T RACTION and suspension methods with such accessories as the Thomas sphnt have pIayed a predominant part in the development of the modern treatment of fractures. Their evoIutionary importance cannot be over-emphasized, though they have, however, certain deficiencies. The patient must be immobihzed to obtain immobilization of the broken bones and is neither ambulatory nor portabIe. Constant checking and readjustment of the apparatus is required, for even though good position may be obtained at first, subsequent dispIacement is not uncommon. HospitaIization which is a considerable factor in these times of economic stress is proIonged. Considerations such as these have Ied to the deveIopment of more efficient procedures, notabIy by BoehIer’ in Europe and by John CaIdweII,2 Roger Anderson3 and others” in this country. Traction-suspension methods may now be repIaced to a Iarge extent by more efhcient means of reduction foIIowed by fixation in plaster of Paris, which is the most satisfactory dressing for most fractures. Often fixed traction, or to use a better term, skeIeta1 fixation in pIaster, is advantageous. PIaster spIints or casts are made to fit the individua1 with accuracy impossibIe to attain by other means. They offer better control of position and are more comfortabIe than any meta or wooden spIint. The patient is comfortabIe, ambuIatory or at Ieast portable and fina anatomical and functiona resuIts are good. SkiIIfuI application of a suitabIe retention dressing is equally as important as a good reduction of the fracture. The technique of pIaster fixation has been negIected in recent Iiterature. Most authors writing on the newer methods of treatment treat the subject IightIy and chapters devoted to spIints and casts in the new textbooks are inadequate and outmoded. This is especiaIIy true of the use of non-padded pIaster. The monographs of Boehlerl and Schnek” are aImost the onIy exceptions. Lack of appreciation of the theoretica and practica1 considerations invoIved in the proper use of the pIaster dressing, in particuIar the non-padded variety, has contributed to the widespread faiIure to reaIize its advantages and possibiIities. Advantages of Non-padded Plaster Casts. The non-padded pIaster cast has numerous advantages over the conventiona padded casts, the most important is that fixation is incomparabIy more secure. Padding, no matter how skiIIfuIIy appIied, is subject to compression and thinning with an increase of the space between the skin and the cast, inevitabIy Ieading to Iooseness and motion within the cast. In some fractures this motion may cause nothing more disastrous than a spasm of pain each time the Iimb is moved unti1 the formation of caIIus stops the painfu1 grinding of the fracture surfaces. In others, especiaIIy those which are comminuted or which invoIve joints, motion of the atrophied, functionless Iimb in a Ioose padded cast may resuIt in shortening, deformity or disabIing maI-ahnement of the joint surfaces. This is particuIarIy true of fractures of the shaft of the femur, the condyIes making up the knee, the mortise of the ankIe and the astrogaIocaIcanea1 joint. Molded smoothly and evenIy over the bony prominences and soft parts, non-padded pIaster firmly holds fragments
Read full abstract