Pituitary Acromegaly Research Articles

Pituitary MRI Features in Acromegaly Resulting From Ectopic GHRH Secretion From a Neuroendocrine Tumor: Analysis of 30 Cases

Ectopic acromegaly is a consequence of rare neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) that secrete GHRH. This abnormal GHRH secretion drives GH and IGF-1 excess, with a clinical presentation similar to classical pituitary acromegaly. Identifying the underlying cause for the GH hypersecretion in the setting of ectopic GHRH excess is, however, essential for proper management both of acromegaly and the NET. Owing to the rarity of NETs, the imaging characteristics of the pituitary in ectopic acromegaly have not been analyzed in depth in a large series. Characterize pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features at baseline and after NET treatment in patients with ectopic acromegaly. Multicenter, international, retrospective. Tertiary referral pituitary centers. Thirty ectopic acromegaly patients having GHRH hypersecretion. None. MRI characteristics of pituitary gland, particularly T2-weighted signal. In 30 patients with ectopic GHRH-induced acromegaly, we found that most patients had hyperplastic pituitaries. Hyperplasia was usually moderate but was occasionally subtle, with only small volume increases compared with normal ranges for age and sex. T2-weighted signal was hypointense in most patients, especially in those with hyperplastic pituitaries. After treatment of the NET, pituitary size diminished and T2-weighted signal tended to normalize. This comprehensive study of pituitary MRI characteristics in ectopic acromegaly underlines the utility of performing T2-weighted sequences in the MRI evaluation of patients with acromegaly as an additional tool that can help to establish the correct diagnosis.

Acromegaly and Its Clinical Outcomes: A 10-year Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort of Patients with Acromegaly from a University Setting

Objective: We purpose to evaluate the demographic characteristics of patients with acromegaly, laboratory values when diagnosed and during follow-up, clinical symptoms, comorbid conditions during follow-up, treatment methods, and treatment response rates. Methods: Data regarding 71 patients with acromegaly who applied to Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases polyclinic outpatient setting between 2010 and 2020 were included in the study. The patients' demographic characteristics, laboratory values, clinical features when diagnosed and follow-up, and selected treatment methods were examined retrospectively. Results: A total of 71 patients was eligible, of which 45.1% of the patients were female, and 54.9% were male. The mean age at diagnosis was 48.5 years. The most common complaint of the patients was an enlargement of the hands and feet (53.5%). 35.2% of the patients had hypertension, 23.9% had diabetes mellitus (DM), 1.4% had cardiovascular disease, and 5.6% had a malignancy history. In diagnosis, 2.8% of the patients had secondary adrenal insufficiency, 1.4% secondary hypothyroidism, 7% hypogonadism, and 2.8% panhypopituitarism. Pituitary acromegaly was determined in 97.2% of the patients, and non-pituitary acromegaly in 2.8%. Regarding co-morbid conditions, 35.2% of the patients had hypertension, 23.9% had diabetes mellitus (DM), 1.4% had cardiovascular disease, and 5.6% had a malignancy history. Of the patients with pituitary adenoma, 71% had macroadenoma, and 29% had microadenoma. The mean adenoma size was 15.3±7.8 mm. Surgery was the The preferred primary treatment in 76.1% of the patients was surgery. In 40.8% of the patients were applied ononly surgical treatment was applied, while in 40.8% surgery+ medical treatment, 8.5% only medical treatment, 5.6% surgery +medical treatment + radiotherapy, 2.8% medical treatment + radiotherapy, 1.4% chemotherapy. After all treatments, 49.3% of the patients were in remission. In the follow-ups, colon malignancy was diagnosed in 4.2% and thyroid malignancy in 5.6%. Conclusions: In our study, tThe clinical features of patients with acromegaly were generally similar to those in the literature. It was evident that early diagnosis and treatment initiation, and patient response to treatment was the prominent factors decreasing comorbidities.

GHRH secretion from a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor causing gigantism in a patient with MEN1.

SummaryA male patient with a germline mutation in MEN1 presented at the age of 18 with classical features of gigantism. Previously, he had undergone resection of an insulin-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (pNET) at the age of 10 years and had subtotal parathyroidectomy due to primary hyperparathyroidism at the age of 15 years. He was found to have significantly elevated serum IGF-1, GH, GHRH and calcitonin levels. Pituitary MRI showed an overall bulky gland with a 3 mm hypoechoic area. Abdominal MRI showed a 27 mm mass in the head of the pancreas and a 6 mm lesion in the tail. Lanreotide-Autogel 120 mg/month reduced GHRH by 45% and IGF-1 by 20%. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, four NETs were identified with positive GHRH and calcitonin staining and Ki-67 index of 2% in the largest lesion. The pancreas tail lesion was not removed. Post-operatively, GHRH and calcitonin levels were undetectable, IGF-1 levels normalised and GH suppressed normally on glucose challenge. Post-operative fasting glucose and HbA1c levels have remained normal at the last check-up. While adolescent-onset cases of GHRH-secreting pNETs have been described, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of ectopic GHRH in a paediatric setting leading to gigantism in a patient with MEN1. Our case highlights the importance of distinguishing between pituitary and ectopic causes of gigantism, especially in the setting of MEN1, where paediatric somatotroph adenomas causing gigantism are extremely rare.Learning pointsIt is important to diagnose gigantism and its underlying cause (pituitary vs ectopic) early in order to prevent further growth and avoid unnecessary pituitary surgery. The most common primary tumour sites in ectopic acromegaly include the lung (53%) and the pancreas (34%) (1): 76% of patients with a pNET secreting GHRH showed a MEN1 mutation (1).Plasma GHRH testing is readily available in international laboratories and can be a useful diagnostic tool in distinguishing between pituitary acromegaly mediated by GH and ectopic acromegaly mediated by GHRH. Positive GHRH immunostaining in the NET tissue confirms the diagnosis.Distinguishing between pituitary (somatotroph) hyperplasia secondary to ectopic GHRH and pituitary adenoma is difficult and requires specialist neuroradiology input and consideration, especially in the MEN1 setting. It is important to note that the vast majority of GHRH-secreting tumours (lung, pancreas, phaeochromocytoma) are expected to be visible on cross-sectional imaging (median diameter 55 mm) (1). Therefore, we suggest that a chest X-ray and an abdominal ultrasound checking the adrenal glands and the pancreas should be included in the routine work-up of newly diagnosed acromegaly patients.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: an international systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes for patients with acromegaly treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Primary outcomes were 5- and 10-year endocrine remission (ER) and endocrine control (EC). Secondary outcomes were 10-year radiographic local control (LC), visual toxicity, and hypopituitarism rates. Weighted random effects meta-analyses using the DerSimonian and Laird methods were conducted to characterize and compare effect sizes. Mixed effects regression models were used to examine correlations between potential prognostic factors and primary and secondary outcomes. In total, 1533 patients across 20 published studies with acromegaly treated with SRS were included. At 5-years, estimated ER and EC rates were 43.2% (95% CI 31.7-54.6%) and 55.0% (95% CI 27.6-82.4%), respectively. At 10-years, estimated ER and EC rates were 56.9% (95% CI 47.5-66.4%) and 69.7% (95% CI 47.7-91.8%), respectively. The estimated 10-year LC rate was 92.8% (95% CI 83.0-100%). Visual toxicity and hypopituitarism following SRS were estimated to be 2.7% (95% CI 1.3-4.2%) and 26.8% (95% CI 16.9-36.7%), respectively. Every 1 Gy increase in margin prescription dose beyond 17 Gy was estimated to result in a 0.41% increased risk of visual toxicity (p = 0.03). No prognostic factors were associated with EC, ER, LC, or hypopituitarism. SRS was well-tolerated in the management of pituitary acromegaly resulting in gradually improving ER and EC rates over time that approached 60% and 70%. SRS-related visual loss is an uncommon treatment-related side effect, and patient-specific clinical decision making remains critical.

Unmasking a new prognostic marker and therapeutic target from the GDNF-RET/PIT1/p14ARF/p53 pathway in acromegaly.

BackgroundAcromegaly is produced by excess growth hormone secreted by a pituitary adenoma of somatotroph cells (ACRO). First-line therapy, surgery and adjuvant therapy with somatostatin analogs, fails in 25% of patients. There is no predictive factor of resistance to therapy. New therapies are investigated using few dispersed tumor cells in acute primary cultures in standard conditions where the cells do not grow, or using rat pituitary cell lines that do not maintain the full somatotroph phenotype. The RET/PIT1/p14ARF/p53 pathway regulates apoptosis in normal pituitary somatotrophs whereas the RET/GDNF pathway regulates survival, controlling PIT1 levels and blocking p14ARF (ARF) and p53 expression.MethodsWe investigated these two RET pathways in a prospective series of 32 ACRO and 63 non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA), studying quantitative RNA and protein gene expression for molecular-clinical correlations and how the RET pathway might be implicated in therapeutic success. Clinical data was collected during post-surgical follow-up. We also established new'humanized’ pituitary cultures, allowing 20 repeated passages and maintaining the pituitary secretory phenotype, and tested five multikinase inhibitors (TKI: Vandetanib, Lenvatinib, Sunitinib, Cabozantinib and Sorafenib) potentially able to act on the GDNF-induced RET dimerization/survival pathway. Antibody arrays investigated intracellular molecular pathways.FindingsIn ACRO, there was specific enrichment of all genes in both RET pathways, especially GDNF. ARF and GFRA4 gene expression were found to be opposing predictors of response to first-line therapy. ARF cut-off levels, calculated categorizing by GNAS mutation, were predictive of good response (above) or resistance (below) to therapy months later. Sorafenib, through AMPK, blocked the GDNF/AKT survival action without altering the RET apoptotic pathway.InterpretationTumor ARF mRNA expression measured at the time of the surgery is a prognosis factor in acromegaly. The RET inhibitor, Sorafenib, is proposed as a potential treatment for resistant ACRO.FundThis project was supported by national grants from Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and Instituto Investigación Carlos III, with participation of European FEDER funds, to IB (PI150056) and CVA (BFU2016-76973-R). It was also supported initially by a grant from the Investigator Initiated Research (IIR) Program (WI177773) and by a non-restricted Research Grant from Pfizer Foundation to IB. Some of the pituitary acromegaly samples were collected in the framework of the Spanish National Registry of Acromegaly (REMAH), partially supported by an unrestricted grant from Novartis to the Spanish Endocrine Association (SEEN).CVA is also supported from a grant of Medical Research Council UK MR/M018539/1.

Abstract #823 Pituitary Acromegaly Diagnosed in the Setting of Growth Hormone Abuse

Abstract #823 Pituitary Acromegaly Diagnosed in the Setting of Growth Hormone Abuse

Pituitary acromegaly: not one disease.

Acromegaly has traditionally been regarded as a monomorphous disorder resulting from a benign pituitary adenoma. Increasing evidence, however, is highlighting that this disorder is associated with a spectrum of morphologically distinct pituitary tumors with variable clinical, biochemical and radiologic features and differing therapeutic outcomes that are attributed to different genetic and epigenetic changes. These data underscore the need for developing a more refined clinicopathological risk stratification system and implementing personalized targeted therapeutic approaches.

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 levels during early and late follow-up after surgery in acromegalic patients.

Disease activity in acromegaly is accurately reflected by growth hormone (GH) concentration during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels, representing an integrated index of GH activity. This prospective study was performed to evaluate whether plasma IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) might also reflect the hormonal disease activity in pituitary acromegaly after operative treatment during early and late follow-up. Twenty-two acromegalic patients were studied. Data were obtained pre-, intra- and post-operatively in 13 cases. In 9 patients the acromegalic activity was studied only after treatment. The hormonal assessment included repeated blood samples for estimation of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and repeated OGTTs. In each case 100 sigma g octreotide (Sandostatin lambda, Sandoz, Basel) was injected to test the acute response of GH, IGF-I and IGFBP-3. Intraoperatively, GH levels were estimated to examine acutely the influence of tumour reduction on GH levels. Patients were considered cured when GH levels (GH60min) were less than 2 ng/ml during OGTT 4 weeks after surgery. The data outlined that in patients with normalized GH60min levels, normalized IGFBP-3 levels were noticed 4 weeks and 12 months post-operatively. In non-cured patients normalized IGFBP-3 concentrations were found in 11 out of 15 cases in the late post-treatment phase. In contrast only 1 of 7 cured patients had persistently elevated IGF-I levels within the first month post-operatively, whereas no case of the non-cured patients had IGF-I values in the normal range. Despite these observations a strong correlation of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 did not exist before one year post-operatively -- either in the cured or in the non-cured patients. Serum IGFBP-3 in patients with pituitary acromegaly does not provide a predictive value of appreciable magnitude concerning cure or non-cure from the disease- whether examined early or late in the post-operative period. Absolute levels of IGFBP-3 may thus cause misinterpretation concerning cure of acromegalics after surgery.

Insulin-like growth factor-1 is essential to the increased mortality caused by excess growth hormone: a case of thyroid cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in a patient with pituitary acromegaly

The effects of growth hormone are mediated in part by stimulating the production of insulin-like growth factor-1. Insulin-like growth factor-1 has significant effects on cell proliferation and differentiation, it is a potent mitogen, and it is a powerful inhibitor of programmed cell death (apoptosis). Insulin-like growth factor-1 also has a well-established role in the transformation of normal cells to malignant cells. Case reports on a possible association between elevated growth hormone and cancer risk in a variety of patient groups have been published. Here, we describe clinical and laboratory findings for a patient with acromegaly who first developed thyroid cancer, and then, in the follow up period, probably due to poorly controlled insulin-like growth factor-1 levels, developed a large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A search revealed that a case with these peculiarities had not previously been reported.

Neuroendocrine tumors secreting growth hormone-releasing hormone: Pathophysiological and clinical aspects

Hypothalamic GHRH is secreted into the portal system, binds to specific surface receptors of the somatotroph cell and elicits intracellular signals that modulate pituitary GH synthesis and/or secretion. Moreover, GHRH is synthesized and expressed in multiple extrapituitary tissues. Excessive peripheral production of GHRH by a tumor source would therefore be expected to cause somatotroph cell hyperstimulation, increased GH secretion and eventually pituitary acromegaly. Immunoreactive GHRH is present in several tumors, including carcinoid tumors, pancreatic cell tumors, small cell lung cancers, endometrial tumors, adrenal adenomas, and pheochromocytomas which have been reported to secrete GHRH. Acromegaly in these patients, however, is uncommon. The distinction of pituitary vs. extrapituitary acromegaly is extremely important in planning effective management. Regardless of the cause, GH and IGF-1 are invariably elevated and GH levels fail to suppress (<1 microg/l) after an oral glucose load in all forms of acromegaly. Dynamic pituitary tests are not helpful in distinguishing acromegalic patients with pituitary tumors from those harbouring extrapituitary tumors. Plasma GHRH levels are usually elevated in patients with peripheral GHRH-secreting tumors, and are normal or low in patients with pituitary acromegaly. Unique and unexpected clinical features in an acromegalic patient, including respiratory wheezing or dyspnea, facial flushing, peptic ulcers, or renal stones sometimes are helpful in alerting the physician to diagnosing non pituitary endocrine tumors. If no facility to measure plasma GHRH is available, and in the absence of MRI evidence of pituitary adenoma, a CT scan of the thorax and abdominal ultrasound could be performed to exclude with good approximation the possibility of an ectopic GHRH syndrome. Surgical resection of the tumor secreting ectopic GHRH should be the logical approach to a patient with ectopic GHRH syndrome. Standard chemotherapy directed at GHRH-producing carcinoid tumors is generally unsuccessful in controlling the activated GH axis. Somatostatin analogs provide an effective option for medical management of carcinoid patients, especially those with recurrent disease. In fact, long-acting somatostatin analogs may be able to control not only the ectopic hormonal secretion syndrome, but also, in some instances, tumor growth. Therefore, although cytotoxic chemotherapy, pituitary surgery, or irradiation still remain available therapeutic options, long-acting somatostatin analogs are now preferred as a second-line therapy in patients with carcinoid tumors and ectopic GHRH-syndrome.

Etiology of Pituitary Acromegaly

Pituitary tumors secreting growth hormone are clonal neoplasms that may arise following a somatic mutation within the somatotroph cell. Promotion of tumor growth also appears to be regulated by hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing hormone, which exerts a trophic action on the pituitary cell. Unraveling the mechanisms of pituitary tumorigenesis will facilitate the application of novel therapeutic techniques, genetic screening, and follow-up of tumor responses.

Somatostatin and Somatostatin Analogue (SMS 201-995) in Treatment of Hormone-Secreting Tumors of the Pituitary and Gastrointestinal Tract and Non-Neoplastic Diseases of the Gut

Somatostatin is a peptide synthesized in many tissues that can act as a neurotransmitter, a systemic hormone, or a local hormone, and inhibits the secretion of hormones or other cell products. A long-acting synthetic analogue of somatostatin (SMS 201-995) has been developed which when administered subcutaneously has a biologic half-life of 90 to 120 minutes and can be administered 2 or 3 times per day. SMS 201-995 can lower plasma concentrations of growth hormone and somatomedin-C in patients with pituitary acromegaly, but no controlled trials to assess symptomatic response or change in tumor size have been done. In patients with pituitary thyrotropin-producing pituitary tumors, SMS 201-995 has been remarkably effective in producing biochemical and clinical responses and is the drug of first choice in this syndrome when tumor resection is not possible. In patients with the carcinoid syndrome, SMS 201-995 effectively reduces diarrhea, is the best available drug for treatment of carcinoid flush (effective in approximately 90% of cases), and is useful in treating carcinoid crisis. Eighty-five percent of patients with pancreatic islet cell tumors that produce vasoactive intestinal peptide will respond to SMS 201-995 with a reduction in diarrhea that often has been resistant to all other therapy. SMS 201-995 may also be useful in treating the symptoms in some patients with glucagonomas, growth hormone releasing hormone-producing tumors and insulinomas. Whether SMS 201-995 has a significant effect on gut neuroendocrine tumor growth remains uncertain. Certain nonmalignant diseases of the gut respond to somatostatin, including secretory diarrhea and fistulas of unknown cause. In general, SMS 201-995 has proved safe with few significant side effects, but whether the long-term use of the drug will result in an iatrogenic form of the somatostatinoma syndrome is uncertain.