Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy Research Articles

A pilot study of neoadjuvant cemiplimab with platinum-doublet chemotherapy and cetuximab in patients with resectable, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

TPS6109 Background: Definitive treatment of locally advanced HNSCC can require radical surgery and reconstruction often resulting in unacceptable functional consequences. Radiotherapy, often with concurrent chemotherapy, is administered postoperatively to achieve the best chance for cure. Induction chemotherapy has previously been shown to reduce the extent of surgical resection and need for adjuvant radiation (RT). The purpose of this trial is to evaluate if an induction regimen combining cytotoxic chemotherapy, EGFR targeting, and immune checkpoint blockade can pathologically downstage resectable HNSCC sufficiently to decrease surgical morbidity and justify omission of adjuvant RT-based therapy. Compared to standard docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU (TPF), docetaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab (TPC) has been shown to be a therapeutic alternative with a more favorable toxicity profile. Targeting PD-1 alone can induce significant pathologic responses in resectable HNSCC patients. Combining PD-1 inhibitors with cetuximab has shown promising activity in incurable HNSCC; cetuximab may optimize the tumor immune microenvionment for PD-1 therapy by stimulating IFN-gamma secretion to increase dendritic cell maturation and CD8 T cell expression of PD1. Based on this rationale, we are evaluating the novel induction regimen of platinum, docetaxel, cetuximab plus cemiplimab (anti-PD1 antibody). Methods: This is a 10-patient pilot study for locally advanced, resectable HNSCC patients for whom standard management requires adjuvant RT +/- chemotherapy. Patients will receive neoadjuvant treatment with a loading dose of cetuximab and cemiplimab followed by 3 cycles of cisplatin or carboplatin, docetaxel, cetuximab and cemiplimab followed by definitive surgical resection of the primary site +/- neck dissection(s). Post-operative RT +/- radiosensitizing agent(s) will be administered per standard of care (SOC) based on pathologic staging (rather than clinical staging at presentation). If the pathologic stage following induction and surgery is ypT0-2N0 without adverse features, adjuvant RT will not be administered and 6 months of adjuvant cemiplimab will be given. Otherwise, patients will receive SOC adjuvant RT-based treatment. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include feasibility assessed by the number of patients whose definitive surgery was delayed due to toxicity and quantifying the number in whom clinical to pathologic downstaging is achieved and the planned surgery and/or need for adjuvant-RT based therapy is modified. Exploratory endpoints include evaluating the association between biomarkers in the tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood with pathologic response. 8 of 10 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04722523.

Two cycles versus three cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (neoSCORE): A randomized, single center, two-arm phase II trial.

8500 Background: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have a promising efficacy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the period of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is undetermined. This phase II study compared the efficacy and safety of two cycles with three cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in resectable stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Methods: This randomized, open-label phase II trial recruited patients aged 18 or older with histologically confirmed, treatment-naïve, American Joint Committee on Cancer-defined stage IB-IIIA, resectable NSCLC. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two or three cycles of neoadjuvant treatment with intravenous sintilimab (200 mg) plus carboplatin (area under curve 5) and nab-paclitaxel (260mg/m2, for squamous) or pemetrexed (500mg/m2, for non-squamous) on day 1 of three-week cycle. After surgical resection, patients received totally four doses of perioperative immunochemotherapy, followed by one-year sintilimab maintenance under patient decision. Randomisation was stratified by tumor PD-L1 expression (≥1% vs < 1%). The primary endpoint was MPR rate. Secondary endpoints included complete pathology response (pCR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT04459611. Results: From 6/2020 to 9/2021, 60 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant treatment. The patient characteristics of both arms were well balanced. Among 55 patients with successful R0 resection, we observed a higher MPR rate (41.4%, 12/29) in three-cycle group compared with two-cycle group (26.9%, 7/26) (p = 0.260), meanwhile, pCR rate achieved 24.1% (7/29) and 19.2% (5/26) respectively (p = 0.660). Patients of squamous subtype generally achieved a statistically higher MPR rate (51.6%, 16/31) compared with the non-squamous subtype (12.5%, 3/24) (p = 0.002). In squamous subgroup, three cycles neoadjuvant treatment induced a MPR rate of 60% compared with 43.8% after two cycles treatment (p = 0.366).In the meantime, the MPR rate was 21.4% versus 0% in non-squamous subgroup, respectively (p = 0.239). The ORR showed no statistical difference between three-cycle group (55.2%, 16/29) and two-cycle (50%, 13/26) (p = 0.701). Patients were well-tolerated in both groups and 5% (3/60) experienced grade 3 immune related adverse events. Conclusions: It is the first randomized study comparing different treatment periods of immuno-chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Three cycles neoadjuvant treatment achieved a numerically higher MPR rate compared with two cycles. Patients with squamous lung cancer obtained a better MPR rate compared with non-squamous subtype. Clinical trial information: NCT04459611.

Capecitabine in pretreated metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: A retrospective study.

9093 Background: Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare disease, sharing common histological features with the undifferentiated subtype of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and being under-represented in non-small cell lung cancer trials and clinical guidelines. While gemcitabine-based platinum doublet chemotherapy is more established in 1st line treatment of stage IV disease, there is limited evidence for subsequent treatment strategy. Oral capecitabine is one of the active agents in metastatic NPC, and was observed to have encouraging outcomes in pulmonary LELC. Methods: All consecutive patients with pulmonary LELC in 2010 – 2019 treated in a tertiary institution were reviewed. Patients with metastatic disease who progressed after gemcitabine-based platinum doublets and treated with capecitabine were included. Capecitabine was given at 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest in each cycle. Treatment response was monitored by clinical history, physical examination and imaging. Treatment was continued till drug holiday, intolerance or disease progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinical predictors for PFS and OS were analyzed using log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Of the 140 LELC patients identified, 36 patients satisfied the above inclusion criteria (14 male, 22 female). Median age was 58.6 years old (range 41.5 – 75.6). All patients had an ECOG performance score of 0 or 1. 16 patients (44.4%) received 2 or more lines of prior systemic treatment. Median capecitabine cycles received was 5 (range 2 – 68). Objective response rate was 27.8% (complete response: 5.6%; partial response: 22.2%), disease control rate was 75.0%. With a median follow-up of 15.3 months (range 1.8 – 82.6), the median PFS and OS were 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.1 – 8.8) and 15.4 months (95% CI, 10.0 – 20.7) respectively. Capecitabine was generally well tolerated, with 22.2% grade 3 or above side effects, and 5.6% treatment termination due to intolerance. Bone and distant lymph node (LN) involvement were significant predictors of poorer PFS on multivariate analyses (bone: HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.44 – 7.29, p=0.004; distant LN: HR: 2.62, 95% CI 1.14 – 6.02, p=0.024). Age, sex, smoking history, number of treatment lines, and other sites of disease involvement were not significant predictors. Conclusions: This is to date the largest reported cohort of capecitabine in pre-treated metastatic pulmonary LELC. Capecitabine is effective and well tolerated, and should be considered as a treatment option after 1st line platinum-based chemotherapy. Future studies are warranted to delineate the optimal treatment pathway of this rare disease entity.

Effect of Postoperative Muscle Loss After Resection of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer on Surgical Outcomes.

Preoperative depletion of psoas muscle mass index (PMI) in lung cancer patients is an unfavorable prognostic factor. The relationship between post-surgical changes in PMI and survival is not clear. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to clarify the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative PMI changes. We retrospectively reviewed lung cancer patients, who underwent curative surgical resection with lymph node dissection and computed tomography (CT) approximately six months post-surgery between 2010 and 2019. Pre- and postoperative PMI was measured from CT images at the third lumbar vertebra level. A sex-dependent PMI change ratio (postoperative PMI/preoperative PMI) was used to divide patients into two groups: high PMI loss (67 patients, ≤25th lower quartile) and low PMI loss/PMI increase (204 patients, >25th lower quartile), and clinicopathological features were compared. Age ≥70 years, elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels, advanced pathological stage, lymphatic permeation, vascular invasion, performance of adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy, low body mass index, and postoperative recurrence were significantly higher in the high PMI loss group. Logistic regression analysis found that Charlson comorbidity index, low body mass index, advanced pathological stage, and postoperative recurrence were associated with high PMI loss. The five-year postoperative overall survival rate was 50% in the high PMI loss group and 79% in the low PMI loss/PMI increase group (p<0.001). High PMI loss was also an unfavorable factor in a multivariable Cox's proportional hazard model (p=0.002). Postoperative muscle loss was an independent prognostic factor for poorer overall survival regardless of preoperative sarcopenia, in non-small cell lung cancer.

Platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPlatinum-doublet chemotherapy has been conventionally used for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) but evidence of chemotherapy is based on studies with small sample sizes and remains scarce. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate the efficacy of platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced GEP-NEC.MethodsWe performed a database search in PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE. Eligible studies were prospective and retrospective studies documenting the efficacy of platinum plus etoposide (EP) and platinum plus irinotecan (IP) for advanced GEP-NEC. Overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were pooled and weighted using generic inverse variance in a random-effects meta-analysis model.ResultsNineteen studies including 1157 patients were identified. The ORR of the platinum-doublet regimen, EP, and IP was 49.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.8–56.5), 44.4% (95% CI: 35.9–53.0), and 59.4% (95% CI: 48.0–70.8). The pooled median OS of the platinum-doublet regimen, EP, and IP was 12.9 months (95% CI:10.9–15.3), 12.9 months (95% CI: 10.8–15.4), and 12.9 months (95% CI: 6.0–27.8), and the pooled median PFS of the platinum-doublet regimen, EP, and IP was 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.5–6.4), 5.4 months (95% CI 4.5–6.5), and 4.0 months (95% CI: 1.4–11.7), respectively.ConclusionConsiderable response rate and survival time of the platinum-doublet regimen for advanced GEP-NEC were observed. IP and EP regimens can be reasonably applicable and these results provide a reference for oncologists in deciding the suitable regimen for patients with advanced GEP-NEC.

Associations between Measured and Patient-Reported Physical Function and Survival in Advanced NSCLC.

Background: There is a lack of tools for selecting patients with advanced lung cancer who benefit the most from systemic treatment. Patient-reported physical function (PRPF) has been identified as a prognostic factor in this setting, but little is known about the prognostic value in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to investigate if measured physical performance was an independent or stronger prognostic factor than PRPF in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed patients from a randomized trial comparing immediate and delayed pemetrexed therapy in stage III/IV NSCLC (n = 232) who performed timed up and go (TUG) and 5 m walk test (5 mWT) and reported physical function on the EORTC QLQ-C30 before chemotherapy commenced. Results: Overall, 208 patients performed TUG and 5 mWT and were included in the present study. Poor physical function was significantly associated with poor survival (TUG: HR 1.05, p < 0.01, 5 mWT: HR 1.05, p = 0.03, PRPF: 1.01, p < 0.01), but only PRPF remained an independent prognostic factor in multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR 1.01, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patient-reported, but not measured, physical performance was an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy.

Rationale and Design of the Phase III KEYLYNK-012 Study of Pembrolizumab and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab With or Without Olaparib for Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundConcurrent chemoradiotherapy is a standard therapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Durvalumab is an approved treatment option following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the absence of disease progression. The multicenter, phase III, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind KEYLYNK-012 study evaluates whether initiation of immunotherapy with pembrolizumab concurrently with chemoradiotherapy, followed by post-chemoradiotherapy pembrolizumab with or without olaparib improves outcomes for participants with stage III NSCLC. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04380636) MethodsEligible participants are aged ≥18 years with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, stages IIIA-C, squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC not suitable for surgery with curative intent. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with pembrolizumab (Groups A and B) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (Group C) for 3 cycles. In the absence of disease progression, participants will receive pembrolizumab plus olaparib placebo (Group A), pembrolizumab plus olaparib (Group B), or durvalumab monotherapy (Group C). Dual primary endpoints are progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by independent central review and overall survival. ResultsEnrollment began on July 6, 2020, and is ongoing at approximately 190 sites. ConclusionKEYLYNK-012 will provide important information on the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and subsequent pembrolizumab with or without olaparib in participants with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

First-line therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR activating mutations: a consideration of the clinical position of osimertinib based on the subset of Japanese patients in the FLAURA study.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have been established as the standard first-line treatment for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an EGFR activating mutation. In the FLAURA study, osimertinib, third-generation EGFR-TKI, resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) than first-generation EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib) in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an EGFR activating mutation. Osimertinib is now widely used as first-line therapy for those patients. In Japanese subset analysis of the FLAURA study, the median progression-free survival was prolonged by osimertinib (19.1months) relative to gefitinib (13.8months). However, there was no apparent OS benefit, albeit at the level of an exploratory post-hoc analysis. Although the safety profile in the Japanese subset was generally consistent with the overall population, the incidence of liver enzyme increases in the gefitinib group and that of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis in the osimertinib group was higher among Japanese patients. There is now an increasing number of first-line treatment options for NSCLC with EGFR mutations, including EGFR-TKIs in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic drugs. These combinations show progression-free survival benefits similar to osimertinib regardless of the mutation type. Therefore, a first-line combination regimen followed by osimertinib remains an attractive strategy. We review data from the randomized clinical trials of first-line EGFR-TKIs including a subset of Japanese patients and discuss first-line therapies for patients with NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations.

KRAS Mutations Impact Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Simple SummaryIn this retrospective study including 580 patients with metastatic (Stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer, we investigated whether KRAS mutational status had any impact on clinical outcome. First, we analyzed overall survival of patients grouped based on absence (KRASWT) or presence (KRASMUT) of mutations in KRAS. Next, we assessed the effect of first-line therapies on both groups: platinum doublet chemotherapy (PT), the backbone treatment for most patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) given to Stage IV patients with high PD-L1 expressing tumors. We found that KRASMUT patients had better response to ICB, but worse response to PT compared to KRASWT patients and that KRASWT patients with high PD-L1 expressing tumors responded better to PT than ICB. Our findings will have immediate clinical value, as KRAS mutations and PD-L1 expression are routinely assessed in most patients diagnosed with lung cancer.There is an urgent need to identify new predictive biomarkers for treatment response to both platinum doublet chemotherapy (PT) and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Here, we evaluated whether treatment outcome could be affected by KRAS mutational status in patients with metastatic (Stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All consecutive patients molecularly assessed and diagnosed between 2016–2018 with Stage IV NSCLC in the region of West Sweden were included in this multi-center retrospective study. The primary study outcome was overall survival (OS). Out of 580 Stage IV NSCLC patients, 35.5% harbored an activating mutation in the KRAS gene (KRASMUT). Compared to KRAS wild-type (KRASWT), KRASMUT was a negative factor for OS (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, KRASMUT persisted as a negative factor for OS (HR 1.478, 95% CI 1.207–1.709, p < 0.001). When treated with first-line platinum doublet (n = 195), KRASMUT was a negative factor for survival (p = 0.018), with median OS of 9 months vs. KRASWT at 11 months. On multivariate analysis, KRASMUT persisted as a negative factor for OS (HR 1.564, 95% CI 1.124–2.177, p = 0.008). KRASMUT patients with high PD-L1 expression (PD-L1high) had better OS than PD-L1high KRASWT patients (p = 0.036). In response to first-line ICB, KRASMUT patients had a significantly (p = 0.006) better outcome than KRASWT patients, with a median OS of 23 vs. 6 months. On multivariable Cox analysis, KRASMUT status was an independent prognostic factor for better OS (HR 0.349, 95% CI 0.148–0.822, p = 0.016). kRAS mutations are associated with better response to treatment with immune checkpoint blockade and worse response to platinum doublet chemotherapy as well as shorter general OS in Stage IV NSCLC.

Cost-Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Biosimilar LY01008 Combined With Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Chinese Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Objective: To investigate whether LY01008, a locally developed bevacizumab biosimilar agent, is appropriate for widespread use among Chinese advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, our current study was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line LY01008 combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Material and Methods: This economic evaluation designed a Markov model to compare the healthcare cost and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of first-line LY01008 combined with chemotherapy versus first-line chemotherapy. Transition probabilities, including disease progression, survival, and adverse event (AE)-related discontinuation of first-line treatment, were estimated using data from the clinical trials. Costs and health utilities were derived from local databases, hospitals, and published literature. Our base case analysis and scenario analysis focused on the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy combined with a clinical trial dosage (15 mg/kg every 3-week cycle) and a real-world dosage (7.5 mg/kg every 3-week cycle) of LY01008, respectively. Results: In the base case analysis, first-line LY01008 combined with chemotherapy was associated with an increase of 0.48 QALYs in effectiveness and an increase of CNY 189,988 (US$ 26,240) in healthcare costs compared with first-line chemotherapy, resulting an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CNY 375,425 (US$ 54,430)/QALY. In the scenario analysis, first-line LY01008 combined with chemotherapy was associated with a mean healthcare cost of CNY 265,060 (US$ 38,429), resulting an ICER of CNY 221,579 (US$ 32,125/QALY) between first-line LY01008 combined with chemotherapy versus first-line chemotherapy. The parameters that determine the cost of LY01008 have the greatest impact on the cost-effectiveness results. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, first-line LY01008 at a real-world dosage combined with chemotherapy is likely to represent a cost-effective strategy compared with first-line chemotherapy alone for Chinese advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC patients.

Prognostic impact of surgical treatment for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

BackgroundHigh-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung, which includes small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), is an aggressive form of lung cancer. Although lobectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is regarded as the standard therapy for this disease, it would be an uphill struggle for HGNEC patients to receive that multidisciplinary therapy perfectly. This study aimed to examine recurrence and survival outcomes in surgically treated patients with HGNEC of the lung.MethodsThe medical records of 104 HGNEC patients who underwent surgical treatment in five institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Standard treatment (ST) was defined as lobectomy, bilobectomy, or pneumonectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy with more than two cycles.ResultsPatients in the ST group (n=31; 30%) were younger and had fewer respiratory complications than those in the non-standard treatment (NST) group (n=73; 70%). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the NST group developed ipsilateral lymph node recurrence (21% vs. 3%; P=0.035) and ipsilateral or contralateral lung recurrence (15% vs. 0%; P=0.031). Five-year overall survival (OS) was 64.2% in the ST group and 38.3% in the NST group (P=0.038). NST was independently associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 2.044; 95% confidence interval, 1.016–4.113; P=0.045).ConclusionsSurgically treated HGNEC patients who received ST had a more favorable outcome than those who received NST. Patients who receive NST may require additional treatment.

CLO22-074: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Patients (pts) With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC) With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥50% Receiving Cemiplimab (CEMI) Monotherapy Versus Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy (CHEMO): A Focus on the EMPOWER-Lung 1 Brain Metastases Subpopulation

"CLO22-074: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Patients (pts) With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC) With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥50% Receiving Cemiplimab (CEMI) Monotherapy Versus Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy (CHEMO): A Focus on the EMPOWER-Lung 1 Brain Metastases Subpopulation" published on 31 Mar 2022 by National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Efficacy of platinum agents for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

BackgroundPlatinum-based chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy for relapsed NSCLC following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of platinum-doublet chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy who were registered in a nationwide registry NSCLC database. Patients were divided into the platinum-doublet chemotherapy (platinum) group and single-agent chemotherapy (non-platinum) group based on the type of second-line chemotherapy.ResultsThe platinum group (n = 119) showed significantly better overall survival (OS) than the non-platinum group (n = 201) (median OS: 21.5 vs. 10.5 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.73, p < 0.001). OS from the beginning of chemoradiotherapy was also significantly better in the platinum group than in the non-platinum group (median OS: 34.9 vs. 21.8 months, HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43–0.79, p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, platinum-doublet chemotherapy as second-line therapy, female sex, clinical stage IIIA, and duration of ≥ 8.6 months from the beginning of first-line therapy to the beginning of second-line therapy were associated with significantly better OS.ConclusionPlatinum-doublet chemotherapy as a second-line therapy may prolong survival in unresectable stage III NSCLC patients following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Thus, re-administration of platinum agents may be a promising treatment for unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.

Clinical Outcomes of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Surgically Resected High-Grade Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Introduction: Data on the clinical outcomes of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resected high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) (large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HGNEC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with surgically resected HGNEC at five institutions in Japan between January 2006 and May 2016. Results: A total of 143 patients were enrolled. Among them, 65 received adjuvant chemotherapy. Four patients who participated in clinical trials were excluded; the remaining 61 patients were included in the study. Fifty-six patients received adjuvant small-cell lung cancer-based chemotherapy. Twenty-five of 29 patients who relapsed after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy received chemotherapy. The most commonly administered chemotherapy agent was amrubicin. The 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 55.2% and 66.8%, respectively. The median relapse-free and overall survival times for the 25 patients who received chemotherapy after relapse were 12.9 and 27.5 months, respectively. Among them, 22 relapsed within 2 years. Patients who received platinum-doublet chemotherapy after relapse tended to have better time to progression disease and overall survival than those who received single-agent chemotherapy. Conclusions: Most patients with HGNEC received small-cell lung cancer-based regimens as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Those who relapsed after adjuvant chemotherapy were mainly treated with amrubicin. Our findings suggest that platinum-doublet chemotherapy tends to improve the time to progression disease and overall survival in patients who relapse after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prediction of response and adverse drug reaction of pemetrexed plus platinum-based chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma by serum metabolomic profiling

BackgroundPemetrexed plus platinum doublet chemotherapy regimen remains to be the standard first-line treatment for lung adenocarcinoma patients. However, few biomarkers can be used to identify potential beneficiaries with maximal efficacy and minimal toxicity. This study aimed to explore potential biomarker models predictive of efficacy and toxicity after pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy based on metabolomics profiling. MethodsA total of 144 patients who received at least two cycles of pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy were enroled in the study. Serum samples were collected before initial treatment to perform metabolomics profiling analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to establish prediction models. Results157 metabolites were found to be differentially expressed between the response group and the nonresponse group. A panel of Phosphatidylserine 20:4/20:1, Sphingomyelin d18:1/18:0, and Phosphatidic Acid 18:1/20:0 could predict pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy response with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.7968. 76 metabolites were associated with hematological toxicity of pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy. A panel incorporating triglyceride 14:0/22:3/22:5, 3-(3-Hydroxyphenyl) Propionate Acid, and Carnitine C18:0 was the best predictive ability of hematological toxicity with an AUROC of 0.7954. 54 differential expressed metabolites were found to be associated with hepatotoxicity of pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy. A model incorporating stearidonic acid, Thromboxane B3, l-Homocitrulline, and phosphoinositide 20:3/18:0 showed the best predictive ability of hepatotoxicity with an AUROC of 0.8186. ConclusionsThis study established effective and convenient models that can predict the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma patients before treatment delivery.

Key Players of the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex, dynamic battlefield for both immune cells and tumor cells. The advent of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) since 2011, such as the anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein (CTLA)-4 and anti-programmed cell death receptor (PD)-(L)1 antibodies, provided powerful weapons in the arsenal of cancer treatments, demonstrating unprecedented durable responses for patients with many types of advanced cancers. However, the response rate is generally low across tumor types and a substantial number of patients develop acquired resistance. These primary or acquired resistance are attributed to various immunosuppressive elements (soluble and cellular factors) and alternative immune checkpoints in the TME. Therefore, a better understanding of the TME is absolutely essential to develop therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance. Numerous clinical studies are underway using ICIs and additional agents that are tailored to the characteristics of the tumor or the TME. Some of the combination treatments are already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), such as platinum-doublet chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) -targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) combined with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies or immuno-immuno combinations (anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1). In this review, we will discuss the key immunosuppressive cells, metabolites, cytokines or chemokines, and hypoxic conditions in the TME that contribute to tumor immune escape and the prospect of relevant clinical trials by targeting these elements in combination with ICIs.

43P MRTX-500: Phase II trial of sitravatinib (sitra) + nivolumab (nivo) in patients (pts) with non-squamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on or after prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy

Therapy with CPI has improved OS in a subset of pts with NSCLC. Mechanisms of CPI resistance, however, have been described, including an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), which may recruit immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), and M2-polarized macrophages in the TME. Sitra, a spectrum-selective TKI targeting TAM (Tyro3/Axl/MerTK) receptors and VEGFR2, reduces the number of MDSCs and Tregs and increases the M1/M2-polarized macrophage ratio. It is hypothesized to overcome an immunosuppressive TME and augment antitumor immune responses. MRTX-500 (NCT02954991) is a phase II study evaluating sitra (120 mg QD) + nivo (Q2W or Q4W) in pts with NSQ NSCLC who have progressed on or after treatment, with a CPI-based regimen (anti-PD1/PD-L1) and/or platinum doublet chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is ORR per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include OS, PFS, and safety. We report updated efficacy data for pts with NSCLC with PCB (prior clinical benefit; CR, PR, or SD ≥12 weeks) from a CPI who were treated with sitra + nivo as either 2L or 3L therapy. As of 17 October 2020, 68 pts with PCB (57% female; median age, 66 years; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 27%/66%/7%) were treated. Median follow-up was 28 months, median OS was 15 months (95% CI 9.3, 21.1),1- and 2-year OS rates were 56% and 32%, respectively. Median PFS was 6 months, and ORR was 16% (11/68), including 2 CRs. Median duration of response was 13 months. In all CPI-experienced pts evaluable for safety (n=124), treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 91% of pts, with Gr 3/4 TRAEs occurring in 60% of pts. The most common (≥10%) Gr 3/4 TRAEs were hypertension and diarrhea. There were no Gr 5 TRAEs. Discontinuation rates for sitra and nivo due to any AE were 30% and 27%, respectively. Sitra + nivo demonstrated antitumor activity and encouraging OS compared to historical controls and no new safety signals were observed in pts with NSQ NSCLC who progressed on prior CPI. This combination is being evaluated in the phase III SAPPHIRE study. Previously presented at ESMO 2021, FPN (Final Publication Number): 1191O, Ticiana Leal et al. - Reused with permission.

The impact of driver mutation on the treatment outcome of early-stage lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy have improved the major pathological response (MPR) in patients with early-stage operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess whether the presence of targetable driver mutations affects the efficacy of the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. We enrolled patients with early-stage operable NSCLC who received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy between January 1, 2017, and December 30, 2020. Neoadjuvant therapy was delivered with platinum-doublet chemotherapy; moreover, pembrolizumab was added at the attending physician’s discretion based on patient’s request. Pathological responses were assessed; moreover, disease-free survival was estimated. Next-generation sequencing was performed in case sufficient preoperative biopsy specimens were obtained. We included 23 patients; among them, 11 received a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy while 12 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The MPR and pathological complete response rates were 54.5% and 27.3%, respectively, in patients who received a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. These rates were significantly higher than those in patients who only received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients in the combination group experienced disease recurrence during the follow-up period even though two of them showed an MPR. These three patients had targetable driver mutations, including an EGFR exon 20 insertion, EGFR exon 21 L858R substitution, and MET exon 14 skipping. Only one patient who remained disease-free had a targetable driver mutation. Among patients with early-stage operable NSCLC requiring neoadjuvant therapy, comprehensive genomic profiling is crucial before the administration of the combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Effectiveness of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone or in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in first-line (1L) non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (Nsq-NSCLC) with PD-L1-high expression using real-world data

Anti-programmed cell death protein (death-ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] therapy alone [cancer immunotherapy (CIT)-mono] or combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CIT-chemo) is used as the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study compared clinical outcomes with CIT-mono versus CIT-chemo in the specific clinical scenario of non-squamous (Nsq)-NSCLC with a high PD-L1 expression of ≥50% [tumor proportion score (TPS) or tumor cells (TC)]. This was a retrospective cohort study using a real-world de-identified database. Patients with metastatic Nsq-NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression initiating first-line CIT-mono or CIT-chemo between 24 October 2016 and 28 February 2019 were followed up until 28 February 2020. We compared overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted (aHR) for differences in baseline key prognostic characteristics using the inverse probability of treatment weighting methodology. Patients with PD-L1-high Nsq-NSCLC treated with CIT-mono (n= 351) were older and less often presented with de novo stage IV disease than patients treated with CIT-chemo (n= 169). With a median follow-up of 19.9 months for CIT-chemo versus 23.5 months for CIT-mono, median OS and rwPFS did not differ between the two groups [median OS: CIT-chemo, 21.0 months versus CIT-mono, 22.1 months, aHR= 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.39, P= 0.83; median rwPFS: CIT-chemo, 10.8 months versus CIT-mono, 11.5 months, aHR= 1.04, 95% CI 0.78-1.37, P= 0.81]. CIT-chemo showed significant and meaningful improvement in OS and rwPFS versus CIT-mono only in the never-smoker subgroup, albeit among a small sample of patients (n= 50; OS HR= 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.83, interaction P= 0.02; rwPFS HR= 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95, interaction P= 0.04). Except in the subgroup of never-smoker patients, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line CIT treatment does not appear to impact survival outcomes in Nsq-NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression.

Veliparib Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Investigator's Choice of Standard Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Non–Squamous Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundThis open-label Phase III trial (NCT02264990) evaluated the PARP inhibitor, veliparib, combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of patients with advanced non–squamous non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). A 52-gene expression classifier (LP52) previously shown to identify patients more likely to respond to veliparib was evaluated as a planned correlative analysis. Materials and MethodsAdult current or former smokers with advanced non–squamous NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to veliparib (120 mg daily for 7 days/cycle) with carboplatin and paclitaxel or to investigators’ choice of platinum doublet chemotherapy (up to 6, 21-day cycles), with optional pemetrexed maintenance. Prospective analysis of the LP52 signature was conducted using a clinical Qiagen/HTG assay. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in LP52+ patients. ResultsOverall, 595 patients received veliparib + carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 298) or chemotherapy alone (n = 297); 13% (n = 40) in each arm were LP52+. The primary endpoint was not met; median OS was 11.2 months with veliparib + carboplatin/paclitaxel versus 9.2 months with chemotherapy alone in the LP52+ subgroup (hazard ratio [HR] 0.644, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.396-1.048; P = .113). In the overall population, median OS was 12.1 months in both arms (HR 0.986, 95% CI: 0.827-1.176; P = .846). No new safety signals were observed. ConclusionIn patients with non–squamous NSCLC, there was no significant improvement in OS with veliparib + carboplatin/paclitaxel versus chemotherapy alone, although a trend toward improved OS in the LP52+ population suggests this subgroup may benefit from veliparib. Statistical power was limited due to the small sample size.