Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a frequent reason for emergency department visits and leads to increased direct medical costs, particularly due to hospitalisation. This study aims to examine the differences between emergency planned re-infusion therapy and hospitalisation in patients with CAP. This retrospective case-control study involved 1889 CAP patients treated at the Emergency Internal Medicine Department of Class A tertiary Hospital in China from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. Patients were divided into groups receiving either emergency planned re-infusion therapy or hospitalisation. Independent sample t tests and χ2 tests were used to compare the clinical outcomes and economic impacts between the two groups across different pneumonia severity index (PSI) classifications. The study enrolled 1889 CAP patients. For PSI I-II patients, the improvement rates were 99.51% in the emergency planned re-infusion therapy group and 99.69% in the hospitalisation group, showing no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Similarly, no significant difference was observed for PSI III patients (84.16 vs. 89.82%). However, significant differences emerged for PSI IV patients, with improvement rates of 50% in the emergency planned re-infusion therapy group and 90.59% in the hospitalisation group (P < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were also noted in treatment duration (5.13 ± 1.65 days vs. 7.60 ± 3.93 days, P < 0.001) and total treatment costs (1921.57 Chinese Yuan (CNY) ± 923.16 vs. 9083.80 CNY ± 3583.55, P < 0.001) between the two groups. Emergency planned re-infusion therapy for CAP is an effective and cost-efficient alternative that can reduce both treatment duration and costs, particularly for patients with PSI I-III. It is recommended that emergency physicians give priority to emergency re-infusion therapy for patients with PSI I-III. In addition, it is recommended that hospitals strengthen the classification and treatment training programmes for emergency department physicians to recognise the patients with PSI I-IV. The hospital's ethics committee (XMCGIRB2024034-01).
Read full abstract