance (area under the curve (AUC) > 0.8). The two best-performing models were one that included the upper-level maximum pleural thickness, extrapleural space obliteration, and mediastinal infiltration (AUC = 0.876), and another that integrated clinical variables and radiological assessment through the clinical T-stage (AUC = 0.879). Selected clinical and radiologic features, including pleural thickness measurements, appear to be strong predictors of unresectability in PM. A more accurate prediction of unresectability in the preoperative assessment of patients with pleural mesothelioma may avoid unnecessary surgery and prompt initiation of nonsurgical treatments. About half of pleural mesothelioma patients are reported to receive an incorrect disease stagepreoperatively. Eleven features identified as predictors of unresectability were included in strongly performing predictive models. More accurate preoperative staging will help clinicians and patients choose the most appropriate treatments.

Randomized trial of anetumab ravtansine and pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab for mesothelioma

PurposeThe mesothelin-targeting antibody-drug conjugate anetumab ravtansine was evaluated in combination with the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab based on the common expression of mesothelin and reports of activity in mesothelioma. Patients and methodsA phase 1 safety run-in of the combination of anetumab ravtansine (6.5 mg/kg iv q3weeks) and pembrolizumab (200 mg, IV q3weeks) was conducted, followed by a phase 2 randomization to the combination or pembrolizumab alone at medical centers across the United States and Canada in the National Cancer Institute’s Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network. Patients with pleural mesothelioma that expressed mesothelin and had previously received platinum-based therapy were eligible. ResultsIn phase 1 (n = 12) only one dose limiting toxicity was observed and the rules for dose reduction were not met. In phase 2, there was no difference in the confirmed response rates between the combination group (n = 18, 2 partial responses [PR], 11 %) and the pembrolizumab group (n = 17, 1 PR, 6 %; z = -0.5523, p = 0.29116). The median PFS was 12.2 months (95 % CI 5.1–not evaluable [NE]) for the combination, and 3.9 months for pembrolizumab (95 % CI 2.1-NE)(HR=0.55, p = 0.20). Patients with high baseline levels of soluble mesothelin who received anetumab ravtansine had a median PFS of 5 months. ConclusionsThe numeric difference in PFS between treatment groups was not statistically significant, likely related to a smaller than planned sample size. High levels of soluble mesothelin should potentially be considered to select against the use of mesothelin-targeting therapies in development that are neutralized by soluble mesothelin.

Outcome prediction based on [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with pleural mesothelioma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab +/- UV1 telomerase vaccine.

The introduction of immunotherapy in pleural mesothelioma (PM) has highlighted the need for effective outcome predictors. This study explores the role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in predicting outcomes in PM treated with immunotherapy. Patients from the NIPU trial, receiving ipilimumab and nivolumab +/- telomerase vaccine in second-line, were included. [18F]FDG PET/CT was obtained at baseline (n = 100) and at week-5 (n = 76). Metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and peak standardised uptake value (SUVpeak) were evaluated in relation to survival outcomes. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess differences in MTV, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and SUVpeak between patients exhibiting an objective response, defined as either partial response or complete response according to the modified Response Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and immune RECIST (iRECIST), and non-responders, defined as either stable disease or progressive disease as their best overall response. Univariate Cox regression revealed significant associations of MTV with OS (HR 1.36, CI: 1.14, 1.62, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 1.18, CI: 1.03, 1.34, p = 0.02), while multivariate analysis showed a significant association with OS only (HR 1.35, CI: 1.09, 1.68, p = 0.007). While SUVpeak was not significantly associated with OS or PFS in univariate analyses, it was significantly associated with OS in multivariate analysis (HR 0.43, CI: 0.23, 0.80, p = 0.008). Objective responders had significant reductions in TLG, SUVmax and SUVpeak at week-5. MTV provides prognostic value in PM treated with immunotherapy. High SUVpeak was not associated with inferior outcomes, which could be attributed to the distinct mechanisms of immunotherapy. Early reductions in PET metrics correlated with treatment response. The NIPU trial (NCT04300244) is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. https://classic. gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?cond=Pleural+Mesothelioma&cntry=NO&draw=2&rank=4.

Peritoneal Dissemination in Patients with Recurrence After Post-pleurectomy/decortication for Pleural Mesothelioma.

In clinical practice, peritoneal dissemination after curative-intent surgery for pleural mesothelioma occasionally recurs. This study investigated the risk factors and prognosis associated with post-pleurectomy/decortication peritoneal dissemination in pleural mesothelioma, which are rarely reported. This retrospective review included 160 patients who experienced recurrence after pleurectomy/decortication for pleural mesothelioma between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients with recurrence were classified according to the initial recurrence pattern. The P group experienced recurrence with peritoneal dissemination, and the non-P group experienced recurrence without peritoneal dissemination. The analysis determined the risk factors for peritoneal dissemination using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Of the 160 patients, 20 (12.5%) exhibited peritoneal dissemination and were assigned to the P group, whereas 140 (87.5%) had recurrence without peritoneal dissemination and were assigned to the non-P group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that diaphragm reconstruction (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-8.0; p = 0.048) and female sex (OR, 3.7; 95% CI 1.26-10.8; p = 0.017) were associated with the P group. Post-recurrence survival was worse in the P group than in the non-P group (1-year post-recurrence survival: 22.2% vs. 65.3%; median: 6.7 months vs. 19.4 months; p = 0.0013). Peritoneal dissemination occurred in approximately one of every eight patients with recurrence after pleurectomy/decortication for pleural mesothelioma, and the incidence was significantly higher among females and patients undergoing diaphragm reconstruction. Moreover, postoperative recurrence of peritoneal dissemination was associated with a poor prognosis.

Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in Denmark between 2011 and 2018: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare thoracic malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Immunotherapy shows potential for improved outcomes; however, real-world evidence on its use will take time to accumulate. This study examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and predictors of mortality among patients diagnosed with MPM in Denmark prior to the introduction of newer treatments. This historical cohort study based on routinely collected Danish National Registry data included adults newly diagnosed with MPM between 01 January 2011 and 31 May 2018. Summary statistics were used to describe patient characteristics and initial treatment. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods; Cox regression was used to compare patient mortality against the (age/sex-matched) general population and to investigate mortality predictors. Overall, 880 patients were included; 44% had advanced MPM, 37% had non-advanced MPM, and 19% had unknown MPM stage. Median age at diagnosis was 71.9 years, and 82% of the patients were male. Within 180 days of diagnosis, no treatment was recorded for 215 patients (54%) with advanced MPM and 150 (46%) with non-advanced MPM. Median time-to-initial treatment (interquartile range) was 47 days (31-111) overall, 40 days (28-77) in patients with advanced MPM, and 53 days (35-121) with non-advanced MPM. Median OS was 13.7 months overall (non-advanced MPM: 18.0 months vs. advanced MPM: 10.0 months). Predictors of higher mortality were older age at diagnosis, histology, and advanced MPM stage. These findings provide a baseline upon which to evaluate MPM epidemiology as newer treatments are adopted in routine practice.

Chemotherapy increases CDA expression and sensitizes malignant pleural mesothelioma cells to capecitabine treatment

The combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed remains the gold standard chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), although resistance and poor response pose a significant challenge. Cytidine deaminase (CDA) is a key enzyme in the nucleotide salvage pathway and is involved in the adaptive stress response to chemotherapy. The cytidine analog capecitabine and its metabolite 5′-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5’-DFCR) are converted via CDA to 5-fluorouracil, which affects DNA and RNA metabolism. This study investigated a schedule-dependent treatment strategy, proposing that initial chemotherapy induces CDA expression, sensitizing cells to subsequent capecitabine treatment. Basal CDA protein expression was low in different mesothelioma cell lines but increased in the corresponding xenografts. Standard chemotherapy increased CDA protein levels in MPM cells in vitro and in vivo in a schedule-dependent manner. This was associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and with HIF-1alpha expression at the transcriptional level. In addition, pretreatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed in combination sensitized MPM xenografts to capecitabine. Analysis of a tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of samples from 98 human MPM patients revealed that most human MPM samples had negative CDA expression. While survival curves based on CDA expression in matched samples clearly separated, significance was not reached due to the limited sample size. In non-matched samples, CDA expression before but not after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with worse overall survival. In conclusion, chemotherapy increases CDA expression in xenografts, which is consistent with our in vitro results in MPM and lung cancer. A subset of matched patient samples showed increased CDA expression after therapy, suggesting that a schedule-dependent treatment strategy based on chemotherapy and capecitabine may benefit a selected MPM patient population.

Spatial landscape of malignant pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma tumor immune microenvironment.

Immunotherapies have demonstrated limited clinical efficacy in malignant mesothelioma treatment. We conducted multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) analyses on tissue microarrays (n=3) from malignant peritoneal (MPeM, n=25) and pleural (MPM, n=88) mesothelioma patients. Our study aimed to elucidate spatial distributions of key immune cell populations and their association with LAG3, BAP1, NF2, and MTAP, with MTAP serving as a CDKN2A/B surrogate marker. Additionally, we examined the relationship between the spatial distribution of major immune cell types with MM patient prognosis and clinical characteristics. We observed a higher degree of interaction between immune cells and tumor cells in MPM compared to MPeM. Notably, within MPM tumors, we detected a significantly increased interaction between tumor cells and CD8+ T cells in tumors with low BAP1 expression compared to those with high BAP1 expression. To support the broader research community, we have developed The Human Spatial Atlas of Malignant Mesothelioma (https://mesotheliomaspatialatlas.streamlit.app/), containing mIF and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images.

Comparison of First-Line Chemotherapeutics and Validation of the EORTC Prognostic Index in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Retrospective Single-Centre Experience.

To evaluate the efficiency of pemetrexed cisplatin in comparison with gemcitabine cisplatin and to validate the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) prognostic score in combination chemotherapy treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma. An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study:Department of Oncology, Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkiye, from October 2000 to November 2017. Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients with EORTC score 0- were recruited. Factors affecting the prognosis of the disease and the effectiveness of first-line treatment were retrospectively analysed. EORTC prognostic score was calculated with a cut-off and survival analyses were used by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and univariable Cox regression tests were used to search for prognostic factors' impact on survival. Patients who received gemcitabine cisplatin treatment had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9 months, while those who received pemetrexed cisplatin therapy had a median PFS of 7 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months in the gemcitabine cisplatin group and 18 months in the pemetrexed cisplatin group (p = 0.051). When the low-risk group was compared with the high-risk group, the median OS was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.009). The EORTC prognostic score, which is used for prognostic prediction in the period when pemetrexed is not utilised in the treatment of MPM, accurately predicts prognosis subsequent to the administration of pemetrexed in treatment. In the context of first-line treatment, cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with pemetrexed demonstrated comparable efficacy with respect to both overall survival and progression-free survival. Chemotherapy, Mesothelioma, Prognosis, Gemcitabine, Progression-free survival.

Rehabilitation for Functioning and Quality of Life in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Scoping Review.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents a significant clinical challenge due to limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Beyond mere survivorship, setting up an effective framework to improve functioning and quality of life is an urgent need in the comprehensive management of MPM patients. Therefore, this study aims to review the current understanding of MPM sequelae and the effectiveness of rehabilitative interventions in the holistic approach to MPM. A narrative review was conducted to summarize MPM sequelae and their impact on functioning, disability, and quality of life, focusing on rehabilitation interventions in MPM management and highlighting gaps in knowledge and areas for further investigation. Our findings showed that MPM patients experience debilitating symptoms, including fatigue, dyspnea, pain, and reduced exercise tolerance, decreasing quality of life. Supportive and rehabilitative interventions, including pulmonary rehabilitation, physical exercise improvement, psychological support, pain management, and nutritional supplementation, seem promising approaches in relieving symptoms and improving quality of life but require further research. These programs emphasize the pivotal synergy among patient-tailored plans, multidisciplinary team involvement, and disease-specific focus. Despite advancements in therapeutic management, MPM remains a challenging disease with limited effective interventions that should be adapted to disease progressions. Rehabilitative strategies are essential to mitigate symptoms and improve the quality of life in MPM patients. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for rehabilitative interventions tailored to the unique needs of MPM patients.

Combined detection of SHOX2 and PTGER4 methylation with serum marker CYFRA21-1 for improved diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma

AimsTo investigate the performance of a combined biomarker approach using the methylation status of the short stature homeobox 2 (SHOX2) and prostaglandin E2 receptor EP4 (PTGER4) genes, along with the...