Background: Piriformis Syndrome (pseudo sciatica) is caused by pressure of an injured or irritatedpiriformis muscle which leads to neuritis of branches of the sciatic nerve; mimics the signs and symptomsof low back pain. Due to high incidence of low back pain in our society, P.S frequently goes unrecognizedor misdiagnosed in clinical settings.Method: Patients with piriformis syndrome were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria after detailedassessment. 30 patients who meet the inclusion criteria were grouped into 2groups (15 patients in eachgroup). Control group received UST and piriformis muscle stretching and experimental group received METwith DFM. Treatment period was about 30-40min each session in regular period of 6 days for a week forboth groups.Outcome Measures: Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analogue Scale, Standard GoniometerResults: Statistical analysis of intergroup significance by Mann Whitney U-test for IR ROM (sig.0.000 table value, t = 2.048) and ODI (t = 4.842 > tablevalue, t = 2.048) reveals that experimental group shows significant difference between pre test and post testvalues of IR ROM, VAS and ODI than that in the control group.Conclusion: experimental group who received MET along with DFM shows greater improvement on pain,disability and IR ROM in individuals with piriformis syndrome than those in the control group who receivedU.S.T and piriformis muscle stretching