Planning Target Volume Research Articles

Comparative analysis of delivered and planned doses in target volumes for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

BackgroundAdaptive therapy has been enormously improved based on the art of generating adaptive computed tomography (ACT) from planning CT (PCT) and the on-board image used for the patient setup. Exploiting the ACT, this study evaluated the dose delivered to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and derived relationship between the delivered dose and the parameters obtained through the evaluation procedure.MethodsSABR treatment records of 72 patients with NSCLC who were prescribed a dose of 60 Gy (Dprescribed) to the 95% volume of the planning target volume (PTV) in four fractions were analysed in this retrospective study; 288 ACTs were generated by rigid and deformable registration of a PCT to a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) per fraction. Each ACT was sent to the treatment planning system (TPS) and treated as an individual PCT to calculate the dose. Delivered dose to a patient was estimated by averaging four doses calculated from four ACTs per treatment. Through the process, each ACT provided the geometric parameters, such as mean displacement of the deformed PTV voxels (Warpmean) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) from deformation vector field, and dosimetric parameters, e.g. difference of homogeneity index (ΔHI, HI defined as (D2%-D98%)/Dprescribed*100) and mean delivered dose to the PTV (Dmean), obtained from the dose statistics in the TPS. Those parameters were analyzed using multiple linear regression and one-way-ANOVA of SPSS® (version 27).ResultsThe prescribed dose was confirmed to be fully delivered to internal target volume (ITV) within maximum difference of 1%, and the difference between the planned and delivered doses to the PTV was agreed within 6% for more than 95% of the ACT cases. Volume changes of the ITV during the treatment course were observed to be minor in comparison of their standard deviations. Multiple linear regression analysis between the obtained parameters and the dose delivered to 95% volume of the PTV (D95%) revealed four PTV parameters [Warpmean, DSC, ΔHI between the PCT and ACT, Dmean] and the PTV D95% to be significantly related with P-values < 0.05. The ACT cases of high ΔHI were caused by higher values of the Warpmean and DSC from the deformable image registration, resulting in lower PTV D95% delivered. The mean values of PTV D95% and Warpmean showed significant differences depending on the lung lobe where the tumour was located.ConclusionsEvaluation of the dose delivered to patients with NSCLC treated with SABR using ACTs confirmed that the prescribed dose was accurately delivered to the ITV. However, for the PTV, certain ACT cases characterised by high HI deviations from the original plan demonstrated variations in the delivered dose. These variations may potentially arise from factors such as patient setup during treatment, as suggested by the statistical analyses of the parameters obtained from the dose evaluation process.

Analysis of the gamma index using an indigenously developed anthropomorphic heterogeneous female pelvis (AHFP) phantom.

It is essential in modern radiotherapy treatment practices to evaluate the quality assurance (QA) of the treatment plan prior to the exclusion of patient from treatment. The typical suitable tools used for patient pretreatment QA are phantoms representing the human anatomy. An anthropomorphic heterogeneous female pelvic (AHFP) phantom has been developed to represent the real female pelvic structure. The objective of the current study is to assess the findings of relative dosimetry carried out utilizing an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) on the AHFP phantom fabricated. The planning target volume (PTV) was created on CT slices of an AHFP phantom to confirm the tool's ability to represent female pelvic anatomy and serve as a QA tool. In order to assess the dose received by healthy organs during radiotherapy, organs at risk such as the bladder and rectum were additionally drawn alongside the PTV. Rapid Arc and Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were both used to create the treatment plan on treatment planning system, and the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm Version 11.0.31 was used to calculate the dose. The results obtained for the average gamma value in RapidArc plans are 0.26, 0.27, and 0.28 (g ≤1) and IMRT plans are 0.39, 0.40, and 0.46 (g ≤1) for target 1, target 2, and target 3, respectively. According to the findings of the current study, the AHFP phantom was used to explore the potential of relative dosimetry using EPID as a QA tool, which was found to be suitable.

First clinical experience of total body irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy technique in Japan.

In recent years, advances in radiotherapy technology have led to the use of high-precision radiotherapy such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Total body irradiation using VMAT technique (VMAT-TBI) was performed for the first time in our hospital. A 56-year-old male patient diagnosed with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia was performed TBI as pretreatment for haploidentical-related peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation. The prescribed dose was 4 Gy for planning target volume in two fractions. The treatment plan was divided into two plans: upper body and lower body with three and two isocenters, respectively. The overall treatment time with VMAT-TBI was approximately 55 min, and it was not significantly longer than that of moving couch techniques. VMAT-TBI is a less burdensome and more accurate treatment for patients, and it may be a useful treatment for TBI.

High-dose hyperfractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy versus standard-dose radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in China: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

For the past 20 years, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy has been the treatment of choice for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), which has a poor prognosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose, accelerated, hyperfractionated, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (54 Gy in 30 fractions) versus standard-dose radiotherapy (45 Gy in 30 fractions) as a first-line treatment for LS-SCLC. This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was performed at 16 public hospitals in China. The key inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 years, with histologically or cytologically confirmed LS-SCLC, who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and who were previously untreated or had received one course of cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) of 45 Gy in 30 fractions to the gross tumour volume or VMAT with a simultaneous integrated boost of 54 Gy in 30 fractions to the gross tumour volume starting 0-42 days after the first chemotherapy course. Both groups received 10 fractions of twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy per week. The planning target volume was 45 Gy in 30 fractions in both groups. Patients with responsive disease received prophylactic cranial radiotherapy (25 Gy in 10 fractions). Randomisation was performed using a centralised interactive web response system, stratified by ECOG performance status, disease stage, previous chemotherapy course, and chemotherapy choice. The primary outcome was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in the as-treated population. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03214003. From June 30, 2017, to April 6, 2021, 224 patients (102 [46%] females and 122 [54%] males; median age 64 years [IQR 58-68]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the 54 Gy group (n=108) or 45 Gy (n=116) group. The median follow-up was 46 months (IQR 33-56). The median overall survival was significantly longer in the 54 Gy group (60·7 months [95% CI 49·2-62·0]) than in the 45 Gy group (39·5 months [27·5-51·4]; hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·37-0·72]; p=0·003). Treatment was tolerable, and the chemotherapy-related and radiotherapy-related toxicities were similar between the groups. The grade 3-4 radiotherapy toxicities were oesophagitis (14 [13%] of 108 patients in the 54 Gy group vs 14 [12%] of 116 patients in the 45 Gy group; p=0·84) and pneumonitis (five [5%] of 108 patients vs seven [6%] of 116 patients; p=0·663). Only one treatment-related death occurred in the 54 Gy group (myocardial infarction). The study was prematurely terminated by an independent data safety monitoring board on April 30, 2021, based on evidence of sufficient clinical benefit. Compared with standard-dose thoracic radiotherapy (45 Gy), high-dose radiotherapy (54 Gy) improved overall survival without increasing toxicity in a cohort of patients aged 18-70 years with LS-SCLC. Our results support the use of twice-daily accelerated thoracic radiotherapy (54 Gy) with concurrent chemotherapy as an alternative first-line LS-SCLC treatment option. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology-Linghang Cancer Research, the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation, and Clinical Research Fund For Distinguished Young Scholars of Peking University Cancer Hospital and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program.

Robust optimization and assessment of dynamic trajectory and mixed-beam arc radiotherapy: a preliminary study

Objective. Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) and dynamic mixed-beam arc therapy (DYMBARC) exploit non-coplanarity and, for DYMBARC, simultaneously optimized photon and electron beams. Margin concepts to account for set-up uncertainties during delivery are ill-defined for electron fields. We develop robust optimization for DTRT&DYMBARC and compare dosimetric plan quality and robustness for both techniques and both optimization strategies for four cases. Approach. Cases for different treatment sites and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins, m , were investigated. Dynamic gantry-table-collimator photon paths were optimized to minimize PTV/organ-at-risk (OAR) overlap in beam’s-eye-view and minimize potential photon multileaf collimator (MLC) travel. For DYMBARC plans, non-isocentric partial electron arcs or static fields with shortened source-to-surface distance (80 cm) were added. Direct aperture optimization (DAO) was used to simultaneously optimize MLC-based intensity modulation for both photon and electron beams yielding deliverable PTV-based DTRT&DYMBARC plans. Robust-optimized plans used the same paths/arcs/fields. DAO with stochastic programming was used for set-up uncertainties with equal weights in all translational directions and magnitude δ such that m= 0.7δ . Robust analysis considered random errors in all directions with or without an additional systematic error in the worst 3D direction for the adjacent OARs. Main results. Electron contribution was 7%–41% of target dose depending on the case and optimization strategy for DYMBARC. All techniques achieved similar CTV coverage in the nominal (no error) scenario. OAR sparing was overall better in the DYMBARC plans than in the DTRT plans and DYMBARC plans were generally more robust to the considered uncertainties. OAR sparing was better in the PTV-based than in robust-optimized plans for OARs abutting or overlapping with the target volume, but more affected by uncertainties. Significance. Better plan robustness can be achieved with robust optimization than with margins. Combining electron arcs/fields with non-coplanar photon trajectories further improves robustness and OAR sparing.

Optimal Correction Strategy of Image Guided Radiation Therapy Including the Paraortic Lymph Node Region in Patients With Cervical Cancers

The clinically accepted planning target volume margin for radiation therapy to the paraortic nodal region in cervical cancer patients is 5 mm. However, the comprehensive alignment and variability from the pelvic bone to all lumbar vertebrae are undetermined. This study aims to quantify the residual setup errors between the pelvic bone and lumbar vertebrae and determine the optimal correction strategy for patients with cervical cancer. Fifteen patients underwent pretreatment mega-voltage computed tomography scans (375 total fractions). Residual setup errors and required margins for each lumbar vertebra were calculated based on registrations accounting for pelvic rotation and translation. The systematic residual errors (1 SD) at L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 using pelvic bone registration were 6.5, 4.9, 3.1, 1.5, and 0.6 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction, 3.1, 2.3, 1.4, 0.6, and 0.3 mm in the right-left direction, and 2.7, 2.2, 1.7, 1.0, and 0.5 mm in the superior-inferior direction, respectively. The residual setup errors were the largest in the AP direction. Registration based on the pelvic bone required margins in the AP direction of 16.0, 12.1, 7.7, 3.6, and 1.3 mm for L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5, respectively, whereas registration based on L3 required margins of 8.8, 4.8, 4.4, 7.1, and 7.7 mm for L1, L2, L4, L5, and pelvic bone, respectively. Considerable local setup variability was found in patients with cervical cancer. After reviewing the corrective strategies, we determined that L3-based registration effectively minimized the required margins.

First implementation of artificial intelligence empowered all-in-one radiotherapy workflow for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

134 Background: To establish an artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered All-In-One (AIO) workflow for providing one-stop radiotherapy to patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and evaluate its feasibility and performance. Methods: The NPC-specific AIO workflow operates on a CT-integrated linac and integrates AI contouring and AI planning modules. A 3D U-net was employed for contours generation and 3D dose distribution. Knowledge-based planning approach and a protocol-based approach were used for plan optimization. MRI datasets with contours of primary gross tumors, CT datasets with contours of targets and organs at risk, and radiotherapy treatment planning datasets were collected from 877, 139, and 243 patients, respectively, for the training, validation, and testing of AI contouring and planning models. The NPC-specific AIO workflow underwent real-world clinical testing with an end-to-end evaluation involving 120 patients with NPC. The technical characteristics, implementation procedures and performance of AIO workflow were described and evaluated. Results: From March 2022 to October 2023, 120 patients with newly-diagnosed, non-metastatic NPC underwent AIO workflow, and 117 patients completed it in a median time of 23.2 min (range: 16.3 to 45.8 min). Median translation motions were 0.2 mm (CT scan to planning approval) and 0.1 mm (during beam delivery). AI-generated contours required little revision for clinical target volume (CTV1) and organs at risk (OARs), minor revision for cervical lymph nodes (GTVn) and clinical target volume (CTV2), with median Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of 0.98 and 0.94, respectively; more revision for GTVp, with a median DSC of 0.84. Of the 117 AI-generated plannings, 108 (92.3%) passed after initial auto-optimization. Volumes receiving ≥ 100% of the prescribed dose for all planning target volumes was ≥ 97.8%. Mean dosimetric parameters met dose constraints for all OARs except the thyroid and submandibulars. One patient died from acute renal failure after 10 fractions of radiotherapy. At week 12 after radiotherapy completion, 115 patients achieved complete response;1 had stable disease. Grade 3-4 acute effects were reported by 54 of 115 patients (36%). Conclusions: We successfully established an AI-empowered AIO workflow for initial radiotherapy of NPC, confirming its feasibility and safety for clinical application.

Clinical Factors Influencing the Radiation Dose of Circulating Immune Cells during Radiotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has garnered significant attention due to its high malignancy, propensity for distant metastasis, and poor prognosis. Radiotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). However, outcomes with radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy remain suboptimal. Radiotherapy can induce lymphopenia by directly irradiating hematopoietic organs or destroying mature circulating lymphocytes, leading to immunosuppression and consequently diminishing therapeutic efficacy. The estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC) model integrates factors such as hemodynamics, lymphocyte radiosensitivity, and proliferation capacity. This study employs the EDRIC model with enhancements to calculate the circulating immune cell radiation dose. By utilizing the EDRIC methodology, the study explores the correlation between EDRIC and tumor target size, average lung dose, average heart dose, clinical features, and peripheral blood lymphocytopenia during radiotherapy for LS-SCLC, aiming to inform personalized patient treatment strategies. This study analyzed data from 64 LS-SCLC patients who met the inclusion criteria at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from January 2023 to January 2024, all of whom received radical thoracic conventional fractionated radiotherapy. Lymphocyte counts were recorded at the following points: before radiotherapy, at the lowest observed value during radiotherapy, at the end of radiotherapy, and one-month post-radiotherapy. Dosimetric data, including average lung, heart, and body doses, were extracted from the treatment planning system, and the circulating EDRIC was calculated using this model. The relationship between EDRIC values and therapeutic outcomes was analyzed. In LS-SCLC, the EDRIC model effectively predicts lymphocyte count reduction, correlating with planning target volume (PTV; cm3), TNM stage, and the percentage of target lesion shrinkage. Post-radiotherapy, there was a significant decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte counts, with greater EDRIC values indicating more pronounced lymphocyte reduction.

Higher immune cell radiation dose is correlated with poor tumor control and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy

IntroductionThe estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC) has been shown to correlate with the overall survival (OS) of patients who receive definitive thoracic radiotherapy. However, the planning target volume (PTV) may be a confounding factor. We assessed the prognostic value of EDRIC for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) with homogeneous PTV.MethodsPatients with NSCLC who underwent PORT between 2004 and 2019 were included. EDRIC was computed as a function of the number of radiation fractions and mean doses to the lungs, heart, and remaining body. The correlations between EDRIC and OS, disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox models. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to assess the survival difference between low- and high-EDRIC groups.ResultsIn total, 345 patients were analyzed. The mean EDRIC was 6.26 Gy. Multivariate analysis showed that higher EDRIC was associated with worse outcomes in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.207, P = .007), DFS (HR 1.129, P = .015), LRFS (HR 1.211, P = .002), and DMFS (HR 1.131, P = .057). In the low- and high-EDRIC groups, the 3-year OS was 81.2% and 74.0%, DFS 39.8% and 35.0%, LRFS 70.4% and 60.5%, and DMFS 73.9% and 63.1%, respectively.ConclusionsEDRIC is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. Higher doses of radiation to the immune system are associated with tumor progression and poor survival. Organs at risk for the immune system should be considered during radiotherapy planning.

A mini review of plan quality and secondary cancer risk in CyberKnife M6 radiosurgery for benign intracranial tumors.

With advancements in medical technology, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an essential option for treating benign intracranial tumors. Due to its minimal side effects and high local control rate, SRS is widely applied. This paper evaluates the plan quality and secondary cancer risk (SCR) in patients with benign intracranial tumors treated with the CyberKnife M6 system. The CyberKnife M6 robotic radiosurgery system features both multileaf collimator (MLC) and IRIS variable aperture collimator systems, providing different treatment options. The study included 15 patients treated with the CyberKnife M6 system, examining the differences in plan quality and SCR between MLC and IRIS systems. Results showed that MLC and IRIS plans had equal PTV (planning target volume) coverage (98.57% vs. 98.75%). However, MLC plans demonstrated better dose falloff and conformity index (CI: 1.81 ± 0.26 vs. 1.92 ± 0.27, P = 0.025). SCR assessment indicated that MLC plans had lower cancer risk estimates, with IRIS plans having average LAR (lifetime attributable risk) and EAR (excess absolute risk) values approximately 25% higher for cancer induction and 15% higher for sarcoma induction compared to MLC plans. The study showed that increasing tumor volume increases SCR probability, but there was no significant difference between different plans in PTV and brainstem analyses.

MRI-based ventilation and perfusion imaging to predict radiation-induced pneumonitis in lung tumor patients at a 0.35 T MR-Linac

Background and purpose:Radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP), diagnosed 6–12 weeks after treatment, is a complication of lung tumor radiotherapy. So far, clinical and dosimetric parameters have not been reliable in predicting RP. We propose using non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based functional parameters acquired over the treatment course for patient stratification for improved follow-up. Materials and methods:23 lung tumor patients received MR-guided hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy at a 0.35T MR-Linac. Ventilation- and perfusion-maps were generated from 2D-cine MRI-scans acquired after the first and last treatment fraction (Fx) using non-uniform Fourier decomposition. The relative differences in ventilation and perfusion between last and first Fx in three regions (planning target volume (PTV), lung volume receiving more than 20Gy (V20) excluding PTV, whole tumor-bearing lung excluding PTV) and three dosimetric parameters (mean lung dose, V20, mean dose to the gross tumor volume) were investigated. Univariate receiver operating characteristic curve - area under the curve (ROC–AUC) analysis was performed (endpoint RP grade≥1) using 5000 bootstrapping samples. Differences between RP and non-RP patients were tested for statistical significance with the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test (α=0.05). Results:14/23 patients developed RP of grade≥1 within 3 months. The dosimetric parameters showed no significant differences between RP and non-RP patients. In contrast, the functional parameters, especially the relative ventilation difference in the PTV, achieved a p-value<0.05 and an AUC value of 0.84. Conclusion:MRI-based functional parameters extracted from 2D-cine MRI-scans were found to be predictive of RP development in lung tumor patients.

A Four-dimensional Computed Tomography Generated Internal Target Volume Approach to Paediatric High Risk Neuroblastoma to Reduce Organ at Risk and Normal Tissue Irradiation

AimsThe magnitude of upper abdominal organ motion in children may be overestimated by current planning target volumes (PTV). A four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) – derived internal target volume (ITV) is frequently used in adult radiotherapy to take respiratory-related organ motion into account. In this study, the dosimetric consequences for target coverage and organs at risk from the use of an ITV approach compared to standard PTV margins in children with high-risk neuroblastoma were investigated. Materials and methods14 patients, median age 4.1 years, range 1.5 – 18.9 years, (9 midline targets, 5 lateralised) each had two dual arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (14 ×1.5 Gy) generated. One used an ITV-approach; motion information derived from 4DCT (PTV_itv) with a 5mm ITV to PTV expansion, and the other a PTV margin of 10mm from CTV to PTV (PTV_standard). Differences in absolute PTV volume and organ at risk doses are described. ResultsThe ITV approach resulted in a highly significant reduction in PTV size of 38% (p<0.0001). For midline targets, an ITV approach resulted in a small but statistically significant reduction in combined mean kidney dose of 0.8Gy, p 0.01. Mean heart and lung dose were reduced by an average of 1 Gy with an ITV approach. Non-PTV integral dose from 30.4 Gy L to 27.8 Gy L using an ITV approach. ConclusionAn ITV-approach to respiratory related organ motion management in children can significantly reduce absolute PTV volumes, maintain target coverage and reduce dose delivered to normal tissue in proximity to the target. This is an essential step to maximising the benefits of highly conformal radiotherapy techniques including VMAT for this patient group, and in the future with Proton Therapy.

Dosimetric comparison of ZAP-X, Gamma Knife, and CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for single brain metastasis

PurposeTo evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of ZAP-X stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for single brain metastasis by comparing with two mature SRS platforms.MethodsThirteen patients with single brain metastasis treated with CyberKnife (CK) G4 were selected retrospectively. The prescription dose for the planning target volume (PTV) was 18–24 Gy for 1–3 fractions. The PTV volume ranged from 0.44 to 11.52 cc.Treatment plans of thirteen patients were replanned using the ZAP-X plan system and the Gamma Knife (GK) ICON plan system with the same prescription dose and organs at risk (OARs) constraints. The prescription dose of PTV was normalized to 70% for both ZAP-X and CK, while it was 50% for GK. The dosimetric parameters of three groups included the plan characteristics (CI, GI, GSI, beams, MUs, treatment time), PTV (D2, D95, D98, Dmin, Dmean, Coverage), brain tissue (volume of 100%-10% prescription dose irradiation V100%-V10%, Dmean) and other OARs (Dmax, Dmean),all of these were compared and evaluated. All data were read and analyzed with MIM Maestro. One-way ANOVA or a multisample Friedman rank sum test was performed, where p < 0.05 indicated significant differences.ResultsThe CI of GK was significantly lower than that of ZAP-X and CK. Regarding the mean value, ZAP-X had a lower GI and higher GSI, but there was no significant difference among the three groups. The MUs of ZAP-X were significantly lower than those of CK, and the mean value of the treatment time of ZAP-X was significantly shorter than that of CK. For PTV, the D95, D98, and target coverage of CK were higher, while the mean of Dmin of GK was significantly lower than that of CK and ZAP-X. For brain tissue, ZAP-X showed a smaller volume from V100% to V20%; the statistical results of V60% and V50% showed a difference between ZAP-X and GK, while the V40% and V30% showed a significant difference between ZAP-X and the other two groups; V10% and Dmean indicated that GK was better. Excluding the Dmax of the brainstem, right optic nerve and optic chiasm, the mean value of all other OARs was less than 1 Gy. For the brainstem, GK and ZAP-X had better protection, especially at the maximum dose.ConclusionFor the SRS treating single brain metastasis, all three treatment devices, ZAP-X system, CyberKnife G4 system, and GammaKnife system, could meet clinical treatment requirements. The newly platform ZAP-X could provide a high-quality plan equivalent to or even better than CyberKnife and Gamma Knife, with ZAP-X presenting a certain dose advantage, especially with a more conformal dose distribution and better protection for brain tissue. As the ZAP-X systems get continuous improvements and upgrades, they may become a new SRS platform for the treatment of brain metastasis.

Intrafraction Motion in Surface-Guided Breast Radiation Therapy and its Implications on a Single Planning Target Volume Margin Strategy

Background and PurposeThis study quantifies intrafraction motion in surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) for breast cancer and considers the need for individualized intrafraction motion measures when calculating Planning Target Volume (PTV) margins. MethodsSGRT was used to assess intrafraction motion in consecutive patients according to (1) site irradiated (whole breast (WB)/chest wall (CW) versus WB/CW + regional lymph nodes) and (2) the use of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) versus free-breathing (FB). Intrafraction motion variation was evaluated throughout the treatment course for all cases. Associations between intrafraction motion and patient specific characteristics were explored. The usefulness of individualised intrafraction motion measures for PTV margin determination was considered. Results102 patients undergoing 1360 fractions were included. On a population level, average intrafraction motion was less than 0.4mm and 0.2 degrees for translational and rotational directions, respectively, with 95th percentiles < 1.2mm and 0.6 degrees. No clinically meaningful differences in intrafraction motion were observed according to site irradiated or the use of DIBH. Consistency in intrafraction motion was noted for all patients throughout the treatment course. No clinically meaningful associations were found between intrafraction motion and patient specific characteristics such as age, seroma volume, PTV volume, and mean body volume. ConclusionIntrafractional deviations with SGRT, using manufacturer-recommended ROIs, are minimal, do not vary substantially for different treatment techniques or patient specific characteristics, and remain constant throughout the treatment course. A universal intrafraction motion measure may be sufficient for calculating PTV margins. Further validation studies are needed to evaluate the impact of ROI size and coverage.

Escalade de dose en radiothérapie modérément hypofractionnée pour les cancers de la prostate localisés, ESHYPRO : résultats d’une série monocentrique rétrospective évaluant la toxicité et l’efficacité

PurposeProstate cancer is the most frequent cancer among men and radiotherapy hypofractionation regimens have become standard treatments for the localized stages, but the absence of increased risk of acute and late genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity of the dose escalation still must be demonstrated. Material and methodsThe study population included all patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated at the institut Curie from February 2016 to March 2018 by external radiation delivered by a linear accelerator using an image-guided conformal intensity modulation technique at a total dose of 75Gy in 30 fractions of 2.5Gy in the planning target volume that included the prostate and the proximal seminal vesicles, and could be paired with a prophylactic lymph node radiotherapy at 46Gy in 23 fractions with simultaneous integrated boost. ResultsA total of 166 patients were included. Among them, 68.6% were unfavourable intermediate or (very) high risk. The median age and follow-up were 71.4years and 3.96years. One hundred and forty-nine patients received prophylactic lymph node radiotherapy (89.8%). One hundred and thirty-one patients received hormonotherapy (78.9%). Genito-urinary toxicity events of grades 2 or above during radiotherapy, at 6months, 1year and 5years were respectively 36.7%, 8.8%, 3.1% and 4.7%. Two patients had late grade 4 toxicity at 5years (1.6%). Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity events during radiotherapy, 6months, 1year and 5years were respectively 15.1%, 1.9%, 14.6% and 9.3%. Of these, eight patients had grade 3 toxicity (6.2%). There was no grade 4 toxicity. Analyses did not reveal any predictive factor for toxicity. The 5-year overall, progression-free, and specific survival rates were respectively 82.4%, 85.7%, and 93.3%. Serum prostate specific antigen concentration and cardiovascular risk factors were found to be predictive factors of deterioration in overall survival (P=0.0028 for both). ConclusionExternal radiotherapy for localized prostatic cancer with our moderately hypofractionated dose escalation regimen is well tolerated. In the absence of increased late toxicity, the analysis of the modes of long-term relapses will be interesting to determine the benefit of this dose escalation on local and distant relapses.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison of IMRT and VMAT using flattening filter and flattening filter-free beams.

This retrospective study was performed to evaluate plan quality and treatment delivery parameters of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. The study utilized different isocentric modulated techniques: intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and 10 MV flattening filter-free beams (FFF). Fifteen retrospective prostate cancer patients were selected for this study. Sixty plans were created with an SBRT-prescribed dose of 36.25Gy delivered in five fractions. Planning target volume (PTV) coverage, plan quality indices, doses delivered to organs at risk (OARs), and treatment delivery parameters were compared for all plans. It turned out that VMAT plans, particularly those using the FFF beam, provided superior target conformality and a steeper dose gradient as compared to IMRT plans. Additionally, VMAT plans showed better OARs sparing compared to IMRT plans. However, IMRT plans delivered a lower maximum dose to the target than VMAT plans. Importantly, the VMAT plans resulted in reduced treatment delivery parameters, including beam on time (BOT), monitor unit (MU), and modulation factor (MF), compared to IMRT plans. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was observed in BOT and mean body dose between FF and FFF beams, with FFF beams showing superior performance. Considering all results, VMAT using 10 MV (FFF) is suggested for treating prostate cancer patients with SBRT. This offers the fastest delivery in addition to maintaining the highest plan quality.

Experiences with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for treating symptomatic peripheral joint osteoarthritis (OA) with Low Dose Radiotherapy (LDRT) – a case series

Introduction: Peripheral joint osteoarthritis (OA) in Australia is the third leading cause of life-years lost. Implant surgery is a great help, but patients who are waiting or are inoperable suffer. Low Dose Radiotherapy (LDRT) is well established in some countries. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) is recommended. However, some departments may only have Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). We present our experiences treating ten volumes of symptomatic OA treated with VMAT in nine consecutive patients to two months post-LDRT. Methods: The hypothesis was that LDRT using VMAT was feasible and effective at two months. Patient response data was collected prospectively. The Visual Analog Scale Pain (VASP) for pain was used. A Visual Analog Scale Mobility (VASM) was created for mobility. Bones within radiation oncologists (RO) skin marks around the joint were auto-contoured for clinical target volume (CTV) with 2 mm expansion to planning target volume (PTV). Treatment was titrated to clinical response. Phase 1 was 3 Gray (Gy) in 6 fractions at 2-3 fractions per week. There was RO review at 2 months post-phase 1 for consideration of phase 2. If no response, then phase 2 was 6 Gy in 6 fractions, if a partial response (PR), then a repeat of phase 1. A third phase similar to phase 2 was possible. RO follow-up was done 2 months after the last phase. Results: Nine consecutive patients, eight males and one female, average age of 69 years (60-84), with ten volumes of symptomatic OA were treated. Joints were three single knees, two cases of both knees, three cases of both hands, one hip and one carpometacarpal joint. They had suffered from OA for an average of eight years (1-20). All were on at least one systemic therapy. All were using some sort of local therapy or device. Eight had a PR to phase 1 and proceeded to phase 2. Two had an equivocal response. No patient had a third phase. Average VASP pain scores fell from baseline of 7.4 to 3.6 after phase 1, and to 2.3 after phase 2. Average VASM immobility scores fell from baseline of 6.9 to 4.4 after phase 1 and to 3.3 after phase 2. Conclusion: In this small Australian cohort LDRT using VMAT is feasible and clinically effective when measured at 2 months. More study is needed.

Dosimetric Analyses of the Three Radiation Techniques Used in the EORTC 22922/10925 IM-MS Breast Cancer Trial

PurposeThe aim of the current study is to compare the dosimetry of 3 radiation therapy (RT) techniques used in the EORTC 22922/10925 trial for irradiating the internal mammary (IM) and medial supraclavicular nodes (MS) using a treatment planning system available nowadays for dose calculation. MethodsWe performed a retrospective dosimetry analysis of anonymised data; thus, ethics approval was not required. Ten cases of left-sided breast were randomly selected for RT planning to a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The treatment planning was done according to the trial's protocol and under the supervision of the EORTC trial's coordinators. Doses to planning target volumes (PTV) and to organs at risk (OARs) are reported. Data is presented in descriptive statistics. ResultsA total of 10 cases and 40 treatment plans (4 plans per case: standard-plan A, modified standard-plan B, individualised-plan C and breast-only–plan D). For all planning techniques, the mean dose to the PTV of the left breast (plan A-D) and the PTV-MS (plan A-C) exceeded 95% of the prescribed dose (>47.5 Gy). The individualised technique (plan C) had a lower coverage for PTV-IM, with a mean of 87% of the prescribed dose compared to ∼102% for plans A and B. The dose to OARs varied between techniques, with the mean heart dose being higher in the standard and modified standard techniques (18.3 and 16.6 Gy, respectively) compared to the individualised technique (9.5 Gy). ConclusionsThe 3 RT techniques used in the trial varied in target coverage and OARs dose. Our results may help to understand the observed larger absolute benefit of individualised IM-MS treatment planning in terms of breast cancer outcomes.

Radiotherapy with Targeted Therapy or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Hepatic Vein and/or Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombi.

This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT) and/or inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT) receiving radiotherapy (RT) combined with systemic therapies. Patients with HCC with HVTT and/or IVCTT who received RT were identified at our institution. The prescription doses were 30-65 Gy for planning target volume and 40-65 Gy for the gross tumor volume. Targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors were used concurrently if patients were at a high risk of or already had distant metastasis. After RT completion, follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and 3 to 6 months thereafter. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were recorded. Thirty-four patients were retrospectively enrolled between January 2016 and September 2021. Most patients received concurrent targeted therapy (70.6%) and/or post-RT (79.4%). The in-field ORR and disease control rates were 79.4% and 97.1%, respectively. The OS rates were 77.6% at 1 year and 36.3% at 2 years (median OS, 15.8 months). The median PFS and median in-field PFS were 4.2 months and not reached, respectively. The PFS and in-field PFS rates were 24.6% and 79.2% at 1 year, 19.7% and 72.0% at 2 years, respectively. An alpha-fetoprotein level >1000 ng/mL was a significant prognostic factor for worse OS (HR, 5.674; 95% CI, 1.588-20.276; p=0.008); in-field complete/partial response was a significant prognostic factor for better OS (HR, 0.116; 95% CI, 0.027-0.499; p=0.004). The most common site of first failure was the lungs (13/34 patients, 38.2%), followed by the liver (7/34 patients, 20.6%). No patients developed radiation-induced liver disease or pulmonary embolism during follow-up. Combining RT and systemic therapy was safe and effective in treating patients with HCC with HVTT and IVCTT.

Treatment outcome of localized prostate cancer using transperineal ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy

BackgroundWe report the results of a retrospective analysis of localized prostate cancer (LPCa) treated with transperineal ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy (TPUS-IGRT).MethodsA total of 124 patients (median age: 74 y, 46–84 y) with LPCa who underwent TPUS-IGRT (Clarity Autoscan system; CAS, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) between April 2016 and October 2021 for curative/after hormone induction were enrolled. The number of patients by risk (National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019) was 7, 25, 42, and 50 for low (LR), good intermediate (good IR), poor intermediate (poor IR), and high (HR)/very high (VHR), respectively. Ninety-five patients were given neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The planning target volume margin setting was 3 mm for rectal in most cases, 5–7 mm for superior/inferior, and 5 mm for anterior/right/left. The principle prescribed dose is 74 Gy (LR), 76 Gy (good IR), and 76–78 Gy (poor IR or above). CAS was equipped with a real-time prostate intrafraction monitoring (RTPIFM) system. When a displacement of 2–3 mm or more was detected, irradiation was paused, and the patients were placed on standby for prostate reinstatement/recorrection. Of the 3135 fractions in 85 patients for whom RTPIFM was performed, 1008 fractions (32.1%) were recorrected at least once after starting irradiation.ResultsA total of 123 patients completed the radiotherapy course. The 5-year overall survival rate was 95.9%. The 5-year biological prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival rate (bPFS) was 100% for LR, 92.9% for intermediate IR, and 93.2% for HR/VHR (Phoenix method). The 5-year late toxicity rate of Grade 2+ was 7.4% for genitourinary (GU) and 6.5% for gastrointestinal (GI) organs. Comparing the ≤ 76 Gy group to the 78 Gy group for both GU and GI organs, the incidence was higher in the 78 Gy group for both groups.ConclusionThese results suggest that TPUS-IGRT is well tolerated, as the bPFS and incidence of late toxicity are almost comparable to those reported by other sources of image-guided radiotherapy.