Fixation Of Pilon Fractures Research Articles

Risk Factors for Postoperative Infection in Patients After Pilon Fracture Fixation.

The combination of high energy fractures, extensive soft tissue trauma, and high infection rates in pilon fractures of the distal tibia have long challenged surgeons. Despite the ample evidence, there is no consensus regarding the factors that may influence postoperative infections following surgical management of these fractures. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for postoperative infections in patients undergoing surgical management for pilon fractures. This retrospective cohort study evaluated demographic variables, smoking status, nutritional status (i.e., pre-and postoperative albumin, pre-and postoperative white blood cell count, use of antibiotics, time to external fixation and ORIF, and hospital length of stay. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to predict risk factors associated with postoperative infection after fixation of a pilon fracture for several independent parameters. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, and a threshold was found for the investigated continuous variables, which were significant in the regression analysis. Overall, 416 patients following surgical management for a pilon fracture were identified. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative albumin, preoperative WBC, and hospital length of stay were associated with postoperative infection following surgical management of pilon fractures. Thresholds determined by the Youden index were 3.05 for preoperative albumin levels, 12.65 for preoperative WBC levels, and 7.1 days for hospital length of stay. Furthermore, older patients were less prone to develop postoperative infection than younger patients. Lower preoperative albumin levels (< 3.05 mg/dL), higher preoperative WBC levels (>12.65 mg/dL), and a longer duration of hospitalization (>7.1 days) were related to an increased risk for postoperative infection after fixation of a pilon fracture.

The Impact of Fibular Fixation Method on Pilon Fracture Healing.

Background: Pilon fractures are associated with high-energy injuries, and there is presently much debate as to optimal fixation strategies and timing of intervention. There is little evidence comparing the type of fibular fixation during pilon fracture fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare fibular fixation methods in complex pilon injuries as it relates to pilon union rates and development of post-traumatic arthritis. Methods: This was a retrospective review from an urban Level 1 trauma center from January 2009 to May 2019, including patients age ≥ 18 who sustained a pilon fracture with an associated fibula fracture. Patients were allocated into one of three groups based on fibular fracture treated with plating, intramedullary device, or no fixation. Radiographic analysis was performed postoperatively and at final follow up to evaluate for tibial or fibular nonunion, malunion, talocrural angle, and ankle Kellgren-Lawrence grade. Results: Of the 107 patients in this study, 42 underwent surgical fixation of their fibular fracture. There were no differences with respect to tibial or fibular union rates amongst the three groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in the presence of radiographic ankle arthritis at final follow up. However, Kellgren-Lawrence arthritis grading did appear to be a more severe grade in patients who did not undergo fibular fixation (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Fibular intramedullary fixation does not appear to influence tibial or fibular nonunion rates as compared to plating in complex pilon injuries.

Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study results

Background. Minimally invasive surgical techniques can reduce the degree of surgical injury during osteosynthesis in peri- and intraarticular pilon fractures. However, these techniques do not always achieve anatomical reduction of the articular component and stable fixation of all columns of the distal tibia. Aim of the study — to test the hypothesis regarding the clinical advantages of multicolumn fixation for comminuted pilon fractures over traditional single-column fixation. Methods. The study enrolled 55 patients with extra- and intraarticular fractures of the distal tibia and fibula, all of whom underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of fixed columns. These groups were comparable in terms of gender and age. The first group consisted of 28 patients who underwent osteosynthesis with one anatomically precontoured plate. The second group consisted of 27 patients who underwent osteosynthesis with two or more plates placed on different tibial columns. The quality of bone fragment reduction was analyzed using control X-rays performed the day after the operation. Functional outcomes were evaluated according to the AOFAS scale at 6 and 12 months post-operation. The incidence of early and delayed complications of osteosynthesis was also determined. Results. No statistically significant difference was found between the two study groups in terms of quality of reduction (p = 0.23). The median functional outcome score in the first group at 6 months was 63 points [IQR 50.00-73.00] and at 12 months was 74 points [IQR 65.00-83.25]. In the second group, the median scores were 75 points [IQR 67.50-81.00] and 85 points [IQR 71.00-94.50], respectively. Multicolumn fixation of the pilon fracture resulted in statistically significantly higher functional outcome scores at both follow-up periods: at 6 months (p = 0.015) and at 12 months (p = 0.028). The probability of complications in the first group was 4.4 times higher than in the second group: OR = 4.444 (95% CI 1.066-18.528). Conclusion. Multicolumn fixation of complete periarticular and intraarticular pilon fractures leads to better functional results compared to single-column fixation. It also reduces the risk of complications due to increased stability of the fragment fixation and the resistance of the implant-bone system to physiological stress.

Fibula fixation is not associated with a higher rate of wound complications during pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation

IntroductionThere is a lack of consensus regarding indications for fibula fixation in pilon fractures. Reduction of the fibula fracture can assist with restoring lateral column length and reduction of the tibial plafond during pilon ORIF. However, there are theoretical concerns with wound complications and soft tissue insult. The purpose of this study is to compare short-term outcome measures after tibial plafond ORIF with and without supplemental fibula fixation using a validated national database. Materials and methodsThe American College of Surgeons' NSQIP database was utilized to identify all patients undergoing tibial plafond ORIF with and without fibula fixation between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 27827 and 27828, respectively. Open fractures and cases with concurrent open procedures were excluded from analysis. Demographic data, medical comorbidities, surgical variables, and various 30-day outcome measures were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent variables associated with various outcome measure of interest. ResultsA total of 3120 patients were included in the final cohort: 1530 patients underwent tibia fixation alone and 1590 patients underwent both tibia and fibula fixation. The supplemental fibula fixation group had a higher rate of reoperation (2.3 % vs. 1.1 %, p = 0.013) and non-home discharge (14.8 % vs. 11.2 %, p = 0.003). The rate of surgical site infection was comparable between groups. Supplemental fibula fixation was independently associated with unplanned reoperation (RR: 1.939 [1.081–3.477], p = 0.026). ConclusionsPatients undergoing supplemental fibula fixation during tibial plafond ORIF had a higher rate of 30-day reoperation and non-home discharge. Supplemental fibula fixation during pilon fracture ORIF was independently associated with a higher rate of 30-day reoperation. There was no difference in the rates of surgical site infection or wound dehiscence between the two groups. Level of evidence3.

Development of a Surgical Difficulty Score for Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Pilon Fractures.

To identify characteristics that contribute to surgical complexity in pilon fractures and to develop a machine learning (ML) Pilon Surgical Difficulty Score (PSDS) based on these factors. Retrospective cohort study. Academic Level I trauma center. Pilon fractures (OTA/AO Type 43) in adult patients treated with open reduction internal fixation. Various patient, injury, and radiological characteristics were assessed. Surgical difficulty was measured using 2 outcomes: (1) operative time and (2) perceived difficulty. Perceived difficulty was determined using the opinion of 16 fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists on a 10-point scale. Significant predictors of difficulty were determined using univariate analyses. ML models were used to develop a PSDS for both operative time and surgical difficulty. One hundred operatively fixed pilon fractures were included. Predictors of operative time were age, OTA/AO classification, articular comminution, articular impaction, bone loss, delay to surgery, poor quality reduction, number of approaches, and number of articular fragments. Predictors of perceived difficulty included OTA/AO classification and delay to surgery. Operative time PSDS had a mean absolute error of 64 minutes and a 60-minute buffer accuracy of 59%. Perceived difficulty PSDS had a mean absolute error of 1.7 points and a 2-point buffer accuracy of 63%. ML was used to generate accurate PSDSs for operative time and difficulty for pilon fractures. Future work should aim to clinically validate these PSDSs, so they may improve patient outcomes. Level III Diagnostic.

Direct Anterior Approach for AO43B/43C Pilon Fracture Fixation Demonstrates No Difference in Rate of Reoperation Compared to Other Surgical Approaches

Category: Trauma; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The direct anterior (DA) approach is commonly used for reconstructive procedures to treat posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis (PTOA), however, literature investigating utilization of the DA approach (defined as the interval between the tibialis anterior tendon and extensor hallucis longus tendon) for initial fixation of pilon fractures is lacking. This retrospective study of patients undergoing fixation of pilon fractures hypothesizes that there is no difference in reoperation rate for patients whose pilon fractures were treated with DA approach. Methods: A retrospective radiographic and chart review of patients undergoing surgical fixation of tibial plafond fractures over a nine year period (2013-2022) at an urban, level 1 trauma center was undertaken. Review of operative notes for reoperation for infection, PTOA, nonunion and symptomatic hardware was utilized to determine reoperation rates. Injuries were radiographically stratified by AO/OTA classification, and quality of fracture reduction was assessed via measurement of the lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) and lateral talar station (LTS) at the first postoperative radiograph. Likelihood of reoperation within one year of index surgery was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimations. Reoperation risk factors were determined with multivariable logistic regression analyses created using a backwards stepwise process. Results: 135 fractures in 130 patients met inclusion criteria; 44 fractures were treated via a DA approach, 91 treated via all other approaches, many in combination. Between groups, AO/OTA classification, demographics, injury characteristics and operative time were no different. Overall reoperation rate was 40.7%. There was no significant difference between DA and all other approaches in rate of reoperation for infection (2.3% vs. 10%, p=0.21), nonunion (15.9% vs. 16.5%, p=1), PTOA (9.1% vs. 7.8%, p=1) and removal of symptomatic hardware (25% vs. 36.3%, P=0.27). Multivariable regression showed DA approach was associated with lower risk of reoperation within one year (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.71, P=0.02). The DA group lateral talar station (LTS) was significantly greater (more anterior) by 0.9mm (2.75mm DA vs. 1.85mm all others, P=0.01). Conclusion: Utilization of the direct anterior approach to the ankle for initial fixation of pilon fractures has no difference in overall reoperation rates and a lower likelihood of reoperation within one year compared to all other combinations of approaches to the tibial plafond. Radiographic outcomes were different between groups, but the clinical significance of this is unclear. The DA approach should be considered for fracture patterns amenable to its use and may offer benefit should reconstructive procedures become necessary.

Our experience in 3D-modelling in pilon (distal tibial plafond) fractures

BACKGROUND: Internal fixation of pilon fractures remains challenging despite the development of new technologies in medical imaging and implant design and various scientific investigations on this problem. A key point in therapeutic strategy is preoperative planning. Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, the procedure has changed dramatically from plain radiograph drawing to 3D models and internal fixation simulation in vitro. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate 3D modeling in pilon fracture osteosynthesis preoperative planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used open, prospective, randomized, and comparative analysis. We analyzed the data of 60 patients with pilon fractures who had undergone surgical treatment for pilon fractures between July 1, 2020, and December 12, 2021, in Moscow City Hospital No. 17. In 30 patients, 3D models were used in preoperative planning, and in another 30 patients, the traditional planning method was performed. The operation time, intraoperation, X-ray dosage, blood loss, fracture reduction quality, and long-term results were analyzed. Additionally, the surgeon’s comfort in applying the 3D model and ease of doctor–patient communication were assessed using questionnaires. RESULTS: Results showed that 3D modeling in pilon fracture osteosynthesis preoperative planning has advantages over traditional preoperative planning. CONCLUSION: Therefore, 3D planning is a promising novel method for distal tibial fracture internal fixation preoperative planning, which provides significant higher degree of fracture anatomy comprehension and facilitates reduction maneuvers and implant positioning.

Do Patients who Undergo Fixation for Pilon Fracture Develop Symptoms Comparable to Primary Ankle OA?

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Pilon fractures are challenging to manage and have poor functional outcomes and high complication rates. A significant proportion of these patients go on to develop post-traumatic ankle arthritis. Our aim was to assess the long term patient reported outcomes following pilon fracture fixation and how this compares to patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis requiring surgical intervention in the form of total ankle arthroplasty. Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent pilon fracture fixation between April 2012 and December 2015 (Group A). Group B consisted of patients with primary ankle osteoarthritis awaiting elective total ankle replacement between 2015 and 2017. Patients completed a Patient Reported Outcome Measures questionnaire (MOX-FQ, EQ-5D and FAOS scores) pre and post-operatively. The average follow up was 8 years. Results: There were 18 patients in Group A and 22 in Group B. Ankle arthritis patients reported significantly worse score for MOXFQ Pain (P vs. AA; 39.0 ±29.5 vs. 68.0 ±27.1; p=0.001), Difficulty with Walking/ Standing (38.3±26.0 vs. 56.4±26.5; p=0.037) and difficulty with social activities (24.0 ±25.6 vs. 49.4 ±31.3; p=0.007) and FAOS domains of symptoms (68.7 vs. 52.1; p=0.005), ability to do Activities of Daily Living (18.9 vs. 27.5; p= 0.003) and Quality of life (56.6 vs. 32.5; p=0.012). There was no difference between groups for EQ-5D general health scores (78.8 vs. 68.8; p=0.156). Ankle arthritis group patients reported worse scores for mobility, ability to self-care and performed activities of daily living (p=0.012) compared to the pilon fracture group. Conclusion: Our 8 year follow up demonstrate good long term outcomes for patients following pilon fracture fixation. Patients did not develop symptomatic arthritis comparable to end stage ankle arthritis requiring surgical intervention and we therefore recommend primary treatment with fixation, irrespective of fracture severity.

Reducing Complications in Pilon Fracture Surgery: Surgical Time Matters.

To correlate patient-specific and surgeon-specific factors with outcomes after operative management of distal intra-articular tibia fractures. Retrospective cohort study. 3 Level 1 tertiary academic trauma centers. The study included a consecutive series of 175 patients with OTA/AO 43-C pilon fractures. Primary outcomes included superficial and deep infection. Secondary outcomes included nonunion, loss of articular reduction, and implant removal. The following patient-specific factors correlated with poor surgical outcomes: increased age with superficial infection rate ( P < 0.05), smoking with rate of nonunion ( P < 0.05), and Charlson Comorbidity Index with loss of articular reduction ( P < 0.05). Each additional 10 minutes of operative time over 120 minutes was associated with increased odds of requiring I&D and any treatment for infection. The same linear effect was seen with the addition of each fibular plate. The number of approaches, type of approach, use of bone graft, and staging were not associated with infection outcomes. Each additional 10 minutes of operative time over 120 minutes was associated with an increased rate of implant removal, as did fibular plating. While many of the patient-specific factors that negatively affect surgical outcomes for pilon fractures may not be modifiable, surgeon-specific factors need to be carefully examined because these may be addressed. Pilon fracture fixation has evolved to increasingly use fragment-specific approaches applied with a staged approach. Although the number and type of approaches did not affect outcomes, longer operative time was associated with increased odds of infection, while additional fibular plate fixation was associated with higher odds of both infection and implant removal. Potential benefits of additional fixation should be weighed against operative time and associated risk of complications. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The effect of spanning external fixation on entrapped structures in tibial pilon fractures.

Pilon fractures are often complex injuries involving severe soft tissue injury. Studies have shown pilon fractures may entrap soft tissue structures between fracture fragments. Staged fixation of pilon fractures with spanning external fixation (SEF) is important for soft tissue rest and plays an important role in the management of these injuries. While SEF has been shown to promote soft tissue rest prior to definitive fixation, no studies have shown the effect SEF has on entrapped structures (ES). The purpose of this study was to evaluate how SEF effects ES in pilon fractures. A retrospective review of 212 pilon fractures treated at our institution between 2010 and 2022 was performed. Patients with a CT scan pre-SEF and post-SEF met inclusion criteria. CTs were reviewed to characterize ES in pre- and post-SEF imaging. Of the 19 patients with ES identified on CT pre-SEF, seven (36.8%) had full release of ES post-SEF and 12 (63.2%) had no release of ES. The posterior tibial tendon was the most commonly ES and remained entrapped in 62.5% of cases. Only 25% of 43-C3 fractures had release of ES post-SEF, while 100% of 43-C1 and 43-C2 fractures demonstrated complete release of ES post-SEF. Entrapped structures in pilon fractures are likely to remain entrapped post-SEF, with only one-third of our cohort demonstrating release. In 43-C3 patterns, if ES are identified on CT pre-SEF, surgeons should consider addressing these either through mini open versus open approaches at the time of SEF as they are likely to remain entrapped post-SEF.

Metabolic Syndrome Increases Risk of Readmission and Complications in Operative Fixation of Pilon Fractures.

Background Studies demonstrate that metabolic syndrome (MetS) negatively impacts surgical outcomes. This study sought to identify how metabolic syndrome affects outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of traumatic pilon fractures. Methods Patients who underwent ORIF for pilon fractures from 2012 to 2019 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients with MetS were compared to non-MetS patients for rates of adverse events, prolonged stay, readmission, discharge location, and operative time in the 30-day postoperative period. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Paired student t-tests were used to assess continuous variables. Pearson's Chi-square and odds ratios were used for categorical variables. Results A total of 1,915 patients met this study's inclusion criteria, and 127 MetS patients were identified in the cohort. The MetS cohort was older (62.7 vs49.5 years old, p-value <0.01), with a greater proportion of female patients (59.1% vs 50.2%, p=0.054). MetS patients experienced significantly higher rates of infectious complications (7.9% vs 3.9% OR 2.75 (CI 1.36-5.53), p=0.008), major adverse events (11% vs 4.3%, OR 2.79 (CI 1.53-5.09) p=0.002), and readmissions. MetS patients also had longer lengths of stay (7 days vs 3.8 days, p-value<0.001), and were more likely to be discharged to a non-home location (51.2% vs 19.5%, p-value<0.01, OR 4.32 (CI=3.0-6.24) p<0.001). Conclusion Patients with MetS have an increased risk of 30-day major complications, infection, readmissions, discharge to a non-home location, and prolonged operative time, and therefore warrant additional consideration for perioperative monitoring.

Safety of Prepping the External Fixator In Situ During Staged Internal Fixation of Pilon Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

(1) To assess the rate of fracture-related infection (FRI) and unplanned reoperation of disinfecting and prepping in the external fixator (Ex-Fix) instrument during definitive open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of pilon fractures treated by a staged protocol and (2) to determine whether the amount of time from external fixation to ORIF influences the risk of FRI. Retrospective cohort study. Level 1 academic trauma center. One hundred thirty-three patients who underwent operative treatment for pilon fracture between 2010 and 2020. External fixation and ORIF with or without the Ex-Fix prepped in situ during definitive fixation. FRI and unplanned reoperation rates. 133 patients were enrolled, of which 47 (35.3%) had Ex-Fix elements prepped in situ. There was an overall infection rate of 23.3% and unplanned reoperation rate of 11.3%, and there was no significant difference in rates between the 2 cohorts. Patients with Ex-Fix elements prepped in situ who developed an FRI had a higher rate of MRSA and MSSA . Diabetes ( P = 0.0019), open fracture ( P = 0.0014), and longer (≥30 days) interval to ORIF ( P = 0.0001) were associated with postoperative FRI. Prepping elements of the Ex-Fix in situ did not lead to an increase in rates of FRI or unplanned reoperation. Although diabetes and open fracture were associated with FRI risk, a stronger association was a longer interval of Ex-Fix utilization before definitive internal fixation, specifically 30 days or greater. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Can Laser-Assisted Indocyanine Green Angiography Be Used to Quantify Perfusion Changes During Staged Fixation of Pilon Fractures? A Pilot Study.

To quantify soft tissue perfusion changes in pilon fractures during staged treatment using laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography (LA-ICGA). Level 1 trauma center. Prospective cohort study. Twelve patients with 12 pilon fractures participated in the study. Seven patients had OTA/AO classification of 43-C3, 3 had 43-C2, and 2 had 43-B2. LA-ICGA was performed with the SPY fluorescence imaging platform. Analysis via ImageJ was used to generate a fractional area of perfusion (FAP) based on fluorescent intensity to objectively quantify soft tissue perfusion. Anterior, medial, and lateral measurements were performed at the time of initial external fixation (EF) application and then at the time of definitive fixation. FAP within the region of interest was on average 64% medially, 61% laterally, and 62% anteriorly immediately before EF placement. Immediately before definitive open reduction internal fixation, fractional region of interest perfusion was on average 86% medially, 87% laterally, and 86% anteriorly. FAP increased on average 24% medially ( P = 0.0004), 26% laterally ( P = 0.001), and 19% anteriorly ( P = 0.002) from the time of initial EF to the time of definitive open reduction and internal fixation. Quantitative improvement in soft tissue perfusion was identified through the course of staged surgical management in pilon fractures. LA-ICGA potentially may be used to determine appropriate timing for definitive surgical intervention based on the readiness of the soft tissue envelope. Ultimately, these findings may influence clinical outcomes with respect to choice of surgical approach, soft tissue management, surgical timing, and wound healing. Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What are the Major Risk Factors for Nonunion in Pilon Fractures?

Category: Trauma; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Pilon fractures are difficult injuries to manage as they are typically associated with extensive soft tissue damage. Although staged management of external fixation followed by open reduction and internal fixation is often used to prevent additional soft tissue damage and its associated complications, rates of nonunion remain high in this patient population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and identify factors associated with increased rates of nonunion following operative fixation of pilon fractures. Methods: A retrospective review of all operatively managed pilon fractures at a single level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Minimum six-month follow-up was required for inclusion. Patients with skeletal immaturity or amputation prior to definitive fixation were excluded. Patients were grouped based on presence or absence of nonunion, which was defined as lack of bridging bone in at least 3 of 4 cortices and the presence of pain with ambulation at six-month follow-up. Demographics, injury and operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Among the 279 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 48 developed nonunion at 6-month follow-up (17.2%). Average follow-up was 3.2 years. Patients with nonunion had significantly higher rates of open fractures (50.0% vs. 22.1%, p&lt;0.001) and more required skin grafts (14.6% vs. 5.6%, p=0.029), muscle flap coverage (12.5% vs. 2.6%, p=0.002), and bone grafting (25.0% vs. 3.9%, p&lt;0.001) compared to controls. Those who developed nonunion had significantly lower rates of medial column fixation (43.8% vs. 67.5%, p=0.002) and higher rates of surgical site infection (45.8% vs. 7.8%, p&lt;0.001). Rates of AO/OTA 43C fractures (70.8% vs. 52.4%) and fractures treated with plates overlapping the site of external fixation (39.5% vs. 26.6%) were higher in the nonunion group, but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.064 and p=0.098). There were no significant differences in demographics, mechanism of injury, Gustilo-Anderson classification, associated ipsilateral lower extremity injuries, surgical approach, or type of fixation between the two groups. Conclusion: In the present study, pilon fractures were found to have a nonunion rate of 17.2% at six-month follow-up. Nonunion was associated with the presence of open fracture, need for soft tissue coverage or bone grafting, and surgical site infection. Medial column fixation was associated with a lower rate of nonunion in these fractures.

Outcomes of tibial pilon fracture fixation based on four-column theory

ObjectivesTo assess the medium-term functional and radiological outcomes, as well as injury mechanisms, fracture patterns and demographics of typical pilon fractures and pilon variant fractures treated based on the four-column theory in adults. MethodsA retrospective comparative study was performed. Demographics of typical pilon and pilon variant fractures, injury mechanisms, OTA/AO classification, Rüedi-Allgöwer and the four-column classification were analyzed for the cohort. Radiographic ankle arthrosis (modified Kellgren-Lawrence 3/4), Burwell Charnley Score, and AOFAS score were also analyzed. ResultsThere were 142 pilon fractures met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study, of which 77(54.23%) were females and 65 (45.77%) were males, with an average of 48 (range, 18-86)years. One hundred twenty-five posterior columns fractured in 142 pilon fractures, and the posterior columns were most prone to fractures. Ninety cases of posterior pilon fractures in 142 pilon fractures were single posterior column fractures with or without medial or lateral malleolar fractures. The average age (51, range, 18-86 years) of low-energy pilon fractures was older than the average age (42, range, 19-66 years) of high-energy pilon fractures significantly. The average time (5, range, 0-17 days) from injury to definitive internal fixation of the low-energy group was shorter than the average time (9, range, 0-21 days) from injury to definitive internal fixation of the high-energy group significantly. The average of AOFAS (87, range, 56-100) of the low-energy group is higher than the average of AOFAS (82, range, 47-100) of the high-energy group significantly. There were more male patients and more die-punch or intercalary fractures in high energy groups significantly. There were more medial and lateral malleolar fractures in low-energy groups. Compared with the non-multiple column group, the multiple-column group had more Rüedi-Allgöwer type III cases, more modified Kellgren-Lawrence 3/4 cases and lower AOFAS score significantly. However, the numbers of Burwell Charnley Score type 1 and 2 cases were not significantly different between the two groups. ConclusionsKinds of pilon variants should be recognized. Outcomes of high-energy pilon fractures were worse than low-energy pilon fractures. The four-column theory can be applied to typical pilon fracture and pilon variants in adults.

Long-Term Trajectory of Recovery Following Pilon Fracture Fixation.

To describe the trajectory of recovery following fixation of pilon fractures from baseline to 5-year follow-up. Prospective cohort study. Level-1 trauma center. Patients with pilon fractures (OTA/AO 43.C) treated with open reduction and internal fixation. None. Patient-reported outcome measures were measured at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years using the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score, Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. One hundred two patients were enrolled: mean age was 42.6 years; 69% were males; 88% had an injury severity score of 9; 74 patients (73%) completed 1-year follow-up; 40 patients (39%) completed 5-year follow-up. Trajectory of recovery of physical function showed a significant decline between baseline and 6 months, with significant improvement between 6 months and 1 year and then ongoing but slower improvement between 1 year and 5 years. Sixty-four patients returned to baseline SF-36 Physical Component Score at 5 years. Pain was a persistent issue and remained significantly worse at 5 years when compared with baseline. Psychological well-being (SF-36 Mental Component Score) did not significantly change from baseline at 5 years. Functional recovery following open reduction and internal fixation for pilon fractures was characterized by an initial decrease in function from baseline, followed by an increase between 6 months and 1 year, and then slower but continued increases from 1 year to 5 years. Function did not return to baseline levels, pain was a persistent issue, and mental well-being showed no change from baseline at 5 years. This information may be useful when counselling patients. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Should the location of distal tibial plating be influenced by the varus or valgus fracture pattern of tibial pilon fracture?

Operative treatment of tibial pilon fracture is challenging. There is a lack of consensus and only one clinical study on the optimal location of distal tibial plating for fixation of pilon fractures based on varus or valgus fracture patterns. We hypothesize that complications rates, specifically mechanical complications, are not influenced by the location of the tibial plating in the fixation of pilon fractures with respect to varus or valgus fracture patterns. Sixty-nine patients who had single plating for tibial pilon from 2007 to 2017 were recruited. They were divided into two groups, transverse fibular fracture (varus fracture pattern) and comminuted fibular fracture (valgus fracture pattern). Our primary outcome measure was any mechanical complications as a result of the location of plating (medial vs lateral) on varus or valgus fracture patterns. There were 38 (55.1%) patients with varus fracture pattern and 31 (44.9%) patients with valgus fracture pattern tibial pilon fractures. In the varus fracture pattern group, mechanical complications were not significantly different between the two plating locations (27.3 vs 33.3%, p > 0.05). Notably, there were more fibula fixations performed in patients with medial plating (74.1 vs 45.5%, p = 0.092) when compared those with lateral plating in the varus fracture pattern group. There were also no statistically significant differences found although 10 (40%) out of 25 patients had mechanical complications in the medial plating group compared to 1 (16.7%) out of 6 patients with lateral plating (p = 0.383) in the valgus fracture pattern group. There were no differences in mechanical complications for medial vs lateral plating in tibial pilon fracture based on varus or valgus deforming forces. As much as we should consider the fracture patterns and deforming forces when deciding on plating location, other factors such as careful soft tissue management and fragment-specific fixation should be prioritized.

Clinical Faceoff: The Complex Tibial Plafond Fracture: ORIF or Circular External Fixation?

Clinical Faceoff: The Complex Tibial Plafond Fracture: ORIF or Circular External Fixation?

Medial Column Support in Pilon Fractures Using Percutaneous Intramedullary Large Fragment Fixation.

Pilon fractures are complex injuries to the tibial plafond requiring stable fixation in the setting of effective soft tissue management, particularly in high-energy injuries, open fractures, or in geriatric individuals. Medial column support of the distal tibial metaphysis is often an essential component when applying balanced fixation. However, the biologic implications of multiple surgical approaches in the setting of damaged tissue, devitalized bone, or significant bone loss may contribute to increased complications. Percutaneous intramedullary large fragment screws offer both stability and a soft tissue-friendly approach for stabilizing the medial column. Here, we present our technique and indications for medial column support in pilon fractures using percutaneous large fragment fixation, along with our early clinical experience in a case series of 7 patients. At minimum 6-month follow-up, all patients healed their injuries with maintained alignment and without complications or further reoperation. Medial column support with percutaneous large fragment fixation in pilon fractures is a viable option to provide mechanical stability while effectively managing tenuous soft tissue envelopes.

A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults.

AimsA pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures.MethodsA randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods.DiscussionThe two treatments being compared are the most commonly used for this injury, however there is uncertainty over which is most clinically and cost-effective. The Articular Pilon Fracture (ACTIVE) Trial is a sufficiently powered and rigorously designed study to inform clinical decisions for the treatment of adults with this injury.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(3):150–163.