SUMMARYPhytophthora erythrosepticaandP. cryptogeahave been isolated on numerous occasions from diseased tulip plants on commercial nurseries, and the isolates, both in pure culture and in their effect on the host, have been compared with authentic cultures of these fungi. Both species have been proved to be, either separately or in conjunction, the cause of a serious root rot, shoot rot and shanking of forced tulips.Infection, which takes place from contaminated soil through the roots, begins as soon as the first roots are produced from the basal plate of the bulb. The parasite passes directly through the basal plate to the base of the flowering stem, leaving the old bulb scales practically un‐attacked. According to the time, or rapidity, of infection an affected bulb may produce no visible shoot, or it may give a shoot bearing a flower bud that remains blind because the flower stem is rotted at the base (shanking). Sometimes a bulb with some of its roots attacked may produce a marketable flower of poor quality.A very similar disease has been induced in outdoor tulips by contaminating the soil.The disease, which may result in the total loss of a forced crop, has not yet been reported outside Great Britain, where it seems to be widely distributed.There is no evidence that the disease is carried with the planted bulb in ordinary commercial practice, and the rate of spread in the glasshouse from one or more inoculated bulbs planted in the midst of healthy ones is comparatively slow.The susceptibility of varieties of tulips to the two species ofPhytophthorais briefly discussed.A contaminated water supply is a possibility, but appears to be relatively unimportant.Partial sterilization of the contaminated soil by steam, or formaldehyde, combined with hygiene, is an effective method of controlling the disease, but soil treatment with Cheshunt Compound is unsatisfactory.Certain strains ofPhytophthora cryptogeavar.Richardiaeand P.parasiticawere tested, but appear to be of little, or no, consequence as parasites of forced tulips.A large proportion of the success of the present investigations has been due to the stimulus, and ever‐ready helpfulness, of Dr Geo. H. Pethybridge and Mr W. C. Moore. The credit for identifying the fungi concerned lies almost entirely with Mr S. F. Ashby. The writer also wishes to express his thanks to his Laboratory Attendant, Mr A. Sherval, for taking the photographs.
Read full abstract