AbstractFiber‐to‐the‐curb (FTTC) system proposals have arisen because of the present high cost of fiber‐to‐the‐home (FTTH) systems. With FTTC systems, fiber is brought only as far as the service access point (SAP). From there, copper drops carry signals from the SAP to several residences. Owing to the extensive sharing of optical sources and the fibers running to the SAP, the per‐subscriber system cost is greatly reduced relative to the per‐subscriber cost of a FTTH system. In addition, elimination of the optical network unit (ONU) at the home may offer new options for powering and battery back‐up.This paper presents an analysis of a star‐configured, fiber‐to‐the‐curb distribution network that serves up to ninety‐six customers, initially providing two plain old telephone service (POTS) channels to each customer. Three system variations, serving either four, six, or eight customers per SAP, are examined. We also estimate the installed first costs (IFC) of the distribution link (remote node to customer) for the three FTTC scenarios and compare them to the IFC of a FTTH system with similar capabilities. Star‐configured FTTC architectures can be installed for substantially less ($1180‐$825/customer for four to eight customers per SAP) than the estimated $2920 per subscriber cost associated with FTTH systems. Finally, we propose an upgrade strategy, consistent with the passive photonic loop (PPL) network, to support future high bandwidth services.
Read full abstract