Placebo Users Research Articles

Suppressed HIV antibody responses following exposure to antiretrovirals—evidence from PrEP randomized trials and early antiretroviral treatment initiation studies

BackgroundExposure to antiretrovirals at or early after HIV acquisition can suppress viral replication and blunt antibody (Ab) responses; a reduced HIV detectability could impact diagnosis and blood donation screening. MethodsWe used three antigen (Ag)/Ab assays and one nucleic acid test (NAT) to analyze samples collected in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trials (iPrEx; Partners PrEP) before infection detection by Ab-only rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), and in early antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation studies (RV254; SIPP). ResultsReactivity using NAT and Ag/Ab assays in samples collected up to 8 weeks prior to the first reactive RDT from 251 PrEP trials participants varied between 49-61% for active PrEP users and between 27-37% for placebo users. Among RV254 participants, reactivity in Ag/Ab assays was <100% at all timepoints, and lower among those initiating ART earlier. Seroreversions occurred for 29% (16/55), and blood donation screening with NAT and Ag/Ab assays could have missed up to 36% (20/55) of RV254 participants. For SIPP participants, who started ART at later timepoints, Ag/Ab assays identified infections with no evidence of reactivity waning. ConclusionPrEP and early ART initiation can delay or reduce HIV detectability. Considerations for the implementation of NAT and Ag/Ab tests in PrEP/PEP programs relying on Ab-only RDTs should be balanced according to feasibility and public health impact. While blood transfusion services using Ab-only RDTs for HIV screening should adopt higher sensitivity tests, surveillance and further research are needed to determine the need for novel HIV testing algorithms for those already using NAT and Ag/Ab screening assays.

No Significant Differences between Bisphosphonates and Placebo for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Objectives: The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the current evidence on the role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of knee bone marrow lesions (BMLs), to understand whether they are truly effective in improving symptoms and restoring the subchondral bone status at imaging evaluation. Methods: A literature search was carried out on PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Potential risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Results: A total of 15 studies were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven studies were RCTs, two were prospective cohort studies, three were retrospective, and three were case series. Our meta-analysis revealed that bisphosphonates did not significantly improve clinical scores or reduce BML size compared to placebo. Accordingly, the rate of adverse events was also non-significantly higher among bisphosphonate users versus placebo users. Conclusions: The main finding of the present meta-analysis and systematic review is that bisphosphonates show neither significant benefits nor significant adverse events when compared to placebo in the treatment of BMLs of the knee. Level of Evidence: Level IV systematic review of level II-III-IV studies. Level I meta-analysis of level I studies.

(092) SEXUAL EXPERIENCES IN AN EXPLORATORY, PHASE 2B, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL OF SILDENAFIL, 3.6% CREAM FOR THE TREATMENT OF FEMALE SEXUAL AROUSAL DISORDER

Abstract Introduction Quantifying the change in the mean number of satisfactory sexual experiences (SSEs) is an efficacy endpoint recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration in studies of treatments for female sexual dysfunctions (FSD), including female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD). Objective Post-hoc analysis of sexual experiences in a study of Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% for treatment of FSAD Methods Phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% among premenopausal women with FSAD (NCT04948151). Following a baseline, single-blind, placebo, run-in period, participants were randomized and used investigational product (IP) at home for 12 weeks. Between monthly, in-clinic assessments, participants answered questions in an electronic diary (eDiary), within 24-hours of each sexual experience. Sexual experiences were categorized as “Partnered” versus “By Myself” and “Satisfactory” versus “Not Satisfactory”. eDiary question 11 (Q11) asked “Were conditions appropriate for satisfactory sexual activity (enough time, no distractions, etc.)?”. Changes from baseline in the mean number of SSEs was a secondary efficacy endpoint. The Orgasm domain (questions 22-24) of the Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ28) was an exploratory efficacy endpoint. Un-partnered women and women with sexual partners who did not sign informed consent were enrolled in the study, but in these cases (n=15), IP was only used in solo sexual experiences. Results Sildenafil Cream users had more sexual experiences and more un-partnered sexual experiences during the double-blind treatment period compared to Placebo Cream users. Sildenafil Cream users were significantly more likely to engage in sexual experiences even when conditions were not appropriate for a satisfactory experience. Although, the change from baseline in the mean number of SSEs at week 12 decreased during solo, un-partnered sexual experiences for both product groups (-0.12±0.27 for Sildenafil versus -0.04±0.32 for Placebo, p=0.85), during the double-blind treatment period, Sildenafil Cream users reported significantly higher proportions of SSEs during un-partnered sexual experiences (197/261, 75.5%) compared to Placebo users (116/187, 62.0%) (p=0.002). Despite Sildenafil Cream users engaging in a sexual experience more frequently when conditions were not appropriate, the proportion of SSEs during these events when Q11=“No” were not different between active (17/59, 28.8%) versus placebo (8/25, 32.0%) users (p=0.77). Finally, un-partnered women and women with un-enrolled sexual partners, who by definition had only solo sexual experiences, had an increase from baseline in their SFQ Orgasm at week 12 with Sildenafil use (2.58±1.13) versus Placebo users in this subset, who had decreases in this score (-0.34±1.13) (p=0.13). Conclusions These data support that Sildenafil Cream 3.6% enhanced solo, un-partnered sexual experiences, which represented approximately 1 in 5 events in this FSAD treatment study. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Dare Bioscience and Strategic Science and Technologies LLC Clarification: Industry initiated, executed and funded study Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Dare Bioscience and Strategic Science and Technologies LLC.

(094) MEASURES OF FEMALE SEXUAL DISTRESS IN AN EXPLORATORY, PHASE 2B, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL OF SILDENAFIL CREAM, 3.6% FOR THE TREATMENT OF FEMALE SEXUAL AROUSAL DISORDER

Abstract Introduction The diagnosis of female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) requires that individuals experience clinically significant distress from their symptoms. Pre-trial content validity investigations were conducted by the sponsor to understand how women with FSAD best described their distress associated with this female sexual dysfunction (FSD) diagnosis. Objective Responses to the Female Sexual Distress Scale – Desire, Arousal, Orgasm (FSDS-DAO) survey among healthy premenopausal women enrolled in a Phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% for FSAD treatment (NCT04948151). Methods After informed consent, enrollment diagnoses for each participant were established during a one-on-one clinical interview with independent experts. Baseline assessments were measured after a one-month, single-blind, placebo, run-in period. Participants were then randomized to Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% (n=101) versus Placebo (n=99) and used the investigational product (IP) as needed at home for 12 weeks, with monthly in-clinic assessments. The change from baseline at week 12 in question 14 (Q14) of the FSDS-DAO was a co-primary efficacy endpoint. All 15 FSDS-DAO questions begin with “How often did you feel, in the past 30 days” with a Likert score of 0 (Never) to 4 (Always). Results Although changes from baseline at week 12 in FSDS-DAO Q14 responses were not different among active versus placebo users in the intent-to-treat population (p=0.84) or the future target population (women with FSAD only or primary FSAD with secondary hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD)) (p=0.95), responses to several FSDS-DAO questions, showed reduced sexual distress among Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% users (Table 1). While Q14 asked specifically about concerns with sexual arousal, the other 5 questions asked about generalized sexual distress, using verbiage more congruent with pre-trial content validity investigations. Post-trial psychometric validation studies selected question 5 as the most appropriate for measuring sexual distress among this population. Conclusions Data from this exploratory trial support that women with a diagnosis of FSAD only or primary FSAD with secondary HSDD experienced reduced sexual distress after receiving Sildenafil Cream, 3.6%. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Dare Bioscience and Strategic Science and Technologies. Clarification: Industry initiated, executed and funded study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Dare Bioscience and Strategic Science and Technologies.

(123) Preliminary Efficacy of Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% in an Exploratory, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Trial for the Treatment of Female Sexual Arousal Disorder

Abstract Introduction Female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) is a persistent or recurrent inability to attain, or to maintain until completion of the sexual activity, an adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement that causes marked distress or interpersonal difficulty. The biologic mechanisms leading to FSAD are similar to male erectile dysfunction. Objective To test the preliminary efficacy of topical Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% among women with FSAD in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, exploratory Phase 2b study. To describe, using validated 28-day recall instruments, changes in sexual function with treatment, and to validate exploratory sexual function questionnaires in a placebo-controlled trial. Methods Healthy pre-menopausal women, aged 18-years or older and their sexual partners, if applicable, were screened and provided written informed consent. An individual clinical interview with each volunteer was conducted in order to establish that FSAD was present and was the primary sexual dysfunction concern. Women at risk of pregnancy used effective contraception during the study. Women or their partners were excluded if they had un-controlled hypertension, a history of serious cardiac events (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke), orthostatic hypotension or other serious medical co-morbidities. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were measured by the arousal sensation domain of the sexual function questionnaire (SFQ28) and question 14 of the female sexual distress scale (FSDS). After a one-month, no drug, run-in period, and a one-month, single-blind placebo, run-in period, 200 eligible women were randomized to receive Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% (n=101) versus placebo cream (n=99). Participants applied 2 grams of the investigational product to the clitoris, vestibule, labia minora and anterior distal vagina 10 – 20 minutes prior to each partnered or un-partnered sexual experience. During the 12-week, double-blind treatment period, participants were seen monthly and completed validated, 28-day recall questionnaires. Efficacy was also measured by a 12-question Arousal Diary (AD), completed within 24 hours of each sexual experience. Results Volunteers (n=833) underwent informed consent in this ethics board (Advarra Pro 00049161) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved study (IND 119922), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04948151). There were 1131 Sildenafil and 951 placebo exposed sexual experiences recorded in the AD during the double-blind treatment period. Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% treated women had a higher proportion of satisfactory sexual events than placebo users. At 12-weeks of use, there was improvement in the co-primary endpoint of arousal sensation consistent with how women reported meaningful improvement in an exit interview at the end of the study, although this did not achieve statistical significance. Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% treated women showed improvements in pre-specified exploratory endpoints that evaluated various aspects of the sexual experience including desire (p=0.02), arousal lubrication (p = 0.059) and orgasm (p=0.066) after 8 weeks of product use. Conclusions Data from this exploratory, placebo-controlled study of topical Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% for the treatment of FSAD in healthy premenopausal women support further clinical development of this first potential treatment for FSAD. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Dare Bioscience and Strategic Sciences and Technologies (SST), LLC. Clarification: Industry initiated, executed and funded study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Dare Bioscience and SST LLC.

Using Computer Vision to Improve Endoscopic Disease Quantification in Therapeutic Clinical Trials of Ulcerative Colitis

Endoscopic assessment of ulcerative colitis (UC) typically reports only the maximum severity observed. Computer vision methods may better quantify mucosal injury detail, which varies among patients. Endoscopic video from the UNIFI clinical trial (A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis) comparing ustekinumab and placebo for UC were processed in a computer vision analysis that spatially mapped Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) to generate the Cumulative Disease Score (CDS). CDS was compared with the MES for differentiating ustekinumab vs placebo treatment response and agreement with symptomatic remission at week 44. Statistical power, effect, and estimated sample sizes for detecting endoscopic differences between treatments were calculated using both CDS and MES measures. Endoscopic video from a separate phase 2 clinical trial replication cohort was performed for validation of CDS performance. Among 748 induction and 348 maintenance patients, CDS was lower in ustekinumab vs placebo users at week 8 (141.9 vs 184.3; P < .0001) and week 44 (78.2 vs 151.5; P < .0001). CDS was correlated with the MES (P < .0001) and all clinical components of the partial Mayo score (P < .0001). Stratification by pretreatment CDS revealed ustekinumab was more effective than placebo (P < .0001) with increasing effect in severe vs mild disease (-85.0 vs -55.4; P < .0001). Compared with the MES, CDS was more sensitive to change, requiring 50% fewer participants to demonstrate endoscopic differences between ustekinumab and placebo (Hedges' g= 0.743 vs 0.460). CDS performance in the JAK-UC replication cohort was similar to UNIFI. As an automated and quantitative measure of global endoscopic disease severity, the CDS offers artificial intelligence enhancement of traditional MES capability to better evaluate UC in clinical trials and potentially practice.

The efficacy and safety of oral antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of oral antibiotic intervention for chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients with/without type-1 Modic changes (MC1). AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline were searched from inception to March 3, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs that investigated the effectiveness or safety of oral antibiotics in treating CLBP patients were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, full-text articles, and extracted data. The methodological quality of each included article were evaluated by RoB2 and NIH quality assessment tools. The quality of evidence was appraised by GRADE. Meta-analyses were performed, where applicable. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the RCTs and case series separately, and to evaluate the effect of removing a low-quality RCT. Three RCTs and four case series were included. All Amoxicillin-clavulanate/Amoxicillin treatments lasted for approximately 3 months. Moderate- and low-quality evidence suggested that antibiotic was significantly better than placebo in improving disability and quality of life in CLBP patients with MC1 at 12-month follow-up, respectively. Low-quality evidence from meta-analyses of RCTs showed that oral antibiotic was significantly better than placebo in improving pain and disability in CLBP patients with MC1 immediately post-treatment. Very low-quality evidence from the case series suggested that oral Amoxicillin-clavulanate significantly improved LBP/leg pain, and LBP-related disability. Conversely, low-quality evidence found that oral Amoxicillin alone was not significantly better than placebo in improving global perceived health in patients with CLBP at the 12-month follow-up. Additionally, oral antibiotic users had significantly more adverse effects than placebo users. Although oral antibiotics were statistically superior to placebo in reducing LBP-related disability in patients with CLBP and concomitant MC1, its clinical significance remains uncertain. Future large-scale high-quality RCTs are warranted to validate the effectiveness of antibiotics in individuals with CLBP.

Modern methods of treating marijuana addiction (cannabis use disorders) and its influence on health

Introduction: Worldwide, cannabis is the most widely used illegal psychoactive substance and the third most common drug, after alcohol and tobacco. Cannabis use disorder (CUD) affects approximately 10% of the 193 million cannabis users worldwide. In recent years, cannabinoids have become more and more popular. The CUD is becoming a growing social and health problem. The search for effective forms of pharmacotherapy is still ongoing, and an effective combination of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy may be crucial for the future of CUD treatment.&#x0D; &#x0D; Material and method: The article was based on a review and analysis of publications and discoveries in recent years, which were available in the PubMed and Google Scholar database.&#x0D; &#x0D; Results: 82 study participants attempted abstinence from cannabis use. In the final primary endpoint analysis, both 400 mg of CBD and 800 mg of CBD were more effective than placebo in reducing cannabis use. 50 people who were addicted to cannabis treated with gabapentin showed a significant reduction in cannabis use and cannabis withdrawal compared to placebo. Moreover, 70 men addicted to cannabis were randomized and those, who used FAAH inhibitors reported fewer cannabis withdrawal symptoms, less cannabis use and lower THC urine levels than placebo users.&#x0D; Conclusions: Gabapentin has been proven to show a reduction in CUD. The use of CBD, FAAH inhibitors and psychotherapy MET/CBT/CM also appear to be effective. In addition, the use of the principles of People-First Language, avoiding slang and idioms, using medical and curing vocabulary, respects the addicted person, and also positively influences the chances of abstinence.

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of EZC Pak, a 5-Day Combination Echinacea-Zinc-Vitamin C Dose Pack with or without Vitamin D, in the Management of Outpatient Upper Respiratory Infections.

Growing antibiotic resistance is among the most serious threats to public health, with antibiotic misuse considered a leading driver of the problem. One of the largest areas of misuse is in outpatient upper respiratory infections (URIs). The purpose of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of EZC Pak, a combination Echinacea-Zinc-Vitamin C dose pack with or without Vitamin D, on the duration of illness and symptom severity of non-specific URIs as an alternative to antibiotics when none are deemed clinically necessary. A secondary analysis was carried out on patient satisfaction. A total of 360 patients across the United States were enrolled and randomized in a double-blind manner across two intervention groups, EZC Pak, EZC Pak+Vitamin D, and one placebo group. The study utilized a smartphone-based app to capture data. Once a participant reported the first URI symptom, they were instructed to take the intervention as directed and complete the daily symptom survey score until their symptoms resolved. The average EZC Pak participant recovered 1.39 days (90% CI 1.05 to 1.73) faster than the average placebo participant (p=0.017). The average EZC Pak participant reported a 17.43% (90% CI 17.1 to 17.8) lower symptom severity score versus placebo (p=0.029). EZC Pak users reported 2.9 times higher patient satisfaction versus placebo users (p=0.012). The addition of Vitamin D neither benefited nor harmed illness duration or symptom severity. The findings support the potential use of EZC Pak as an alternative to patient request for antibiotics when none are deemed clinically necessary at the time of initial clinical presentation. The decision to replete vitamin D in the acute phase of URI is an individualized decision left to the patient and their clinician. EZC Pak may play a critical role in improving outpatient URI management and antibiotic stewardship (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04943575).

Association between Dupilumab and Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Conjunctivitis is commonly reported in dupilumab users with atopic dermatitis (AD), and few studies have compared the risk of conjunctivitis among patients with different indications. This study aimed to investigate the association between dupilumab and conjunctivitis in various diseases. The protocol of this study was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42023396204). The electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for the period from their inception to January 2023. Only placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The main outcome was the incidence of conjunctivitis during the study period. The subgroup analysis was performed for patients with AD and non-AD indications, which include asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and eosinophilic esophagitis. In total, 23 RCTs involving 9153 patients were included for meta-analysis. Dupilumab users exhibited significantly higher risk of conjunctivitis (risk ratio [RR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-2.67) than placebo users. Notably, significantly increased incidence of conjunctivitis was observed in the dupilumab group relative to the placebo group among patients with AD (RR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.84-3.12) but not among patients with non-AD indications (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.43-1.13). In conclusion, only dupilumab users with AD but not those with non-AD indications reported an elevated incidence of conjunctivitis.

Sildenafil Improves Six-minute Walk Distance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

Sildenafil has been found to improve exercise capacity and haemodynamic parameters in patients with various pulmonary disorders. This study was undertaken to evaluate its efficacy in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, 37 patients with severe COPD received either sildenafil or placebo for 12 weeks. Distance covered in six-minute walk test (6MWD) was taken as primary end-point. Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was measured as secondary end point. Thirty-three patients (15 in sildenafil arm and 18 in placebo arm) completed the study. Non-parametric tests were used for comparison. There was significant increase in 6MWD from baseline after three months of follow-up in sildenafil users (median change in distance covered in six-minute walk test (delta6MWD) = 190m) as compared to placebo users (delta6MWD = 0m, p < 0.05). The PAP decreased significantly (chi2 = 14.94, p < 0.05) in sildenafil group after three months, while it did not change significantly among placebo group (chi2 = 3.84, p > 0.05). Sildenafil improved 6MWD and PAP in patients with severe COPD.

Safety and Tolerability of SBD111 an Optimized Probiotic/Prebiotic Medical Food Combination Designed for the Dietary Management of Age-Related Bone Loss in Adults.

ObjectivesTo determine the effect of a daily administration of 6.1 × 1010 CFU/d of SBD111 (an optimized probiotic/prebiotic combination) on safety and tolerability in adults in a randomized trial. MethodsParticipants (n = 32) were randomized to either SBD111 or placebo. The primary outcomes were the number, frequency and severity of adverse Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms over 28-d. Secondary outcomes were the number and severity of all adverse events (AEs). Stool samples were collected at baseline and after 28-d to determine the impact of SBD111 on gut microbial engraftment, diversity and function using shotgun metagenomics. Groups were compared using Incidence Rate Ratios (negative binomial regression), Odds Ratios (logistic regression) and 95%CI (P< 0.05) using intention-to-treat approach. ResultsAt baseline, the mean age was 45(SD:18)y in SBD111 users (n = 5M, 10F) vs 42(SD:14)y in placebo users (n = 5M, 12F). The two groups did not significantly differ in age, BMI, blood pressure and screening labs. After 28-d, the presence of GI symptoms tended to be higher with SBD111 use vs placebo (P = 0.08). The total number, frequency/severity of GI symptoms did not significantly differ between groups and only 1 person withdrew from the placebo group due to side effects. The number of AEs possibly related to the study were significantly higher with SBD111 use vs placebo (P = 0.05), there were no significant differences in the mean number or severity of AEs. The majority of reported AEs were mild, some were moderate, but none were severe. There were no significant differences in Shannon diversity/microbial richness between the two groups at baseline or after 28-d. After 28-d, participants receiving SBD111 but not placebo showed a significant enrichment in metabolic pathways of menaquinone (vitamin K2) production including the superpathway of menaquinol-10. Fragment recruitment analysis identified the genomic signal of the strains comprising SBD111 after 28-d of SBD111 use, but not placebo. SBD111 strains were undetectable at baseline in either group. ConclusionsThe relatively low frequency and mild severity of GI symptoms and AEs suggests that SBD111 at the level tested is safe for human consumption and that SBD111 microbes are able to pass through the intestinal tract, be identified in stool and enrich microbial gene pathways related to bone health. Funding SourcesSolarea Bio Inc.

Interactions Between Statins, Exercise, and Health: A Clinical Update

Interactions Between Statins, Exercise, and Health: A Clinical Update

Identification of Statin’s Action in a Small Cohort of Patients with Major Depression

Statins are widely used as an effective therapy for ischemic vascular disorders and employed for primary and secondary prevention in cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases. Their hemostatic mechanism has also been shown to induce changes in cerebral blood flow that may result in neurocognitive improvement in subjects with Major Depressive Disorder. Behavioral data, various blood tests, and resting-state brain perfusion data were obtained at the start of this study and three months post-therapy from a small cohort of participants diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder. Subjects received either rosuvastatin (10 mg) or placebo with their standard selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors therapy. At the end of the study, patients using rosuvastatin reported more positive mood changes than placebo users. However, standard statistical tests revealed no significant differences in any non-behavioral variables before and after the study. In contrast, feature selection techniques allowed identifying a small set of variables that may be affected by statin use and contribute to mood improvement. Classification models built to assess the distinguishability between the two groups showed an accuracy higher than 85% using only five selected features: two peripheral platelet activation markers, perfusion abnormality in the left inferior temporal gyrus, Attention Switching Task Reaction latency, and serum phosphorus levels. Thus, using machine learning tools, we could identify factors that may be causing self-reported mood improvement in patients due to statin use, possibly suggesting a regulatory role of statins in the pathogenesis of clinical depression.

EVO100 prevents chlamydia and gonorrhea in women at high risk of infection

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, rates of infection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are increasing in the United States. EVO100 is an investigational antimicrobial, pH-modulating, vaginal gel with active ingredients L-lactic acid, citric acid, and potassium bitartrate that is being evaluated for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. The objective of this phase 2B/3 study was to assess the efficacy and safety of EVO100 for the prevention of chlamydia and gonorrhea. AMPREVENCE was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study based in the United States conducted over approximately 16 weeks in women at the age of 18 to 45 years who were at risk of urogenital chlamydia and gonorrhea infection. Enrolled women had been diagnosed as having and treated for chlamydia or gonorrhea ≤16 weeks before enrollment. Women received either EVO100 or placebo vaginal gel and were instructed to apply the study drug immediately before or up to 1 hour before each act of vaginal sexual intercourse. The primary and secondary endpoints were the prevention of urogenital chlamydia and gonorrhea, respectively. Exploratory outcomes include women's overall satisfaction with EVO100. In total, 860 women were randomized 1:1 to receive EVO100 (n=426) or placebo (n=434), and 764 women (EVO100, n=376; placebo, n=388) were documented as using the study drug at least once. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms. Overall, women had a mean age of 27.7 years (standard deviation, 6.9) and body mass index of 28.9 kg/m2 (standard deviation, 8.0). Most women were of White (54.3% [467 of 860]) or African American (41.6% [358 of 860]) race and of non-Hispanic/Latina ethnicity (67.1% [577 of 860]). The chlamydia infection rate in EVO100 users was 4.8% (14 of 289) compared with 9.7% (28 of 290) among placebo users (P=.0256), representing a relative risk reduction of 50%. For gonorrhea, the infection rate was 0.7% (2 of 280) in the EVO100 arm compared with 3.2% (9 of 277) in the placebo arm (P=.0316), representing a relative risk reduction of 78%. Increased efficacy was observed with increased adherence, and chlamydia infection rates were significantly reduced with increased adherence in the EVO100 group compared with placebo. Across both arms, there were similar rates of all-cause adverse events (EVO100, 21.3% [80 of 376]; placebo, 20.4% [79 of 388]) and treatment-related adverse events (EVO100, 7.2% [27 of 376]; placebo, 7.5% [29 of 388]). The most common adverse events in the EVO100 arm were vulvovaginal candidiasis (5.1% [19 of 376]), vaginal discharge (3.2% [12 of 376]), and urinary tract infection (3.2% [12 of 376]) and, in the placebo arm, bacterial vaginosis (4.6% [18 of 388]), urinary tract infection (2.6% [10 of 388]), and vaginal discharge (2.6% [10 of 388]). Few women discontinued owing to adverse events in either arm (EVO100, 1.1% [4 of 376]; placebo, 1.5% [6 of 388]). No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Most EVO100 users (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied with EVO100 after 16 weeks of use. EVO100 significantly reduced the risk of chlamydia and gonorrhea infections in women at high risk of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection and was well tolerated, with observed adverse events consistent with its known safety profile.

Caplacizumab: an anti-von Willebrand factor antibody for the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, dosing and administration, and place in therapy of caplacizumab, a novel antibody fragment that inhibits von Willebrand factor, for the treatment of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) are summarized. Caplacizumab is a humanized anti-von Willebrand factor monoclonal antibody fragment that inhibits the interaction between ultralarge von Willebrand factor multimers and platelets. Caplacizumab is indicated for use in combination with standard-of-care modalities such as plasma exchange and immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of adults with acquired TTP. By inhibiting von Willebrand factor, caplacizumab offers a new approach to the management of TTP by preventing the development of potentially life-threatening microvascular thrombosis that can occur in the disease process. In a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, patients with acquired TTP treated with caplacizumab had more rapid platelet level normalization than placebo users; caplacizumab use also resulted in lower rates of disease recurrence and TTP-related death. The most common adverse events associated with caplacizumab use are bleeding-related events. In a phase 3 trial, serious bleeding-related adverse events were reported in 8 patients (11%) in the caplacizumab group and 1 patient (1%) in the placebo group. Caplacizumab is administered as an 11-mg intravenous loading dose 15 minutes prior to plasma exchange, followed by administration of 11 mg subcutaneously daily after plasma exchange. Once-daily caplacizumab administration can be continued for 30 days after the last plasma exchange. The medication and supplies for administration are provided as a single-use kit; patients should be trained on proper reconstitution and self-administration technique prior to the use of caplacizumab in the ambulatory setting. Caplacizumab is a first-in-class von Willebrand factor inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with acquired TTP.

Duration of Symptom Relief and Early Trajectory of Adverse Events for Oral Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Despite an extensive body of research on nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in osteoarthritis, the duration of their efficacy and timeline of adverse event (AE) onset have been understudied. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses from 2 to 26 weeks to characterize the efficacy and AE trajectories of oral NSAIDs in knee osteoarthritis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database from inception to May 2018. Randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and/or safety of Federal Drug Administration-approved NSAIDs in knee osteoarthritis patients were included. Two independent reviewers assessed quality and extracted data. We calculated standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We included 72 randomized controlled trials (26,424 participants). NSAIDs demonstrated moderate, statistically significant effects on pain that peaked at 2 weeks (SMD -0.43 [95% CI -0.48, -0.38]), but the magnitude of the effects decreased over time. The results for function were similar. The incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) AEs was significantly higher in NSAID users than placebo users as early as 4 weeks (RR 1.38 [95% CI 1.21, 1.57]). The incidence of cardiovascular (CV) AEs in NSAID users was not significantly different from placebo. Most GI and CV AEs were transient and of minor severity. NSAIDs produced significant pain and function improvements that peaked at 2 weeks but decreased over time. The incidence of minor GI and CV AEs consistently rose, reaching significance as early as 4 weeks. Clinicians should weigh the durability of efficacy with the early onset of minor AEs along with patient tolerability and preferences when formulating an NSAID regimen.

Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate if gabapentin 600 mg reduces pain after osmotic dilator placement the day before a dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure. Study designWe conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (stratified by vaginal parity) trial among women undergoing osmotic dilator placement before D&E at 15–23 5/7 weeks gestation. Subjects received gabapentin 600 mg or placebo 30 min before dilator placement, with re-dosing 8 h later. We assessed pain after dilator placement using a numeric rating scale (NRS; scale 0–10) at 5 min, 2, 4, and 8 h, and at presentation for D&E. The primary outcome was median NRS pain score change from baseline to 8 h after dilator placement. Secondary outcomes included gabapentin-related side effects and analgesic use. ResultsOf 121 randomized women, we excluded three subjects (allergic reaction [placebo], randomization error, no NRS data), leaving 60 gabapentin and 58 placebo subjects. Of 110 (93%) women who provided 8-hour data, median pain score changes from baseline did not differ between gabapentin and placebo groups overall (2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.52), in vaginally nulliparous women (2 vs. 4, p = 0.10) or in parous women (2 vs. 1.5, p = 0.37). We found no statistically significant differences in median pain score change from baseline to any timepoint overall or when stratified by parity. Beginning at 2 h after dilator placement, more gabapentin than placebo users experienced dizziness (29/53[55%] vs. 11/53[21%], p = 0.001) and tiredness (34/54[63%] vs. 17/54[31%], p = 0.002). The proportion of women using narcotics did not differ between gabapentin (35/60[58%]) or placebo (40/58[69%]) users (p = 0.26). ConclusionsGabapentin does not reduce pain with overnight osmotic dilator placement prior to D&E and causes drug-related side effects. Implications statementWomen experience pain, mostly mild to moderate, with overnight cervical dilator placement at 15–23 5/7 weeks gestation. About 2/3 of women will use a limited quantity of narcotics if provided. Gabapentin does not decrease the pain with or following dilator placement and does not decrease narcotic use.

Use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in patient with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: an updated meta-analysis.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors were previously considered a potential therapy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), but prior studies remained controversial about their efficacy. We performed an updated meta-analysis regarding the therapeutic and adverse effects of mTOR inhibitors in patients with ADPKD. We systematically searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mTOR inhibitors to placebo in ADPKD patients up to August 2019. We calculated weighted mean differences (WMDs) for total kidney volume (TKV), estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs), and weighted odds ratios (ORs) for treatment-related complications between thetreatment and theplacebo groups, using the random effects model. We retrieved a total of 9 RCTs enrolling 784 ADPKD patients receiving rapamycin, sirolimus, or everolimus between 2009 and 2016. The WMDs of TKV and eGFR from baseline to the last measurement were - 31.54mL (95% confidence interval [CI] - 76.79 to 13.71mL) and 2.81mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI - 1.85 to 7.46mL/min/1.73m2), respectively. Patients receiving mTOR inhibitors had a significantly increased risk of any adverse effects (OR 5.92, 95% CI 3.53-9.94), with the most common ones being aphthous stomatitis (OR 15.45, 95% CI 9.68-24.66) and peripheral edema (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.31-9.27) compared to placebo users. mTOR inhibitors did not significantly influence renal progression in patients with ADPKD, but were associated with a higher risk of complications. Whether mTOR inhibitors can be an add-on option or second-line agents remain undetermined.

Tamoxifen for the prevention of unscheduled bleeding in new users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system: a randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo determine if a course of oral tamoxifen initiated following placement of a levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system (IUS) reduces bleeding/spotting days over 30 days. Study designIn this single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited women ages 15–45 years initiating the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUS. We randomized eligible women to tamoxifen 10 mg or placebo twice daily for 7 days starting 21 days after levonorgestrel 52-mg IUS insertion. Participants tracked bleeding/spotting days via daily electronic diaries for 30 days after starting drug treatment. We assessed participant satisfaction with their bleeding pattern and the IUS using a visual analog scale (0–100 mm). A sample size of 42 provided 80% power to detect a difference of 7 bleeding/spotting days in 30 days by two-sample t test, accounting for an expected 20% dropout rate. ResultsFrom September 2016 to January 2018, 42 women enrolled. A total of 34 women provided complete bleeding/spotting data, and 30 women provided satisfaction data. Mean bleeding/spotting days over 30 days did not differ between tamoxifen (12.0±5.8 days) and placebo users (16.8±9.0 days), p=.08. We found no significant differences in mean satisfaction with bleeding profiles (51 mm tamoxifen vs. 59 mm placebo, p=.48) or with the IUS (83 mm vs. 75 mm, p=.36) between groups. Both groups reported similar rates of adverse events, with no serious adverse events reported. ConclusionA course of oral tamoxifen did not improve early breakthrough bleeding or satisfaction in new users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUS. ImplicationsAlthough tamoxifen treatment caused a trend toward modest bleeding/spotting day reduction in new levonorgestrel 52-mg IUS users, bleeding satisfaction did not improve. Future studies of tamoxifen treatment for IUS-related bleeding issues may be best targeted toward users with ongoing bleeding irregularities or lower-dose IUS products which cause more bleeding irregularities.