Summary. The organisms responsible for Blackleg in sugar beet seedlings have been referred to and the damage that they do considered. It has been shown that treatments used to disinfect the “seed” may be harmful, they may exert no influence, or they may be of considerable value. The present trials have shown the beneficent effects of an organic compound containing mercury. This material increased the “plant” in the majority of cases, and this increase varied between 12 per cent, under some conditions and in increasing amounts up to 193 per cent, under more favourable conditions. An increase in the vigour of young plants was noted occasionally. Quantitative tests showed an increase in both the green and dry weight per seedling as the result of treatment. The beneficial action of treatment is not due to the influence of water. The organic compound containing mercury was the most effective in reducing diseased growths during laboratory tests; the proprietary dust was nearly as efficient. Steeping in a f per cent, solution of carbolic for half‐an‐hour was ineffective. Treatment of the clusters with 60 per cent, sulphuric acid did not appreciably improve “plant” establishment, but this treatment followed by the mercury treatment increased the number of plants considerably. Field trials conducted for one season on a field scale have not shown an increase in the percentage of sugar as a result of the treatment of “seed,” but a slight increase in yield and in the total number of roots per acre was noted as the result of treatment with the organic compound containing mercury. The proprietary dust was not noted as being responsible for reducing the “plant” in the field. Its beneficent action was not as uniformly apparent as that of the mercury material. Carbolic acid at a strength of per cent, was definitely injurious when used for steeping purposes. Furthermore, trials show no benefit from a modified form of this treatment in which a 3| per cent, solution is sprinkled on the “seed.” Other materials tested were found to be of doubtful value. Certain samples of commercial “seed” as supplied treated with a mercury material were found to be infected to a considerable extent by Phoma Betae. Such “seed” it was found could be efficiently re‐disinfected by careful re‐treatment with marked beneficial results. In conclusion it is desired to thank those who gave assistance. Among these are Mr Alfred Eastham, Director of the Official Seed Testing Station, Cambridge, Dr Van Poeteren, Wageningen, Mr G. R. Clarke, Advisory Chemist, and Dr N. Cunliffe, Advisory Entomologist both of Oxford, Mr W. A. Stewart and Mr W. R. Seward, Dr Pethybridge and the officials of many beet sugar factories who lent a helping hand.