Pipeline Construction Activities Research Articles

Effect of subsoil tillage during pipeline construction activities on near‐term soil physical properties and crop yields in the right‐of‐way

AbstractPersistence of subsoil compaction in construction right‐of‐way (ROW) areas is a major cropland concern following installation of underground pipelines. Soil physical disturbance and remediation practices including removal of topsoil, subsoil tillage and replacement of topsoil were investigated in a soybean–corn rotation field, which was located within a pipeline ROW. The objectives of the study were to investigate the effectiveness of subsoil tillage (300 and 450 mm) applied shortly after the pipeline installation used to help restore soil physical properties and to recover crop yields. Soil bulk density, soil cone index and crop yields (soybean and corn) from three ROW trafficked zones (Z1, Z2 and Z3) and adjacent unaffected zones were compared at one year and two years after pipeline installation. Compared to 300 mm of subsoil tillage in the ROW zones, 450 mm of subsoil tillage did not significantly improve the soil bulk density and crop (soybean and corn) yields. Compared to 300 mm of subsoil tillage, 450 mm of subsoil tillage created significantly lower soil cone index values within the treated soil layer. Compared to yield data from the adjacent unaffected zones, the ROW zones (Z1, Z2 and Z3) had statistically significant (p < .05) crop yield declines of 25% in soybean (2017) and 15% in corn (2018). The near‐term soil physical properties and crop yield have been improved from the subsoil tillage applied in the affected zones; however, their recovery to normal conditions as in the unaffected areas has not been achieved within the 2‐year period.

Learning curve modelling of gas pipeline construction in Egypt

It is commonly accepted that production rates for repetitive tasks will improve with acquired experience and learning. Several mathematical models, or learning curves, have been proposed to investigate improvement in productivity as a function of the number of units produced. Deciding the best-fit learning curve model for construction activities is a managerial challenge. In this paper, the best-fit learning curve model for describing past performance of gas pipeline construction in Egypt is investigated. Data were collected from eight real-life projects, which are constructed in different types of land, under various weather conditions with different sizes, lengths, and pipe diameters. Only labour-intensive activities are considered in the present work. Cumulative average data is used to represent collected data in order to ensure curve smoothness as well as to avoid scattered data. The commercial Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) is used to determine Pearson's coefficient of correlation. The cubic model is found to be the best fitting curve to describe welding activities in gas pipeline construction activities in Egypt. This work helps both academics and practitioners in deciding the best-fit learning curve model(s) for gas pipeline construction. This will aid in making realistic estimates of the time and cost of repetitive projects.

Demarcation of Right of Way (ROW) and Re-Installation of Damaged Markers of Transmission Pipeline in Balochistan, Pakistan through Geomatics Technologies: A Case Study of Zarghun to Quetta High Pressure Natural Gas Supply

The alignment of gas pipelines in a rugged terrain has always been a serious challenge around the globe but they can be perfectly aligned with the help of Geo-Spatial technologies. When South Zarghun gas fields were discovered in Pakistan, gas transmission pipeline laying process between gas fields and Quetta city was as challenging task for the Government of Pakistan. Very rough terrain and extreme weather conditions especially in winter season were the two major constraints for the alignment of pipeline. Geomatics survey was essential before transmission pipeline construction work, done twice by private consultant in Pakistan’s local geographic coordinate system. SSGC took decision in 2006 for the construction of pipeline but unfortunately it could not be executed due to law & order situation in Pakistan especially in Balochistan province and later all bench marks of pipeline alignment route were vanished by the locals. In 2012, SSGC again started pipeline construction work on war steps. Previous pipeline alignment survey was converted into existing SSGC’s GIS coordinate system i.e. UTM Zone 42 WGS84 using ESRI ArcGIS software. Identification & re-installation of all bench marks and re-routing of pipeline were done by SSGC GIS survey team with the help of global positioning system (GPS) and satellite data. Finally, right of way (ROW) of transmission pipeline from Zarghun gas fields to Quetta city was designed and produced in the form of GIS map for pipeline construction activities.

Simulation modeling of weather-sensitive tunnelling construction activities subject to cold weather

In cold regions, weather introduces a great deal of uncertainty to weather-sensitive construction activities, resulting in project schedules that deviate from plans. To maximize construction process productivity, decisions regarding process execution planning and sequence of work need to be made, based on reliable plans and schedules. Faced with winter weather uncertainty in cold regions, this task becomes quite challenging. This paper follows the framework that was proposed in the literature for simulating weather-sensitive construction projects executed under cold weather conditions. In the literature, the authors applied the framework steps to enable simulating and planning pipeline construction activities under severe cold weather. The proposed framework sets out a work breakdown structure of activities to account for and quantify weather impact on the project schedule. The steps outlined in the framework are followed to enable simulating and planning tunnelling construction activities executed under severe cold weather conditions. Relevant simulation findings, which clarify the impact of cold weather events on construction projects and can assist in project planning and decision support, are reported.

Monitoring Petroleum Hydrocarbons in the Sediments of the Nearshore Beaufort Sea During Construction and Development of the Northstar Production Island, 1999 through 2006

Abstract In 1999 the Minerals Management Service (MMS) initiated studies to characterize the pre-construction environment near the Northstar and Liberty oil prospects, and to monitor hydrocarbons over time as part of a long-term program to assess potential spatial and temporal changes related to oil development and production near the Northstar and Liberty sites. The initial program, Arctic Nearshore Impact Monitoring in the Development Area (ANIMIDA), was designed to monitor changes specifically related to gravel island and oil pipeline construction activities. The follow-on project, the continuation of ANIMIDA (cANIMIDA) program, continued monitoring sediment chemistry. The objectives of these programs were: 1) to determine the background levels of chemicals of concern (i.e., anthropogenic-related organic parameters) associated with oil exploration, development, and production activities, 2) to examine temporal and spatial changes in chemical concentrations and composition, and 3) to determine if any ob...

Modeling Weather-Sensitive Construction Activity Using Simulation

This paper proposes a framework for simulating weather-sensitive construction projects that are executed under extreme weather conditions. It applies the framework steps to enable simulating and planning pipeline construction activities under severe cold weather conditions. The uncertainties caused by weather, such as extreme cold, heat, wind, or precipitation, can significantly affect a project’s schedule and produce significant deviations from the baseline schedule. The proposed framework structures a project in the way an engineer would approach it, setting out a breakdown of work activities to quantify weather effects and account for their impact on the project baseline. The proposed weather-sensitive construction simulation framework is employed to determine the effects of weather on the construction process of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe installation. The relevant simulation findings are reported to clarify the impact of extreme weather events on construction projects and to assist in project planning and decision support.

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

AbstractOil and Gas (MIC: SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910)Buckeye Partners is primarily engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for key integrated oil companies, large refined products marketing companies and key end‐users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. Co. also operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities. As of Dec 31 2007, Co.'s facilities included approximately 5,400 miles of six‐inch to 24‐inch diameter pipeline, 100 delivery points and 51 active bulk storage and terminal facilities with aggregate capacity of approximately 20.0 million barrels.

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

AbstractOil and Gas (MIC: SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910)Buckeye Partners is primarily engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for key integrated oil companies, large refined products marketing companies and key end‐users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. Co. also operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities. As of Dec 31 2007, Co.'s facilities included approximately 5,400 miles of 6‐inch to 24‐inch diameter pipeline, 100 delivery points and 51 active bulk storage and terminal facilities with aggregate capacity of approximately 20.0 million barrels.

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

AbstractOil and Gas (MIC: 14.2 SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910)Buckeye Partners is primarily engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for key integrated oil companies, large refined products marketing companies and key end‐users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. Co. also operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities. As of Dec 31 2007, Co.'s facilities included approximately 5,400 miles of 6‐inch to 24‐inch diameter pipeline, 100 delivery points and 51 active bulk storage and terminal facilities with aggregate capacity of approximately 20.0 million barrels.

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

AbstractOil and Gas (MIC: 14.2 SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910)Buckeye Partners is primarily engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for key integrated oil companies, large refined products marketing companies and key end‐users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. Co. also operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities. As of Dec 31 2006, Co.'s facilities included approximately 5,400 miles of 6‐inch to 24‐inch diameter pipeline, 100 delivery points and 45 active bulk storage and terminal facilities with aggregate capacity of approximately 17.6 million barrels.

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

AbstractOil and Gas (MIC: 14.2 SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910)Buckeye Partners is primarily engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for key integrated oil companies, large refined products marketing companies and key end‐users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. Co. also operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities. As of Dec 31 2006, Co.'s facilities included approximately 5,400 miles of 6‐inch to 24‐inch diameter pipeline, 100 delivery points and 45 active bulk storage and terminal facilities with aggregate capacity of approximately 17.6 million barrels.

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

AbstractOil and Gas (MIC: 14.2 SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910)Buckeye Partners is primarily engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for key integrated oil companies, large refined products marketing companies and key end‐users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. Co. also operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities. As of Dec 31 2006, Co.'s facilities included approximately 5,400 miles of 6‐inch to 24‐inch diameter pipeline, 100 delivery points and 45 active bulk storage and terminal facilities with aggregate capacity of approximately 17.6 million barrels.

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

AbstractOil and Gas (MIC: 14.2 SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910)Buckeye Partners is primarily engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for key integrated oil companies, large refined products marketing companies and key end‐users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. Co. also operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities. As of Dec 31 2006, Co.'s facilities included approximately 5,400 miles of 6‐inch to 24‐inch diameter pipeline, 100 delivery points and 45 active bulk storage and terminal facilities with aggregate capacity of approximately 17.6 million barrels.

Buckeye Partners (L.P.)

AbstractOil and Gas (MIC: 14.2 SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910)Buckeye Partners is primarily engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for key integrated oil companies, large refined products marketing companies and key end‐users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. Co. also operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with key integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities. As of Dec 31 2005, Co.'s facilities included approximately 5,000 miles of 6‐inch to 24‐inch diameter pipeline, 100 delivery points and 43 active bulk storage and terminal facilities with aggregate capacity of approximately 16.6 million barrels.

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

Mergent's Dividend AchieversVolume 3, Issue 3 p. 46-46 U.S. Company Reports Buckeye Partners, L.P.† First published: 30 June 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/div.4272 † Contact: : William H. Shea Jr. — Chmn., Pres., C.E.O. Address: : 5002 Buckeye Road, Emmaus, PA 18049 Web Site: : www.buckeye.com AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Business Summary: Oil and Gas (MIC: 14.2 SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910) Buckeye Partners is a master limited partnership. Co. is engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for major integrated oil companies, large refined product marketing companies and major end users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. In addition, Co. operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities, generally for these same customers. Co. is an independent pipeline common carrier of refined petroleum products in the U.S. with about 4,500 miles of pipeline serving 13 states. Volume3, Issue3Summer 2006Pages 46-46 RelatedInformation

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

Mergent's Dividend AchieversVolume 3, Issue 2 p. 46-46 U.S. Company Reports Buckeye Partners, L.P.† First published: 20 April 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/div.3854 † Contact: : William H. Shea Jr. — Chmn., Pres., C.E.O. Address: : 5002 Buckeye Road, Emmaus, PA 18049 Web Site: : www.buckeye.com AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Abstract Oil and Gas (MIC: 14.2 SIC: 4613 NAIC: 486910) Buckeye Partners is a master limited partnership. Co. is engaged in the transportation, terminalling and storage of refined petroleum products for major integrated oil companies, large refined product marketing companies and major end users of petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities owned and operated by Co. In addition, Co. operates pipelines owned by third parties under contracts with integrated oil and chemical companies and performs pipeline construction activities, generally for these same customers. Co. is an independent pipeline common carrier of refined petroleum products in the U.S. with about 4,500 miles of pipeline serving 13 states. Volume3, Issue2Spring 2006Pages 46-46 RelatedInformation