Clozapine Plasma Concentrations Research Articles

Plasma Clozapine and Norclozapine After Use of Either Crushed Tablets or Suspension Compared With Tablets.

With clozapine, either crushed tablets suspended in an aqueous medium or proprietary suspension is sometimes prescribed as an alternative to tablets, but bioequivalence data are scant. We compared clozapine dose, and plasma clozapine and N -desmethylclozapine (norclozapine) concentrations after use of either tablets or crushed tablets/suspension in samples submitted for clozapine therapeutic drug monitoring, 1993 to 2017. There were 846 patients (1646 samples) given crushed tablets/suspension and 6065 patients (10,779 samples) given tablets. The median dose (mg d -1 ) was significantly higher in men (500 vs 450) and women (500 vs 400) given crushed tablets/suspension, but the median plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations (mg L -1 ) were significantly lower (men: 0.29 and 0.22 vs 0.39 and 0.28; women: 0.35 and 0.26 vs 0.50 and 0.32, respectively). A subgroup of 480 patients was prescribed either crushed tablets/suspension (1016 samples) or tablets (1259 samples) at different times. The median dose was again significantly higher in men (500 vs 500) and women (500 vs 450), but the median plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations were significantly lower (men: 0.29 and 0.22 vs 0.32 and 0.24; women: 0.30 and 0.24 vs 0.38 and 0.29, respectively). Poor adherence, sedimentation of suspension before use, and incomplete dosage are potential contributors to the lower median plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations observed after use of either crushed clozapine tablets or suspension as compared with tablets. Those administering crushed tablets/suspension should be aware of these factors.

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia : the relationship between clozapine plasma concentration and clinical outcome

IntroductionClozapine is highly effective in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia but, to ensure optimal clinical response it is important to optimize its use and this depends on adequate pharmacological monitoring.ObjectivesEvaluate the therapeutic response rate according to clozapine plasma concentration.MethodsIt was a cross-sectional, retrospective and analytical study, carried out over a period of six months, in the F and A psychiatry departments of the Razi hospital in Tunis, including patients followed for treatment-resistant schizophrenia and receiving clozapine. We evaluated the response to clozapine using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).Results The average age was 37.7 ± 9.4. The mean age of introduction of clozapine was 31 years and the mean time to its introduction was 9.3 years. Clozapine was administered as a single drug in 85% of cases. The mean dose of clozapine was 373 mg/day. The mean of clozapine plasma concentration was 386.5 ng/ml with a minimum of 89 ng/ml and a maximum of 913 ng/ml. The clinical response rate to clozapine was 25% with a BPRS good response threshold value of less than 35. Patients with clozapine levels above the conventional cut-off of 350 ng/ml (n=34) had a response rate of 34.6%. A response rate of 37% was observed in the group of patients with a clozapine plasma concentration interval of 200-350 ng/ml. There was no statistically significant difference in therapeutic response (p=0186)ConclusionsOur study revealed a therapeutic response variation according to plasma clozapine concentration and showed the existence of a non-negligible and effective response rate.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Clozapine and COVID-19 Vaccination: Effects on blood levels and leukocytes. An observational cohort study.

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety of COVID‐19 vaccination in patients on clozapine as regards plasma clozapine concentration and haematological parameters.MethodsWe conducted a multicentre observational cohort study from 22 February 2021 to 2 September 2021. Primary outcomes were clinically relevant increase in clozapine blood levels (>100 μg/L increase compared to baseline) and clozapine alert levels (>1000 μg/L). Secondary outcomes were granulocytopenia, leukocytopenia and lymphocytopenia. Outcomes were measured approximately 5 days after the first and (where applicable) second dose of COVID‐19 vaccine.ResultsThis study included 139 patients. Compared to baseline, clozapine blood levels increased significantly (ES = 0.28, p = 0.003) after the second vaccination. Clinically relevant increases in clozapine blood levels occurred in 20/92 patients (22%) and in 16/56 patients (29%) during the first and second phases, respectively. Clozapine alert levels developed in one patient (1%) following the first dose and in three patients (5%) after the second dose. In both phases, changes in white blood cells (WBC) were limited to mild granulocytopenia (3% and 5%), moderate granulocytopenia (1% and 0%) and leukocytopenia (2% and 3%) without cause for extra monitoring according to the guideline.ConclusionIn general, as regards WBC counts COVID‐19 vaccination seems to be safe in patients with SMI. Changes in WBC had no clinical implications. Psychoeducation on the symptoms of clozapine intoxication is recommended, especially in patients with clozapine blood levels approaching the upper limit of the therapeutic range. Increase in the C‐reactive protein (CRP) level can signal inflammation rapidly and help to prevent clozapine intoxication following vaccination.

Reasons for admission to a general medical hospital for patients taking clozapine.

Clozapine is associated with a diverse range of side effects. In addition, patients prescribed clozapine commonly suffer with medical comorbidities. This study aimed to characterise patients prescribed clozapine who required medical admission, understand reasons for admission, identify areas for interventions to prevent future admission and describe clozapine management during the inpatient stay. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients prescribed clozapine who were admitted to a general medical hospital in a 12-month period. Data were collected using electronic drug charts and notes. In total, 114 clozapine patients were hospitalised. Twenty-eight patients (25%) were admitted because of infection, 12 (11%) were elective admissions and 12 (11%) had gastrointestinal problems. Most patients admitted were Black (54%) and half were female. Few changes were made to clozapine dosing on admission or during the inpatient stay. Most patients had been taking clozapine for many years at the point of admission, the majority were able to continue taking it for the duration of their medical treatment and were discharged on the same dose they were taking prior to admission. Clozapine plasma concentrations were not consistently measured with only 18 (16%) patients having one or more plasma concentrations determined during their admission. The median clozapine plasma concentration on admission was 0.48 mg/L (nor-clozapine 0.21 mg/L), with a range of 0.09 to 3.9 mg/L. Three patients were admitted to the intensive care unit during their admission; all were discharged on clozapine. Four patients died; one from lung adenocarcinoma, one bowel obstruction, one cardiac arrest and one chest sepsis. In total, 27 patients (23%) had their clozapine stopped on admission, 6 (22% of this group) unintentionally. Our study found that the most common reason for admission for patients taking clozapine was infection. Plasma concentrations were not measured routinely despite clozapine having a narrow therapeutic index and enhanced potential for toxicity in the medically unwell patient.

Clozapine Once-Daily Versus Divided Dosing Regimen: A Cross-sectional Study in Japan.

Clozapine is generally recommended to be prescribed in a divided dosing regimen based on its relatively short plasma half-life. However, there has been little evidence to support the superiority of divided dosing of clozapine over once-daily dosing. To our knowledge, there have been no studies examining differences in actual plasma concentrations or adverse effects between the 2 dosing strategies of clozapine. We aimed to compare actual plasma concentrations of clozapine between once-daily and divided dosing regimens, and to examine the relationships of these regimens with psychiatric symptoms and adverse effects of clozapine. We analyzed data from 108 participants of a previous study conducted in 2 hospitals in Japan. A population pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate the peak and trough plasma concentrations of clozapine based on actual plasma concentrations. We evaluated psychiatric symptoms with the Brief Evaluation of Psychosis Symptom Domains and adverse effects of clozapine with the Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effects Scale for Clozapine. The estimated peak and trough plasma concentrations of clozapine did not differ significantly between once-daily and divided dosing regimens. There were no significant differences in psychiatric symptoms except for depression/anxiety or subjective adverse effects of clozapine between the 2 dosing strategies. Our findings tentatively support the feasibility and clinical utility of once-daily dosing of clozapine in clinical practice. Further studies are needed to replicate these findings and determine causality between dosing strategies and clinical outcomes.

Metabolic Effects of Clozapine Administration Based on Sex Differences and the Relationships Between Dosage and Prolactin Levels: An Observational Study.

Clozapine is the second-generation antipsychotic that induces the largest metabolic disorders. However, evidence is limited to the liabilities based on sex differences. This study aimed to investigate the effects of clozapine treatment on metabolic and neuroendocrine parameters, and the relationships between prescribed clozapine dosage and prolactin levels that may be associated with plasma clozapine concentrations, in 24 female and 24 male Japanese schizophrenia inpatients switched to clozapine. Within female and male subjects, sequential changes in 7 items of metabolic parameters, including anthropometric measurements, fasting serum lipid components and glucose levels, and estimated insulin resistance at 2 months were evaluated and analyzed against clozapine dosages and prolactin levels at 2 months. Triglyceride levels, triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein ratios reflecting insulin resistance and glucose levels increased in female and male subjects. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased in female and male subjects. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were negatively correlated with prolactin levels in female subjects, and glucose levels were positively correlated with prolactin levels in male subjects, although clozapine doses showed no such correlations. Clozapine administration developed sex-neutral metabolic disorders in the study subjects. Higher prolactin levels seemed to increase the risk of dyslipidemia and hyperglycemia with sex differences, which suggested that serum prolactin levels other than clozapine doses might be useful to predict sex-specific metabolic disorders. Further prospective studies, combining measurement of metabolic hormones and plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolites, will help to confirm our findings.

Evaluation of bioequivalence between generic and brand-name clozapine in Chinese schizophrenic patients: Arandomized, two-period, crossover study.

Clozapine is the most effective therapy for schizophrenia. This study compared the bioequivalence of a generic formulation of clozapine (ChangZhou Pharmaceutical Factory Co. Ltd. Jiangsu, China) to the brand name formulation (Clozaril, HLS Therapeutics, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA) after multiple doses in Chinese schizophrenic patients. This was a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover study in which patients with schizophrenia received the generic clozapine or Clozaril 100 mg twice daily for 10 days before crossing over to the alternate formulation for the next 10 days. Blood samples were collected at regular intervals during each treatment period, and plasma concentration of clozapine was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. 26 patients were enrolled, of whom 24 completed the study and were included in the steady-state analyses. The mean AUC0-12 was 6,003.29 h×ng/mL for generic clozapine and 6,347.53 h×ng/mL for Clozaril. The mean Cmax,ss was 698.52 ng/mL for generic clozapine and 739.75 ng/mL for Clozaril. The ratio of the adjusted geometric means and its 90% CI of the ratios for AUC0-12 was 96.24% (89.60 - 103.36%), and for Cmax,ss was 95.90% (88.91 - 103.44%). A total of 66 adverse events were reported by 22 (84.62%) subjects. Among them, 34 occurred in 17 (65.38%) patients during dosing of generic clozapine, and 32 occurred in 16 (61.54%) patients during dosing of brand-name clozapine. The result demonstrated that the generic clozapine was bioequivalent to brand-name clozapine (Clozaril). This would provide physicians with reassurance that patients who receive the studied generic clozapine will achieve similar plasma drug concentrations to those of brand-name clozapine (Clozaril).

A prospective multicenter assessor-blinded randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of short versus long protocols of electroconvulsive therapy as an augmentation strategy to clozapine in patients with ultra-resistant schizophrenia (SURECT study)

BackgroundAlthough clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, it leads to a poor or partial response in 40 to 70% of patients. Augmentation of clozapine with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective and relatively safe treatment for these clozapine-resistant patients. However, parameters are not yet well specified, such as the optimal number of sessions, their frequency, and the relevance of maintenance ECT. Our objective is to compare the efficacy and tolerance between two protocols of combined ECT and clozapine treatment in patients with ultra-resistant schizophrenia (URS): a 6-month protocol (short protocol with 20 ECT sessions) and a 12-month protocol (long protocol with 40 ECT sessions).MethodsSixty-four patients with schizophrenia with persistent psychotic symptoms despite clozapine treatment will be enrolled in a prospective multicentric assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to the short or the long protocol. The main outcome is the response rate assessed by the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) 3 months after the end of the treatment in patients following the long protocol compared to those following the short protocol. The response was defined as a 30% reduction on the PANSS baseline. Clinical assessments (PANSS, BPRS, HAMD-21, YMRS, CGI, GAF, Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS), and Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS)) and plasma clozapine concentration will be performed at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months. Neuropsychological measures (MMSE, RL/RI-16, Doors test, D2 Test of Attention, Copy of the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure) will be performed at baseline and at 6 and 15 months.DiscussionThe aims of this research are to optimize protocols of combined ECT with clozapine in patients with URS and to offer specific recommendations for these patients’ care.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03542903. Registered on May 31, 2018. Id RCB: 2017-A02657-46

Body mass index as a determinant of clozapine plasma concentrations: A pharmacokinetic-based hypothesis.

Knowledge regarding the impact of body composition measures on pharmacokinetics of antipsychotics is limited. Our aim was to investigate the impact of body weight and body mass index on clozapine pharmacokinetics using a therapeutic drug monitoring database. A large therapeutic drug monitoring dataset of clozapine plasma concentrations considering three patient subgroups was analysed: a control group (CLZ0, 20-30 kg/m2, n=266), a group with high body mass index (CLZhigh, body mass index ⩾30 kg/m2, n=162) and with low body mass index values (CLZlow, body mass index <20 kg/m2, n=27). Comparisons of plasma and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D) of clozapine were based on the Spearman's correlation (rs), Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests. For percentages we used the Pearson chi-square test (χ2). To assess effects of confounders we used bootstrapping analysis of covariates. Regarding demographic characteristics, groups differed only for sex percentage with more females than males in CLZlow and CLZhigh compared to CLZ0 (p=0.001 for χ2 test). Plasma and C/D values were positively associated with body mass index (rs=0.108, p=0.022 and rs=0.156, p=0.001 respectively). Intergroup differences were observed for plasma and dose-adjusted concentrations of clozapine (p=0.031 and p=0.029 for Kruskal Wallis respectively): post-hoc pairwise comparisons showed higher plasma concentrations and C/D of clozapine in CLZhigh compared to CLZ0 (p=0.014 and p=0.007 respectively for Mann-Whitney U-test), by mean 21 and 18%, respectively. Differences for C/D values remained after accounting for sex (p=0.02). In obese patients, bioavailability, distribution or elimination of clozapine may be altered due to increased clozapine deposits in fat tissue and hepatic enzyme activity changes.

Outcomes in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: symptoms, function and clozapine plasma concentrations.

Background:Clozapine is the only medication licenced for treating patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines as to the optimal plasma level of clozapine to aim for, and their association with clinical and functional outcome.Objective:We assessed the relationship between clinical and functional outcome measures and blood concentrations of clozapine among patients with treatment-refractory psychosis.Methods:Data were reviewed in 82 patients with treatment-refractory psychosis admitted to a specialised tertiary-level service and treated with clozapine. Analysis focussed on the relationship between clozapine and norclozapine plasma concentrations and the patient’s clinical symptoms and functional status.Results:Clinical symptom improvement was positively correlated with norclozapine plasma concentrations and inversely correlated with clozapine to norclozapine plasma concentrations ratio. Clozapine concentrations showed a bimodal association with clinical improvement (peaks around 350 and 660 ng/ml). Clinical symptom improvement correlated with functional outcomes, although there was no significant correlation between the latter and clozapine or norclozapine plasma concentrations.Conclusion:Clozapine treatment was associated with optimal clinical improvement at two different peak plasma concentrations around 350 and 650 ng/ml. Clinical improvement was associated with functional outcome; however, functionality was not directly associated with clozapine concentrations. A subset of patients may require higher clozapine plasma concentrations to achieve clinical improvement.

Comprehensive assessment of exposure to clozapine in association with side effects among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a population pharmacokinetic study.

Background:There have been scarce data on the distribution of clozapine concentrations in comparison with the recommended range (350–600 ng/ml) or their relationship with side effects among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Furthermore, no studies have assessed the association between side effects and overall exposure to the drug by calculating the 24-h area-under-curve (AUC).Methods:In- and outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (ICD-10) who were receiving a stable dose of clozapine for ⩾2 weeks were included. Side effects were assessed using the Glasgow antipsychotic side-effects scale for clozapine (GASS-C). Using two collected plasma samples, plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations at peak and trough and their 24-h AUC were estimated using population pharmacokinetic models.Results:A total of 108 patients completed the study (mean ± SD age, 43.0 ± 10.1 years; clozapine dose, 357.5 ± 136.9 mg/day); 33 patients (30.6%) showed estimated trough concentrations of clozapine within the recommended range (350–600 ng/ml) whereas the concentrations were higher and lower than this range among 37 (43.5%) and 28 (25.9%) patients (%), respectively. There were no significant correlations between estimated peak or trough concentrations or 24-h AUC of both clozapine or norclozapine, and GASS-C total or individual scores. No significant differences were found between GASS-C total or individual item scores between the patients with estimated trough concentrations of clozapine of >600 ng/ml and the other subjects.Conclusion:The results suggest that clozapine or norclozapine concentrations are not linked directly to the extent of side effects experienced in clozapine-treated patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia while the cross-sectional study design limits the interpretation of any causal relationships. These findings indicate that side effects associated with clozapine may occur at any dose or concentration.

The relationship between plasma clozapine concentration and clinical outcome: a cross‐sectional study

There is no report that statistically evaluates the therapeutic reference (350-600ng/ml) and adverse drug reaction (ADR) range (>1000ng/ml) of clozapine (CLZ) recommended by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) consensus guidelines in an isolated and large sampling study. We administered CLZ to 131 Japanese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia in a multicenter cross-sectional study. Plasma CLZ concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography using trough sampling. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and severe dose-dependent ADR (sedation, myoclonus, and seizures) were analyzed statistically after adjusting for possible confounders. The daily CLZ dosage showed a moderately positive relationship with the plasma concentration (r=0.49, p<0.001). Every 100ng/ml increase in plasma CLZ concentration improved the total BPRS score 1.95% (95% CI: 0.89-3.01, p<0.001) and the odds ratio (OR) 1.38 (95% CI: 1.14-1.66, p=0.001) for BPRS response. Compared with concentrations below 350ng/ml CLZ, 350-600ng/ml (11.12%; 95% CI: 2.52-19.72, p=0.012) and 600-1000ng/ml (11.05%; 95% CI: 2.40-19.71, p=0.013) showed significant improvement in the total BPRS score. Dosages above 1000ng/ml showed greater improvement (25.36%; 95% CI: 13.08-37.64, p<0.001) of the total BPRS score but more severe ADRs than dosages below 1000ng/ml (OR: 31.72; 95% CI: 1.04-968.81, p=0.048). The AGNP therapeutic reference range (350-600ng/ml) is useful, and a dose above 1000ng/ml is potentially more effective but carries the risk of severe ADRs in the central nervous system.

Relationship of Change in Plasma Clozapine/N-desmethylclozapine Ratio with Cognitive Performance in Patients with Schizophrenia.

ObjectiveThe clozapine/N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC) ratio is proposed to be used as a predictor of cognitive performance in clozapine-treated patients, as its principal metabolite, NDMC, has an opposite action with clozapine on the cholinergic system. The aim of this study is to determine whether clozapine has influence on cognitive performance in accordance with changes in the clozapine/NDMC in patients with schizophrenia. MethodsThe data of fifteen patients with schizophrenia, who had initial and follow-up assessments after starting clozapine treatment, were retrospectively collected. The assessments included clinical scale, cognitive battery, and pharmacological data including plasma concentrations of clozapine and NDMC. The data were analyzed with Pearson correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses. ResultsΔAttention/vigilance, Δsocial cognition, and Δcomposite score had a significant correlation with Δclozapine/NDMC ratio, while ΔWorking memory had correlation with Δclozapine concentration and ΔNDMC concentration, and Δsocial cognition had association with Δclozapine concentration. Multiple regression analysis showed that Δattention/vigilance had negative association with Δclozapine/NDMC ratio, Δworking memory had negative relation with Δclozapine concentration, and that Δsocial cognition had negative association with Δclozapine concentration. ConclusionThis finding implicates that lowering the clozapine/NDMC ratio could enhance cognition in patients with schizophrenia treated with clozapine.

Clozapine: An Updated Overview of Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers, Risks, and Safety-Particularities in the Context of COVID-19.

Background: clozapine (CLZ) use is precarious due to its neurological, cardiovascular, and hematological side effects; however, it is the gold standard in therapy-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in adults and is underused. Objective: to examine the most recent CLZ data on (a) side effects concerning (b) recent pharmacological mechanisms, (c) therapy benefits, and (d) the particularities of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data sources: a search was performed in two databases (PubMed and Web of Science) using the specific keywords “clozapine” and “schizophrenia”, “side effects”, “agranulocytosis”, “TRS”, or “bipolar affective disorder (BAF)” for the last ten years. Study eligibility criteria: clinical trials on adults with acute symptoms of schizophrenia or related disorders. Results: we selected 37 studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and clinical case series (CCS), centered on six main topics in the search area: (a) CLZ in schizophrenia, (b) CLZ in bipolar disorder, (c) side effects during the clozapine therapy, (d) CLZ in pregnancy, (e) CLZ in early-onset schizophrenia, and (f) CLZ therapy and COVID-19 infection. Limitations: we considered RCTs and CCS from two databases, limited to the search topics. Conclusions and implications of key findings: (a) clozapine doses should be personalized for each patient based on pharmacogenetics testing when available; the genetic vulnerability postulates predictors of adverse reactions’ severity; patients with a lower genetic risk could have less frequent hematological monitoring; (b) a CLZ-associated risk of pulmonary embolism imposes prophylactic measures for venous thromboembolism; (c) convulsive episodes are not an indication for stopping treatment; the plasma concentration of clozapine is a better side effect predictor than the dosage; (d) COVID-19 infection may enhance clozapine toxicity, generating an increased risk of pneumonia. Therapy must be continued with the proper monitoring of the white blood count, and the clozapine dose decreased by half until three days after the fever breaks; psychiatrists and healthcare providers must act together.

Elevated Clozapine Concentrations in Clozapine-Treated Patients with Hypersalivation.

Hypersalivation is a common, clozapine-related adverse drug reaction with a serious impact on quality of life. Pharmacokinetic correlates of clozapine-related hypersalivation have evaded attention. The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between clozapine-treated patients with vs. without hypersalivation from a large therapeutic drug monitoring database. Out of a large therapeutic drug monitoring dataset of clozapine-treated patients, we compared a group of patients with hypersalivation (n = 72) and a control group of patients without any adverse reactions in this regard (n = 323). Comparisons included plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose as well as demographic characteristics between groups. Post-hoc analyses were performed separately in smokers and non-smokers. We used the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square test, while effects of confounders were assessed using a bootstrapping analysis of covariance. Patients with hypersalivation had higher clozapine plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose (p < 0.001 for the Mann-Whitney U test in both cases). Groups did not differ regarding demographic characteristics except for clozapine daily dose and percentage of smokers (p = 0.005 for the Mann-Whitney U test and p = 0.028 for the chi-square test, respectively). There were fewer smokers across patients with hypersalivation compared with patients without and daily doses were higher in patients with hypersalivation. After analysis of covariance, differences remained for both plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose (p < 0.001 for both). Post hoc analyses in smokers and non-smokers separately reported similar findings. Elevated clozapine plasma concentrations and higher concentrations-by-dose were observed in patients with hypersalivation. A potential role for therapeutic drug monitoring in the prevention or management of clozapine-related hypersalivation is suggested.

Change in plasma concentration of clozapine and norclozapine following a switch of oral formulation.

Background:Clozapine formulation has been shown to affect plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine. Changes in formulation might result in toxicity or treatment failure.Methods:We identified, from electronic records, patients who switched from clozapine tablets to oral liquid or vice versa and compared plasma concentrations before and after the switch.Results:We identified 13 patients with 85 blood samples who changed formulation of clozapine. Overall mean standardized clozapine plasma level was 0.67 mg/l daily dose on liquid and 0.87 mg/l daily dose on tablets (p = 0.035).Conclusion:Use of clozapine liquid results in lower plasma clozapine concentration than the same dose of tablets.

Clozapine and desmethylclozapine: correlation with neutrophils and leucocytes counting in Mexican patients with schizophrenia

PurposeThe aim of present study is to measure plasma clozapine (CLZ) and N-desmethyl clozapine (DMC) as biomarkers to correlate drug concentrations with the appearance of preclinical adverse hematic effects.MethodsA high-performance liquid chromatographic method, using a diode-array (ultraviolet) detector, was validated to obtain reliable concentrations of CLZ and DMC, its main metabolite, in plasma of 41 schizophrenic patients taking CLZ. Blood neutrophils and leucocytes counting were concurrently assessed as a proxy to subclinical adverse reactions.ResultsThe analytical method employed was linear, reproducible, and stable to measure concentrations of CLZ between 30 and 1000 ng/mL, while 12.5–560 ng/mL of the metabolite. The method allowed us to correlate CLZ plasma concentrations, the time taking CLZ and CLZ dose as determinants of neutrophils’ counting with a R2 = 0.447, using a multiple regression analysis model. Likewise, the correlation of leucocyte counting vs CLZ plasma levels and CLZ time, showed a R2 = 0.461. DMC correlated significantly with both neutrophils and leucocytes counting, but was excluded from the regression when CLZ concentration was included in the model. Finally, no other hematological adverse reactions were recorded. One patient presented a cardiovascular complication. The negative correlation between clozapine and neutrophil count observed in patients, suggest that CLZ itself, but not DMC, could be related to hematologic side-effects.ConclusionThe findings of this study, demonstrate for the first time, that plasma levels of CLZ and time taking the drug are independent determinants of blood neutrophils and leucocytes, so the monitoring of plasma CLZ may be useful in the clinic practice to determine safe dosing of the drug.

Changes in smoking status, mental state and plasma clozapine concentration: retrospective cohort evaluation.

To investigate the percentage of patients who commenced smoking after transferring out of a non-smoking forensic psychiatric unit, the corresponding clozapine dose adjustments, the effects on plasma clozapine/norclozapine concentrations and observed changes in mental state. We reviewed the notes and plasma clozapine/norclozapine concentrations of 46 patients transferred to medium secure units between July 2008 and December 2013. Thirty-five patients commenced smoking. Their median clozapine dose was increased by 50 mg/d. In the non-smokers, the median clozapine dose remained unchanged. Plasma clozapine/norclozapine concentrations were significantly reduced in smokers despite dosage adjustment. Eighteen patients experienced deterioration in mental state after transfer; almost all these patients were smokers. Approximately three-quarters of patients who were non-smokers by virtue of being in a secure non-smoking environment commenced smoking after transfer. Monitoring of clozapine serum levels and assessment of mental state in the immediate period after a change in smoking status is indicated.

Pharmacogenomic Variants and Drug Interactions Identified Through the Genetic Analysis of Clozapine Metabolism.

Clozapine is the only effective medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but its worldwide use is still limited because of its complex titration protocols. While the discovery of pharmacogenomic variants of clozapine metabolism may improve clinical management, no robust findings have yet been reported. This study is the first to adopt the framework of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to discover genetic markers of clozapine plasma concentrations in a large sample of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The authors used mixed-model regression to combine data from multiple assays of clozapine metabolite plasma concentrations from a clozapine monitoring service and carried out a genome-wide analysis of clozapine, norclozapine, and their ratio on 10,353 assays from 2,989 individuals. These analyses were adjusted for demographic factors known to influence clozapine metabolism, although it was not possible to adjust for all potential mediators given the available data. GWAS results were used to pinpoint specific enzymes and metabolic pathways and compounds that might interact with clozapine pharmacokinetics. The authors identified four distinct genome-wide significant loci that harbor common variants affecting the metabolism of clozapine or its metabolites. Detailed examination pointed to coding and regulatory variants at several CYP* and UGT* genes as well as corroborative evidence for interactions between the metabolism of clozapine, coffee, and tobacco. Individual effects of single single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) fine-mapped from these loci were large, such as the minor allele of rs2472297, which was associated with a reduction in clozapine concentrations roughly equivalent to a decrease of 50 mg/day in clozapine dosage. On their own, these single SNPs explained from 1.15% to 9.48% of the variance in the plasma concentration data. Common genetic variants with large effects on clozapine metabolism exist and can be found via genome-wide approaches. Their identification opens the way for clinical studies assessing the use of pharmacogenomics in the clinical management of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Unbound Fraction of Clozapine Significantly Decreases with Elevated Plasma Concentrations of the Inflammatory Acute-Phase Protein Alpha-1-Acid Glycoprotein.

BackgroundDuring inflammation, elevated total (unbound plus protein-bound) clozapine plasma concentrations have been observed. Elevated alpha-1-acid glycoprotein concentrations during inflammation are suggested to cause increased plasma clozapine-alpha-1-acid glycoprotein binding, resulting in elevated total clozapine plasma concentrations without significant changes in unbound concentrations. Here, we investigated the association between alpha-1-acid glycoprotein plasma concentrations and clozapine unbound fraction.MethodsFirst, 25 and 60 µL of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein solution (20 mg/mL) were added to plasma samples (n = 3) of clozapine users (spiking experiment). Second, the association between alpha-1-acid glycoprotein plasma concentration and clozapine unbound fraction was assessed in patient samples (patient study). Samples were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Data were analyzed with a paired t test (spiking experiment) and an unpaired t test (patient study).ResultsThe spiking experiment showed significantly lower mean unbound fractions following 25- and 60-µL alpha-1-acid glycoprotein spikes (relative reductions of 28.3%, p = 0.032 and 43.4%, p = 0.048). In the patient study, total clozapine plasma concentrations were 10% higher in elevated (n = 6) compared with normal alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (n = 20) samples [525 µg/L vs. 479 µg/L, mean difference = 47 µg/L (95% confidence interval −217 to 310), p = 0.72]. Elevated alpha-1-acid glycoprotein samples had a 26% lower mean unbound fraction compared with normal samples [1.22% vs. 1.65%, mean difference = −0.43% (95% confidence interval −0.816 to −0.0443), p = 0.03].ConclusionsBoth the spiking experiment and patient study showed a significant association between elevated alpha-1-acid glycoprotein plasma concentrations and a lower clozapine unbound fraction. Future studies should include clinical data to examine whether this association is clinically relevant, suggesting any clozapine dose adjustments.