Platinum-sensitive Ovarian Cancer Research Articles

UP-NEXT (GOG-3049/ENGOT-Ov71-NSGO-CTU): A study of Upitifamab Rilsodotin (UpRi), a NaPi2b-directed antibody drug conjugate in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (1248)

UP-NEXT (GOG-3049/ENGOT-Ov71-NSGO-CTU): A study of Upitifamab Rilsodotin (UpRi), a NaPi2b-directed antibody drug conjugate in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (1248)

First-line maintenance therapy with niraparib in advanced platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: two 'long responder' case reports and review of the current literature.

The standard of care for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer is surgical cytoreduction plus platinum-based chemotherapy; however, recurrent disease frequently occurs after treatment. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as first-line maintenance therapy have been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of disease progression or death in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have a complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Niraparib is the only PARP inhibitor that offers a significant progression-free survival benefit compared with placebo in this patient population regardless of the homologous recombination status. However, predictive factors for treatment responses and approaches to dose optimization remain to be investigated. In this study, two Chinese patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer exhibited long-term responses to niraparib treatment, and hematological toxicity was successfully managed by dose adjustment. The literature on clinical trials and real-world experience on the efficacy, tolerability, and dose individualization of niraparib treatment in Western and Chinese patients was also reviewed. Future research is warranted to identify the characteristics of 'long responders' to niraparib treatment.

Analysis of three prediction models for complete gross resection in secondary cytoreductive surgery for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (063)

Analysis of three prediction models for complete gross resection in secondary cytoreductive surgery for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (063)

AUF1-induced circular RNA hsa_circ_0010467 promotes platinum resistance of ovarian cancer through miR-637/LIF/STAT3 axis.

Increasing evidences has indicated that primary and acquired resistance of ovarian cancer (OC) to platinum is mediated by multiple molecular and cellular factors. Understanding these mechanisms could promote the therapeutic efficiency for patients with OC. Here, we screened the expression pattern of circRNAs in samples derived from platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive OC patients using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). The expression of hsa_circ_0010467 was validated by Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays. Overexpression and knockdown experiments were performed to explore the function of hsa_circ_0010467. The effects of hsa_circ_0010467 on enhancing platinum treatment were validated in OC cells, mouse model and patient-derived organoid (PDO). RNA pull-down, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), and dual-luciferase reporter assays were performed to investigate the interaction between hsa_circ_0010467 and proteins. Increased expression of hsa_circ_0010467 is observed in platinum-resistant OC cells, tissues and serum exosomes, which is positively correlated with advanced tumor stage and poor prognosis of OC patients. Hsa_circ_0010467 is found to maintain the platinum resistance via inducing tumor cell stemness, and silencing hsa_circ_0010467 substantially increases the efficacy of platinum treatment on inhibiting OC cell proliferation. Further investigation reveals that hsa_circ_0010467 acts as a miR-637 sponge to mediate the repressive effect of miR-637 on leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and activates the LIF/STAT3 signaling pathway. We further discover that AUF1 could promote the biogenesis of hsa_circ_0010467 in OC. Our study uncovers the mechanism that hsa_circ_0010467 mediates the platinum resistance of OC through AUF1/hsa_circ_0010467/miR-637/LIF/STAT3 axis, and provides potential targets for the treatment of platinum-resistant OC patients.

Cost-effectiveness of maintenance niraparib with an individualized starting dosage in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer in China.

Objective: Niraparib improved survival in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) patients versus routine surveillance, accompanied by increased costs. Based on the NORA trial, we evaluated for the first time the cost-effectiveness of maintenance niraparib with individualized starting dosage (ISD) in China. Methods: A Markov model was developed to simulate the costs and health outcomes of each strategy. The total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to estimate model robustness. Scenario analyses were also conducted. Results: Compared to routine surveillance, niraparib additionally increased QALYs by 0.59 and 0.30 in populations with and without germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutations, with incremental costs of $10,860.79 and $12,098.54, respectively. The ICERs of niraparib over routine surveillance were $18,653.67/QALY and $39,212.99/QALY. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $37,488/QALY, the ISD enhanced the likelihood of cost-effectiveness from 9.35% to 30.73% in the gBRCA-mutated group and from 0.77% to 11.74% in the non-gBRCA mutated population. The probability of niraparib being cost-effective in the region with the highest per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in China was 74.23% and 76.10% in the gBRCA-mutated and non-gBRCA mutated population, respectively. Niraparib was 100% cost-effective for National Basic Medical Insurance beneficiaries under the above WTP thresholds. Conclusion: Compared to routine surveillance, the ISD of niraparib for maintenance treatment of PSROC is cost-effective in the gBRCA-mutated population and more effective but costly in the non-gBRCA mutated patients. The optimized niraparib price, economic status, and health insurance coverage may benefit the economic outcome.

Comparison of the effectiveness of liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer receiving third-line chemotherapy.

In this retrospective study, we compared the effectiveness and reliability of the third-line chemotherapies gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin, in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC). The retrospective study included platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer patients who had previously received paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy. Between 2013-2021, cross-matched 45 patients who received gemcitabine and 48 who received liposomal doxorubicin as third-line therapy were compared based on clinicopathological characteristics, biomarkers, and blood cancer antigen (CA) 125 levels. Time to treatment failure, survival, and quality of life were additional objectives. The study included a total of 93 patients. The reported mean survival durations for treatments, 19.45 months for gemcitabine and 17 months for liposomal doxorubicin, did not statistically significantly differ (p=0.398). The mean CA 125 levels for the liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine groups after treatment were 54.4±11.4 U/ml and 54.7±11.1 U/ml, respectively. There was no noticeable difference between the treatments when comparing the postop CA 125 value (p=0.37). For both pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine as single agents in the third line, our data revealed comparable effectiveness results, and there was no substantial difference in progression-free survival (PFS) for recurrent ovarian cancer. These therapies were tolerated with an expected incidence of hematological toxicities.

Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose. Paclitaxel and carboplatin are novel anticancer drugs that have emerged in recent years, while there is still a lack of clinical consensus on these two drugs. The study conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to analyze the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel and carboplatin for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Methods. A systematic search was carried out in three databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed from the inception of each database to March 2021, and defined the progression-free survival and overall survival as the primary outcomes. Data analysis was performed using STATA 15.1. Results. Altogether, five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis, involving 2,740 patients, including 1317 in the CD (carboplatin doxorubicin) group and 1423 in the CP (carboplatin plus paclitaxel) group. It was found that pooled OS demonstrated no significant differences between the CD group and CP group (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.89–1.18, P = 0.340), and the differences were not statistically significant in progression-free survival (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71–0.99, P = 0.140), thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09−0.58, P = 0.775), and grade II alopecia between the two groups (OR = 9.41, 95% CI = 6.57–13.47, P = 0.215). Conclusion. Current evidence suggests that paclitaxel and carboplatin do not produce more satisfactory results with respect to overall survival and reduction of side effects in treating platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, and further studies are needed.

PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Review.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have transformed the ovarian cancer (OC) treatment landscape. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of data for the PARPis olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib in patients with OC and discusses their role in disease management, with a focus on the use of PARPis as maintenance therapy in the United States (US). Olaparib was the first PARPi to be approved as first-line maintenance monotherapy in the US, with maintenance niraparib subsequently approved in the first-line setting. Data also support the efficacy of rucaparib as first-line maintenance monotherapy. PARPi maintenance combination therapy (olaparib plus bevacizumab) also provides benefit in patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC whose tumors tested positive for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Biomarker testing is critical in the newly diagnosed setting to identify patients most likely to benefit from PARPi maintenance therapy and guide treatment decisions. Clinical trial data support the use of PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib) as second-line or later maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed OC. Although distinct differences in tolerability profile were observed between PARPis, they were generally well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events managed by dose modification. PARPis had no detrimental effect on patients' health-related quality of life. Real-world data support the use of PARPis in OC, although some differences between PARPis are apparent. Data from trials investigating novel combination strategies, such as PARPis plus immune checkpoint inhibitors, are awaited with interest; the optimal sequencing of novel therapies in OC remains to be established.

UP-NEXT (GOG-3049/ENGOT-Ov71-NSGO-CTU): A study of upitifamab rilsodotin (UpRi), a NaPi2b-directed antibody drug conjugate (ADC), in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

TPS5614 Background: UpRi is a first-in-class NaPi2b-targeting ADC with a novel scaffold-linker-payload that enables high drug-to-antibody ratio and controlled bystander effect. NaPi2b is a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter protein broadly expressed in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) with limited expression in healthy tissues. It is estimated that the majority of HGSOCs have high NaPi2b expression. Studies are being conducted to evaluate UpRi safety and efficacy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), but there remains an unmet need in the maintenance setting for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC), particularly for patients who have received prior maintenance therapy, are at high-risk of early relapse, and where close monitoring after platinum-based therapy would generally be considered preferable. Methods: UP-NEXT is a Phase 3 study evaluating UpRi monotherapy as post-platinum maintenance treatment in recurrent PSOC, enrolling patients with NaPi2b-positive tumors (defined as TPS ≥75). Patients must have received 2-4 prior lines of platinum containing chemotherapy, achieved a partial or complete response in their penultimate platinum regimen, and progressed >6 months after completion of the last dose of platinum in the penultimate regimen. Patients may be enrolled if their best response to the last line of treatment is no evidence of disease, complete or partial response, or stable disease. Prior PARPi treatment is required for patients with a BRCA mutation. Patients who received bevacizumab in combination with their most recent platinum containing regimen are excluded. Patients are randomized 2:1 to UpRi 30mg/m2 or placebo, given IV Q4W. The primary endpoint is PFS assessed by BICR, with key secondary endpoint of OS. UP-NEXT is conducted in collaboration with GOG(3049) and ENGOT(Ov71-NSGO-CTU). Approximately 350 patients will be enrolled globally. NCT05329545. Clinical trial information: NCT05329545 .

Triplet maintenance (olaparib, pembrolizumab, and bevacizumab) in BRCA non-mutated patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: A multi-center, single-arm phase II study (OPEB-01).

5584 Background: The optimal treatment of BRCA 1/2 non-mutated patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer remains unknown. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of triplet maintenance therapy in BRCA non-mutated patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods: BRCA 1/2 non-mutated patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, showing a complete/partial response after second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, were eligible. Triplet maintenance therapy (olaparib, bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab) was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at six months after therapy initiation. The secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival, and safety. The translational objectives included biomarker evaluation with respect to survival outcomes. Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled (median age 61 years), majority with high-grade serous carcinoma (93.2%) and partial response (75.0%) to second-line chemotherapy. Overall, 54.6% were homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive (genomic instability score ≥ 42) and 63.6% had PD-L1 positive tumors (combined positive score [CPS] ≥ 1). At 6 months, the PFS rate was 88.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75.4–96.2). The median PFS has not been reached. The most common ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were anemia (20.5%) and neutropenia (6.8%), but there were no grade 4 AEs. Exploratory analysis demonstrated remarkable survival outcomes regardless of HRD status, whereas patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 showed improved PFS compared to those with PD-L1 CPS < 1 ( P = 0·032). Analysis of molecular consensus subtype of the pre-treatment tissue samples showed that patients with mesenchymal subtype demonstrated poor PFS, compared to non-mesenchymal subtypes (p = 0.0023). Conclusions: This is the first report on triplet maintenance therapy in BRCA non-mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The results show that the triplet maintenance therapy is efficacious with manageable toxicity, showing a particular promise for patients with molecular consensus subtype other than mesenchymal. Clinical trial information: NCT04361370 .

TEDOVA/GINECO-OV244b/ENGOT-ov58 trial: Neo-epitope based vaccine OSE2101 alone or in combination with pembrolizumab vs best supportive care (BSC) as maintenance in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with disease control after platinum.

TPS5618 Background: Besides PARP inhibitors and bevacizumab, there are no approved maintenance therapies after platinum based chemotherapy for patients with a platinum sensitive relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as single agents have limited activity in OC. One attractive strategy is to turn OC from immunogenic “cold” to “hot” tumors via vaccination with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). OSE2101 is a multiple-neoepitope vaccine restricted to HLA-A*02-positive patients (45% of OC patients) targeting 5 TAAs: TP53, MAGE2, MAGE3, CEA and HER2. These neo-epitopes are modified to increase both major histocompatibility complex and the T cell receptor binding affinity. The proof of concept for this approach was recently demonstrated with OSE2101 improving overall survival in a phase III trial in lung cancer progressing after ICI (Besse et al. 20211). The combination of OSE2101 with an ICI may most effectively harness anti-tumor immunity. Methods: TEDOVA is an international randomized open-label, phase II trial evaluating the benefit of maintenance by OSE2101 alone or in combination with PD1 inhibition (pembrolizumab) after platinum based chemotherapy in relapsed OC, previously treated with bevacizumab (if eligible) and a PARP inhibitor (if eligible). Patients (N=180) with CR/PR/SD at the end of chemotherapy are randomized (1:1:2) to: Observation/BSC (Arm A), OSE2101 alone (Arm B), or OSE2101 in combination with pembrolizumab (Arm C). Experimental treatments are continued until progression, or intolerance, for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, safety, time to subsequent first or second treatment (TTST-1, TTST-2) and overall survival. 180 HLA-A*02 positive patients will be randomized. HLA-A*02 negative patients will be followed in a separate observational cohort. The sample size is calculated to provide 90% power to detect an improvement in PFS for Arm C vs Arm A with a HR of 0.57. Three one-sided Log-rank tests will be considered in a pre-defined sequence: H1: C (OSE2101+pembrolizumab) vs A (BSC); H2: C (OSE2101+pembrolizumab) vs B (OSE2101) and H3: B vs A. The type I error will be α=5%. The type II error will be β=10%. Tests will be one-sided. Status: The TEDOVA/GINECO-OV244b/ENGOT-ov58 trial is currently recruiting. Clinical trial information NCT04713514. 1. Besse B, Garcia MR, Cobo MA, Quoix E, Madroszyk A, Felip E, et al. LBA47 - Activity of OSE-2101 in HLA-A2+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after failure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO): Final results of phase III Atalante-1 randomised trial. Annals of Oncology 2021;32(suppl_5) : S1283-S1346. Clinical trial information: NCT04713514 .

Effects of the baseline prognostic factors on efficacy of the p62/SQSTM1-encoding plasmid combined with gemcitabine in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

e17540 Background: We recently reported on the efficacy of the p62/SQTM1-encoding plasmid in patients with advanced, recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) receiving gemcitabine chemotherapy. Here we analyze the effects of baseline prognostic factors on efficacy. Methods: A prospective multicenter randomized study took place between 01/2020 and 08/2023. Cohort A (n=20) consisted of Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1,8 every 3 weeks and Cohort B (n=20) consisted of Gemcitabine (Gem) 1000 mg/m2 days 1,8 every 3 weeks plus p62-plasmid 2.5 mg i.m. weekly. We stratified the patients into subgroups according to their baseline CA-125 level (normal vs high), number of lines of chemo (1 vs 2-3) received by a platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) patient before they became PROC, platinum-free interval (PFI) (up to 3 mo vs more than 3 mo), and presence or absence of peritoneal effusion. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was utilized to determine effect of progression free survival (PFS). Results: The median follow-up was 13.8 months (mos). The median PFS was 2.8 mos in Gem (Arm A) and 7.2 mos in Gem + Plasmid (Arm B) respectively (p = 0.03). The overall response rate (ORR) by RESIST 1.1 was higher in the Gem +Plasmid arm: partial response (PR) - 5.0% and 20.0%, stable disease (SD) - 40.0% and 60.0%, and disease control rate 41.2 and 80% in Chemo and Plasmid arms respectively). In cohort A, all patients have progressed, whereas in Cohort B (Gem +Plasmid) 9 patients (45%) remained progression-free with the longest duration of response being 30 mo. Overall survival cannot be assessed yet. Analyzing prognostic factors with Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis identified that the following factors increase p62 sensitivity: initial high CA-125 level PFS 2.5 and 6.5 (p = 0.01) in Arm A vs B, 1 line chemo vs 2 or 3 lines for PSOC, PFS 2.3 and 7.1 (p = 0.008) in Arm A vs B, and presence of peritoneal effusion PFS 2.4 and 7.6 (p = 0.008) in Arm A vs B (Table ). Conclusions: We observed maximal effect on PFS when combining the p62-encoding plasmid with Gem in the patients with the most dismal prognosis PROC: rapid progression (relapse as PROC after the first line of treatment and/or short PFI), in patients with an initial high level of CA-125, and/or pleural effusion. [Table: see text]

GLORIOSA: A randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of mirvetuximab soravtansine with bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab as maintenance in platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

TPS5622 Background: Elevated folate receptor-alpha (FRα) expression is a characteristic of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), thereby providing a rational target for antibody drug conjugate (ADC) development in ovarian cancer. Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an ADC comprising a FRα-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a potent tubulin-targeting agent that has received accelerated approval for patients with FRα positive platinum resistant ovarian cancer. MIRV in combination with BEV has demonstrated clinically meaningful activity, along with acceptable tolerability, in patients with FRα expressing ovarian cancer.1 Methods: GLORIOSA is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy of in combination with bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone as maintenance for patients with FRα-positive recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancers who have not progressed after second line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (which may be given on protocol for patients with high FRα tumor expression). Confirmation of high FRα positivity by immunohistochemistry using the Ventana FOLR1 CDx Assay (high expression; ≥ 75% of viable tumor cells staining at 2+ intensity) and 1 prior line of therapy is required for inclusion. GLORIOSA is designed to randomize 418 patients, 1:1 receiving intravenous MIRV at a dose of 6 mg/kg adjusted ideal body weight plus bevacizumab 15mg/kg every 3 weeks or receiving bevacizumab 15mg/kg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Radiological assessments will be conducted every 9 weeks (± 2 weeks) for 72 weeks, and subsequently every 18 weeks (± 3 weeks) until progressive disease (PD), death, the start of new anticancer therapy, or withdrawal of consent from the study (whichever occurs first). The primary efficacy endpoint is progression-free survival by investigator and will also be assessed as a sensitivity analysis. The secondary endpoints include objective response rate, quality of life, overall survival, and safety and tolerability. GLORIOSA is a global study that opened for enrollment in December 2022. Reference: 1. Gilbert L, Oaknin A, Matulonis UA, et al. Safety and efficacy of mirvetuximab soravtansine, a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in combination with bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2023; 170: 241–247 Clinical trial information: NCT05445778 .

Response to subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy post PARP inhibitor in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

5578 Background: Maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) can increase progression free survival (PFS) for recurrent or metastatic platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Little is known about disease trajectory following treatment with these agents, though some evidence suggests a decreased response to subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy. This retrospective cohort study assessed real-world response rates to platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent high grade EOC following treatment with a PARPi. Methods: All patients prescribed a PARPi as maintenance therapy for recurrent or metastatic EOC at the Ottawa Regional Cancer Center (ORCC) from September 2017 to May 2022 were included. PFS following penultimate therapy (line of therapy preceding PARPi initiation) as well as the PFS following subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with disease progression more than 6 months after penultimate therapy were calculated. Incidence of platinum resistance in patients with disease progression following PARPi therapy was determined. Results: 91 patients were included in the analysis including 54 patients on niraparib and 36 patients on olaparib. Follow-up after initiation of PARPi ranged from 4.6 months to 62.0 months with a median of 16.3 months. 54 (59.3%) of patients experienced disease progression after initiation of PARPi therapy, including 10 (11.0%) who progressed within 6 months of their penultimate therapy. Of the 44 patients who experienced disease progression more than 6 months following penultimate therapy, 32 (72.7%) were rechallenged with platinum-based chemotherapy. Of these, 16 (50.0%) experienced further disease progression with 14 (43.8%) progressing within 6 months of their platinum rechallenge. Median PFS following platinum rechallenge was 4.4 months (from 0.8 months to 34.9 months), significantly lower than previous reports. Conclusions: Patients who experienced disease progression following PARPi therapy showed a poor response to subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy, even when progression occurred more than 6 months after completion of their penultimate platinum-based chemotherapy. This supports the theory that PARPi resistance may be a surrogate for platinum resistance and raises concern for possible contribution of PARPi in the induction of platinum resistance in recurrent EOC.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biomarker Testing to Guide First-Line PARP Inhibitor Maintenance for Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Response to First-Line Platinum Chemotherapy in the USA.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance treatments are available for platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer. Olaparib (O) is available for BRCA mutation patients or in combination with bevacizumab (O+B) for patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD+); niraparib (N) is available for all patients. This study aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of biomarker testing and maintenance treatments(mTx) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer in the USA. Ten strategies were evaluated (S1-S10), representing biomarker testing (none, BRCA or HRD), and mTx (O, O+B, Nor B). PAOLA-1 data were used to build a model estimating progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS (PFS2) and overall survival for O+B. PFS was modelled through mixture cure models; PFS2 and overall survival were modelled by standard parametric models. Hazard ratios of PFS for O+B versus B, N and O were obtained from the literature to estimate PFS for B, N and O. PFS2 and OS for B, N and O were informed by PFS benefits. S2 (no testing, B) had the lowest cost while S10 (HRD testing, O+B for HRD+ and B for HRD-) had the highest quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). All niraparib strategies were dominated. S2, S4 (BRCA testing, O for BRCA+ and B for BRCA-), S6 (BRCA testing, olaparib plus bevacizumab for BRCA+ and bevacizumab for BRCA-) and S10 were the non-dominated strategies with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $29,095/QALY, $33,786/QALY and $52,948/QALY for S4 versus S2, S6 versus S4 and S10 versus S6, respectively. Homologous recombination deficiency testing followed by O+B for HRD+ and B for HRD- is a highly cost-effective strategy for patients with platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer. A HRD biomarker-guided approach provides most QALYs with good economic value.

A Retrospective Study Comparing Olaparib and Bevacizumab as a Maintenance Therapy for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Impact on Recurrence-Free Survival in Japanese and Asian Populations.

The use of angiogenesis inhibitors and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors following multi-agent chemotherapy, including platinum-based agents, has become the standard treatment for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC). However, the optimal maintenance therapy and selection criteria for these patients remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to optimize the treatment options and selection criteria for patients with PSROC. The clinical data of 51 patients with PSROC admitted to Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital and Nippon Medical School Hospital were retrospectively collected. The log-rank test was used for the survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used for the multivariate survival analysis. Of the 51 patients, 17 received maintenance therapy with bevacizumab (Bev), and 34 received olaparib (Ola). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly prolonged in the Ola group (27 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 19-NA months) compared with that in the Bev group (9 months; 95% CI, 5-22 months; p = 0.000103). The efficacy of Ola was independent of background factors, including response to previous chemotherapy, homologous recombination status, histological type, or laboratory data. Ola is superior to Bev as PSROC maintenance therapy, especially in Japanese and Asian populations.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of niraparib maintenance therapy in Chinese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of niraparib versus routine surveillance as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer in China. MethodA three-state partitioned survival model that adopted a lifetime horizon with a 4-week cycle length was developed. Efficacy data were derived from the NORA study. Cost and utility data were obtained from published studies and online databases. The cost and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 5%. In this analysis, the primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were set at 1 to 3 times the gross domestic product per capita of China in 2022 ($12,741 to $38,233/QALY). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the model results. ResultsIn the base-case analysis, niraparib was not found to be cost-effective, with an ICER of $42,888/QALY compared with routine surveillance at the WTP thresholds. One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses indicated that the ICER value was most sensitive to the cost of subsequent treatment in placebo group. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that at the WTP thresholds, the probability of niraparib being cost-effective was 2.9% to 50.1%. ConclusionsNiraparib improves the survival benefit of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. However, it seems to be less cost-effective, as it has higher costs than routine surveillance at the WTP thresholds. Reasonable dose reduction according to the patient's actual situation or lowering the price of niraparib can improve its cost-effectiveness.

Bevacizumab for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer


 It was not clear from the studies in this review whether bevacizumab plus chemotherapy does or does not improve overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone (or with placebo) for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
 Most studies in this review found that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy results in longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone (or with placebo) for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
 Most studies in this review found that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy had a more beneficial effect on treatment response than chemotherapy alone (or with placebo) for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
 There was no difference in quality of life, based on 1 randomized controlled trial, and no clear differences in adverse events reported between bevacizumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone (or with placebo).

PD-0809 RT in platinum-sensitive oligometastatic ovarian cancer: an alternative to delay systemic treatment

PD-0809 RT in platinum-sensitive oligometastatic ovarian cancer: an alternative to delay systemic treatment

Comprehensive Analysis of Purine-Metabolism-Related Gene Signature for Predicting Ovarian Cancer Prognosis, Immune Landscape, and Potential Treatment Options.

Purine metabolism is an important branch of metabolic reprogramming and has received increasing attention in cancer research. Ovarian cancer is an extremely dangerous gynecologic malignancy for which there are no adequate tools to predict prognostic risk. Here, we identified a prognostic signature consisting of nine genes related to purine metabolism, including ACSM1, CACNA1C, EPHA4, TPM3, PDIA4, JUNB, EXOSC4, TRPM2, and CXCL9. The risk groups defined by the signature are able to distinguish the prognostic risk and the immune landscape of patients. In particular, the risk scores offer promising personalized drug options. By combining risk scores with clinical characteristics, we have created a more detailed composite nomogram that allows for a more complete and individualized prediction of prognosis. In addition, we demonstrated metabolic differences between platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer cells. In summary, we have performed the first comprehensive analysis of genes related to purine metabolism in ovarian cancer patients and created a feasible prognostic signature that will aid in risk prediction and support personalized medicine.