Oskar Björkqvist Oskar Björkqvist, from the KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden, talks to us about his submission “Additive manufactured dielectric Gutman lens”, and the potential ubiquity of 3D-printed antennae, page 1318. I am a recently graduated electrical engineer with a specialisation in electromagnetics. At the time we authored this paper I was affiliated with the Division for Electromagnetic Engineering at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, which specialises in wave propagation and antennas. They have worked in close collaboration with industry recently to prepare for the launch of 5G, amongst other projects. Some of the topics we focus our research on are transformation optics, metasurfaces and lens antennas, such as the one in this publication. Some people in my research group had started using these new RF-compatible 3D printing filaments to make customised layers and bodies of dielectric. I came across a few papers where people had been looking at 3D printing dielectric lenses, but none of them seemed to have turned to the cheapest and most commercially available form of 3D printing, known as ‘fused filament fabrication’. This led us to the idea that we could probably make similar lenses with a normal desktop 3D printer. Some initial simulations showed promising results, and we were able to print and measure a first working prototype soon after. Since then we have developed a few different versions of these lenses, one of which we decided to publish here in Electronics Letters. We have in this work shown that it is fully feasible to make a gradient refractive index lens, which historically have been relatively complex to manufacture, by very simple means. The fact that the entire antenna can be made in a single piece, by a single machine, suggests that pretty much anyone with access to a 3D printer could make their own low cost, high gain antennas using this method – not to mention the fact that the source 3D models can very easily be redistributed. I'd like to imagine that the method could be well suited for applications where weight and form factor of an antenna plays a role, as this plastic lens is in general relatively light weight and could assume many different shapes with the use of transformation optics. We are further confident that the method also is applicable to even higher frequency bands than the one we have considered here, possibly stretching into the mm-wave regime. Not being an expert in 3D printing technology, it was at times not easy to know how well a 3D model might translate into a printed object. The small details in the models and the limited spatial resolution of a desktop 3D printer necessitated us iterating a few different methods for generating the models and different geometries of our unit cells, which are the ‘building blocks’ we use to create the lens. Still being relatively new to this field, I have not yet experienced any significant changes first-hand. It is however evident to me that working with antennas and electromagnetics in general clearly has changed the last couple of decades as an effect of the IT revolution – the simulation tools we have now are extremely powerful and the process of designing, manufacturing and evaluating a design is probably easier than ever. Our publication in this edition of Electronics Letters is perhaps a good example – the time from conceiving the idea to measuring the first prototype spanned over only a few weeks and could be done pretty much single-handedly, only with the help of a computer and a relatively simple 3D printer. I suspect that we will see more of this way of working in the future and that research groups will to a greater extent be able to manufacture their designs by themselves, which is likely to speed up the process of conducting research significantly.