Pivotal Clinical Trials Research Articles

Risankizumab: Mechanism of action, clinical and translational science.

Risankizumab is a high-affinity neutralizing anti-interleukin (IL)-23 monoclonal antibody marketed in over 40 countries across the globe to treat several inflammatory diseases, such as plaque psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and Crohn's disease (CD). This paper reviews the regulatory approval, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics (PKs)/pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy and safety data for risankizumab, focusing on the three main approved indications. Risankizumab binds to the p19 subunit of IL-23 and inhibits IL-23 from interacting with the IL-23 receptor and subsequent signaling. Biomarker data obtained following treatment with risankizumab in multiple indications provided supportive evidence for downstream blockade of IL-23 signaling associated with disease pathology. The PKs of risankizumab is linear and time-independent, consistent with typical IgG1 monoclonal antibodies, across all evaluated indications. Risankizumab exhibited positive exposure-response relationships for efficacy with no apparent exposure-dependent worsening in safety. Immunogenicity to risankizumab had no major clinical consequences for either efficacy or safety. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab have been established in PsO, PsA, and CD in the pivotal clinical trials where superior benefit/risk profiles were demonstrated compared to placebo and/or active comparators. Moreover, safety evaluations in open-label extension studies following long-term treatment with risankizumab showed stable and favorable safety profiles consistent with shorter-term studies. These data formed the foundation for risankizumab's marketing approvals to treat multiple inflammatory diseases across the globe.

'Immunotherapeutic Strategies for Intra-cranial Metastatic Melanoma - a Meta-analysis and Systematic Review'.

Immune-activating anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies (alone or in combination) are being used to treat advanced melanoma patients and can lead to durable remissions, and long-term overall survival may be achieved in between 50-60% of patients. Although intracranial metastases are very common in melanoma (about 50-75% of all patients with advanced disease), most of the pivotal prospective clinical trials exclude patients with intra-cranial metastases, certainly if their lesions are symptomatic and steroid-requiring and the degree of sensitivity of intra-cranial melanoma to immunotherapy remains uncertain, and requires further investigation especially in view of the demonstrable activity of RAF-MEK inhibitors in this clinical setting and the emergence of stereotactic radiotherapy. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy against advanced melanoma patients with brain metastases. In terms of comparative studies, only retrospective analyses could be identified. Based on 3 retrospective studies, treatment of patients with melanoma brain metastases with immunotherapeutic approaches improves overall survival substantially compared with supportive measures alone (no active anticancer treatment). The efficacy of targeted therapy appeared to be comparable to that of immune therapy in terms of overall survival, based on a small number of patients. The combination of concurrent radiation therapy to the brain and systemic immunotherapy led to improved overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone, suggesting potential synergism between the approaches, and combination treatment could be delivered safely. Our review supports the use of immunotherapeutic strategies for these patients although treatment efficacy appears to be lower for symptomatic lesions. In view of the extremely high efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy approaches in the brain, understanding the interaction between radiotherapy and immunotherapy is vital and should be an area of active investigation.

Shortening the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale cognitive subscale.

A short yet reliable cognitive measure is needed that separates treatment and placebo for treatment trials for Alzheimer's disease. Hence, we aimed to shorten the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and test its use as an efficacy measure. Secondary data analysis of participant-level data from five pivotal clinical trials of donepezil compared with placebo for Alzheimer's disease (N=2,198). Across all five trials, cognition was appraised using the original 11-item ADAS-Cog. Statistical analysis consisted of sample characterization, item response theory (IRT) to identify an ADAS-Cog short version, and mixed models for repeated-measures analysis to examine the effect sizes of ADAS-Cog change on the original and short versions in the placebo versus donepezil groups. Based on IRT, a short ADAS-Cog was developed with seven items and two response options. The original and short ADAS-Cog correlated at baseline and at weeks 12 and 24 at 0.7. Effect sizes based on mixed modeling showed that the short and original ADAS-Cog separated placebo and donepezil comparably (ADAS-Cog original ES=0.33, 95% CI=0.29, 0.40, ADAS-Cog short ES=0.25, 95% CI =0.23, 0.34). IRT identified a short ADAS-cog version that separated donepezil and placebo, suggesting its clinical potential for assessment and treatment monitoring.

A Qualitative Interview Study on Expanded Access Clinical Trials for Compassionate Use in Japan.

An expanded access clinical trials (EACTs) provides exceptional patient access to investigational new drugs for life-threatening diseases for which no effective treatment exists. Based on public information, we have studied EACTs since 2016, when the EACT system was launched in Japan. In this study, we investigated the reality of EACTs by interviewing pharmaceutical companies and clarifying how they view them. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 pharmaceutical companies developing new drugs. This study aims to clarify the status of EACTs, so we selected pharmaceutical companies that develop innovative drugs for which they may perform EACTs (however, experience in conducting EACTs was optional). All those surveyed were aware of EACTs. Twelve access clinical trials were conducted, and the EACT implementation rate for pivotal clinical trials was 2.5%. The most common reason for implementing an EACT was "requests from physicians and medical institutions" (nine companies, 90.0%), and the most common reason for not implementing an EACT was "the applicability of the system" (five companies). Improvements to EACTs were identified by eight companies (80.0%); financial assistance by six companies (60.0%); reducing the scope of data to be collected and simplifying the procedure by six companies (60.0%). Seven companies (70.0%) responded that a Single Patient Investigational New Drug Application should be conducted, suggesting that the system should be revised. An interview survey of ten pharmaceutical companies developing new drugs in Japan regarding expanded access clinical trials indicated that there were issues with the system. Many wished to improve the system by establishing a single patient access system, supporting resources, and simplifying procedures. Based on our interviews with 10 Japanese pharmaceutical companies, it was found that the system needed to be improved by introducing a single patient access system, providing supporting resources, and simplifying procedures. In Japan, about eight years have passed since EACT was established, and it appears a revision of the EACT legislation is due.

Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy in Potentially Trial-Eligible or Trial-Ineligible Patients With Metastatic NSCLC in the German Prospective CRISP Registry Real-World Cohort (AIO-TRK-0315)

IntroductionPatients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice may often not meet the strict inclusion criteria of clinical trials. Our aim was to assess the trial eligibility of patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy in real-world and to compare the outcome of “trial-ineligible” and “potentially trial-eligible” patients. MethodsData from the prospective, clinical research platform CRISP were used to compare patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score greater than or equal to 50% tumors treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy who are deemed either “potentially trial-eligible” or “trial-ineligible” according to inclusion and exclusion criteria of the registrational studies (KEYNOTE-024 and -042). ResultsOf 746 patients included, 343 patients (46.0%) were classified as “trial-ineligible” and had significantly worse outcomes compared with “potentially trial-eligible” patients (n = 403, 54.0%): median progression-free survival: 6.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2–8.4) versus 10.3 (95% CI: 8.4–13.8) months, hazard ratio (trial-ineligible versus potentially trial-eligible) of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.19–1.72), p less than 0.001; median overall survival: 15.9 (95% CI: 11.4–20.3) versus 25.3 (95% CI: 19.8–30.4) months, hazard ratio of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.10–1.67), p equals 0.004. ConclusionsOur data reveal that a considerable proportion of patients with mNSCLC are not eligible to participate in a clinical trial and were found to have worse outcomes than potentially trial-eligible patients, whose outcomes were comparable with those obtained from pivotal clinical trials. This is of substantial clinical relevance for physicians discussing outcomes to be expected with their patients and stresses the need for real-world effectiveness analyses.

Outcomes of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in men with ventral curvatures: an updated series.

The efficacy and safety of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) have been demonstrated in the treatment of men with Peyronie's disease (PD); however, the pivotal clinical trials excluded men with ventral penile curvature. The study sought to evaluate outcomes of CCH treatment in men with ventral curvatures secondary to PD. Men with PD treated with CCH were identified from a prospective database. Patients received up to 4 series of CCH injections using a progressively modified protocol over time. Results were compared between those with baseline ventral vs nonventral penile curvatures. Changes in penile curvature, Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire scores, International Index of Erectile Function scores, nonstandardized assessments, and adverse events. A total of 560 men with PD (85 ventral curvature, 475 nonventral curvature) were included in the analysis. Baseline median curvature was 60.0° (interquartile range, 48.8°-75.0°) in the ventral cohort and 65.0° (interquartile range, 45.0°-80.0°) in the nonventral cohort. Median change from baseline penile curvature was -25.0° in the ventral cohort vs -24.0° in the nonventral cohort (P = .08, between-group comparison), which corresponded to curvature reductions of 44.7% and 33.6%, respectively (P = .03). In the subset of patients who completed CCH treatment (ie, received 8 injections or discontinued early because of patient satisfaction with curvature reduction), median change from baseline was -35.0° in the ventral cohort vs -25.0° in the nonventral cohort (P < .05); median percent improvement was 48.3% and 37.5%, respectively (P = .11). Median change from baseline in Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire and International Index of Erectile Function domain scores and adverse events were similar between cohorts, with the exception of possibly higher hematoma rates in the nonventral group (50% vs 37%; P = .05). No urethral injuries were sustained in either cohort. Data support the use of CCH for the treatment of ventral as well as nonventral penile curvatures in men with PD. Study strengths are the inclusion of a general clinical population of men with PD, the prospective design, and the relatively large series of men with ventral curvature. Limitations include the single-center and observational nature of the study. CCH was safe and effective in the treatment of both ventral and nonventral penile curvatures in men with PD.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis.

Cancer is a complex and dynamic disease. The "hallmarks of cancer" were proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg (2000) as a group of biological competencies that human cells attain as they progress from normalcy to neoplastic transformation. These competencies include self-sufficiency in proliferative signaling, insensitivity to growth-suppressive signals and immune surveillance, the ability to evade cell death, enabling replicative immortality, reprogramming energy metabolism, inducing angiogenesis, and activating tissue invasion and metastasis. Underlying these competencies are genome instability, which expedites their acquisition, and inflammation, which fosters their function(s). Additionally, cancer exhibits another dimension of complexity: a heterogeneous repertoire of infiltrating and resident host cells, secreted factors, and extracellular matrix, known as the tumor microenvironment, that through a dynamic and reciprocal relationship with cancer cells supports immortality, local invasion, and metastatic dissemination. This staggering intricacy calls for caution when advising all people with cancer (or a previous history of cancer) to receive the COVID-19 primary vaccine series plus additional booster doses. Moreover, because these patients were not included in the pivotal clinical trials, considerable uncertainty remains regarding vaccine efficacy, safety, and the risk of interactions with anticancer therapies, which could reduce the value and innocuity of either medical treatment. After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis. This hypothesis is based on biological plausibility and fulfillment of the multi-hit hypothesis of oncogenesis (i.e., induction of lymphopenia and inflammation, downregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression, activation of oncogenic cascades, sequestration of tumor suppressor proteins, dysregulation of the RNA-G quadruplex-protein binding system, alterationof type I interferon responses, unsilencing of retrotransposable elements, etc.) together with growingevidence and safety reports filed to Vaccine Adverse Effects Report System (VAERS) suggesting that some cancer patients experienced disease exacerbation or recurrence following COVID-19 vaccination. In light of the aboveand because some of these concerns (i.e., alteration of oncogenic pathways, promotion of inflammatory cascades, and dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system) also apply to cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, we encourage the scientific and medical community to urgently evaluate the impact of both COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination on cancer biology and tumor registries, adjusting public health recommendations accordingly.

Cefiderocol and Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) remain a clinical challenge due to limited treatment options. Recently, cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, and sulbactam-durlobactam, a bactericidal β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of and resistance to cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, the antimicrobial susceptibility of A. baumannii isolates to these drugs, as well as the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol and sulbactam/durlobactam-based regimens against CRAB. Overall, cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam show an excellent antimicrobial activity against CRAB. The review of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of cefiderocol therapy against CRAB indicates it is non-inferior to colistin/other treatments for CRAB infections, with a better safety profile. Combination treatment is not associated with improved outcomes compared to monotherapy. Higher mortality rates are often associated with prior patient comorbidities and the severity of the underlying infection. Regarding sulbactam-durlobactam, current data from the pivotal clinical trial and case reports suggest this antibiotic combination could be a valuable option in critically ill patients affected by CRAB infections, in particular where no other antibiotic appears to be effective.

First-line Palliative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: a Population-based Analysis of Delivery and Outcomes in a Single-payer Health System

AimsClinical practice guidelines recommend palliative chemotherapy for most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, outcomes observed in the real world compared with patients enrolled in clinical trials have not been sufficiently described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the delivery and outcomes of first-line palliative chemotherapy administered to patients with colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice compared with clinical trials. Materials and methodsUsing linked health administrative data, we carried out a retrospective population-level cohort study on patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Ontario, Canada from 2010 to 2019. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics were summarised. The primary outcome was median overall survival, stratified by treatment prescribed and age. Demographics and outcomes in this real-world population were compared with those from pivotal clinical trials. A multivariable Cox regression model reporting hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals was used to determine factors associated with survival in patients receiving systemic treatment. ResultsWe identified 70 987 patients with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer, of which 4613 received first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease and formed the study cohort. Fifty-eight per cent were male and the mean age was 63 years. Most had colon cancer (69%), at least one comorbidity (73%) and lived in an urban location (79%). Less than half (47%) had surgery after diagnosis. The most common regimen prescribed was folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with bevacizumab or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi; n = 2784, 60%). Among all treated patients, the median overall survival was 17.1 months, with survival difference by regimen [median overall survival 18.3 for FOLFIRI with bevacizumab or EGFRi, 19.6 for folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)/capecitabine, oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab or EGFRi, 13.6 for FOLFIRI alone and 7.8 for 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine]. Patients aged >80 years were most likely to have received single-agent 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine, and had inferior overall survival compared with their younger counterparts. Compared with pivotal clinical trials, patients in the real world had inferior overall survival outcomes despite similar demographic characteristics (including age and sex). ConclusionsIn this real-world population-based analysis of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, survival outcomes were inferior to those reported in randomised trials despite similarities in age and sex. This information can be used when counselling patients in routine practice about expected outcomes.

OP128 Uncertainties In The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec For Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1

IntroductionNusinersen and risdiplam are available in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1. Onasemnogene abeparvovec, a promising gene therapy, was approved in 2020 in Brazil. Given the high cost of this therapy and its promise of a lifetime effect, the objective of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec, compared with nusinersen and risdiplam, in the treatment of SMA type 1 from the perspective of SUS in different scenarios.MethodsA Markov model was adapted from one originally developed for the USA that considers five states of health. Short-term data were obtained from pivotal clinical trials and long-term survival curves were extracted from published reports from the USA. Maintenance of motor function milestones achieved at the end of follow up in clinical trials was considered until death. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at five percent per year over a baseline lifetime time horizon. Alternative scenarios were evaluated for horizons of five and ten years, with and without a discount.ResultsOnasemnogene abeparvovec resulted in an incremental cost of BRL742,890 (USD297,156) per QALY and an increase of 3.32 QALYs in relation to the alternatives over a lifetime time horizon. In the same time horizon, but without the discount, onasemnogene abeparvovec resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of BRL166,539 (USD66,615) per QALY. In a five-year time horizon, considering the discount rate, the therapy resulted in an ICER of BRL12,527,667 (USD5,011,066); in ten years the ICER was BRL3,384,793 (USD1,353,917).ConclusionsSince the benefits of onasemnogene abeparvovec mainly occur in the long term, decision makers need to consider the uncertainty of assumptions of sustained effectiveness in view of the high initial cost of the technology.

Iron and erythropoietin to heal and recover after intensive care (ITHRIVE): A pilot randomised clinical trial

ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of a pivotal randomised clinical trial of intravenous (IV) iron and erythropoietin in adult survivors of critical illness with anaemia requiring treatment in the intensive care unit. DesignAn investigator-initiated, parallel group, placebo-controlled, randomised feasibility trial. SettingA tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) in Perth, Western Australia. ParticipantsAdults with anaemia (haemoglobin <100 g/L), requiring ICU-level care for more than 48 h, and likely to be ready for ICU discharge within 24 h. InterventionsA single dose of IV ferric carboxymaltose and Epoetin alfa (active group) or an equal volume of 0.9% saline (placebo group). Main outcome measuresStudy feasibility was considered met if the pilot achieved a recruitment rate of ≥2 participants per site per month, ≥90% of participants received their allocated study treatment, and≥ 90% of participants were followed up for the proposed pivotal trial primary outcome - days alive and at home to day 90 (DAH90). ResultsThe 40-participant planned sample size included twenty in each group and was enrolled between 1/9/2021 and 2/3/2022. Participants spent a median of 3.4 days (interquartile range 2.8–5.1) in the ICU prior to enrolment and had a mean baseline haemoglobin of 83.7 g/L (standard deviation 6.7). The recruitment rate was 6.7 participants per month [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8–9.0], DAH90 follow-up was 100% (95% CI 91.2%–100%), and 39 (97.5%, 95% CI 86.8%–99.9%) participants received the allocated study intervention. No serious adverse events were reported. ConclusionThe iron and erythropoietin to heal and recover after intensive care (ITHRIVE) pilot demonstrated feasibility based on predefined participant recruitment, study drug administration, and follow-up thresholds.

PP079 Country contribution of investigators to pivotal clinical trials and their primary publications of new oncology drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration

PP079 Country contribution of investigators to pivotal clinical trials and their primary publications of new oncology drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration

Pathogenetic treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is found in around one third of people with diabetes, but remains inadequately diagnosed and treated. Its management includes three cornerstones: 1) causal treatment with lifestyle modification, intensive diabetes therapy aimed at near-normoglycemia, and multifactorial cardiovascular risk intervention, 2) pathogenesis-oriented pharmacotherapy, and 3) symptomatic pain relief. Since symptomatic analgesic monotherapy only relieves the pain without targeting the underlying neuropathy and both has limited efficacy and is associated with adverse events, there is an unmet need for additional approaches derived from the pathogenetic concepts of DPN. Preclinical studies have suggested that diabetic neuropathy can be prevented or improved through the use of various agents that interfere with the pathophysiology of the underlying condition. Some of these encouraging findings could be translated successfully into the clinical setting. Efficacy and excellent safety were demonstrated in several meta-analyses (α-lipoic acid) and randomized clinical trials (benfotiamine, actovegin, epalrestat) in the treatment of symptomatic DPN. The NATHAN 1 trial demonstrated an improvement of neuropathic signs (deficits, impairments) after four years in asymptomatic DPN. These compounds are currently authorized for treatment of DPN in several countries. Long-term pivotal clinical trials should further establish their value as mono- and combination therapies in DPN.

Large Scale Analysis of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma Patients Older Than 65 Years

Introduction In multiple myeloma (MM) patients older than 65, the value of consolidation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is not well defined. This is generally a population not represented in the pivotal clinical trials on which routine clinical practice is based. Even though the treatment of MM in older patients has improved in recent years, their survival is shortened, and most do not reach a second line. However, there are data supporting auto-SCT in this population with low associated mortality not related to relapse (NRM). TriNetX is a federated global health research platform that provides researchers with access to electronic medical records from healthcare organizations to conduct research studies. The aim of our study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of auto-SCT in patients older than 65 years with MM with in a large population of world real life data. Methods We have analyzed the cohort of patients from our center (H12O) who have received an auto-SCT from January 2014 to March 2023. We defined two cohorts: Cohort 1, patients with &amp;gt; 65 years at the time of transplantation (n=59 patients) and Cohort 2, &amp;lt;= 65y (n=213 patients). Data from the last 20 years of the TriNetX platform of 48 centers have been used. Cohort 1, patients with &amp;gt; 65 years included n=6,876 patients; and Cohort 2, &amp;lt;= 65y included n=11,046 patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on 8 characteristics: in the Demographics category patients were matched on female or male. In the diagnosis category patients were matched on Hypertensive diseases, Ischemic heart diseases, Chronic kidney disease, Diabetes mellitus, Diseases of liver, Chronic lower respiratory diseases characteristic. Results In the H12O cohort of patients, the median age was 68 (66-74) in &amp;gt;65 y patients and 57 (28-65) in &amp;lt;65 y patients. The older population presented greater comorbidity measured with the Charlson Index (p=0.001) and a history of another neoplasm (p=0.009). There were no differences in the type of MM, ISS disease stage, type of conditioning, pre-transplant response, induction treatment, number of lines or previous transplants. With a median follow-up of 3.4 years the probability of survival was 39.6 % in Cohort 1 and 68.6 % in Cohort 2 (HR, 2.69 95% CI, 1.34 to 5.44, p=0.004) (Figure 1). PFS at the end of follow-up was similar in both groups: 35%.5 in Cohort 1 and 42.9 % in Cohort 2 (HR, 1.36 95% CI, 0.79 to 2.32, p=0.26). The older population required admission to the Intensive Care Unit more frequently (20.3% vs 10,4%, p=0.041), without an associated increase in NRM (1.7 % vs 1.4 %, p=0.871). We found no significant differences in the recovery time of neutrophils or platelets, blood component transfusion, and transplant complications, and short-term survival was similar between both cohorts. At TriNetX database, after the PSM, the final population was 5,820 patients in each cohort. Cohort 1 with a mean age (+-SD) of 69.7 (3) years and Cohort 2 of 55.6 (7.8) years. The rest of the variables were balanced. The probability of survival at the end of follow-up was 20.8 % in Cohort 1 and 30.5 % in Cohort 2 (HR, 1.29, 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.39, p&amp;lt;0.001) (Figure 2). The relative risk of any transplant complication was significantly lower in Cohort 1 vs. Cohort 2 (0.82, 95 % CI, 0.73 to 0.93). As well as in the other cohort short-term survival was similar between both cohorts. Conclusion We have found that ASCT in MM patients older than 65 years have the similar NRM, PFS and performance. However, the long-term outcome of these elderly patients is dismal, probably due to the limited options of rescue after the relapse and the impact of the age. This large-scale study shows that ASCT in MM patient, between 65 and 70 years, had similar results.

Outcomes with MEK Inhibitor Therapy Among Adults with Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH): A Multi-Institutional Study from the Adult LCH Working Group for the Histiocyte Society

Purpose: The discovery of MAPK/ERK pathway mutations has led to the approval of MEK-inhibitor (MEKi) cobimetinib in histiocytic neoplasms. However, the pivotal clinical trial that led to the approval of cobimetinib included only 4 patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Therefore, there is a need to define outcomes with MEKi therapy in patients with LCH. We undertook a multi-center collaboration through the Adult LCH Working Group for the Histiocyte Society to address this gap in knowledge. Methods: Adults with LCH who received MEKi therapy were included from five institutions. Objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated using PET/CT criteria, and CT/MRI if PET scan was not available; response categories were categorized into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of targeted therapy initiation. Risk organ disease was defined as liver, spleen, or bone marrow involvement. Results: 25 adults with LCH were included in this study; median age at MEKi initiation 43y (range, 18-85). Most common systems involved at diagnosis were bone (52%), pituitary (44%), and lung (36%). Risk organ involvement was observed in 7 (28%, 6 liver, 1 liver and spleen) and 2 (8%) patients had intra-axial CNS involvement. Median lines of prior therapy received were 2 (range: 1-5), and 4 (16%) patients received MEKi in first-line. MAPK/ERK pathway status was assessed via target capture next generation sequencing (NGS) in 22 (96%) cases. Amongst those who underwent NGS, alterations identified included: BRAF V600E (2/22, 9%), BRAF deletions (11/22 50%), MAP2K1 or MEK mutations (4/22, 18%), and MAPK1 or ERK2 (n=1, 5%). Overall, 5 patients also received BRAF inhibitors (4 patients as first therapy prior to MEKi and 1 concomitantly due to BRAF V600E positive melanoma). Specific MEKi agents utilized included cobimetinib (n=13) and trametinib (n=12). Among the response evaluable patients (n=23), ORR to MEKi treatment was 78% (9 CR, 9 PR, 4 SD, 1 PD). Among the 7 patients with liver involvement, responses were seen in 2 (29%) cases. ORR did not significantly differ according to mutation status among those with NGS data (78% MAPK mutated vs. 100% unmutated; p=1.0). In this subcohort, all of the 4 cases that did not respond to MEKi had liver involvement; 3 had BRAF deletions (2 SD and 1 PD), and one had MAPK1 mutation (SD). Median follow-up duration after MEKi initiation in the entire cohort was 18 months (95% CI 6 - 30). The median PFS and OS were not reached; 2-year PFS and OS were 78.1% and 79.9%, respectively (Figure 1A). The median PFS was much shorter in those with liver involvement (7 months [95% CI 0 - 14]) compared with those without liver disease (not reached [95% CI 19-not reached] P=0.047; Figure 1B). PFS did not differ significantly between MAPK pathway mutated and unmutated patients (p=0.34) Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 36% (n=9) and most commonly included rash (n=5) and fatigue (n=3). Four patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs including rash, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Common causes of MEKi discontinuation included AEs (n=3), progression (n=2), and drug holiday (n=2). At last follow-up, 5 patients died and 18 remained on MEKi. Death was attributable to LCH (n=3), concomitant malignancy (n=1), or unknown causes (n=1). Conclusions: In our multi-institutional study of adults with LCH, we found MEKi therapy to be highly efficacious. However, liver involvement correlated with a lack of response and worse PFS, while mutational status did not. Future studies are needed to evaluate optimum treatment for high-risk subgroups of LCH like liver disease.

Real-World Utilization of Daratumumab-Containing Induction Regimen in Transplant Eligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma and Its Role in Patients Historically Excluded from Clinical Trials: A Single Institution Experience

Daratumumab is increasingly being used in the treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM). However, patients with severe anemia (hgb &amp;lt; 7.5), severe hypercalcemia (serum calcium &amp;gt; 14), creatinine clearance &amp;lt; 30 ml/min, and patients aged &amp;gt; 70 years were excluded from the pivotal clinical trials that investigated first line daratumumab. Here we report how daratumumab is utilized in the treatment of real-world transplant eligible (TE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and its safety and efficacy in these vulnerable patient populations. Method: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult Multiple Myeloma patients who had autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) at Vanderbilt University Stem Cell Transplant (VUSCT) program between January 2017 and April 2023. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize patient and disease characteristics. Patients with del 17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), 1q gain and 1p deletion were categorized as high risk. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare variables. Kaplan-Meir curves and log rank tests were used to compare PFS and OS. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate patient and disease variables associated with daratumumab use. A p-value of &amp;lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result: A total of 508 charts were reviewed. Out of 508, 104 patients had daratumumab containing induction regimen, including 44 patients who took daratumumab starting with the first cycle and 60 patients who had daratumumab added or regimen switched to include daratumumab as part of the induction regimen. Patient, disease, and outcomes of these patients is summarized in table 1. Additional 149 patients received daratumumab post-ASCT during subsequent relapses. Occurrence of relapse was the only variable associated with increased risk of death (HR=4.45, (95% CI: 1.94,10.06) with p-value=0.0003). Having standard cytogenetic risk was associated with decreased utilization of daratumumab in the induction regimen (OR=0.49, (95% CI: 0.27, 0897) with p-value of 0.02). Out of the 104 patients induced with daratumumab, patients who had daratumumab added after the first induction cycle had longer diagnosis to ASCT time when compared with patients who take daratumumab starting from cycle 1 of induction (table 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group. Among populations of interest, there were 7, 2 African American (AA) and 5 white(W), 5 female (F) and 2 male patients, aged between 54 and 67 years, who had hemoglobin &amp;lt; 7.5 (range: 5.4 -7 g/dL) at diagnosis among the patients who had daratumumab containing induction regimen. All 7 of the patients had improvement in their hemoglobin post-induction and they remain in remission post-ASCT. Their hemoglobin trend is depicted on figure 1. There were 11 TE NDMM patients above age 70 (mean: 74, range: 71-77 years) who received daratumumab containing induction regimen. Although there was no statistically significant difference with the rest of the population, all patients had G3 infection within 30 days of ASCT, but no ICU admission or mortality with follow up of up to 39 months (average 18.45 months). We identified 10 patients with mean age of 53.8 years (range 45-65), 30% F, 40% AA, and 50% high-risk patients who had serum calcium &amp;gt;14 mg/dL. Only 1 patient had daratumumab containing induction regimen. Unfortunately, this patient died of disease progress 3 months after ASCT. Four other patients in this group also died between 3 and 54 months (mean: 18 months) from ASCT. Among 54 patients with creatinine &amp;gt; 2 at diagnosis, 8 patients, aged between 45 and 68 (mean = 58.37) years, mean creatinine of 4.95 (range 2.1-13.05) were induced with daratumumab containing regimen. Average creatinine dropped to 2.15 post-induction and 1.91 at 100 days post-ASCT. Three out of 8 died within 11months of ASCT (mean: 7 months) due to COVID infection in 1standard risk and disease progress in 2 high-risk patients. Conclusion: Inclusion of daratumumab at the onset of induction is associated with shorter time between diagnosis and ASCT. Longer follow up is warranted to determine difference in PFS and OS among patients with early and late incorporation of daratumumab containing induction regimen. Our study suggests that daratumumab containing induction regimen is safe and effective for TE NDMM of all ages, including those with severe anemia and creatinine &amp;gt; 2 mg/dL.

Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy (CAR-T) As Standard of Care for Relapsed-Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Introduction: The randomized registrational ZUMA-7 (Locke, NEJM 2022) and TRANSFORM (Kamdar, Lancet 2022) trials in second line (2L) LBCL showed superiority of CAR T when compared to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy-based regimens with a goal of consolidative autologous stem cell transplant. These results led to the FDA approval of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in 2L for LBCL with refractory disease or relapse within 1 year of completing induction chemotherapy. Significant differences exist between the registrational trial patient population and the real-world commercial CAR-T recipients in 3L+ setting (Nastoupil, JCO 2020, Jacobson, JCO 2020). Herein, we describe the outcomes of patients with LBCL treated with 2L commercial CAR T therapy. Methods: Five US academic institutions contributed data to this retrospective study. CAR T associated toxicities were graded by ASTCT consensus grading criteria (Lee, TCT 2019) and investigator assessed responses were reported per Lugano 2014 criteria. Patients who received CAR T therapy in 2L after the histologic diagnosis of LBCL were included, with leukapheresis between SOC approval on 4/1/2022, and 4/25/23. Patients were included if they received intermediary therapies before CAR T-cell infusion. These intermediary therapies included disease-holding therapy, defined as therapy given between relapse and the time of leukapheresis, given with the intent to “hold” patients' disease under control until CAR T-cell therapy was arranged (Bucklein, Hemasphere 2023). Patients who received therapy after relapse with the intent of restaging to decide on subsequent CAR T-cell therapy were excluded. Patients who received bridging therapy, defined as therapy given between leukapheresis and the start of lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy were also included. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS). Results: 112 patients were leukapheresed with intention to receive commercial CAR T as 2L (103 axi-cel, 9 liso-cel). All but two patients received CAR T infusion (one manufacturing failure and one delayed due to infection). The median follow-up of the cohort was 6.2 months (95%CI 4.32 - 7.61). Median age of the cohort was 66.5 yrs (range 23-83) with male predominance (66%). The median international prognostic index (IPI) score was 3 (range 0-5) and 72% of the patients had stage III/IV disease. Fifty-nine percent of the patients had primary refractory disease. The median time between documentation of progression after 1L therapy and patient evaluation for 2L CAR T was 22 days (IQR 15-32). The median time from patient evaluation to CAR T infusion was 47.5 days (IQR 36.25 - 67). Forty-two patients (37.5%) received disease-holding therapy and 77 (69%) received bridging therapy. Twenty-nine patients (26%), received both disease-holding therapy and bridging therapy. Receipt of these therapies was associated with longer CAR T evaluation-to-infusion times, with a median time of 61 days for patients who received both disease-holding therapy and bridging therapy, as opposed to 38 days for patients who didn't receive either therapy. This is presumably related to washout requirements and the time needed to allow for count recovery prior to either leukapheresis or LD therapy. Among 110 CAR T infused patients, cytokine release syndrome(CRS) occurred in 88% (n=97) of the patients with grade 3 or 4 in 6.3% (n=7). Immune effector cell associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 59% (n= 65) with grade 3 or 4 in 30% (n= 33). No deaths from CRS or ICANS were observed. Overall response rate (ORR) was 82.7% and complete remission rate was 61.8%. Median PFS and OS were not reached. Point estimates of PFS and OS at six months were 64.1% (95% CI: 52.8 - 73.4), and 84.4% (95% CI: 73.8 - 90.9), respectively ( Figure 1). Conclusions: This multicenter retrospective study provides insights into practice and outcomes of SOC CAR T therapy for 2L relapsed-refractory LBCL. In clinical practice, patients commonly receive “disease-holding therapy” to control disease while organizing CAR T-cell consultation and leukapheresis. Despite the relatively short follow-up duration, the best response and toxicity profiles were comparable to those observed in the pivotal clinical trials. Updated follow-up and subgroup analysis will be presented at the meeting. SD and JYS contributed equally.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Initiating First-Line Treatment with Ibrutinib or Zanubrutinib

Background: A pivotal clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib with zanubrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) did not achieve its primary endpoint of complete response or very good partial response. In addition, median progression-free survival was not reached in either treatment arm. In the absence of treatment effectiveness differentiation based on clinical trial evidence, we conducted a real-world study to assess patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with WM who received ibrutinib or zanubrutinib as first-line (1L) therapy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the ConcertAI Database to collect claims data of patients with WM aged ≥18 years who initiated single-agent ibrutinib (420 mg/day) or zanubrutinib (320 mg/day) as 1L therapy on or after 9/1/2021 (index date). A 6-month washout period of guideline-recommended WM antineoplastic agents was required to confirm 1L status. Patients were excluded if they were receiving ibrutinib and zanubrutinib concurrently, died within 30 days of the index date, had a record of hematopoietic stem cell transplant, had a record of other ibrutinib indications in the 6 months before index, or were participating in a clinical trial. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, therapy duration (number of days between the first and last day of the medication supply), and HRU (all-cause and WM-specific) per-patient-per-month (PPPM) were assessed. Results: The study included 51 patients (ibrutinib, n=30; zanubrutinib, n=21). In both cohorts, most participants were male (ibrutinib, n=20 [67%]; zanubrutinib, n=16 [76%]), and the mean age at baseline was 73 years and 75 years, respectively. At baseline, the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 0, and the WM-related and ibrutinib/zanubrutinib-related clinical events were similar between the two cohorts. While the zanubrutinib cohort had a higher prevalence of infections (33% vs 3%) and musculoskeletal pain (24% vs 7%) at baseline, the ibrutinib cohort had a higher prevalence of hypertension (20% vs 14%). The baseline prevalence of anemia was similar in both cohorts (ibrutinib, 27%; zanubrutinib, 29%). Mean follow-up was 6.9 months (ibrutinib) and 6.3 months (zanubrutinib). The mean ± SD duration of therapy was 152 ± 112 days (ibrutinib) and 113 ± 99 days (zanubrutinib; p=0.195). The ibrutinib cohort had a significantly lower all-cause HRU PPPM (4.53 ± 3.96 vs 8.53 ± 6.66, p=0.020) and lower WM-specific HRU PPPM (0.11 ± 0.26 vs 0.54 ± 1.14, p=0.104). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, patients with WM treated with 1L ibrutinib had a numerically longer duration of therapy and lower all-cause and WM-specific HRU PPPM, compared to those treated with 1L zanubrutinib. Due to a small sample size and short follow-up, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Differing Definitions of Vaso-Occlusion in Clinical Studies of Sickle Cell Disease Can Result in Differing Outcomes

Background: Frequent episodes of vaso-occlusion are the hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD), but the definition of what constitutes a vaso-occlusive episode is not consistently applied across clinical trials, creating challenges in evaluating and comparing efficacy results among different therapies. Here, we compare vaso-occlusion endpoint definitions from clinical trials for various therapies, including genetic therapies, and use clinical trial data to demonstrate the potential for outcomes differences based on differing definitions of vaso-occlusive episodes. Methods: We reviewed completed and ongoing clinical trials and published articles using endpoints assessing the reduction or elimination of vaso-occlusive crisis/events, including trials of (i) exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel, CRISPR/Cas-9 based genome editing treatment), (ii) lovotibeglogene autotemcel (lovo-cel, gene addition therapy), (iii) L-glutamine, (iv) voxelotor, (v) hydroxyurea (HU) and (vi) crizanlizumab. Outcomes related to vaso-occlusion were compared across variables including care setting, care duration, treatments, and complications. Data from the CLIMB SCD-121 trial of exa-cel in patients aged 12 to 35 years with severe SCD (data cut as of 10 Feb 2023) were evaluated using different published definitions of vaso-occlusion. Results: The most substantial differences in vaso-occlusion endpoint definitions were associated with frequency and duration of visits to medical facilities for acute pain and inclusion of specific SCD specific complications. Definitions of vaso-occlusions for acute pain related events differed across studies. The definitions of severe vaso-occlusive crises for exa-cel (severe VOC; exa-cel), sickle cell pain-related crises (SCPC; crizanlizumab and L-glutamine), and VOC (VOC; voxelotor) include events with medical facility visits of any duration (severe VOC and SCPC) or medical records of a patient being seen or contacting a physician within 1 business day of an event (VOC), whereas the definition of severe vaso-occlusive events (severe VOE; lovo-cel) requires a ≥ 24-hour hospital or emergency room (ER) observation unit visit or ≥2 visits to a day unit or ER over 72 hours. Vaso-occlusion definition for HU (painful crisis) required a facility visit of ≥4 hours duration. All endpoints include acute chest syndrome and priapism; however, the definition of severe VOE requires ≥4 visits to a medical facility for priapism to meet criterion, while others require only a single visit. The exa-cel phase 3 trial in SCD employs a broad and inclusive definition for severe VOC which counts each individual medical facility visit, regardless of frequency or duration of hospitalization. Based on this, 19 out of 20 patients (95%) met the primary endpoint of freedom from severe VOCs for at least 12 consecutive months (95% CI, 75.1%, 99.9%; P&amp;lt;0.0001). However, when the primary endpoint was analyzed using the severe VOE definition, all patients (20/20; 100.0%) were free from severe VOEs for at least 12 consecutive months (95% CI: 83.2%, 100.0%; P&amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusions: Requirements for health care facility visits in the definitions of severe VOC (exa-cel), VOC, and SCPC were more broadly inclusive and include events that would not be counted in the definitions of severe VOE (lovo-cel) or painful crisis. Clinically, support for this observation comes from our analysis of exa-cel SCD pivotal clinical trial data using these different definitions, which showed the number of patients free from vaso-occlusive episodes changed depending on the definition of vaso-occlusion employed. These results show differences in vaso-occlusion definitions have the potential to impact assessments of treatment efficacy across different SCD therapies.

The Glass Wall: Gendered Authorship Disparities in in CD 19 and BCMA CAR-T Clinical Trials for Lymphoma and Myeloma

Introduction: Existing literature suggests that women are significantly underrepresented in the field of hematology-oncology. Data from 2021 suggests that women make up 35.6% of hematologists, and thus the disparity continues in clinical trial research authorship. Minorities including women receive fewer awards, deliver fewer board review lectures, and hold fewer professorships, and leadership positions in clinical departments and professional organizations. To further investigate this issue, we conducted a study to assess the gender gap in authorship across 13 pivotal clinical trials that led to the approval of CD19 and BCMA Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies. Methods: We included the 13 pivotal trials that led to the approval of CART for Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), lymphoma and myeloma , published between 2017-2022. These included the trials: ELIANA, ZUMA-1, JULIET, ZUMA-2, KarMMa, TRANSCEND, ZUMA-5, CARTITUDE-1, ZUMA-7, ZUMA-3, TRANSFORM, PILOT, and ELARA. We examined the overall number of female authors, the number of lead female authors as defined as first, second, or last author, and the ratio of all authors to female authors. 367 total authors were included in the analysis, with several authors being included more than once for their work on separate studies. Results: Table 1 summarizes the results. Of the 367 authors assessed, 109 were female, correlating to 28.9% female authorship. The only study with female authorship &amp;gt;50% was ELIANA, a 2017 pediatric study, while all others had &amp;gt;50% male authorship. 7 (54%) of the 13 studies had females as lead authors; of note, 6 out of 7 of these studies were published after 2021. Conclusion: Gender inequities in research authorship are pervasive in many areas of medicine, including the field of immune effector cell therapy. Publications in the field broadly are overwhelmingly male dominated, possibly reflective of lower female representation in transplant and cellular therapy. Despite this, we observed improved gender equality in authorship in more recent publications since 2021, and in certain research areas such as pediatric hematology-oncology. Recognizing these seemingly invisible barriers is the first step in bringing gender equity to the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplant and cellular therapy, with gender serving as one of many domains in which underrepresented groups' ability to scale the glass wall must be supported. Table 1.