Platinum-based Doublet Chemotherapy Research Articles

A real-world retrospective study to assess efficacy and safety of alectinib as adjuvant therapy in IB-IIIB NSCLC patients harboring ALK rearrangement.

Alectinib has demonstrated promising disease-free survival (DFS) benefit for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ALK rearrangement positive in phase 3 ALINA trial. However, real-world evidence for the efficacy and safety of alectinib in early-stage ALK-positive NSCLC is limited. We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with stage IB-IIIB ALK-positive NSCLC who underwent complete pulmonary resections from April 2010 to July 2023 at a single institution. 38 (55.9%) enrolled patients had N2 lymph node metastasis, and 17 (24.9%) patients had multi-station N2 metastasis. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the adjuvant treatment regimen, with 19 patients in the alectinib group and 49 patients in the chemotherapy group. There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. After curative resection surgery, patients in alectinib group received oral alectinib at a dose of 600 mg twice daily and patients in chemotherapy group received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy regimen every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was 3-year DFS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DFS and overall survival (OS). Safety analyses were conducted by comparing the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. At the last follow-up date (January 22th, 2024), A total of 1 (5.3%) and 28 (57.1%) DFS events were observed in alectinib group and chemotherapy group respectively. The 3-year DFS showed significant improvement in the alectinib group compared with chemotherapy group (91.7% vs 60.7%, P=0.051). In the IIIAN2 subgroup, the 3-year DFS rate in the alectinib group reached a satisfactory 87.5%. In both groups, the majority of AEs were graded as level 1 or 2, No grade 3-4 AEs were observed in alectinib group. Alectinib, as adjuvant therapy, demonstrated favorable efficacy and manageable safety in patients with completely resected ALK-positive stage I B-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. A limitation of this study is the small sample size, and a larger-scale real-world sample study is needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of alectinib as adjuvant therapy.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus carboplatin-based doublet as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer aged ≥70 years or with an ECOG performance status of 2 (GFPC 08-2015 ENERGY): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.

Combined treatment with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies has shown superiority over chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but data for older patients (aged ≥70 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1 or those with an ECOG performance status of 2 are scarce. We aimed to test the superiority of the PD-1 antibody nivolumab and the CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab over platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with NSCLC aged 70 years or older or with an ECOG performance status of 2. This open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 30 hospitals and cancer centres in France. Eligible patients had stage IV histologically proven NSCLC, with no known oncogenic alterations, and were either aged 70 years or older with ECOG performance status of 0-2 or younger than 70 years with an ECOG performance status of 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally, using a computer-generated algorithm stratified by age (<70 vs ≥70 years), ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve ≤700 mg] plus pemetrexed [500 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks] or carboplatin [on day 1; area under the curve ≤700 mg] plus paclitaxel [90 mg/m2 as intravenous infusion on days 1, 5, and 15, every 4 weeks]). The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety. All efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was analysed in the safety analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and who had at least one safety follow-up. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03351361. The trial was stopped early for futility on the basis of a pre-planned interim analysis after 33% of the expected events had occurred. Between Feb 12, 2018, and Dec 15, 2020, 217 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 216 patients were included in the final analysis, with 109 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 107 in the chemotherapy group; median age was 74 years (IQR 70-78). Median overall survival was 14·7 months (95% CI 8·0-19·7) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 9·9 months (7·7-12·3) in chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85 [95% CI 0·62-1·16]). Among patients aged 70 years or older with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 (median age 76 years [IQR 73-79]), median overall survival was longer in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group than the chemotherapy group: 22·6 months (95% CI 18·1-36·0) versus 11·8 months (8·9-20·5; HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·46-0·96]). Among patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 (median age 69 years [IQR 63-75]), median overall survival was 2·9 months (95% CI 1·4-4·8) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus 6·1 months (3·5-10·4) in the chemotherapy group (HR 1·32 [95% CI 0·82-2·11]). No new safety signals were reported. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (28 [27%] of 103 patients) in the chemotherapy group and endocrine disorders (five [5%] of 105 patients), cardiac disorders (ten [10%] patients), and gastrointestinal disorders (11 [11%] patients) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group. The study showed no benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination in the overall study population. As a result of early stopping, the trial was underpowered for primary and secondary endpoints; however, the finding of better survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with platinum doublet in the subgroup of older patients with NSCLC with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 warrants further study. Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in Advanced Primary Pulmonary Salivary Gland Tumors (PSGTs)

Primary pulmonary salivary gland tumors (PSGT) constitute a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, no established treatment guidelines exist for advanced PSGT. The efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy for PSGT within the context of NSCLC remains uncertain. Therefore, we retrospectively collected 37 PSGT patients who underwent first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from 2010 to 2023. Survival analysis, employing the Kaplan–Meier method, and group comparisons via the log rank test were conducted. Our results show that first-line platinum-based chemotherapy demonstrates favorable efficacy and manageable safety in advanced PSGT, with the combination of Paclitaxel + Platinum emerging as a preferred option.

Maintenance with mirvetuximab soravtansine plus bevacizumab vs bevacizumab in FRα-high platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

At first recurrence, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) is frequently treated with platinum-based chemotherapy doublets plus bevacizumab, then single-agent bevacizumab. Most patients' disease progresses within a year after chemotherapy, emphasizing the need for novel strategies. Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV), an antibody-drug conjugate, comprises a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody and tubulin-targeting payload (maytansinoid DM4). In FRα-high PSOC, MIRV plusbevacizumab previously showed promising efficacy (objective response rate, 69% [95% CI: 41-89]; median progression-free survival, 13.3months [95% CI: 8.3-18.3]; median duration of response, 12.9months [95% CI: 6.5-15.7]) and safety. The Phase III randomized GLORIOSA trial will evaluate MIRV plusbevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone as maintenance therapy in patients with FRα-high PSOC who did not have disease progression following second-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05445778; GOG.org ID: GOG-3078; ENGOT.ESGO.org ID: ENGOT-ov76.

Targeting AKR1B10 by Drug Repurposing with Epalrestat Overcomes Chemoresistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids.

Systemic treatments given to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are often ineffective due to drug resistance. In the present study, we investigated patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTO) and matched tumor tissues from surgically treated patients with NSCLC to identify drug repurposing targets to overcome resistance toward standard-of-care platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. PDTOs were established from 10 prospectively enrolled patients with non-metastatic NSCLC from resected tumors. PDTOs were compared with matched tumor tissues by histopathology/immunohistochemistry, whole exome sequencing, and transcriptome sequencing. PDTO growths and drug responses were determined by measuring 3D tumoroid volumes, cell viability, and proliferation/apoptosis. Differential gene expression analysis identified drug-repurposing targets. Validations were performed with internal/external data sets of patients with NSCLC. NSCLC cell lines were used for aldo-keto reductase 1B10 (AKR1B10) knockdown studies and xenograft models to determine the intratumoral bioavailability of epalrestat. PDTOs retained histomorphology and pathological biomarker expression, mutational/transcriptomic signatures, and cellular heterogeneity of the matched tumor tissues. Five (50%) PDTOs were chemoresistant toward carboplatin/paclitaxel. Chemoresistant PDTOs and matched tumor tissues demonstrated overexpression of AKR1B10. Epalrestat, an orally available AKR1B10 inhibitor in clinical use for diabetic polyneuropathy, was repurposed to overcome chemoresistance of PDTOs. In vivo efficacy of epalrestat to overcome drug resistance corresponded to intratumoral epalrestat levels. PDTOs are efficient preclinical models recapitulating the tumor characteristics and are suitable for drug testing. AKR1B10 can be targeted by repurposing epalrestat to overcome chemoresistance in NSCLC. Epalrestat has the potential to advance to clinical trials in patients with drug-resistant NSCLC due to favorable toxicity, pharmacological profile, and bioavailability.

Single-drug Chemotherapy Plus Immunotherapy as First-line Treatment for Stage Ⅳ Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Elderly Patients: A Phase II Clinical Trial UNICORN Study

IntroductionLung cancer remains the most common malignancy and the leading cancer-related death among the elderly in China, which deserves more research attention. Immunotherapy combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy has been approved as the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are devoid of specific gene mutations or fusions. Given that patients with NSCLC over the age of 65 typically exhibit declining organ function and physical condition, they often showed reduced tolerance for this rigorous treatment regimen. However, the KEYNOTE-042 study illuminated a promising pathway: in patients testing positive for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), immunotherapy alone has demonstrated a superior overall survival (OS) compared to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. This suggests that moderating the intensity of chemotherapy and prioritizing immunotherapy may be a gentler alternative in elderly demographic. Patients and MethodsThis multicenter phase II clinical trial named UNICORN aimed to enroll 49 patients aged 65 and older, utilizing paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel for those with squamous NSCLC, and pemetrexed for those diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma. The treatment protocol entails 4 cycles of serplulimab plus chemotherapy followed by an extended regimen of serplulimab maintenance, spanning a total of 35 cycles. Primary endpoints of this study are progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and the secondary endpoints are OS, objective control rate (ORR) and safety metrics. ConclusionThis is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of serplulimab combined with either paclitaxel or pemetrexed in elderly treatment-naïve patients with stage IV NSCLC whose PD-L1 are positive.

Response Rate,Side Effect and Reduction in Tumor Size of Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine and Taxanes as First Line Setting of Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Background: Squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung is a kind of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been found to deliver benefits to patients in advanced disease settings. Objective: To compare response rate and side effects between first-line chemotherapies vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and taxanes in patients with metastatic SCC of the lung. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study including 45 patients with metastatic lung SCC. All patients had received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles. Patients were allocated into three groups based on the additional treatment protocol, with fifteen patients per group. A reduction in tumor size was assessed from tumor measurements for patients who had at least two evaluable assessments with computed tomography. The side effects of each drug were evaluated. Results: The reduction in tumor size in the gemcitabine, taxan, and vinorelbine arms was -5.59±35.62 cm3, 1.3±39.98 cm3 and -10.55±14.62 cm3, respectively, with no significant differences. The response rates in the taxan, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine arms were 73.33%, 80%, and 86.67%, respectively, with no significant differences. The side effects, including nausea, alopecia, diarrhea, arthralgia, and peripheral neuropathy, were, in particular, more common in patients in the taxan arm than in other arms, with significant differences. Conclusion: The three therapeutic arms, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and taxanes, had similar efficiency based on response rate, with a mild preponderance of vinorelbine.

Response Rate, Side Effect and Reduction in Tumor Size of Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine and Taxanes as First Line Setting of Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Background: Squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung is a kind of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been found to deliver benefits to patients in advanced disease settings. Objective: To compare response rate and side effects between first-line chemotherapies vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and taxanes in patients with metastatic SCC of the lung. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study including 45 patients with metastatic lung SCC. All patients had received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles. Patients were allocated into three groups based on the additional treatment protocol, with fifteen patients per group. A reduction in tumor size was assessed from tumor measurements for patients who had at least two evaluable assessments with computed tomography. The side effects of each drug were evaluated. Results: The reduction in tumor size in the gemcitabine, taxan, and vinorelbine arms was -5.59±35.62 cm3, 1.3±39.98 cm3 and -10.55±14.62 cm3, respectively, with no significant differences. The response rates in the taxan, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine arms were 73.33%, 80%, and 86.67%, respectively, with no significant differences. The side effects, including nausea, alopecia, diarrhea, arthralgia, and peripheral neuropathy, were, in particular, more common in patients in the taxan arm than in other arms, with significant differences. Conclusion: The three therapeutic arms, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and taxanes, had similar efficiency based on response rate, with a mild preponderance of vinorelbine. Keywords: Squamous-cell carcinoma,vinorelbine, gemcitabine,taxanes

Preliminary results of atezolizumab and pirfenidone in non-small cell lung cancer.

e15197 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis improved outcomes for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Poor response to PD-L1 antibody has been linked to increased cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), which interact with cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) similarly to regulatory T cells (Tregs). CAFs, through cytokine production, impair antitumor immunity by affecting CTL function (TGF beta) and inhibiting CTL recruitment into tumors, suggesting that CAFs could be a therapeutic target in CPI-resistant NSCLC. Pirfenidone (P) exhibits anti-fibrotic effects by blocking fibroblast differentiation into CAFs and suppressing TGF beta production and associated signaling pathways/collagens. Atezolizumab (A) targets PD-L1, inhibiting its interaction with PD-1 and B7-1 (CD80) receptors on T cells. We initiated a phase I/II trial to test the combination of AP in recurrent NSCLC after CPI progression. The phase I study aims to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AP and assess its safety and tolerability. The phase II study will evaluate its efficacy. The Exploratory Objectives are to measure circulating levels of TGF beta and investigate the expression of CAF-related proteins. Methods: phase I will enroll 3 patients using P at 801 mg PO TID and A at 1200mg IV every 3 weeks. If there is ≤ 1 Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT), the study will proceed to phase II. If there are ≥2 DLTs, P will be reduced to 534 mg TID. If there is ≤ 1 DLT at this dose, we will proceed to phase II. If there are ≥2 DLTs, then the study will be terminated. Phase II will enroll 16 patients to assess efficacy. The main inclusion criteria are patients with recurrent NSCLC without actionable mutation, after progression with first-line therapy CPI with or without platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, no more than 2 lines of therapy, measurable disease, ECOG 0-2, and adequate organ function. Results: The study enrolled a total of 5 patients (4 males, 1 female), median age of 63.4; 5 were white; 3 patients did not complete the required 21 days of therapy for evaluation (1 non-compliance, 1 disease progression,1 unrelated Urinary Tract Infection); 2 patients were evaluable for toxicity, without DLT; 1 exhibited a partial response to cutaneous metastatic disease, with overall stable disease, 1 had disease progression. Adverse events (AE) in more than 5% of patients included blood disorders, cardiac, gastrointestinal, administration site, metabolic, musculoskeletal, psychiatric, respiratory, and skin disorders. Serious AEs were noted in 2 patients: one experienced gastrointestinal bowel perforation due to disease progression resulting in death, and the other had a respiratory disorder. Conclusions: The combination of AP did not produce unexpected side effects or reach the dose-limiting toxicity threshold. After the phase I portion is completed, the study will proceed to phase II expansion to enroll patients with recurrent NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT04467723 .

Comparison of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus concurrent or sequential radiochemotherapy in patients with driver mutation-lacking lung adenocarcinoma presenting with recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion leading to hoarseness.

e14635 Background: For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly those with adenocarcinoma lacking a driver mutation, the encroachment upon the recurrent laryngeal nerve causing hoarseness presents a substantial challenge in treatment. Such patients, at TNM stage IIIB or higher, may undergo platinum-based doublet chemotherapy combined with concurrent or sequential radiotherapy. Despite these treatments, survival rates remain modest, and quality of life is significantly impaired by symptoms such as hoarseness, dysphagia, and coughing. Recently, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has emerged as a frontline treatment for adenocarcinoma patients, showing promising outcomes in unresectable, advanced stages of the disease. However, its efficacy in patients experiencing hoarseness due to recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement has not been previously investigated. Methods: Between September 2018 and October 2022, Jiangmen Central Hospital admitted 71 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma and hoarseness, who lacked a driver mutation as confirmed by NGS testing. After excluding patients who did not complete the treatment plan, the remaining subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group, consisting of 21 patients, received pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. The control group, also comprising 21 patients, underwent concurrent or sequential radiotherapy alongside pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. Results: Among the treatment group, hoarseness was reversed in 13 out of 21 patients, with a return to normal vocal function. In the control group, 5 out of 21 patients experienced a reversal of hoarseness. The treatment group showed superior outcomes in reversing hoarseness caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement (p=0.013). The objective response rate (ORR) in the treatment group was 28.57%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 66.67%. In contrast, the control group had an ORR of 9.52% and a DCR of 28.57% (p&lt;0.05). The Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as calculated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve method, was 11.77 months (95% CI: 11.19-12.35) in the treatment group and 7.53 months (95% CI: 6.73-8.33) in the control group, indicating a significantly higher survival rate in the treatment group (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: In patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy appears to effectively reverse hoarseness caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement, higher objective response rates, and increased PFS. This suggests the necessity for multicentric, prospective, evidence-based studies in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma patients with hoarseness due to recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion.

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy for resectable stage II-IIIB non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations: A multi-center, multi-cohort, exploratory study.

TPS8120 Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has been widely applied in the treatment of resectable stage II-IIIB NSCLC patients without driver gene mutation. However, as for the EGFR-positive patients, the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant treatment, either TKI or chemotherapy, is far from satisfied and the outcome of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in these patients remains an unanswered but crucial question. Herein, we conducted a phase 2 prospective trial (NCT05962021). Methods: This is a multicenter, multi-cohort prospective phase 2 study in the treatment-naïve patients with resectable stage II-IIIB (N2) (AJCC 8th edition) non-squamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations (19DEL or L858R). Enrolled patients will be divided into two cohorts according to EGFR status and receive neoadjuvant toripalimab (240mg, q3w) plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 5, q3w) for 3 cycles. Surgery will be performed after completion of neoadjuvant therapy based on the multidisciplinary discussion, while local radiotherapy will be considered if the patient cannot undergo surgery due to disease progression. Key inclusion criteria: non-squamous NSCLC, resectable stage II-IIIB (N2), EGFR mutations (19DEL or L858R), age≥18 years, ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate cardiopulmonary function. Exclusion criteria: prior systemic anticancer treatment, contraindication to immunotherapy, active autoimmune disease. Adequate pre-treatment tissue samples are required for RT-PCR or next-generation sequencing to determine the EGFR mutation status and PD-L1 expression immunohistochemical detection. The primary study endpoint is complete pathological response (pCR) rate, per blinded independent pathologist review. Simon's optimal two-stage design will be used to test the null hypothesis of pCR rate ≤5% and alternative hypothesis of pCR rate ≥15%, and 5 or more pCRs among 56 patients per arm are needed for the primary endpoint to be met. Secondary endpoints include major pathological response (MPR) rate, pCR/MPR rate in different EGFR mutation subgroups (19DEL or L858R) and different PD-L1 expression subgroups (TPS &lt; 1% and ≥ 1%), event-free survival and safety and tolerability. Peripheral blood, stool and tissue samples will be obtained longitudinally at baseline, during perioperation and at follow-ups for exploratory analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT05962021 .

Induction therapy with PD-1 antibody combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A randomised controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial.

8044 Background: Chemoradiotherpay plus immunotherapy is recommended for unresectable locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on PACIFIC trial. However, it is unclear whether surgery can provide survival benefit for patients with tumors initially unresectable transformed into resectable ones after chemoimmunotherapy. This trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic regimen of chemoimmunotherapy plus surgery or radiotherapy. Methods: Patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IIIC NSCLC were enrolled to receive 4 cycles (q21d) of PD-1 antibody (Serplulimab, 4.5mg/kg) and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. After the induction therapy, those with disease downstaged to IIIA or lower stage and resectable were randomized to receive radical surgery or radiotherapy with a ratio of 1:1, and those with stage IIIB or higher stage or unresectable disease after induction therapy were then treated by oncologists. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), major pathologic response (MPR), pathologic complete response (pCR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), R0 rate of resection, severe adverse event (SAE) rate, and health related quality of life (HRQol). Preliminary short-term results were collected. Results: One hundred patients will be enrolled as planned, and a total of 82 patients were enrolled by the data cutoff date (January 6, 2024). Fifty-four and 28 patients were diagnosed with stage IIIB and IIIC disease, respectively. The percentage of squamous carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, and NSCLCs not otherwise specified were 68.3% (56/82), 15.9% (13/82), and 15.9% (13/82), respectively. ORR in 73 evaluable patients was 74.0% (54/73). Twenty-six of them are still in induction therapy phase, and the other 47 and 9 patients received 4 cycles and 1-3 cycles of induction therapy, respectively. Thirty-one patients had downstaged and resectable disease after 4 cycles of induction therapy, and 26 of them were randomized to arm A (n = 13) and arm B (n = 13), and 5 refused randomization (3 received surgery). One patient received surgery after 2 cycles of induction therapy. In 56 patients finished 1-4 cycles of induction therapy, the rate of conversion to resectability was 57.1% (32/56). In total, 17 patients received surgery, and the MPR and pCR rate in 16 evaluable patients were 62.5% (10/16) and 31.3% (5/16), respectively. The grade 3-5 adverse event rate in 56 patients finished induction therapy was 50.0% (28/56). One patient died of immune-related pneumonia. Conclusions: Induction therapy with PD-1 antibody (Serplulimab) and chemotherapy could transform half of unresectable stage IIIB-IIIC NSCLC into resectable, and the efficacy and safety were satisfactory. Clinical trial information: NCT05766800 .

Clinical factors predicting objective response to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies in advanced and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Bevacizumab-based chemotherapies are commonly administered in the treatment of patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The primary aim of this study was to assess the factors that predict the objective response to bevacizumab-based therapies in cases of advanced and recurrent EOC. The retrospective data of 264 patients with EOC from the current study were collected between 2009 and 2022 at our clinic. Survival analyses were conducted utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the factors predicting the objective response. A predominant subset of patients (83%) presented with serous adenocarcinoma, exhibiting a high-grade differentiation at 87%. The vast majority (80%) of the cohort experienced disease recurrence. Three-fourths of the cases received bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, clinical factors such as a disease recurrence (P=0.031), upfront tumor debulking surgery before bevacizumab (P=0.009), doublet chemotherapy (P=0.003), and the presence of malignant pleural effusion (P=0.024) emerged as significant determinants influencing the Objective Response Rate (ORR) in patients undergoing bevacizumab-based therapy. The ORR was 67.5% (N.=178), comprising 15.2% complete responses (N.=40) and 52.1% partial responses (N.=138). The median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated at 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.60-11.9) and 20.1 months (95% CI, 16.0-24.2), respectively. The responses to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies could be predict by the presence of malignant pleural effusion, disease recurrence, upfront tumor debulking surgery and doublet regimen of chemotherapy.

The efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundPlatinum-based doublet chemotherapy is commonly used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A growing body of evidence indicates that incorporating antiangiogenic agents into platinum-based chemotherapy may enhance the survival outcomes for NSCLC patients. However, the optimal administration protocol for intravenous recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin), an antiangiogenic agent, remains uncertain at present.AimThis study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of 5-d continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin in combination with chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. The predictive biomarkers for this treatment regimen were further probed.MethodsThis prospective, single-arm multicenter study enrolled a total of 48 patients with advanced NSCLC who were histologically or cytologically confirmed but had not received any prior treatment from January 2021 to December 2022. Prior to the chemotherapy, these patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin (210 mg) over a period of 120 h, using an infusion pump. The chemotherapy regimen included a combination of platinum with either pemetrexed or paclitaxel, given in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint of the study was median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the secondary endpoints included median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and assessment of adverse events (AEs).ResultsThe mPFS was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.8–9.1 m) while the mOS was 12.3 months (95% CI: 7.6–18.5 m). The ORR and DCR was 52.1% and 75.0%, respectively. Leukopenia (52.1%), anemia (33.3%), and thrombocytopenia (20.8%) were the most common adverse effects and these toxicities were deemed acceptable and manageable. In addition, a correlation was noted between elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and decreased PFS and OS.ConclusionsThe incorporation of a 5-day continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin into platinum-based doublet chemotherapy has demonstrated both safety and efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, the baseline serum levels of CEA may potentially function as a predictor for the efficacy of rh-endostatin when combined with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients.ClinicalTrials.govNCT05574998.

First-line treatment of driver gene-negative metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with malignant pleural effusion: Should chemotherapy be combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor or bevacizumab?

SummaryPatients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (MLA) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) without driver gene mutations have a poor prognosis. None of the standard treatment strategies is recommended for such patients. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of the first-line treatment for this specific population: standard platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (CT), CT plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor (CT plus ICI), and CT plus bevacizumab (CT plus Bev). A total of 323 eligible patients were enrolled: CT alone (n = 166), CT plus Bev (n = 72), and CT plus ICI (n = 85). Treatment efficacy assessments were performed every two cycles according to the RECIST guidelines. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier (K‒M) curves and the log-rank test were used to compare OS and PFS. p < 0.05 was the threshold of significance (statistical software: SPSS). The median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 2.1–49.6 months). PFS and OS in the CT plus ICI/CT plus Bev cohort were significantly longer than those in the CT group (PFS: 7.8/6.4/3.9 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 16.4/15.6/9.6 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). CT plus Bev had better PFS and OS than CT plus ICI/CT in PD-L1 < 1% patients (PFS: 8.4/5.0/3.8 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 15.6/12.9/9.3 months, p < 0.0001). Among patients with PD-L1 1–49%, CT plus ICI led to a longer PFS and OS (PFS: 8.9/5.8/4.2 months, p = 0.009; OS: 24.2/18.8/11.5 months, p = 0.03). In the cohort with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, CT plus ICI was still the best first-line treatment (PFS: 19.7/13.8/9.6 months, p = 0.033; OS: 27.2/19.6/14.9 months, p = 0.047). In driver gene-negative MLA with MPE, CT plus Bev or ICI better controlled MPE and significantly prolonged survival compared to CT alone. PD-L1 expression (negative/positive) may be a key factor influencing the choice of CT plus Bev or ICI.

Canakinumab in combination with docetaxel compared with docetaxel alone for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer following platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy (CANOPY-2): A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial

ObjectivesCanakinumab, an interleukin-1 beta inhibitor, previously showed reduced lung cancer incidence and mortality (CANTOS). Here, we compare the efficacy/safety of canakinumab versus placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had progressed after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (PDC) and immunotherapy. Materials and methodsCANOPY-2, a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, enrolled adult patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, without EGFR or ALK alterations, who had received one prior PDC regimen and one prior programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor and experienced subsequent disease progression. Patients were randomized to canakinumab plus docetaxel or placebo plus docetaxel. ResultsA total of 237 patients were randomly allocated: 120 (51 %) to canakinumab and 117 (49 %) to placebo, stratified by histology and prior lines of therapy. Three patients in the placebo arm did not receive study treatment. The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of overall survival: median 10.6 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 8.2–12.4) for the canakinumab arm and 11.3 months (95 % CI, 8.5–13.8) for the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95 % CI, 0.76–1.48]; one-sided P-value = 0.633). AEs (any grade) were reported in 95 % of patients in the canakinumab group and in 98 % of patients in the placebo group. Grade 3–4 AEs were experienced by 62 % and 64 % of patients in the canakinumab and placebo groups, respectively, and grade 5 AEs were experienced by 8 % and 5 %. Prespecified, post-hoc subgroup analyses showed that patients with undetected circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and/or lower levels (< 10 mg/L) of C-reactive protein (CRP) achieved longer progression-free and overall survival than those with detected ctDNA or higher (≥ 10 mg/L) CRP levels. There was no association with treatment arm. ConclusionAdding canakinumab to docetaxel did not provide additional benefit for patients with advanced NSCLC who had progressed after PDC and immunotherapy.Clinical registration: NCT03626545.

Use of Novel National Data Sets to Monitor Chemotherapy Use and Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Te Aho o Te Kahu, the New Zealand Cancer Control Agency, is establishing a systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) database (Anti-Cancer Therapy-Nationally Organized Workstream [ACT-NOW]) which can be linked to other national health data collections. In this article, we explore the application of ACT-NOW data in the monitoring of uptake and outcomes after the public funding of pemetrexed in Aotearoa New Zealand. We used the ACT-NOW collection to identify patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer, who were treated with first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy over an 8-year period. Data were extracted for a period of 4 years before and 4 years after the national funding of pemetrexed (November 1, 2017). Treatments were classified as historical platinum doublet (cisplatin or carboplatin with gemcitabine, vinorelbine, paclitaxel, or docetaxel) or platinum pemetrexed doublet (cisplatin or carboplatin with pemetrexed). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving each treatment type, before and after November 1, 2017. To prototype linkage to outcomes data, we evaluated hospitalization and 1-year overall survival (OS) rates by treatment. A total of 331 patients were included from four cancer centers. All patients (116 of 116) who were treated with first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy between November 2013 and November 2017 received historical platinum doublet chemotherapy. After the introduction of pemetrexed, between November 2017 and November 2021, 94% (203 of 215) were treated with platinum pemetrexed doublet chemotherapy and 6% (12 of 215) with historical platinum doublet chemotherapy. Linkage to outcomes data for 1-year OS, hospitalization rates, and lengths of stay outcome data were achievable. The ACT-NOW data set has the potential to facilitate evaluation of the impact of national-level SACT funding decisions on prescribing practice and specific patient outcomes. Our results support the use of these data to inform resource planning and quality improvement.

Comparison of different maintenance regimens following first-line immunochemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immunochemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the ideal combination strategy and maintenance regimen remain uncertain. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of different first-line maintenance regimens for advanced EGFR/ALK (epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma Kinase) negative NSCLC and explore the eligibility of chemo-free maintenance. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 1,510 EGFR/ALK negative NSCLC patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment in our center from 2019 to 2021. Patients who had controlled disease after 2-6 cycles of first-line ICIs in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with or without anti-angiogenesis were included. Four maintenance regimens were analyzed: ICIs plus platinum-free chemotherapy with (group 1, I+C+A) or without anti-angiogenesis maintenance (group 2, I+C), single-agent ICIs maintenance (group 3, I) or ICIs plus anti-angiogenesis maintenance (group 4, I+A). For group 3-4, rechallenge with initial chemo-agents was given upon the first progression, those who achieved controlled disease were repeatedly followed by another chemo-free period. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Notably, for group 3-4, PFS was characterized as the duration between treatment initiation and failure of rechallenge (last disease progression). In total, 140 eligible patients in the maintenance phase were analyzed, with 20, 40, 42, and 38 patients in groups 1 to 4, respectively, displaying comparable baselines. Median PFS was similar in the I+C+A maintenance group (22.6 months), I+C maintenance group (21.0 months), and I+A maintenance group (21.5 months), whereas PFS was inferior in group 4 with I maintenance alone (13.4 months). Median chemo-free duration were 6.3 months in I maintenance group, while 13.5 months in I+A maintenance group. During the maintenance period of group 1 to 4, 25%, 25%, 19%, and 42% of patients experienced partial response (PR) again, respectively. Fifty-five percent, 65%, 48% and 61% of patients sustained durable disease control at the end of follow-up. In group 4, 39% of patients received progressive disease (PD) and rechallenge initial chemo-agents. Fifty percent of patients achieved PR and resumed to chemo-free maintenance. We showed that following first-line immunochemotherapy, chemo-free maintenance by ICIs plus anti-angiogenesis and on-demand chemo-rechallenge provided comparable efficacy to chemo-on maintenance in terms of PFS, thus allowing the minimization of cytotoxic drugs without compromising therapeutic effectiveness. In addition, anti-angiogenesis is essential during chemo-free maintenance.

Real-World Treatment Outcomes and Safety of Afatinib in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Progressed after Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy (SPACE Study)

Real-World Treatment Outcomes and Safety of Afatinib in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Progressed after Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy (SPACE Study)

Influence of Tumor Cavitation on Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PurposeA considerable portion of lung squamous cell cancer (LUSC) displays radiographic signs of cavitation. The cavitation of lesions is not accounted for in the prevailing Evaluation Criteria of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 or iRECIST in lung cancer. We hypothesized that cavitation might alter response assessment in these patients. Patients and MethodsWe performed a retrospective radiologic review of 785 patients with stage IV LUSC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. 131 patients exhibited cavitation lesions pre- or after-treatment. Response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 and a modified Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) guidelines in which the longest diameter of any cavity was subtracted from the overall longest diameter of that lesion to measure target lesions. The response rate and PFS and OS between mRECIST and RECIST v1.1 were compared. Survival curves of different response categories in each criterion were prepared using the method of Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Weighted κ statistics were used to assess interobserver reproducibilities and to compare response rates. The chi-square test confirmed the relationship between PD-L1 expression and post-treatment cavitation. ResultsNotable cavitation of pulmonary lesions was seen in 16.7% of 785 patients treated with immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy. Using the mRECIST for response assessment resulted in a higher response rate than RECIST v1.1 (66% vs. 57%). mRECIST might better identify patients with PFS and OS benefits who have cavitation. The chi-square test revealed a marginally significant difference between PD-L1 expression and tumor cavitation. Interobserver reproducibility of mRECIST for tumor cavitation evaluation was acceptable (the weighted k coefficients for mRECIST criteria was 0.821). ConclusionCavitation lesions at baseline and after checkpoint treatment are common in LUSC patients. mRECIST records a significantly higher response rate than RECIST for these LUSC patients. Response assessment might be improved by incorporating cavitation into volume assessment for target lesions. These results may inform further modifications to RECIST V1.1 to better reflect efficacy with immunotherapy.