Platelet-rich Plasma Preparation Research Articles

Bibliometric Analysis of Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Hair Restoration, Facial Rejuvenation, Dental Procedures, and Gynecological Rejuvenation

Introduction: Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) technologies offer an attractive treatment option for various medical fields. Owing to its high concentration of growth factors, PRP has been posited to induce proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis at the cellular level, as well as wound-healing and remodeling at the tissue level. The goal of the present bibliometric analysis was to characterize the growing body of literature concerning PRP use in various medical applications. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on June 28, 2024, using Web of Science and SCOPUS databases, covering all available publications in selected categories from 2001 to present. Results: PRP use for hair restoration had both the greatest number of total publications among the investigated applications, whereas PRP use in dental procedures had the longest-standing history of publications. PRP use in hair restoration and facial rejuvenation had the greatest number of placebo-controlled and double-blinded randomized controlled trials; however, the impact of results may suffer from a lack of consistency in PRP preparation and outcome measurement between different studies. Conclusion: To effectively validate the utility of PRP across various medical interventions, careful consideration of methodology should be undertaken for future studies to ensure validity of results.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Although there has been some amount of research into the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, most studies have not fully demonstrated its benefits. In addition, PRP formulations containing different concentrations of leukocytes have not been directly compared for rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this article was to determine whether arthroscopic rotator cuff repair combined with PRP injection, either leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) or leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), is superior to the control. The null hypothesis was that the addition of any PRP formulation would not result in outcomes superior to the control group. Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic repair were assessed for eligibility. The included patients were randomized to 3 treatment groups: the LR-PRP, LP-PRP, and standard-care control groups. After the rotator cuff suture was fixed firmly, different groups of liquid PRP preparations prepared by centrifugation were injected into the tendon-to-bone interface. The functional outcomes were assessed using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the visual analog scale for pain during sleep and activity, and active range of motion at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. In addition, the visual analog scale score was obtained at weeks 2 and 6. Postoperative structural integrity was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging at 12 months using the Sugaya classification. Type III was considered partial retear, and types IV and V were considered complete retears. The safety of surgery was compared by the incidence of complications. The main analyses were performed in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. Of 150 patients initially randomized, the functional outcomes in 142 (46 LR-PRP, 47 LP-PRP, 49 control) and the structural integrity in 133 (40 LR-PRP, 46 LP-PRP, 47 control) were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of the UCLA score among the 3 groups (P = .169). The trends in functional outcomes and range of motion were similar for the 3 groups, with no significant differences among the groups at 12 months. However, within 6 months after surgery, the ASES score was better in the LR-PRP group than in the control group (3 months: 85.8 ± 4.1 vs 81.6 ± 8.7; P = .011; 6 months: 90.0 ± 5.4 vs 86.2 ± 6.8; P = .003). At 12 months after surgery, the overall retear rate, including partial and complete retears, was 8%. There were no significant differences in the rates of overall retear (P = .755) or complete retear (P = .633) among the 3 groups. The only surgical complication was postoperative stiffness, which occurred in 3% of patients, and the incidence did not significantly differ among the groups (P = .790). The study did not reveal that shoulders treated with the LR-PRP or LP-PRP formulations had any superior functional or structural outcomes at 12 months compared with those of the control group. However, LR-PRP may offer better ASES scores than the control group up to 6 months after surgery, and its clinical benefit remains to be proven. ChiCTR2100045039 (Chinese Clinical Trial Register).

Critical Insights on Preparation of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Tubes With a Thixotropic Gel Separator.

Thixotropic gels are the preferred choice in the collection of platelet-rich plasma as an easy solution to operator variability. One often unnoticed shortcoming is the entrapment of platelets in the gel layer's uppermost surface. We provide instructions to optimize platelet yield, ie, agitation to re-suspend platelets, setting the optimal G-force and time of centrifugation, and the essential use of a horizontal swing bucket centrifuge. We conclude that this technique represents a new clinical and research direction, particularly to optimize platelet counts. We therefore encourage others to utilize this technique in future endeavors. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(11):979-985. doi:10.36849/JDD.7983.

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Hair Restoration Treatments: A Comprehensive Review of Existing Literature

Hair loss is a common concern affecting individuals worldwide. With various therapies available to address this issue, it prompts the search for effective treatments and prevention methods. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) therapy has emerged as a promising option for hair restoration, leveraging the regenerative properties of platelets to stimulate hair growth. This comprehensive review aims to synthesize the existing literature on the use of PRP in hair restoration treatments. A systematic search of major databases was conducted to identify relevant studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of PRP therapy for hair loss of the scalp. Eligible studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion criteria, and data extraction was performed to capture key findings, including patient demographics, PRP preparation methods, treatment protocols, and outcomes measured. The review encompasses both clinical trials and observational studies, providing insights into the effectiveness of PRP therapy in promoting hair regrowth, improving hair density and therefore enhancing patient satisfaction. Additionally, safety considerations, adverse events, and limitations of current evidence are discussed. Overall, this review highlights the growing body of evidence supporting the use of PRP in hair restoration treatments while identifying areas for further research and clinical refinement.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-articular Injections in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative disorder that causes significant pain and functional limitations. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has gained considerable attention in recent years in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. In this narrative review, we aim to investigate the role of intra-articular PRP injections in the treatment of knee and hip OA. The review also discusses different classifications of PRP based on composition. Furthermore, this narrative review also identified various limitations of PRP therapy in OA. PRP is classified into different types based on cell content and fibrin architecture, including pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP), leukocyte- and platelet-rich plasma (L-PRP),pure platelet-rich fibrin (P-PRF), and leukocyte- andplatelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF).Various clinical trials have shown that PRP is an effective option for the treatment of knee and hip OA. However, the superiority of PRP over hyaluronic acid has been reported inconsistently. This variability can be attributed to PRP preparation techniques. The safety profiles of PRP are generally favorable and the adverse effects are generally mild in nature. Although there is sufficient evidence in support of PRP in the treatment of OA, the long-term effects of PRP have not been reported. Further studies should focus on longer follow-up periods to identify the efficacy and safety of PRP in treating knee OA. There is also a need for standardization of PRP preparations in OA management.

Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Management of Non-obstructive Azoospermia.

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a common cause of infertility in males, which is characterized by the absence of sperm in the ejaculate, resulting from impaired spermatogenesis. The primary therapeutic approaches for the management of NOA include testicular sperm extraction, varicocelectomy in case of clinical varicoceles, and hormonal manipulation. While traditional treatments are found to have a limited role in the management of NOA, recent studies have explored the potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a safer and promising therapeutic option. Autologous PRP preparations are derived from the patient's blood and comprise growth factors and cytokines, promoting tissue repair and regeneration. PRP has a wide range of applications in the medical field, including managing infertility in males and females. This literature review aimed to evaluate the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of PRP in the management of NOA. After a thorough review of relevant data from observational and experimental studies, the findings of this study suggested that PRP may positively influence spermatogenesis, sperm quality, DNA integrity, and sperm retrieval during assisted reproductive procedures. Further research is needed to establish the optimal PRP preparation, administration method, and long-term benefits. The newer studies shall include a diverse patient population and employ long-term follow-up to assess the durability of any positive effects of PRP treatment. The growing body of evidence regarding the therapeutic potential for NOA in humans offers greater opportunities for men seeking fertility treatment, informing clinical practice, and optimizing the use of PRP.

Optimized Methodology to Produce Platelet-Rich Plasma and Perform Platelet Aggregation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Inter-individual differences in clopidogrel metabolism and platelet counts within platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intrigued us to optimize light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) assay in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients administered with clopidogrel and ticagrelor.The objective of the study was to optimize PRP preparation using separating gel PRP tubes to perform LTA among CAD patients on clopidogrel and ticagrelor. Initially, we optimized PRP preparation and platelet aggregation (PA) on healthy controls. To validate the protocol, we recruited 10 healthy controls and 28 CAD patients, comprising 16 on clopidogrel and 12 on ticagrelor regimen. Bio-X, India, supplied PRP tubes (9 mL) with 3.2% sodium citrate. PRP and autologous platelet-poor plasma (PPP) were prepared by centrifugation at 151 g for seven minutes and 3,780 g for 10 minutes, respectively. LTA was performed using platelet aggregometer TA-4V (Stago, Asnières-sur-Seine, France). Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (10 µM) was used as an agonist. The mean maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) among controls, clopidogrel patients, and ticagrelor patients were 55.161±13.69%,53.17±22%, and 35.84±20.79% (p=0.042), respectively. The mean platelet volumes among groups were 9.34±2.51fL, 7.60±0.85fL, and 10.99±1.62fL (p≤0.01), respectively. We successfully optimized PRP preparation for the LTA assay using a PRP tube. Its application to measure PA routinely in a cardiology clinic seems propitious.

Intraovarian Platelet-Rich Plasma Administration for Anovulatory Infertility: Preliminary Findings of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Background/Objectives: Infertility constitutes a significant challenge for couples around the world. Ovarian dysfunction, a major cause of infertility, can manifest with anovulatory cycles, elevated follicle-stimulating hormone levels, and diminished ovarian reserve markers such as anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels or the Antral Follicle Count (AFC). Blood-derived therapies including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have been used in fertility treatments in women with low ovarian reserve or premature ovarian insufficiency. This prospective clinical cohort study aims to assess the effects of intraovarian PRP therapy on ovarian function in women diagnosed with anovulatory cycles. Methods: The preliminary findings of this prospective cohort study are based on the first 32 patients enrolled. In this study, patients over 40 years old with anovulatory infertility were included. Venous blood samples were collected from each participant for the preparation of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Each participant received two courses of intraovarian PRP injections using a transvaginal ultrasound-guided approach. Serum levels of reproductive hormones before and after PRP intervention were measured. Results: This study's results demonstrate a significant improvement in ovarian physiology following transvaginal ultrasound-guided PRP infusion. A 75% increase in Antral Follicle Count (AFC) was observed, which was statistically significant. Furthermore, statistically significant reductions in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and prolactin levels were observed. Serum Vitamin D 1-25 levels were substantially increased after the injection. Conclusions: These findings highlight the beneficial impact of intraovarian PRP injection in optimizing ovarian function and other metabolic parameters. However, the published literature on this subject is limited and further clinical studies should be conducted to confirm the role of intraovarian PRP in fertility treatments.

The additive value of platelet-rich plasma to topical Minoxidil in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

It still needs to be determined if platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has any added advantage over Minoxidil in treating androgenetic alopecia. We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing scalp injections of PRP plus Minoxidil vs Minoxidil alone for managing androgenetic alopecia. All RCTs published on Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed comparing PRP plus Minoxidil vs. Minoxidil alone were eligible. The literature search was completed on 5 March 2024. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024509826). Of five included RCTs, three had a high risk of bias, while one had some concerns. A systematic review of the studies showed that all trials reported better outcomes with PRP plus Minoxidil than with Minoxidil alone. Meta-analysis showed that hair density at one month (MD: 11.07 95% CI: 1.20, 20.94 I2 = 0%), three months (MD: 21.81 95% CI: 10.64, 33.00 I2 = 57%) and 5/6 months (MD: 17.80 95% CI: 7.91, 27.69 I2 = 80%) of follow-up was significantly better in the PRP plus Minoxidil vs the Minoxidil alone group. Meta-analysis of adverse events showed that the risk of adverse events was comparable in both groups (OR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.22, 1.36 I2 = 0%). The certainty of evidence on the GRADE assessment was "low to very low." Very low-quality evidence shows that the addition of injectable PRP to topical Minoxidil may improve outcomes in patients with androgenetic alopecia. The addition of PRP was found to improve hair density and patient satisfaction significantly. However, the small number of studies with a high risk of bias and heterogeneity in PRP preparation methods are significant limitations of current evidence. Further studies with larger sample sizes and uniform PRP preparation protocols are needed.

Platelet-rich plasma protects hippocampal neurons and memory functions in a rat model of vascular dementia.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a promising biomaterial rich in bioactive growth factors, offering potential as a therapeutic agent for various diseases. However, its effectiveness in central nervous system disorders like vascular dementia (VaD) remains underexplored. This study investigated the potential of PRP to mitigate VaD progression in vivo. A rat model of VaD was established via bilateral common carotid artery occlusion and hypovolemia operation. Rats were randomly assigned to receive either PRP or platelet-poor plasma (PPP)-the latter being a byproduct of PRP preparation and used as a reference standard-resulting in the groups designated as 'operated group (OP)+PRP' and 'OP+PPP', respectively. PRP or PPP (500 μl) was administered intraperitoneally on the day of the operation and postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8. Cognitive function was assessed using the Y-maze, Barnes maze, and passive avoidance tests. On postoperative day 8, hippocampal samples were subjected to histological and semi-quantitative analyses. OP exhibited significant memory decline compared to controls, while the 'OP+PRP' group showed notable improvement. Histological analysis revealed increased neuronal loss and neuroinflammation in OP hippocampi, mitigated in 'OP+PRP'. Semi-quantitative analysis showed decreased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) in OP, restored in 'OP+PPP' and further in 'OP+PRP'. These results highlight PRP's protective effects against VaD-induced hippocampal damage and cognitive impairment, partially attributed to BDNF/TrkB pathway upregulation.

Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Medical and Surgical Specialties: Quality, Evaluation, Evidence, and Enforcement.

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used in various medical and surgical specialties for its regenerative properties, including aesthetics (facial rejuvenation, hair restoration, and skin tightening) and orthopedics (treatment of tendinitis and osteoarthritis). However, the inconsistent literature on PRP's efficacy and safety leads to critical knowledge gaps. This systematic review evaluates quality control measures in PRP preparation and application and explores the regulatory environment governing its clinical use. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, for studies published from January 2020 to April 2024. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving human participants undergoing PRP treatment for aesthetic or regenerative purposes. Key parameters such as the PRP preparation methods, platelet concentration, and quality control measures were analyzed. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024557669). Results: Out of 75 RCTs involving 5726 patients, the review identified significant variability in PRP preparation methods and application techniques, including differences in centrifugation protocols and platelet concentration levels. A new evidence-based scoring system, the William-Eqram Scoring System for PRP Quality Reporting (WESS-PQR), was proposed to address these inconsistencies. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.79) between proper temperature control during preparation and PRP efficacy. Initial platelet count assessment showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.57) with efficacy. Conclusions: Standardized PRP preparation protocols and robust regulatory frameworks are urgently needed to ensure the safety and efficacy of PRP treatments. The proposed WESS-PQR scoring system can serve as a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers, promoting consistency and reliability in PRP applications.

Subacromial injection of platelet-rich plasma provides greater improvement in pain and functional outcomes compared to corticosteroids at 1-year follow-up: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BackgroundStudies evaluating the results of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) have demonstrated conflicting results and have been confounded by small patient samples, the absence of a control group, the combined analysis of isolated tendinopathies and rotator cuff tears, insufficient reporting of PRP preparations, The purpose of this study was to perform a randomized controlled trial comparing platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with standard corticosteroid (CS) injections in providing pain relief and improved function in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy. MethodsThis was a double-blind RCT at a single center. We evaluated patients between 18 and 50 years old who had both a clinical and magnetic resonance (MRI) diagnosis of supraspinatus tendinopathy refractory to conservative treatment. A total of 50 patients received PRP treatment, whereas 50 patients received a corticosteroid, as a control group. Patients completed patient-reported outcome assessments at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection. The primary outcome was improvement in the VAS score for pain. Secondary outcomes included changes in ASES score, SANE score and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Treatment failure was defined as persistent pain at 3 months which required a subsequent injection. ResultsThe mean age was 27.7 (±7.4). All the patients completed 12 months clinical follow-up. At 12 months, patients in the PRP group showed a significantly greater improvement in the VAS than patients in the CS group 1.68(0.6) vs 2.3(1.0) (p<0.001). As well, at 12 months follow-up, the 3 scores evaluated were significantly higher in patients treated with PRP than in patients treated with CS ASES 89.8 (6.3) vs 78.0 (8.6) (p<.001); SANE 89.2 (6.3) vs 80.5 (9.6) (p< .001) and PSQI 2.72 (0.6) vs 4.02 (1.7) (p< .001)The overall failure rate, was significantly higher in the CS group (30%) than in the PRP group (12%) (p<0.01) ConclusionOne subacromial PRP injection in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy showed significantly superior and sustained pain-relieving and functional improvements compared with one corticosteroid subacromial injection assessed by 4 patient-reported outcome scales at 12 months of follow-up. Moreover, the overall failure rate, was significantly higher in the CS group than in the PRP group.

Platelet-Rich Plasma in Aesthetic Dermatology: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising treatment in aesthetic dermatology. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current evidence for PRP applications in skin rejuvenation, hair restoration, wound healing, and fat grafting. FollowingPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases and 13 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected for review. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of included studies. The reviewed studies consistently reported positive outcomes for PRP across various applications. In skin rejuvenation, significant improvements in collagen density and overall skin appearance were observed. For hair restoration, studies showed mean increases of 18-27.7 hairs/cm² in treated areas. PRP demonstrated efficacy in accelerating wound healing across various wound types, including chronic ulcers. In fat grafting, PRP was associated with improved graft survival and integration. Patient satisfaction was generally high across all applications. However, there was significant heterogeneity in PRP preparation methods and treatment protocols among studies. This systematic review provides evidence supporting the efficacy of PRP in aesthetic dermatology, particularly in skin rejuvenation, hair restoration, wound healing, and fat grafting. PRP demonstrates a favorable safety profile across applications. However, the variability in study designs and PRP protocols highlights the need for standardization. Future research should focus on large-scale randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols and longer follow-up periods to solidify the evidence base for PRP in aesthetic dermatology.

Platelet-Rich Therapies in Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Review of the Impact of Platelet Concentrates on Mesh Integration in Hernia Management.

Mesh-augmented hernia repair is the gold standard in abdominal wall and hiatal/diaphragmatic hernia management and ranks among the most common procedures performed by general surgeons. However, it is associated with a series of drawbacks, including recurrence, mesh infection, and adhesion formation. To address these weaknesses, numerous biomaterials have been investigated for mesh coating. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous agent that promotes tissue healing through numerous cytokines and growth factors. In addition, many reports highlight its contribution to better integration of different types of coated meshes, compared to conventional uncoated meshes. The use of PRP-coated meshes for hernia repair has been reported in the literature, but a review of technical aspects and outcomes is missing. The aim of this comprehensive review is to report the experimental studies investigating the synergistic use of PRP and mesh implants in hernia animal models. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus without chronological constraints. In total, fourteen experimental and three clinical studies have been included. Among experimental trials, synthetic, biologic, and composite meshes were used in four, nine, and one study, respectively. In synthetic meshes, PRP-coating leads to increased antioxidant levels and collaged deposition, reduced oxidative stress, and improved inflammatory response, while studies on biological meshes revealed increased neovascularization and tissue integration, reduced inflammation, adhesion severity, and mechanical failure rates. Finally, PRP-coating of composite meshes results in reduced adhesions and improved mechanical strength. Despite the abundance of preclinical data, there is a scarcity of clinical studies, mainly due to the absence of an established protocol regarding PRP preparation and application. To this point in time, PRP has been used as a coating agent for the repair of abdominal and diaphragmatic hernias, as well as for mesh fixation. Clinical application of conclusions drawn from experimental studies may lead to improved results in hernia repair.

Profound Properties of Protein-Rich, Platelet-Rich Plasma Matrices as Novel, Multi-Purpose Biological Platforms in Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Wound Healing.

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparations are prepared at the point of care. Centrifugation cellular density separation sequesters a fresh unit of blood into three main fractions: a platelet-poor plasma (PPP) fraction, a stratum rich in platelets (platelet concentrate), and variable leukocyte bioformulation and erythrocyte fractions. The employment of autologous platelet concentrates facilitates the biological potential to accelerate and support numerous cellular activities that can lead to tissue repair, tissue regeneration, wound healing, and, ultimately, functional and structural repair. Normally, after PRP preparation, the PPP fraction is discarded. One of the less well-known but equally important features of PPP is that particular growth factors (GFs) are not abundantly present in PRP, as they reside outside of the platelet alpha granules. Precisely, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are mainly present in the PPP fraction. In addition to their roles as angiogenesis activators, these plasma-based GFs are also known to inhibit inflammation and fibrosis, and they promote keratinocyte migration and support tissue repair and wound healing. Additionally, PPP is known for the presence of exosomes and other macrovesicles, exerting cell-cell communication and cell signaling. Newly developed ultrafiltration technologies incorporate PPP processing methods by eliminating, in a fast and efficient manner, plasma water, cytokines, molecules, and plasma proteins with a molecular mass (weight) less than the pore size of the fibers. Consequently, a viable and viscous protein concentrate of functional total proteins, like fibrinogen, albumin, and alpha-2-macroglobulin is created. Consolidating a small volume of high platelet concentrate with a small volume of highly concentrated protein-rich PPP creates a protein-rich, platelet-rich plasma (PR-PRP) biological preparation. After the activation of proteins, mainly fibrinogen, the PR-PRP matrix retains and facilitates interactions between invading resident cells, like macrophages, fibroblast, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), as well as the embedded concentrated PRP cells and molecules. The administered PR-PRP biologic will ultimately undergo fibrinolysis, leading to a sustained release of concentrated cells and molecules that have been retained in the PR-PRP matrix until the matrix is dissolved. We will discuss the unique biological and tissue reparative and regenerative properties of the PR-PRP matrix.

P-294 Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma(PRP) for patients with refractory thin endometrium in euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles improve pregnancy outcomes

Abstract Study question Can intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma(PRP) for patients with refractory thin endometrium in euploid frozen embryo transfer(FET) cycles improve pregnancy outcomes? Summary answer Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma(PRP) for patients with refractory thin endometrium in euploid FET cycles improve pregnancy outcomes. What is known already Previous studies have reported a positive correlation between endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate, which has led to the common clinical practice of canceling embryo transfer in cycles where the patient’s endometrial thickness remains below 7mm.One of the novel and promising treatments to improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with refractory thin endometrium is intrauterine infusion of autologous PRP.Recent studies demonstrated that intrauterine infusion of PRP improve pregnancy outcomes in these patients.Thus, to better assess the efficacy of intrauterine PRP treatment, further studies involving euploid embryos are necessary to rule out failed implantation or pregnancy loss due to aneuploidy of the embryos. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study analyzed all cycles(n = 131) of euploid FET in women with refractory thin endometrium at the CHA Fertility Center in Seoul Station from January 2022 to August 2023.Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received PRP intrauterine infusion before embryo transfer in euploid FET cycles.Group A(n = 88) received intrauterine infusion of PRP at least once before transfer of euploid FET,and Group B(n = 43) underwent euploid FET without PRP infusion. Participants/materials, setting, methods Intrauterine infusion of autologous PRP was performed on patients who had more than two canceled FET cycles due to thin endometrial thickness(&amp;lt;7mm). Endometrial preparation was executed according to a standardized protocol for hormone replacement therapy. Group A received the last autologous PRP infusion 48 hours before euploid FET. PRP preparation was carried using an aseptic PRP centrifuge kit (PROSYS PRP; Prodizen, Korea). All embryos transferred were tested for genetic abnormalities using next-generation sequencing. Main results and the role of chance There was no significant difference in mean age and maximum endometrial thickness between the two groups. (38.1±3.1 vs. 38.3±3.2, p = 0.986 and 6.6±1.1 vs. 6.0±0.8, p = 0.320, respectively) Group A had significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates and ongoing pregnancy rates than Group B. (51.1% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.024 and 44.3 vs. 16.3%, p = 0.0017, respectively) Implantation rate and beta HCG positivity were also higher in group A, but there was no statistical difference. (63.6% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.063 and 37.2 vs. 23.2%, p = 0.064, respectively) Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective study and results must be confirmed on a well-designed randomized controlled study. Also, follow-up study consisting of larger number of patients is necessary. Wider implications of the findings Autologous PRP intrauterine infusion has shown positive effects in assisting implantation in patients with refractory thin endometrium. In particular, euploid frozen embryo transfer in these patients excludes failed implantation and pregnancy loss due to embryo aneuploidy, suggesting that intrauterine PRP treatment contributes to successful implantation and pregnancy. Trial registration number not applicable

P-405 Effects of intrauterine perfusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma on recurrent implantation failure in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Study question We aimed to evaluate the effect of the platelet-rich plasma （PRP) on pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIF undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). Summary answer Intrauterine infusion of PRP might have more beneficial effects on pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients undergoing FET. What is known already Immunological therapies are of great interest to specialists in reproductive medicine. The immune therapies use intrauterine infusion (i.e., PRP, PBMC, G-CSF, and hCG) for endometrial immunomodulation. Despite the limited number of publications available, the results are encouraging. In the network meta-analysis, PRP, PBMC, C-GCSF, and hCG administration all significantly increased embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy compared to controls. Additionally, PRP administration resulted in a higher live birth rate than the control. This year, more research has focused on PRP as an innovative method to treat RIF. Study design, size, duration Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to July 29, 2023. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on pregnancy outcomes of women with RIF who were administered PRP undergoing FET were included. We conducted a meta-analysis where possible using a fixed effects model. The Cochrane Handbook was used to assess the risk of bias for RCTs. Binary outcomes were pooled using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Participants/materials, setting, methods Seven RCTs were included with 1,014 RIF women. The final number of women analyzed was 508 with intrauterine infusion PRP and 506 without it. Main results and the role of chance Meta-analysis showed that compared to the controls, the women who received PRP had a significantly higher embryo implantation rate (n = 2, risk ratio (RR) 2.34, 95% CI 1.65 to 3.32; P &amp;lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%), biochemical pregnancy rate (n = 5, RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.36; P &amp;lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%), clinical pregnancy rate (n = 7, RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.82; P &amp;lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%), ongoing pregnancy rate (n = 3, RR 2.70, 95% CI 1.79 to 4.05, P = 0.0004, I2 = 31%), and multiple pregnancy rate (n = 3, RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.68, P = 0.04, I2 = 0%). However, PRP was not attributable to reduce the miscarriage rate (n = 3, RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.35; P = 0.80, I2 = 0%). Limitations, reasons for caution The proportion of small-sample studies included has to some extent affected the validity of the results. There were some variations regarding the PRP preparation process, which may result in a variable composition and concentrations of its different contents. Wider implications of the findings Intrauterine infusion PRP in patients with RIF who underwent FET may improve the pregnancy outcomes assessed in RCTs, including clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy. Therefore, we suggest that PRP be included in endometrial preparation protocols. Trial registration number not applicable

Operator impact assessment on qualitative and quantitative parameters of canine platelet-rich plasma.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a cornerstone in veterinary regenerative medicine. The present study evaluated the impact of the operator on the qualitative and quantitative features of non-activated PRP derived from canine whole blood. Blood was collected in anticoagulant acid citrate dextrose from twelve healthy adult dogs and PRP was prepared according to the double-spin method. Both operators followed an identical protocol and utilized the same equipment for PRP preparation from the pooled blood samples. The resulting PRP underwent characterization, classification and coding based on minimum reporting standards. The consistency and internal reliability of different parameters were also assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha values. Variables such as white blood cell (WBC) concentration, relative WBC composition and mean platelet volume (MPV) showed poor reliability, and WBC concentration and MPV also had unacceptable internalconsistency. Significant differences were observed in several qualitative and quantitative parameters of the prepared PRP, highlighting the influence of the operator even when the same protocol and equipment were used. Our study has direct implications to regenerative medicine, reinforcing the urgency to set minimum requirements for reporting PRP in research studies.

Feasibility Study on Using Syringes to Separate Human Peripheral Blood for Preparing Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

This paper focuses on exploring new methods for preparing platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to improve its clinical application and popularization. As a natural growth factor, PRP has significant advantages in promoting tissue repair and alleviating inflammation, but limitations in preparation methods hinder its widespread use. The study uses clinical medical syringes as the centrifuge container for PRP preparation. Without disrupting the stratification of the blood, the method employs a pushing technique to move the density gradient centrifuged blood through a medical three-way valve, separating the different blood components to obtain the target PRP layer. This method is simple to operate, has a higher recovery efficiency, and ensures the blood is handled in a closed environment throughout the process, reducing environmental contamination. It can be performed in ordinary settings. The authors seek a feasible, easy-to-operate, environmentally low-requirement, and low-cost separation method to facilitate the clinical popularization of PRP.

Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections from open preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection: A systematic review of 91 randomized controlled trials and 5914 injections.

To compare the infection rate of intraarticular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) knee injections between open and closed techniques in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the last decade. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed, Scopus and Virtual Health Library were accessed in October 2022 using the terms 'platelet-rich plasma', 'PRP', 'knee' and 'tibiofemoral' alone and in combination with Boolean operators AND/OR. RCTs published during the last 10 years evaluating PRP intra-articular knee injections were considered eligible. Studies were excluded if the kit/preparation technique was not described. Data were presented using individual studies' absolute values, totals, and pooled percentages. Publication bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool. Ninety-one studies met the predetermined eligibility criteria. Forty-one implemented a closed technique, while 50 were open. All studies implementing a closed technique disclosed their commercial kits. Only 16 studies (17.58%) failed to report joint infections. Among the studies reporting joint infections as outcomes, 30 implemented a closed technique with 1195 patients, 1921 intra-articular knee injections and 95.44% of patient follow-up. On the other hand, 45 of them implemented an open technique with 2290 patients, 3993 intra-articular knee injections and 97.07% of patient follow-up. No patient had a joint infection among the included studies. Thirty-three studies prepared their PRP in controlled environments (36.26%). Most studies did not report where the preparation occurred (48.35%). Only twelve studies disclosed using laminar flow during preparation (13.19%). The infection rate for both techniques was 0 per 1000 knee injections. Open PRP preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection and can lower manufacturing costs when appropriate facilities are available. However, PRP preparation setting and laminar flow implementation data are deficient, and minimal requirements for good manufacturing practices demand further studies while adhering to local and regional regulations. Level I, systematic review of RCTs.