A SERIES OF OPENINGS: BROWN, MARTINO, AND WUORINEN RICHARD HERMANN NTRIGUED BY JOSEPH STRAUS’S BOOK on serialism in the United States, I examined aspects of the earlier phase of serial composition.2 Here I consider openings of three early piano works by Earle Brown, Perspectives (1952); Donald Martino, Piano Fantasy (1958); and Charles Wuorinen, Piano Variations (1963).2 In spite of some similarity for that day’s listener of surface intervallic combinations, temporal features, and gestures that were common for avant-garde composers of that generation, each composer took a different path. Here I explore how such similar sounding works at that time are truly radically different. Comparing work proximate in medium, time and place also clarifies both technical and aesthetic premises and accomplishments. While Straus mentions Cage’s quasi-serial durational plans and study with Schoenberg, Feldman’s study with Riegger and Wolpe as well as his “regulatory schemes” starting in the late 1970s, and Wolff’s careful study of Webern under Cage’s guidance, there is no mention of serialism’s influence upon Brown.3 Brown writes: There are three works composed in Denver just before composing Folio: Three Pieces for Piano, 1951; Music for Violin, Cello, and Piano, I 68 Perspectives of New Music which was also 1951, I believe; and Perspectives for Piano, 1952. All three of these works are technically based on Schillinger principles of generative units and cellules, rhythmic groups, and so forth. . . . The title of the piece, Perspectives, suggests that it’s oriented around a visual kind of parallel with conception and listening. The “perspectives” are of a relatively small amount of material, but the material is seen from many different angles—as one can look at a mobile from many different angles and see different relationships of the units. . . .4 Let us examine the opening of Perspectives with his thought in mind. * * * Medium and large cardinality set-classes (hereafter scs) have few repetitions. Various kinds of pitch-class (hereafter pc) networks yield quite limited information. Strings of pcs of cardinality 5 or more do not seem to reproduce series of ordered pc-intervals. Although there is a constant turnover of the chromatic, the pcs completing an aggregate do not seem to fall in special or expected places at the ends of phenomenally well-articulated segments. Let us start by examining the opening’s “small amount of material” in the pitch and pc dimension as Brown’s comments suggest. Example 1 is the opening three systems of Brown’s Perspectives displaying my “time signatures” and segmentations with their durations.5 These are full of dyadic and triadic details. In Hanninen’s terms, I indicate change or a disjunction orientation for the sonic domain with the following articulators, given here as lower case letters in italics: a = articulation, d = density (no. of simultaneously attacking pitches), l = length (duration), p = pedal, r = register, v = volume, and s = sound or silence (the lone toggle in this list).6 Vertical lines of various kinds through systems suggest relative strength of segmentation boundaries in increasing importance: dotted, dashed, solid-thin, and solid-thick.7 I made no attempt to scale these variables as this rough calculus is sufficient for my purposes at present; certainly, some sonic segmentations will have a degree of subjective interpretation too. For visual clarity, sub-segments within each segment are usually not marked. Example 2 considers pitch and pc segments; unless otherwise designated , dotted or dashed lines or enclosures indicate weaker segments or foreshadowing. Interval-class (hereafter ic) 1 receives significant emphasis at the very start in the first segment; see Example 2a. By the end of segment 1, ic 3 comes to the fore; see Example 2b. Ic 4 is foreshadowed in Example 2c, and that suggests an initial hierarchy of A Series of Openings: Brown, Martino, and Wuorinen 69 ics via ubiquity. They are listed from most to least prominent: 1, 3, 4, and 2; ics 5 and 6 are relatively equally deemphasized at this point. The three most prominent ics appear as members of scs 3-2 [013] and 3-3 [014] as shown in Example 2d; ic 2 is deemphasized in these realizations. Segments 3-5 (Example 2e) documents...