Pineal Parenchymal Tumor Of Intermediate Differentiation Research Articles

A case of a pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation with bifocal lesions differentiated by negative placental alkaline phosphatase in the spinal fluid.

Placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) in the spinal fluid is helpful for the diagnosis of intracranial germinomas. Bifocal lesions involving the pineal and pituitary regions have also been reported as characteristic findings of intracranial germinomas. We present a rare case of a 15-year-old boy with a pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) with bifocal lesions negative for PLAP. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed bifocal mass lesions in the pineal and suprasellar regions and non-communicating hydrocephalus. We initially suspected a germinoma based on imaging findings, but all tumor markers, including PLAP, in the spinal fluid were negative. Based on these results, germinoma was considered less likely, and an endoscopic third ventriculostomy and endoscopic tumor biopsy were performed for diagnosis. The histopathological diagnosis was PPTID, corresponding to World Health Organization grade 3, in both pineal and suprasellar specimens. A craniotomy for tumor removal was performed, resulting in total resection. PLAP is known to have high sensitivity and extremely high negative predictive value for germinomas. Although bifocal lesions highly suggest germ cell tumors, there are exceptions, as in the present case. This case suggests that PLAP measurements are useful for differentiation, leading to appropriate treatment strategies.

A Pineal Parenchymal Tumor of Intermediate Differentiation in an Octogenarian Contains a Rare KBTBD4 Insertion.

Pineal parenchymal tumors are rare central nervous system tumors that pose diagnostic challenges for surgical pathologists. Due to their paucity, their clinicopathologic features are still being defined. We report an 86-year-old woman with a remote history of breast lobular carcinoma who presented with a 2-month neurologic history that included gait instability, blurry vision, and headaches. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lobular, heterogeneously enhancing pineal region mass compressing the aqueduct of Sylvius. A biopsy performed concomitant with endoscopic third ventriculostomy consisted of small sheets of cells with eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm, multipolar processes, and ovoid nuclei with stippled chromatin. Whole exome sequencing revealed a small in-frame insertion (duplication) in exon 4 of KBTBD4 (c.931_939dup, p.P311_R313dup/ p.R313_M314insPRR), which has very recently been reported in 2 pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID). Additionally, variants of uncertain significance in CEBPA (c.863G > C, p.R288P) and MYC (c.655T > C, p.S219P) were identified. Although PPTID is considered a disease of young adulthood, review of 2 institutional cohorts of patients with pineal region tumors revealed that 25% of individuals with PPTID were over 65 years of age. In conclusion, PPTID should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pineal region tumors in older adults.

Clinicopathologic analysis of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation: a multi-institutional cohort study by the Kyushu Neuro-Oncology Study Group.

Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs), which were recognized in the 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, are rare, accounting for less than 1% of all central nervous system tumors. This rarity and novelty complicate the diagnosis and treatments of PPTID. We therefore aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of this tumor. At 11 institutions participating in the Kyushu Neuro-Oncology Study Group, data for patients diagnosed with PPTID were collected. Central pathology review and KBTBD4 mutation analysis were applied to attain the diagnostically accurate cohort. PPTID was officially diagnosed in 28 patients: 11 (39%) with WHO grade 2 and 17 (61%) with WHO grade 3 tumors. Median age was 49years, and the male:female ratio was 1:2.1. Surgery was attempted in all 28 patients, and gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 46% (13/28). Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered to, respectively, 82% (23/28) and 46% (13/28). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 64.9% and 70.4% respectively. Female sex (p = 0.018) and GTR (p < 0.01) were found to be independent prognostic factors for PFS and female sex (p = 0.019) was that for OS. Initial and second recurrences were most often leptomeningeal (67% and 100% respectively). 80% (20/25) of patients harbored a KBTBD4 mutation. Female sex and GTR were independent prognostic factors in our patients with PPTID. Leptomeningeal recurrence was observed to be particularly characteristic of this tumor. The rate of KBTBD4 mutation observed in our cohort was acceptable and this could prove the accuracy of our PPTID cohort.

Radiation therapy for pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: A case series and literature review.

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is a rare, primary tumor of the pineal gland. Due to its rarity, there is no consensus on optimal therapeutic strategies or standard characterization of the tumor's behavior. Here, we report 2 new cases of PPTID and an extensive review of the literature involving the use and extent of radiation therapy. Patient 1 is a 54-year-old male who presented with PPTID and drop metastases in the spinal cord, received cranial spinal irradiation (CSI), and experienced recurrence 3.5 years after treatment. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) helped the patient into remission for 9months. Patient 2 is a 32-year-old male with a local PPTID at presentation who went on to receive surgical resection followed by focused adjuvant radiation therapy to the pineal tumor bed. He then presented 6years after treatment with extensive disseminated recurrence and died due to leptomeningeal disease (LMD) about 4years after recurrence. The available literature on PPTID is limited and reported cases of LMD with ongoing follow-up in PPTID are scarce. Our report adds to the current known PPTID cases, contributing to the information available regarding prognosis and treatment response. Although an optimal therapeutic strategy for PPTID still cannot be determined, data from the literature suggest that utilizing radiation therapy in patients with low-risk disease and gross total resections as well as the use of upfront CSI have the potential to improve patient progression and survival outcomes.

The Prognosis of Pineal Parenchymal Tumors: Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results

Pineal parenchymal tumors are exceedingly rare and optimal disease management has yet to be defined. In this study, we aimed to identify prognostic factors and establish a predictive model for the prognosis of patients with pineal parenchymal tumors. All patients with pineal parenchymal tumors in the SEER database between 1975 and 2019 were reviewed. Data were summarized and survival was modeled with Cox regression analyses. In addition, a nomogram predicting 5- and 10-year survival probability for pineal parenchymal tumors was developed and validated. We found 691 pineal parenchymal and 1961 pineal region neoplasms during 1975 and 2019 resulting in an incidence of 35%. 441 patients were excluded as surgical status was unknown. The final cohort was subdivided into groups based on tumor histology: pineocytomas, pineoblastomas and pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID). Multivariate Cox analysis identified age and beam radiation as prognostic factors in pineoblastomas. Age, histology, tumor size, extent of resection, radiation and chemotherapy were selected to build a clinical nomogram. The C-index for the nomogram was 0.795 (95% CI 0.738-0.852). The calibration curves of the 5- and 10-year survival rates showed good agreement between the nomogram predictions and actual observations. This nomogram is a convenient and precise tool for clinicians to evaluate prognosis of pineal parenchymal tumors.

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation with late spinal dissemination 13 years after initial surgery: illustrative case.

Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs) are rare in the pineal gland. A case of PPTID that disseminated to the lumbosacral spine 13 years after the total resection of a primary intracranial tumor has been reported. A 14-year-old female presented with headache and diplopia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a pineal tumor that induced obstructive hydrocephalus. A biopsy and endoscopic third ventriculostomy were performed. Histological diagnosis revealed a grade II PPTID. Two months later, the tumor was removed via craniotomy because the postoperative Gamma Knife surgery was ineffective. Histological diagnosis confirmed PPTID, although the grade was revised from II to III. Postoperative adjuvant therapy was not performed, because the lesion had been irradiated and gross total tumor removal was achieved. She has had no recurrence in 13 years. However, pain around the anus newly appeared. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine revealed a solid lesion in the lumbosacral spine. The lesion was subtotally resected, and histological diagnosis revealed grade III PPTID. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed, and she had no recurrence 1 year after radiotherapy. Remote dissemination of PPTID can occur several years after the initial resection. Regular follow-up imaging, including the spinal region, should be encouraged.

NCOG-35. A SINGLE INSTITUTION SERIES ON PINEAL PARENCHYMAL TUMORS OF INTERMEDIATE DIFFERENTIATION (PPTID)

Abstract INTRODUCTION First classified in 2000, pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is an uncommon intracranial malignancy. Given recent codification and rarity, there is no consensus on management and treatment is often provider dependent. METHODS Within an institutional database, we identified 10 patients with PPTID diagnosed between 2009 and 2022. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, presenting symptoms, extent of disease, surgical interventions, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Progression free survival, overall survival, and neurocognitive outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 36 (range 13-73), 40% women, 60% Caucasian. Nine patients had tumor involvement limited to the pineal region and one patient had multifocal intracranial tumor involvement with leptomeningeal disease. Two patients had gross total resection (GTR) alone, three had GTR followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), two had subtotal resection (STR) followed by craniospinal irradiation (CSI), two had biopsy followed by adjuvant RT, and one had biopsy with CSI and chemotherapy. At median follow up of 31 months (range 3-88 months), only one patient, who had received biopsy, CSI, and chemotherapy, had progression of disease and no patients are deceased. Two patients treated with CSI had adverse neurocognitive outcomes, which was not observed with focal RT. CONCLUSIONS Our limited case series suggests GTR followed by surveillance, GTR followed by focal RT, and any extent resection followed by CSI may all achieve durable disease control in patients with PPTID. Treatment selection should be individualized and potential neurocognitive toxicities should be considered.

Histopathology and molecular pathology of pediatric pineal parenchymal tumors.

Pineal parenchymal tumors in children are rare. They consist of two main types, pineoblastoma (PB) and pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID), which are World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 and grade 2-3 respectively. PBs are divided into four distinct molecular groups: PB-miRNA1, PB-miRNA2, PB-RB1, and PB-MYC/FOXR2. PB-RB1 and PB-MYC/FOXR2 affect young children and are associated with a dismal prognosis. PB-miRNA1 and PB-miRNA2 groups affect older children and follow a more favorable course. They are characterized by mutually exclusive alterations in genes involved in miRNA biogenesis, including DICER1, DROSHA, and DGCR8. They may be sporadic or may represent one manifestation of DICER1 syndrome. PB-RB1 tumors show alterations in the RB1 gene and may develop in the setting of congenital retinoblastoma, a condition known as "trilateral retinoblastoma." In the pediatric population, PPTIDs typically affect adolescents. They are characterized by small in-frame insertions in the KBTBD4 gene which is involved in ubiquitination.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pineal Region Tumors in Adults: A EURACAN Overview.

Simple SummaryPineal region tumors are rare intracranial tumors. A deeper knowledge of these tumors’ molecular mechanisms has been gained in recent years, which has led to a new classification and new potential systemic treatments. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, while radiotherapy and systemic therapy depend on histological, molecular, and clinical characteristics. This paper highlights recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.Pineal region tumors are rare intracranial tumors, accounting for less than 1% of all adult intracranial tumor lesions. These lesions represent a histologically heterogeneous group of tumors. Among these tumors, pineal parenchymal tumors and germ cell tumors (GCT) represent the most frequent types of lesions. According to the new WHO 2021 classification, pineal parenchymal tumors include five distinct histotypes: pineocytoma (PC), pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID), papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR), pinealoblastoma (PB), and desmoplastic myxoid tumor of the pineal region, SMARCB1-mutant; GCTs include germinoma, embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, choriocarcinoma, teratoma, mixed GCTs. Neuroradiological assessment has a pivotal role in the diagnostic work-up, surgical planning, and follow-up of patients with pineal masses. Surgery can represent the mainstay of treatment, ranging from biopsy to gross total resection, yet pineal region tumors associated with obstructive hydrocephalus may be surgically managed via ventricular internal shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Radiotherapy remains an essential component of the multidisciplinary treatment approach for most pineal region tumors; however, treatment volumes depend on the histological subtypes, grading, extent of disease, and the combination with chemotherapy. For localized germinoma, the current standard of care is chemotherapy followed by reduced-dose whole ventricular irradiation plus a boost to the primary tumor. For pinealoblastoma patients, postoperative radiation has been associated with higher overall survival. For the other pineal tumors, the role of radiotherapy remains poorly studied and it is usually reserved for aggressive (grade 3) or recurrent tumors. The use of systemic treatments mainly depends on histology and prognostic factors such as residual disease and metastases. For pinealoblastoma patients, chemotherapy protocols are based on various alkylating or platinum-based agents, vincristine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and are used in association with radiotherapy. About GCTs, their chemosensitivity is well known and is based on cisplatin or carboplatin and may include etoposide, cyclophosphamide, or ifosfamide prior to irradiation. Similar regimens containing platinum derivatives are also used for non-germinomatous GCTs with very encouraging results. However, due to a greater understanding of the biology of the disease’s various molecular subtypes, new agents based on targeted therapy are expected in the future. On behalf of the EURACAN domain 10 group, we reviewed the most important and recent developments in histopathological characteristics, neuro-radiological assessments, and treatments for pineal region tumors.

Malignant Pineal Parenchymal Tumors in Adults: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Limited retrospective data exist on malignant pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) in adults, and there are no large previous studies that review clinical outcomes across the 3 treatment arms of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. As a result, optimal disease management has yet to be defined. To evaluate treatment trends and perform survival analysis in adult PPT. The National Cancer Database was queried for histologically confirmed PPT diagnosed from 2007 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were used to evaluate the prognostic impact of covariates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for comparative subanalyses. Of the 251 patients who met inclusion criteria, 172 had PPTs of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) and 79 had pineoblastoma. A plurality of patients with pineoblastoma were treated with trimodal therapy (39.1%), whereas patients with PPTID were commonly treated with either surgery alone or surgery and radiation (33.7% each). Factors independently associated with improved overall survival include younger patient age, female sex, lower comorbidity score, lower tumor grade, and treatment with surgery or radiation (each P < .05). Subanalyses confirm the effect of radiation on survival in patients with grade III PPTID with subtotal resection; however, no survival benefit of adjuvant radiation is demonstrated in patients with grade II PPTID with subtotal resection. Although radiotherapy and surgery were found to increase survival in all patients with PPT, there was no demonstrable survival benefit of adjuvant radiation in surgically treated patients with grade II PPTID. This suggests that adjuvant radiotherapy may not add significant survival benefit in many adult patients with grade II PPTID.

Role of proliferative marker index and KBTBD4 mutation in the pathological diagnosis of pineal parenchymal tumors.

Pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) are clinically rare and a biopsy is often required for a definitive diagnosis. To improve the accuracy of histological assessment of PPTs, we examined the proliferative capacity of PPT cells and investigated DICER1 expression and KBTBD4 mutations. This study included 19 cases of PPTs [3 pineocytomas (PCs), 10 PPTs of intermediate differentiation (PPTID), and 6 pineoblastomas (PBs)]. Immunohistochemistry for Ki-67, PHH3, and DICER1, as well as Sanger sequencing analysis for KBTBD4 mutations, was performed using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens that were resected during surgery. Tumor cell proliferation was quantified using an image analysis software. For the PHH3 and MIB-1 indices, a significant difference was observed between the PPTIDs and PBs (P < 0.05). Loss of DICER1 was not specific for PB; 0/3 PCs (0.0%), 2/9 PPTIDs (22.2%), and 2/4 PBs (50.0%). KBTBD4 mutations were detected in 1/3 PCs (33.3%), 6/9 PPTIDs (66.7%), and 0/4 PBs (0.0%). Thus, combined application of the proliferative marker index and KBTBD4 mutation analysis may be useful for the differential diagnosis of PPTs. Furthermore, detection of KBTBD4 mutations using Sanger sequencing analysis may support the diagnosis of PPTID.

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: a systematic review and contemporary management of 389 cases reported during the last two decades.

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is a WHO grade II and III tumor arising from pineal parenchymal cells. PPTID is a rare tumor accounting for less than 1% of all primary central nervous system neoplasms. Therefore, reports describing the clinical characteristics and biological features of PPTID are lacking. Moreover, the therapeutic strategy remains controversial. The current study aimed to evaluate treatment results and problems of contemporary therapeutic modalities of PPTID based on its features compared with other pineal parenchymal tumors. A comprehensive systematic literature review of 69 articles was performed, including articles on PPTID (389 patients) and similar tumors. Patient demographics, disease presentation, imaging characteristics, biological features, and current therapeutic options and their results were reviewed. We found that histopathological findings based on current WHO classification are well associated with survival; however, identifying and treating aggressive PPTID cases with uncommon features could be problematic. A molecular and genetic approach may help improve diagnostic accuracy. Therapeutic strategy, especially for grade III and aforementioned uncommon and aggressive tumors, remains controversial. A combination therapy involving maximum tumor resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy could be the first line of treatment. However, although challenging, a large prospective study would be required to identify ways to improve the clinical results of PPTID treatment.

Prognosticating survival of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) by grade.

Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) are a rare group of pineal parenchymal tumors classified by histology as either World Health Organization (WHO) Grades 2 or 3. The rarity of these tumors in adults has left a number of clinical management questions open. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to aggregate a large PPTID cohort with sufficient statistical power from a large national cancer database to analyze prognostic parameters. All PPTID patients aged over 18years in the U.S. National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were summarized and survival was modeled using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. A total of 103 adult PPTID patients were identified in the NCDB with 63 (61%) WHO Grade 2 and 40 (39%) WHO Grade 3 tumors. Overall, mean age was 53 ± 18years with even gender distribution. A total of 75 (73%) patients underwent surgical resection for diagnosis, with gross total resection (GTR) was the most common resection outcome in 50/75 (67%). Chemotherapy was utilized in 18 (17%) patients, and radiation therapy in 37 (36%) patients. Overall, 5-year survival rate was estimated to be 54% (95% CI 42-64%), with mean survival was 84 (95% CI 69-99) months. Patients with Grade 2 tumors survived statistically longer than Grade 3 tumor counterparts (P < 0.01). Overall, older age (HR 1.09, P < 0.01) was associated with shorter survival, whereas GTR (HR 0.43, P = 0.02) was associated with longer survival. Both these parameters were significant within Grade 2 and Grade 3 subgroup analyses as well. PPTID are rare tumors with expected mean survival more than 5years, although Grade 2 tumors are expected to survive longer than Grade 3 tumors. Age and gross total resection are significant independent predictors of survival in PPTID overall, as well as within Grade 2 and Grade 3 subgroups separately. The prognostic role and benefit of adjuvant therapy is yet to be elucidated, mandating more molecular and biologic research be done to further optimize clinical management in the future.

Clinical Features of Pineal Parenchymal Tumors of Intermediate Differentiation (PPTID): A Single-Institution Series

Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) are rare tumors of the pineal gland. Their treatment is often heterogeneous due to the lack of literature to compile standardized treatments. Although no single institution has large numbers of cases, our experience has been that the clinical course is more varied and complicated than reported. We reviewed the clinical data for all patients with pathology found to be consistent with PPTID at our institution between the years 2006 and2019. Nine patients were identified. At initial diagnosis, all were treated with surgery and 4 of 9 patients underwent gross total resection. Adjuvant radiation therapy to the resection bed was administered in 6 of 9 patients. Mean follow-up time was 95.3 months. Mean progression-free survival was 50.5 months, with a tendency to be longer for male sex and after gross total resection. Seven patients developed a recurrence. Five of 6 known locations of first recurrences had either distant metastases or dissemination of disease. First recurrences were treated with radiation alone in 5 patients, craniospinal radiation with multiagent chemotherapy in 1 patient, and surgery with radiation therapy in 1. At last follow-up, 2 patients had died. Herein, we report clinical patterns of disease progression and treatment patterns of PPTID. Many patients progressed during the follow-up period. Disseminated disease was the most common presentation at recurrence. Ultimately, given the risk of recurrence and dissemination at recurrence, more aggressive treatment strategies should be considered. Specifically, our series suggests a benefit of adjuvant radiation at initial diagnosis for grade II patients.

Clinical and molecular heterogeneity of pineal parenchymal tumors: a consensus study

Recent genomic studies have shed light on the biology and inter-tumoral heterogeneity underlying pineal parenchymal tumors, in particular pineoblastomas (PBs) and pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs). Previous reports, however, had modest sample sizes and lacked the power to integrate molecular and clinical findings. The different proposed molecular group structures also highlighted a need to reach consensus on a robust and relevant classification system. We performed a meta-analysis on 221 patients with molecularly characterized PBs and PPTIDs. DNA methylation profiles were analyzed through complementary bioinformatic approaches and molecular subgrouping was harmonized. Demographic, clinical, and genomic features of patients and samples from these pineal tumor groups were annotated. Four clinically and biologically relevant consensus PB groups were defined: PB-miRNA1 (n = 96), PB-miRNA2 (n = 23), PB-MYC/FOXR2 (n = 34), and PB-RB1 (n = 25). A final molecularly distinct group, designated PPTID (n = 43), comprised histological PPTID and PBs. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling allowed the characterization of oncogenic drivers for individual tumor groups, specifically, alterations in the microRNA processing pathway in PB-miRNA1/2, MYC amplification and FOXR2 overexpression in PB-MYC/FOXR2, RB1 alteration in PB-RB1, and KBTBD4 insertion in PPTID. Age at diagnosis, sex predilection, and metastatic status varied significantly among tumor groups. While patients with PB-miRNA2 and PPTID had superior outcome, survival was intermediate for patients with PB-miRNA1, and dismal for those with PB-MYC/FOXR2 or PB-RB1. Reduced-dose CSI was adequate for patients with average-risk, PB-miRNA1/2 disease. We systematically interrogated the clinical and molecular heterogeneity within pineal parenchymal tumors and proposed a consensus nomenclature for disease groups, laying the groundwork for future studies as well as routine use in tumor diagnostic classification and clinical trial stratification.

Pineal Parenchymal Tumor of Intermediate Differentiation (PPTID) and Papillary Tumor of Pineal Region (PTPR): A Review.

Pineal parenchymal tumors account for less than 0.3% of all CNS tumors and "Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation" (PPTID; World Health Organization (WHO) grades II and III) exhibit intermediary differentiation and prognosis. However "Papillary tumor of the pineal region" (PTPR; WHO grades II and III) is a distinct entity. This combination of rarity and apparent similarity often leads to perplexity regarding the treatment and prognosis among neurosurgeons. In this review, we have tried to elucidate the differences in clinical as well as treatment modalities and outcomes of these two entities. We used the PubMed Database to search for all relevant articles using the keywords "pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation" and "Papillary tumor of the pineal region." Articles having details regarding demographic and clinical variables along with treatment and outcomes were chosen for this study. Full text of these articles was analyzed, and data tabulated. A total of 25 articles for PPTID and 45 for PTPR were found suitable for inclusion in this study. The studies were either case reports or small retrospective series with only one systemic review for each pathology. Despite the poor quality of data, some trends were apparent. Surgical resection offered a survival benefit in both pathologies. Radiotherapy was effective in increasing the survival in PPTID, while there was little to no effect in PPTR. Chemotherapy was not found to be beneficial in either. Both of these tumors have moderate growth rate and potential for malignant behavior. This continuum of characteristics makes their optimal treatment strategy difficult and confusing. The discussion on comprehensive literature review should give information for neurosurgeons to decide on optimal treatment strategies.

271 - Successful Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in an Adult Metastatic Pineal Parenchymal Tumor of Intermediate Differentiation (PPTID)

271 - Successful Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in an Adult Metastatic Pineal Parenchymal Tumor of Intermediate Differentiation (PPTID)

RARE-53. PINEAL PARENCHYMAL TUMOR OF INTERMEDIATE DIFFERENTIATION (PPTID) AND DICER1 SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT

BACKGROUNDDICER1 syndrome is a rare inherited tumor predisposition syndrome linked to an increased risk of several malignancies. Affected individuals most commonly develop pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) and ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors. Brain tumors in these patients are rare, however; the increased frequency of pineoblastoma in this population has been established. Traditionally, pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs) have not been associated with DICER1 syndrome, with research suggesting alternative mutations driving tumorigenesis. These tumors are pathologically and clinically diverse, with long-term surveillance based on therapeutic interventions. Here we describe a case of a germline DICER1 mutation in a patient with a PPTID, suggesting that this mutation is not limited to pineoblastoma as previously reported. CASE: We describe a 19 year-old female with a WHO grade III PPTID treated with multimodal therapy including surgery, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and chemotherapy. She was noted to have a thyroid mass at diagnosis and was subsequently diagnosed with a benign thyroid nodule, followed most recently by a cataract with pathology concerning for medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body. Due to the known association between medulloepithelioma and DICER1 syndrome, targeted germline sequencing was obtained and confirmed a pathogenic heterozygous mutation.CONCLUSIONTo our knowledge this is the first report of a PPTID in a patient with DICER1 syndrome. This association highlights the clinical implications of molecular evaluation in pediatric brain tumors, for both immediate therapeutic decisions and long-term surveillance.

Erratum: Pineal Parenchymal Tumor with Intermediate Differentiation—A Case Report and Review of Literature from Rural India

Pineal gland tumors are rare tumors. According to World Health Organization (WHO) classification (2016) of the central nervous system, pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) occupied their position between pineocytoma and pineoblastoma. It is either grade II or III. There are small numbers of reported cases, so its classification is still a matter of controversy. Here, we report a case of a 35-year-old man who presented with complaints of headache, nausea, vomiting, and focal weakness for 1 year. Computed tomography revealed an enhancing mass lesion in the region of pineal gland along with hydrocephalus. Following operation, histopathology of excised specimen was done, and it showed cellular tumor. Cells were having larger nuclei, vesicular chromatin pattern, ample cytoplasm, focal neuropil-like stroma along with moderate atypia, 3 to 5 mitotic figures per 10 hpf (high-power field), marked vascular proliferation, and pseudo rosette. Immunohistochemistry was found strongly positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), variable for synaptophysin, and negative for neurofilament and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). These findings confirmed the diagnosis. As this tumor is rare with uncertain behavior following available treatment, the case report of PPTID grade III large cell type may enrich the existing data and is being presented because of its rarity.

Pineal Parenchymal Tumor with Intermediate Differentiation—A Case Report and Review of Literature from Rural India

AbstractPineal gland tumors are rare tumors. According to World Health Organization (WHO) classification (2016) of the central nervous system, pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) occupied their position between pineocytoma and pineoblastoma. It is either grade II or III. There are small numbers of reported cases, so its classification is still a matter of controversy. Here, we report a case of a 35-year-old man who presented with complaints of headache, nausea, vomiting, and focal weakness for 1 year. Computed tomography revealed an enhancing mass lesion in the region of pineal gland along with hydrocephalus. Following operation, histopathology of excised specimen was done, and it showed cellular tumor. Cells were having larger nuclei, vesicular chromatin pattern, ample cytoplasm, focal neuropil-like stroma along with moderate atypia, 3 to 5 mitotic figures per 10 hpf (high-power field), marked vascular proliferation, and pseudo rosette. Immunohistochemistry was found strongly positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), variable for synaptophysin, and negative for neurofilament and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). These findings confirmed the diagnosis. As this tumor is rare with uncertain behavior following available treatment, the case report of PPTID grade III large cell type may enrich the existing data and is being presented because of its rarity.