Platelet Reactivity Index Values Research Articles

Relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison between vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay and multiple electrode aggregometry

ESSENTIALS: The reliability of platelet tests as markers of the variable bioavailability of clopidogrel is not yet defined. Kinetics of clopidogrel active metabolite (CAM) and platelet response were studied in ischemic heart disease. CAM plasma maximum concentration (Cmax ) predicted vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP-P). Timely performed VASP-P, not an aggregation-based test, may be a surrogate for clopidogrel bioavailability. The high inter-individual variability in the inhibition of platelet function by clopidogrel is mostly explained by high variability in its transformation to an active metabolite (CAM). Objective We investigated the relations between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CAM by comparing two methods of platelet function. We enrolled 14 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome or inducible myocardial ischemia. Plasma concentrations of clopidogrel and CAM, phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP-P), expressed as a platelet reactivity index (PRI) and whole-blood platelet aggregation (multiple electrode aggregometer, MEA) were measured before and after a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose (nine time-points) and before and after 75-mg maintenance doses on days 2, 7 and 30. Plasma concentrations of clopidogrel and CAM were highly variable. CAM reached maximal concentration (Cmax ) (median, 110.8 nm; range, 41.9-484.8) 0.5-2 h after the loading dose. A sigmoid dose-response curve defined the relations between CAMCmax and PRI after 3 to 24 h (IC50 , 459.6 nm; 95% confidence interval, 453.4-465.7; R(2) = 0.82). PRI was unchanged from baseline in patients with the lowest CAMCmax (< 83 nm, n = 7), indicating low sensitivity of VASP-P. PRI values were also predicted by CAMCmax at days 2, 7 and 30. Platelet aggregation measured by MEA did not show significant relations with either PRI or with CAM pharmacokinetics at any time-point. After 600 mg clopidogrel, VASP-P, but not whole-blood platelet aggregation measured by MEA, is almost entirely predicted by CAMCmax . VASP-P could be useful in studies aimed at investigating relations between CAM bioavailability and clinical events.

Platelet inhibition with prasugrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing therapeutic hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Therapeutic hypothermia improves neurological outcome in combination with early revascularisation, but seems to affect clopidogrel responsiveness. The more potent thienopyridine prasugrel has not yet been sufficiently evaluated during therapeutic hypothermia. We investigated 23 consecutive AMI patients (61 ± 11 years) following out-of-hospital resuscitation undergoing revascularisation and therapeutic hypothermia. Prasugrel efficacy was assessed by the platelet-reactivity-index (PRI) before and 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours (h) following a loading dose of 60 mg via a gastric tube. Mean PRI (± SD) was 70 ± 12 % prior to loading and 60 ± 16 % (2 h, ns), 52 ± 21 % (4 h, p< 0.01), 42 ± 26 % (6 h, p< 0.01), 37 ± 21 % (12 h, p< 0.01), 27 ± 23 % (24 h, p< 0.01), 18 ± 14 % (48 h, p< 0.01), and 13 ± 10 % (72 h, p< 0.01) after loading. Sufficient platelet inhibition occurred later compared to stable AMI patients (6 h vs 2 h); however, high on-treatment platelet reactivity significantly decreased over time and was non-existent after 72 h (PRI> 50 %: 2 h: 72 %, 4 h: 52 %, 6 h: 43 %, 12 h: 29 %, 24 h: 17 %, 48 h: 5 %, 72 h: 0 %). There was no relation between 30-day mortality rate (26 %) and PRI values. Prasugrel significantly reduced platelet reactivity even during vasopressor use, analgosedation and therapeutic hypothermia. Despite a significant delay compared to stable AMI patients, sufficient platelet inhibition was reached in 83 % of patients within 24 h. Therefore, prasugrel administration via gastric tube might be a useful therapeutic strategy in these patients at high risk, providing potent and effective P2Y12 inhibition.

Plasma fibrin clot phenotype independently affects intracoronary thrombus ultrastructure in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Determinants of intracoronary thrombus (ICT) composition in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are largely unknown. We sought to investigate whether plasma fibrin phenotype and platelet reactivity affect ICT ultrastructure. We assessed the content of fibrin, platelets and erythrocytes including polyhedrocytes by scanning electron microscopy on the surface and inside ICT aspirated from 80 STEMI patients within 12 hours since chest pain onset. Plasma fibrin clot permeability (Ks), which indicates the average pore size, lysis time (t50 %), platelet reactivity index (PRI) and ADP-induced platelet aggregation (ADP5, 20µM) were evaluated on admission. All patients received aspirin and 45 (56.3 %) 600 mg of clopidogrel, 80 (60-120) min prior to aspiration. Higher content of fibrin (61.6 vs 34.3 %, P< 0.0001) and platelets (8.2 vs 4.8 %, P=0.018) and lower erythrocyte content (15.8 vs 42.9 %, P< 0.0001) were found on ICT surface compared with its inner part. After adjustment for fibrinogen, in both ICT parts fibrin content was correlated with Ks (r≤-0.55, P< 0.0001) and t50 % (r≥ 0.29, P≤ 0.02) but not with PRI and ADP5,20µM. Polyhedrocytes were observed in 16 (20 %) patients and their large amount expressed as ≥ 50 % fields of view covered by polyhedrocytes was associated with the lower PRI values (40 vs 69 %, P=0.015), but not Ks or t50 %. By multivariate regression, Ks (β=-0.62, P< 0.0001), clopidogrel pretreatment (β=-0.36, P< 0.001), ischemia time (β=0.19, P=0.044) and family history (β=0.18, P=0.049) independently predicted fibrin content in the whole ICT (R²=0.65, P< 0.0001). Formation of denser plasma fibrin clots is independently associated with high fibrin content within the ICT in STEMI.

Issue highlights--November 2015 (88:B6).

Issue highlights--November 2015 (88:B6).

Abstract 13180: Impact of Cigarette Smoking on Levels on Platelet P2Y12 Mediated Platelet Inhibition in Prasugrel Treated Patients: Results of a Pharmacodynamic Study

Introduction: In patients with established vascular disease, smoking is a strong independent risk factor for adverse outcomes, including mortality. Several investigations have shown that cigarette smoking induces cytochrome P450 enzymatic activity which in turn increases clopidogrel metabolism leading to enhanced pharmacodynamic (PD) effects compared with non-smokers. These findings may explain the heightened clinical benefits of clopidogrel in smokers compared with nonsmokers. Prasugrel has superior PD and clinical effects compared with clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cigarette smoking on platelet P2Y 12 mediated effects among patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy. Methods: A total of 156 patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy (10mg/qd) for at least 7-days, in addition to aspirin (81mg/qd), who previously underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome were studied. An objective assessment of smoking status was performed by measuring serum levels of cotinine (the major stable degradation product of nicotine metabolite). Cotinine levels &gt;3 ng/ml identified patients as smokers. PD assessments to determine platelet P2Y 12 activity was performed by flow cytometric assessment of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). Results were reported as platelet reactivity index (PRI). A PRI&gt;50% identified patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR). Results: According to cotinine serum levels, patients were divided into smokers (n=55) and nonsmokers (n=101). PRI values in the overall population were not normally distributed (median [interquartile range (IQR)] 30 [19.1-38.9]) and 14.6% of patients had HPR. PRI levels were not significantly different between smokers and nonsmokers (33.7 [13.6-46.9] vs 28.8 [21.7-37.3], p= 0.56). There was no correlation between PRI values and cotinine levels (r=0.03; p=0.74). Accordingly, HPR rates were similar between smokers and nonsmokers (18.2% vs 12.9%; p=0.25). Conclusions: In patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy, cigarette smoking status, as objectively assessed by serum levels of cotinine, does not affect the degree of platelet P2Y 12 mediated inhibition.

Pharmacodynamic Effects of Cangrelor on Platelet P2Y12 Receptor–Mediated Signaling in Prasugrel-Treated Patients

The purpose of this study was to assess the in vitro P2Y12 receptor inhibitory effects of cangrelor on platelets from patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy treated with 2 reloading dose regimens. Despite its more potent and rapid antiplatelet effects compared with clopidogrel, recent studies have shown variability in prasugrel-mediated P2Y12 receptor inhibition, particularly in high-risk settings. Cangrelor is a potent intravenous P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. A total of 60 patients with coronary artery disease on maintenance prasugrel (10 mg/day) therapy were randomized to a 30- or 60-mg reload of prasugrel. The platelet reactivity index (PRI), as assessed by whole-blood vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, was measured with and without in vitro incubation of cangrelor (500 nM) at baseline, and at 1 and 4 h after reload. In the absence of cangrelor, prasugrel reloading reduced PRI (p < 0.001 for both doses), although a 60-mg reload had greater platelet inhibition compared with a 30-mg reload at 4 h (p = 0.001). Cangrelor was associated with a reduction in PRI values during the overall study time course in patients reloaded with 30 mg (p = 0.001) and 60 mg (p < 0.001) of prasugrel. In patients reloaded with 30 mg prasugrel, cangrelor decreased PRI at each time point (baseline, p < 0.001; 1 h, p = 0.013; 4 h, p = 0.001). In patients reloaded with 60 mg prasugrel, cangrelor decreased PRI at baseline (p < 0.001) and 1 h (p = 0.002); levels of platelet reactivity comparable to those achieved with cangrelor were observed only at 4 h (p = 0.325). The intergroup comparisons with cangrelor were not significant at any time point. In patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy exposed to a reloading dose (30 or 60 mg) of prasugrel, in vitro cangrelor is associated with further platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitory effects.

Pharmacodynamic effects of standard dose prasugrel versus high dose clopidogrel in non-diabetic obese patients with coronary artery disease

Increased body weight is independently associated with impaired clopidogrel pharmacodynamic (PD) response. Prasugrel has more potent PD effects compared with clopidogrel, although its PD effects in obese patients are unknown. The aim of this prospective, randomised, study was to compare the PD effects of standard-dose prasugrel [60 mg loading dose (LD)/10 mg daily maintenance dose (MD)] with high-dose clopidogrel (900 mg LD/150 mg daily MD) in non-diabetic obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m²] patients, with coronary artery disease (CAD) on aspirin therapy. PD assessments (baseline, 2 hours post-LD and 6 ± 2 days after MD) were conducted using four platelet function assays, and the platelet reactivity index (PRI) assessed by VASP was used for sample size estimation. A total of 42 patients with a BMI of 36.42 ± 5.6 kg/m² completed the study. There were no differences in baseline PD measures between groups. At 2 hours post-LD, prasugrel was associated with lower PRI compared with clopidogrel (24.3 ± 5.5 vs 58.7 ± 5.7, p≤0.001), with consistent findings for all assays. At one-week, PRI values on prasugrel MD were lower than clopidogrel MD without reaching statistical significance (34.7 ± 5.8 vs 42.9 ± 5.8, p=0.32), with consistent findings for all assays. Accordingly, rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity were markedly reduced after prasugrel LD, but not after MD. In conclusion, in non-diabetic obese patients with CAD, standard prasugrel dosing achieved more potent PD effects than high-dose clopidogrel in the acute phase of treatment, but this was not sustained during maintenance phase treatment. Whether an intensified prasugrel regimen is required in obese patients warrants investigation.

Comparison of a new ELISA-based with the flow cytometric assay for vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation to assess P2Y12-inhibition after ticagrelor intake

Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, with superior effects but also ensuing enhanced bleeding risk as compared to clopidogrel. Determination of platelet inhibition may be useful to confirm efficient platelet inhibition on an individual patient level and to identify patients at risk for bleeding. The vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay specifically measures platelet P2Y12 inhibition, but has so far required individual sample processing. A new ELISA-based VASP assay has been developed, which allows batch analysis after initial platelet activation. Because of the reversible binding of ticagrelor it is unclear if the ELISA and flow cytometric assays provide comparable results; several washing steps of the ELISA may potentially result in false low results through dilution. We hypothesized that the conventional and new methods may be comparable when ticagrelor is used. We pair-wise compared the platelet reactivity index (PRI) between assays in a prospective clinical trial. Six healthy volunteers received a single 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor. PRI-values of the two methods correlated well (r = 0.97, P < 0.001). Ticagrelor rapidly decreased PRI values on average after 50 min, but nadir levels 2-6 h after ticagrelor intake were 15% higher when PRI% was measured with the flow cytometric method. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the flow cytometric assay measured markedly higher PRI levels than the new ELISA-based technique (mean difference 13%). The new ELISA-based VASP assay offers an alternative to the currently used flow cytometric method, but measures lower PRI levels, particularly when PRI falls below 20% after ticagrelor intake.

Comparison of a new ELISA-based with the flow cytometric assay for vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation to assess P2Y12 -inhibition after ticagrelor intake.

Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, with superior effects but also ensuing enhanced bleeding risk as compared to clopidogrel. Determination of platelet inhibition may be useful to confirm efficient platelet inhibition on an individual patient level and to identify patients at risk for bleeding. The vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay specifically measures platelet P2Y12 inhibition, but has so far required individual sample processing. A new ELISA-based VASP assay has been developed which allows batch analysis after initial platelet activation. Due to the reversible binding of ticagrelor it is unclear if the ELISA and flow cytometric assays provide comparable results; several washing steps of the ELISA may potentially result in false low results through dilution. We hypothesized that the conventional and new methods may be comparable when ticagrelor is used. We pair-wise compared the platelet reactivity index (PRI) between assays in a prospective clinical trial. Six healthy volunteers received a single 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor. PRI-values of the two methods correlated well (r=0.97, p<0.001). Ticagrelor rapidly decreased PRI values on average after 50 minutes, but nadir levels 2-6 hours after ticagrelor intake were 15% higher when PRI% was measured with the flow cytometric method. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the flow cytometric assay measured markedly higher PRI levels than the new ELISA-based technique (mean difference 13%). The new ELISA-based VASP assay offers an alternative to the currently used flow cytometric method, but measures lower PRI levels, particularly when PRI falls below 20% after ticagrelor intake. © 2013 Clinical Cytometry Society.

Role of VASP Phosphorylation Assay in Monitoring the Antiplatelet Therapy

Abstract Dual antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin represents standard regimen in prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One of the greatest pitfalls of clopidogrel treatment is large inter-individual variability in response. Large amount of patients does not respond adequately and therefore are not „protected“ even in spite of receiving the therapy. Poor responders are exposed to three-fold increased risk of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and cardiac death. Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet prodrug, whose active metabolite inhibits platelet function by irreversible binding to the (adenosine diphosphate) platelet receptor P2Y12. Receptor P2Y12 plays primal role in ADP-mediated platelet activation, and also in mechanism of action of ADP inhibitors such as clopidogrel, prasugrel etc. Reasons stated above, raised the necessity for implementing reliable laboratory test in order to identify the unprotected patients. In an ideal scenario, such test would serve to adjust the dose and guide the individual tailored treatment. Vasodilator Stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP) is an intracellular platelet protein which is non phosphorylated at basal state. Since its relation in cascade with P2Y12 receptor, VASP phosphorylation corerlates with inhibition of P2Y12 which is the receptor of prime importance in ADP mediated activation of platelets and as is primary target of ADP inhibitors action. Outcome of the assay is represented as the value of platelet reactivity index (PRI), where PRI values above 50% are considered inadequate response to treatment and signal exposure to increased risk of myocardial infarction, post-PCI stent thrombosis and cardiac death. VASP-P flow cytometric assay is emerging into the spotlight as the promising method, mostly for its specificity for ADP inhibitors, better outlook for standardising results and lesser sample manipulation compared to multiple electrode aggregometry.

A Phase 1 Study of Prasugrel in Subjects with Sickle Cell Disease: Impact on Ex Vivo Platelet Reactivity

Abstract 1053 Introduction:There is evidence of increased platelet reactivity in subjects with sickle cell disease (SCD). This could contribute to vaso-occlusive complications that characterize the disease; thus, antiplatelet therapy may be useful in the management of SCD. Prasugrel, a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 ADP receptor antagonist, is an effective inhibitor of ADP-mediated platelet activation and aggregation, but it has not been evaluated in SCD. The present study examined 1) the utility of various platelet assays used to assess platelet reactivity in blood from subjects with SCD; and 2) the impact of prasugrel on platelet reactivity in subjects with SCD compared to healthy controls. Methods:Twenty-six adult subjects were enrolled and 25 completed the study: 12 with SCD and 13 well-matched healthy controls. Subjects were examined before and after 12±2 days of treatment with oral prasugrel (5.0 mg/day for subjects weighing <60 kg and 7.5 mg/day for subjects weighing ≥60 kg). Platelet reactivity to ADP at baseline and after 12 days of prasugrel treatment was assessed by 1) maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) to 5mM ADP using light transmission aggregometry (LTA); 2) area under the aggregation curve (AU.min) to 6.5 mM ADP using impedance aggregometry (IA); 3) P2Y12 reactivity units (PRU) by VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN); and 4) platelet reactivity index (PRI) by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation. Baseline population differences and the within-group changes from baseline were analyzed using t-tests. The population differences for change from baseline were analyzed using an analysis of covariance model, with dose, subject group, and dose-by-subject group interaction as fixed effects, and baseline measurement as the covariate. Results:All data are shown as mean±SD. At baseline and prior to initiation of prasugrel, subjects with SCD showed increased platelet reactivity vs. healthy controls, as evidenced by VN (PRU: 407.9±39.6 vs. 322.5±74.2, p=0.003) and IA (AU.min: 106.4±27.9 vs. 76.5±13.2, p=0.002). However, there was no difference between subjects with SCD and healthy controls in baseline platelet reactivity with LTA (MPA: 73.1±14.4% vs. 80.4±23.2%, p=0.376). Baseline PRI by VASP was significantly lower in subjects with SCD than in healthy controls (PRI: 59.4±23.3% vs. 78.9±10.0%, p=0.018) (Figure).After 12 days of treatment with prasugrel, all measures of platelet reactivity were significantly reduced compared with baseline in both SCD subjects and healthy controls (p< 0.05 for each assay); absolute change from baseline were as follows: LTA (−33.4 vs. −49.9), IA (−63.2 vs. −49.5), VN (−197.4 vs. −212.0), and VASP (−46.0 vs. −49.9; all SCD vs. control respectively, Figure). Changes from baseline in subjects with SCD compared to changes from baseline in healthy controls were not statistically significant after adjusting for baseline.Prasugrel was safe and well tolerated with no serious adverse events observed during the study. No subject discontinued the study due to an adverse event (AE) and the majority of AEs were mild. No subjects with SCD reported any bleeding-related AEs. Conclusion:At baseline, compared with healthy controls, subjects with SCD had increased platelet aggregation to ADP in whole blood by two independent assays (VN and IA), but similar aggregation in platelet-rich plasma (LTA). These results may be influenced by the lower hematocrit and higher platelet count in subjects with SCD. At baseline, subjects with SCD had more variable VASP PRI values resulting in reduced mean PRI. It remains to be determined whether this is a reflection of altered ADP and/or PGE1 signaling in certain individuals with SCD. Prasugrel administration significantly attenuated ADP-stimulated platelet reactivity in SCD subjects as measured by LTA, IA, VN, and VASP. The extent of prasugrel inhibition of platelet function in SCD was similar to that observed in prasugrel-treated healthy controls as measured by all 4 assays. The present results demonstrate that prasugrel inhibits platelet function in subjects with SCD, and that this inhibition can be monitored by a variety of assays. These results provide the basis for future studies evaluating prasugrel for the treatment of vascular complications associated with SCD. [Display omitted] p value: change from baseline; error bars: arithmetic mean±SD for combined dose data Disclosures:Jakubowski:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Off Label Use: This abstract discusses prasugrel treatment in patients with sickle cell disease. Please see USPI for most up-to-date information. Zhou:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Small:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Winters:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lachno:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Frelinger:Takeda: Research Funding; GLSynthesis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd. and Eli Lilly and Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Howard:Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd. and Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Payne:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership.

The platelet hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with 75 mg/day clopidogrel may be overcome within 1 month of treatment

Platelets are involved in thrombus formation and inflammation following vascular injury, while clopidogrel exerts antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory actions. We investigated various platelet-derived prothrombotic and proinflammatory mediators as well as the platelet aggregatory response in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) receiving clopidogrel, as a function of the patient responsiveness to drug treatment. Blood samples were obtained from 40 patients with recent (<24 h) ACS before clopidogrel loading 600 mg (followed by a maintenance dose of 75 mg/day) as well as 5-days and 30-days afterwards. Twelve patients exhibited platelet reactivity index (PRI) values higher than 50% evaluated by the Vasodilator Stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP) test at 5 days and were characterized as nonresponders. The platelet response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thrombin receptor agonist peptide-14 (TRAP) was studied by flow cytometry and light transmission aggregometry. A maximum reduction of ADP- or TRAP-induced platelet aggregation in 28 clopidogrel responding patients was observed at 5 days postclopidogrel loading, whereas in nonresponders, it was achieved at 30-days along with a significant decrease in the PRI values. Similar results were obtained for the membrane expression of CD40L and the production of platelet-derived microparticles. By contrast, the maximum inhibition of P-selectin expression and platelet–leukocyte conjugate formation was observed at 30-days in both patient groups. A maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel differentially affects the platelet aggregation and platelet-derived prothrombotic and proinflammatory mediators in ACS patients within the first month of the treatment, a phenomenon that is highly influenced by the drug response variability. Since these factors may be involved in the major adverse cardiovascular events in ACS patients, especially in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the above findings may be clinically important.

Clinical predictors of dual aspirin and clopidogrel poor responsiveness in stable cardiovascular patients from the ADRIE study.

Poor response to both aspirin and clopidogrel (dual poor responsiveness [DPR]) is a major risk factor for recurrent ischemic events. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with DPR, defined with specific tests, and derive a predictive clinical score. We studied 771 consecutive stable cardiovascular patients treated with aspirin (n = 223), clopidogrel (n = 111), or both drugs (n = 37). Aspirin responsiveness was evaluated by serum thromboxane (Tx)B₂ assay, and clopidogrel responsiveness by calculating the platelet reactivity index (PRI) on the basis of the phosphorylation status of the vasodilator phosphoprotein. The analysis was focused on patients treated with both drugs, and on independent predictors of DPR. Among patients on dual therapy, there was no relevant correlation between TxB₂ levels and PRI values (r = 0.11). Sixty-seven patients (15.4%) had DPR. Diabetes [odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-3.39], high body weight (> 86 kg vs. < 77 kg, OR 4.74, 95% CI 2.49-9.73), low aspirin dose (75-81 mg vs. ≥ 160 mg, OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.09-0.93) and high C-reactive protein (CRP) level (> 1.6 mg L⁻¹ vs. < 0.6 mg L⁻¹, OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.74-8.72) were independently associated with DPR, via increased TxB(2) levels, increased PRI, or both. These associations with TxB₂ and PRI were reproduced across the whole population. With use of a factor-weighed score (c-index = 0.74), the predicted prevalence of DPR was 57% in the highest strata of the score as compared with < 4% for the lowest strata. Diabetes, body weight, the aspirin dose and CRP levels are readily available independent predictors of DPR, and some are potential targets for reducing its prevalence.

Premature preoperative discontinuation of antiplatelet drug therapy in cardiovascular risk patients: a preliminary study on the role of P2Y12 receptor monitoring

In high-bleeding risk procedures, discontinuation of antiplatelet drug therapy with clopidogrel may be requested by surgeons, usually 7-10 days before the surgical procedure. New platelet function tests, such as the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, may help to assess the perioperative status of the clopidogrel-specific P2Y12 receptor. Using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, the platelet reactivity index (PRI) was measured in 80 individuals, including 20 healthy volunteers, 20 cardiologic patients under full antiplatelet drug therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin, 20 surgical patients without any antiplatelet drugs and 20 patients under clopidogrel, discontinued 7 days before the surgical procedure. The mean PRI (95% confidence interval) in healthy volunteers was 86 (82-89%) and that in the surgical control group was 77% (72-81%). In cardiologic patients under full antiplatelet therapy, mean PRI was 51% (42-60%). In the clopidogrel discontinuation group, PRI increased from 51% (40-62%) on day 0 to 65% (57-74%) on day 3 and to 76% (69-84%) on day 5. On the morning of surgery, mean PRI was 85% (80-91%). The PRI values on the 5th day were equivalent to those of the surgical control group (mean difference -0.4%, 95% confidence interval -8.6% to 7.8%, P = 0.9). Fifty-five percent of the patients in the discontinuation group had a PRI of more than 50% on day 0. The study using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, one of the new platelet function assays for the assessment of inhibition of platelet P2Y12 receptor, demonstrates that the PRI on day 5 after discontinuation of clopidogrel is equivalent to a surgical control group and it questions the rigid practice of delaying surgery for 7-10 days, particularly in patients without a clopidogrel effect.

Biological effect of increased maintenance dose of clopidogrel in cardiovascular outpatients and influence of the cytochrome P450 2C19 ⁎2 allele on clopidogrel responsiveness

Introduction The first aim of this study is to evaluate the biological effect of doubling the maintenance dose of clopidogrel in pre-defined clopidogrel “low responders”, compared to the biological effect of the standard dose in “responders”. The second aim is to test the influence of the CYP 2C19 ⁎2 allele on clopidogrel responsiveness. Materials and methods The platelet reactivity index (PRI), based on the phosphorylation status of the vasodilatator phosphoprotein, was determined in 81 consecutive cardiovascular outpatients who had been taking clopidogrel 75 mg/day for at least 15 days (visit 1). Patients with PRI ≥50% (“low responders”) were then given clopidogrel 150 mg/day. All the patients were again evaluated 15 days later (visit 2) and were genotyped for the CYP 2C19 ⁎2 allele. Results At visit 1, PRI values ranged from 12.6% to 80.4%. In “low responders” ( n = 45), the mean PRI fell from 62.0 ± 6.7% to 49.4 ± 11.3% ( P< 0.001) after 15 days of clopidogrel 150 mg/day, while no significant change was observed in the other patients (“responders”), who remained on the standard dose (mean PRI: 37.7 ± 10.4% and 39.9 ± 10.8%, P = 0.22, in visit 1 and 2, respectively). The CYP 2C19 ⁎2 allele was not associated with clopidogrel responsiveness. Conclusions Increasing the maintenance dose of clopidogrel from 75 to 150 mg/day for 15 days in “low responders” is associated with a relative 20%-increase in its biological effect, independently of the CYP2C19 genotype, but without reaching the levels observed in “responders”. The CYP 2C19 ⁎2 allele is not associated with clopidogrel responsiveness in our population of cardiovascular outpatients.

Flow cytometric analysis of intraplatelet VASP phosphorylation for the detection of clopidogrel resistance in patients with ischemic cardiovascular diseases

Interindividual variability of the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on platelet functions leading to clopidogrel resistance has been described in some patients with ischemic cardiovascular disease. A reliable laboratory test is therefore needed to identify patients insufficiently protected by this antiplatelet treatment. The phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), an intraplatelet actin regulatory protein, is dependent on the level of activation of the platelet P2Y12 receptor, which is targeted by clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to use a flow cytometric VASP phosphorylation assay to evaluate the efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. The platelet reactivity index (PRI), expressed as a percentage, is the difference in VASP fluorescence intensity between resting (+PGE1) and activated (+ADP) platelets. In vitro, the PRI was strongly correlated with the inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by specific blockade of the P2Y12 receptor by the competitive antagonist AR-C69931MX (R = 0.72, P < 0.0001). Ex vivo, the PRI was 78.3 +/- 4.6% in 47 healthy donors, 79.0 +/- 4.1% in 34 patients not receiving clopidogrel and 61.1 +/- 17.0% in 33 patients treated with clopidogrel (P < 0.0001). In the clopidogrel group, the PRI values were widely dispersed (from 6.6 to 85.8%) and more than 30% of these patients had a PRI equivalent of values in patients not receiving clopidogrel. The flow cytometric analysis of VASP phosphorylation seems to be a suitable test to evaluate the efficacy of clopidogrel treatment. This assay demonstrated a wide interindividual variability of the inhibitory response of platelets to clopidogrel and showed that one-third of the patients treated appeared to be 'unprotected' by this therapy.

Chemical polishing using field responsive materials

The purpose of this study was to assess the in vitro P2Y12 receptor inhibitory effects of cangrelor on platelets from patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy treated with 2 reloading dose regimens.Despite its more potent and rapid antiplatelet effects compared with clopidogrel, recent studies have shown variability in prasugrel-mediated P2Y12 receptor inhibition, particularly in high-risk settings. Cangrelor is a potent intravenous P2Y12 receptor inhibitor.A total of 60 patients with coronary artery disease on maintenance prasugrel (10 mg/day) therapy were randomized to a 30- or 60-mg reload of prasugrel. The platelet reactivity index (PRI), as assessed by whole-blood vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, was measured with and without in vitro incubation of cangrelor (500 nM) at baseline, and at 1 and 4 h after reload.In the absence of cangrelor, prasugrel reloading reduced PRI (p < 0.001 for both doses), although a 60-mg reload had greater platelet inhibition compared with a 30-mg reload at 4 h (p = 0.001). Cangrelor was associated with a reduction in PRI values during the overall study time course in patients reloaded with 30 mg (p = 0.001) and 60 mg (p < 0.001) of prasugrel. In patients reloaded with 30 mg prasugrel, cangrelor decreased PRI at each time point (baseline, p < 0.001; 1 h, p = 0.013; 4 h, p = 0.001). In patients reloaded with 60 mg prasugrel, cangrelor decreased PRI at baseline (p < 0.001) and 1 h (p = 0.002); levels of platelet reactivity comparable to those achieved with cangrelor were observed only at 4 h (p = 0.325). The intergroup comparisons with cangrelor were not significant at any time point.In patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy exposed to a reloading dose (30 or 60 mg) of prasugrel, in vitro cangrelor is associated with further platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitory effects.