Phraseological Units In English Research Articles

Semantic Features of Phraseological Units in English and Uzbek Languages

This article examines the semantic features of phraseological units in English and Uzbek languages, focusing on their classification and distinct characteristics. While phraseological semantics shares similarities with lexical semantics, it exhibits unique traits. The study addresses the knowledge gap in the classification of phraseological units by exploring their broader semantic structure, which transcends denotative and connotative meanings. The research employs a comparative linguistic methodology, analyzing the semantic components of phraseological units in both languages. Findings reveal that phraseological units in English and Uzbek have different types of semantic structures, yet share common elements. Sh. Rakhmatullayev's classification of Uzbek phraseological units into integrity, mixing, and introduction provides a foundational framework. The study identifies three main types of phraseological meanings: idiomatic, idiophraseomatic, and phraseomatic. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the complex nature of phraseological semantics. The implications of this research extend to language teaching and cross-cultural communication, providing a valuable reference for linguists, educators, and translators working with phraseological units in both languages. The study highlights the need for further exploration into the classification and interpretation of phraseological units, encouraging future research in this underexplored area.

TRANSLATION PROBLEMS OF GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES AND COMPONENTS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS

This article examines the problems of representation of geographical names and components of phraseological units in English, Russian and Uzbek languages, as well as their theoretical and practical significance. The penetration of geographical names and phraseological units from English literature into Uzbek literature is explained.

Syntactic features of verbal phraseological units in english and karakalpak languages

The article deals with the syntactic characteristics of verbal phraseological units in English and Karakalpak languages. Significant structural semantic peculiarities in the formation of phraseological units are analysed with examples taken from literary texts.

Functional classification of phraseological units in English and their correspondence in the Azerbaijani language

Functional classification of phraseological units in English and their correspondence in the Azerbaijani language

Phraseological units of English and Azerbaijan languages in the cognitive process

Phraseological units of English and Azerbaijan languages in the cognitive process

The Differences of Gender Indicative Phraseology and Proverbs of English and Uzbek Languages

This article analyzes the gender marked phraseological units in English and Uzbek languages. It also discusses the comparison of masculine and feminine stereotypes in the English and Uzbek phraseological world view, exposure and explanation of gender asymmetries and connotations, which will create ground for lexicographical description of gender marked phraseological units of the analyzed language and their adequate interpretation in the contexts of usage is.

Wine and translation: an analysis of phraseological units in English and Spanish wine technical sheets

ABSTRACT The language used to market and describe wine is characterised by the subjectivity and creativity of the terms used. This makes the encoding and decoding of oenology-related texts a demanding task. As genres in this field are persuasive in nature, the correct translation of wine-related terminology is crucial to sell the product. In wine-related genres, phraseological units have been understudied especially with regards to translation. The aim of this paper is to shed light on the use of phraseological units in one of the most representative genres in the field, i.e. wine technical sheets, with a view to assisting translators in the comprehension and management of oenology-related texts. A contrastive analysis was carried out using an English-Spanish comparable corpus in order to identify and classify phraseological units according to their function and semantic characteristics; further analysis of the distribution of these units allowed us to define the rhetorical structure of wine technical sheets. The study evidenced the high frequency and complexity of phraseological units in the genre.

A Corpus-Based Study of Body-Part Terms in Verbal Phraseological Units in English and Albanian

This paper focuses on the use of body-part terms in verbal phraseological units in English and Albanian. By using parallel texts from two different languages, we are going to recognize the structural, semantic, and stylistic properties of body-part terms as well as their cultural context. By comparing structures involving body terms in one language and their equivalents in another, we aim at showing the differences between these languages in the conceptual patterns and grammaticalization, which seem to be widely certified for this part of the lexicon. 18 items representing the terms for body parts (head, face, eye, brow, ear, nose, tongue, mouth, lip, neck, tooth, hand, leg, knee, heel, shoulder, finger, back) were checked in both English and Albanian and compared semantically based on a corpus of verbal phraseological units retrieved and later selected from 8 literary works in English and 12 in Albanian and 3 idiomatic dictionaries. In the course of our findings, we discovered important similarities and differences between the two languages in the use of body-part terms. In this study, both quantitative and qualitative criteria were taken into account and some cultural nuances were drawn from the interpretation of data.

Comparative Study of Somatic Phraseological Units in English and Azerbaijani Languages

Somatic phraseological units, also known as somatisms, consist of a simple word composition that has multiple meanings and form the most ancient lexical layer of the language. Researchers’ growing interest in somatic phraseology stems from the fact that, in terms of the plan of expression and the plan of content, we think that somatic phraseology has two opposite polarities. In other words, the components of the phraseological units as well as their combined whole are, in one way or another, aimed at describing and characterising humans and their activities.
 Somatic phraseologies play a special role in the expressiveness of the language and in its emotionality, with one of their main features being the fact that they are figurative, emotional, and expressive. In fact, somatic phraseologies are the most effective and figurative way to reflect concepts than any other phraseological combinations.
 The purpose of this article is to conduct a comparative analysis of phraseological combinations based on the materials of both English and Azerbaijani languages. The study included somatic phraseologies with mouth, foot, head and hand components in English and Azerbaijani, and analysed these from the point of view of semantic differences.

A comparative analysis of traditional and cultural phraseological units in english and uzbek languages

The article provides information on the specifics of phraseological units. A comparative analysis of traditional and cultural phraseological units in English and Uzbek is presented with a number of examples. Rich in theoretical data. There are a lot of superstitions and legends, e.g., a black sheep -a less successful or more immoral person in a family or in a group. People believed that a black sheep was marked by the devil. Each with the help of phraseologics of the people's lifestyle, customs manifest the spiritual physical states of nations.

Classification of phraseological associations in english and Uzbek

Each language's vocabulary is made up ofphrase ological units, which are speech-ready pieces of language that make up the vocabulary. In addition, they are present in phenomena like polysemia, homonymy, paronymy, antonymi'a, synonymy, and antonymi'a, taking into consideration their semantic properties, just like other linguistic units. The phrase ological unit itself and additional vocabulary meaning are both considered to be part of phrase ological polysemy. The classification of phrase ological units in English and Uzbek is discussed in this article.

Phraseological units in english and Uzbek children's literature

Phraseological units in english and Uzbek children's literature

СОПОСТАВИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ФЕ С НАЗВАНИЯМИ ДОМАШНИХ ЖИВОТНЫХ В АНГЛИЙСКОМ И РУССКОМ ЯЗЫКАХ

The article is devoted to phraseology, one of the most complex linguistic phenomena at the junction of various scienc-es – lexicology, grammar, stylistics, phonetics, language history, history, philosophy, logic and regional studies, which is investigated using a particular research method. The article aims at conducting a comparative analysis of idioms with the names of domestic animals in Russian and English. The methodological basis of the study is theoret-ical works related to classification and semantic analysis of phraseological units, which are not onlycollocations with complicated semantics, but also units of mental representation. It is emphasized that the phraseological units under consideration contain culturally significant information, which is expressed in both denotative and connotative aspects of meaning. A comparative analysis of phraseological units in English and Russian shows that English phraseological units, without an equivalent in Russian, are often translated in a descriptive way. The author explains this by the fact that phraseological units are verbalized in a certain logosphere of the language culture, connected, on the one hand, with linguistic consciousness and thinking, and on the other, with the linguistic picture of the world. The article points out that the concept “animal” has a universal meaning and national peculiarity, generalized in the national linguistic picture of the world. The attention is drawn to the fact that the English phraseological units with animal names do not coincide partially or completely with their Russian equivalents on the figurative basis due to national peculiarities. In conclusion, the number of English phraseological units denoting dogs with negative connotations is much greater than the number of phraseological units with positive emotional connotations.

Библеизмы vs библейские фразеологизмы: уточнение понятий (на примере английских и немецких текстов)

This article discusses the problem of delimiting the notions of biblical lexical item and biblical phraseological unit within the framework of studying the formation and development of biblical phraseology as a separate branch of general phraseology. The author believes that biblical phraseology should to be considered as an independent research area due to the progressive development of the study of phraseology in general, as well as the growing interest among scholars in phraseology of biblical origin and pertinent research materials that have accumulated over the past two decades. To begin with, the paper specifies the status of the biblical phraseological unit as a phraseological unit. Further, the definitions of the above-mentioned notions are analysed and a typology of biblical lexical items and phraseological units of biblical origin is developed based on a review of scholarly works dealing with various aspects of biblical lexical items and biblical phraseological units. Examples of the use of biblical lexical items and biblical phraseological units in English and German texts are provided as illustrations. The research methods applied here include analysis and synthesis, generalization and hypotheticoinductive method; comparative, contextual, and classification methods, as well as analysis of definitions, phraseological identification, and phraseological analysis. The author concludes that biblical lexical item is a broader notion, which includes biblical phraseological units. Biblical lexical items are numerous and diverse in terms of composition and can be presented in the form of multi-level linguistic units (from a word to a sentence), while biblical phraseological units are structured as fixed expressions, from a phrase to a sentence. Thus, a biblical phraseological unit is defined as a fixed reproducible linguistic unit in the form of a phrase or a sentence, having integrity of nomination and integrity of meaning that is etymologically related to the Bible. It is emphasized that the specificity of phraseological units of biblical origin is manifested at the formal, content and functional levels.

Comparative analysis of the usage of concept "hospitality" in the phraseological units of English, Russian and Uzbek languages on the basis of the English translation of the novel “Silence” by S.Ahmad

At present, in connection with globalization, the language is especially interested in cross-cultural understanding. Today, the interest in the study of original and translations of the text "Silence" in the world literary process is attracting the attention of orientalists and translators around the world. The scientific study of the content and phrase logical aspects of the novel "Silence" by world scholars, such as the creative personality, the writer's creative method, artistic skills, allows to identify and evaluate the features of the development of literature. According to structure of phrases, a phrase is a lexical unit that is equivalent to a sentence, semantically whole, has a generalized meaning, is not created in the speech process, but is ready to be introduced into the speech. According to the linguist Mamatov, phrases are a separate unit of language, which, according to their structure, is a free connection or equivalent to a sentence, fully or partially semantically reconstructed figurative, stable phrases. Phrases are specific figurative expressions of people's conclusions based on observation of life events, assessment of acceptable and unacceptable actions in society, generalization of life experiences. Writers are often not content to select and use phrases appropriate to the purpose of the image.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS VERBALIZING THE CONCEPT OF "LOVE" IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

This article is a comparative analysis of the phraseological units in English and Uzbek that verbalize the concept of "love", which explores the similarities and differences between the phraseological units in both languages, revealing the factors that require them.

STYLISTIC PECULIARITIES OF THE TRANSLATION OF SOMATIC PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS

This article covers the issue of clarifying the stylistic peculiarities of the translation of somatic phraseological units in English and Kyrgyz languages, as well as their functions, emotional shades, semantic and thematic content groups. Based on somatic groups, similarities and differences, it is possible to determine the relationship between languages, to investigate the process of formation of secondary meanings of somatisms that may reflect various aspects of human life. Wishing to emphasize that the identification of significant linguistic similarities and differences can be carried out under various conditions of generalization of the material, in particular, comparing the categories of phraseology and entire phraseological systems, along with the general features of comparative analysis, intra-linguistic descriptions, their comparability, identification of interlanguage differences based on identities, two-way direction. Their internal organization (aspect instructive-semantic correlation) so it is in their combined content and functioning (functional and semantic correlation).

The Translation Problems of Religious Onomastic Units in the Phraseological Layer of the Language

In this article the author has analyzed the religious onomastic components in the structure of phraseological units of English, Russian and Uzbek languages, and also, citing the views of scientists about translations preserving the national features of onomastic units into unrelated languages and expressed the attitude towards them. In addition, it is discussed the role of onomastic units in translation studies as well as, their functions in the structure of phraseological units.

Culturally relevant memory properties in English phraseology

The paper focuses on culturally relevant properties of personal memory and the potential of natural languages in codifying them. The study is based on one of the key postulates of anthropological linguistics stating that dynamic changes in human mentality, cultural developments and newly accumulated knowledge find their reflection in the lexical subsystem of the language. Relying on the concept of phraseology as a fragment of linguistic reality bearing an information-intensive map of the national world view and the type of linguistic identity, the paper examines phraseological units verbalizing fundamental memory processes of encoding, storing, remembering and forgetting and offers a linguacultural perspective on the specifics of representing individual memory processes in English phraseology. A combination of automatic processing methods applied to analyzing authentic lexicographic sources along with conventional data-collecting procedures yielded an empirical base of the research composed of phraseological units representing key stages of mnemonic processing. To analyze the obtained data, component, lexicographic, and content-analysis methods were employed. Findings allowed compiling an inventory of mnemonic phraseological units in English, developing their typology on the basis of structural, semantic and functional criteria, identifying the proportion of each structural, semantic and stylistic type in the data sample. A multi-parameter cognitive interpretation procedure yielded a stage-based typology of mnemonic phraseological units reflecting phases of mnemonic processing, its content and nature. The results suggest a possible correlation between cultural specifics of Anglo-Saxon world view and verbal representation of individual memory on the phraseological level.

Comparative And Linguocultural Analysis Of The Concept Gender In Uzbek And English Languages

The article under discussion reveals the issues of comparative and linguocultural analysis of the concept “gender” in Uzbek and English languages. The present study presents gender as a concept of linguistic culture and describes it as the basis that forms gender stereotypes on the material of phraseological units of English and Uzbek languages. The author of the article considers that gender is not a linguistic category, but its content can be revealed through the analysis of language structures, which explains the need for a linguistic study of the cultural representation of gender.