Photoprotective Behavior Research Articles

Fotoproteção e exercício físico

As medidas de fotoproteção são divulgadas como procedimentos essenciais na prevenção de doenças cutâneas e manutenção da saúde e beleza. Os exercícios físicos regulares também são indicados para alcançar o estilo de vida saudável; no entanto, a prática esportiva expõe a maior radiação solar. O objetivo deste artigo é revisar as medidas fotoprotetoras na prevenção dos danos causados pelo Sol na pele dos desportistas. Abordam-se o histórico da fotoproteção, o espectro eletromagnético, os efeitos das radiações e os riscos de exposição durante as atividades físicas. Implementar estratégias, como a escolha do horário, local, roupas e acessórios, complementados pelo uso de filtros solares, minimizam os riscos decorrentes das radiações ultravioletas A e B (UVA e UVB) durante a prática esportiva ao ar livre. Dentre os produtos disponíveis no mercado, devem-se preferir aqueles que ofereçam segurança, ampla proteção, boa cosmética, estabilidade química em diferentes condições de calor e umidade, fotoestabilidade e baixo custo. O atleta deve ser orientado pelos profissionais da área da saúde sobre os riscos inerentes às suas atividades cotidianas e esportivas. O autoexame de pele é parte essencial na prevenção dos problemas dermatológicos, pois auxilia na detecção precoce. O futuro da fotoproteção no esporte está no investimento em medidas educativas desde a infância, reduzindo assim os danos solares cumulativos. A exposição solar deve ocorrer de modo cauteloso e com o mínimo de sequelas, mediante comportamento de fotoproteção, para proporcionar melhor qualidade de vida.

Sunscreens and occupation: the Austrian experience

Since the nineteen fifties the attitude of the fair-skinned world population towards the sun has changed dramatically. Tanned skin, which before was regarded as the stigma of the underprivileged working classes, became fashionable and desirable. The science of photoprotection primarily focuses on ultraviolet exposure during leisure time activities, whereas ultraviolet radiation is still underestimated as a risk factor for UV-induced skin and eye problems. The actual discussion on the registration of UV-induced skin tumours as occupational diseases, however, has drawn more attention to this important issue. Ambient radiation, the working process itself and the photoprotective behaviour of an outdoor worker are the main factors which influence the actual UV exposure. However, the total risk for the development of actinic damage results from the interaction of both the occupational and the leisure time exposure. It is evident that there is a high need for photoprotective measures for outdoor workers. Topical sunscreens as a part of a comprehensive UV protection strategy for outdoor workers have to fulfil special requirements: reasonable price, high water resistance, non-sticky appearance. At present only a few products are available which meet these criteria. This is the reason why sunscreens are not so well accepted by outdoor workers. Great efforts have to be undertaken to improve sunscreen formulations and to convince people to apply them correctly and regularly.

Patterns of photoprotection following CDKN2A/p16 genetic test reporting and counseling

The impact of melanoma genetic testing and counseling on photoprotective behaviors is unknown. To determine if genetic testing and counseling alter compliance with photoprotection recommendations. Reported use of sunscreen, protective clothing, and sun avoidance by 59 members of CDKN2A/p16-mutation positive pedigrees was assessed as a function of mutation status and melanoma history, before, immediately after, and 1 month following test reporting. Intentions to practice all photoprotective behaviors increased in all participant groups (P < .0001). At 1 month, 33% of participants reported the adoption of a new photoprotective behavior. Subpopulation analyses identified different patterns of change in photoprotection relative to baseline (P < .005), with no net decline in any group. This initial study of CDKN2A/p16 families is small and awaits replication in a larger sample. Melanoma genetic testing and counseling enhanced intentions to implement photoprotective strategies and did not result in reduced compliance in the CDKN2A/p16-subpopulation.

Update on photoprotection

Photoprotection is an effective method for preventing damaging effects from ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Photoprotection is accomplished through the use of sunscreens, protective clothing, and safe sun practices. Sunscreens are composed of various UV filters, including inorganic/physical blockers and organic/chemical sunscreen agents. New technologies are emerging in sunscreen development and may soon be available to U.S. consumers. General guidelines for sunscreen use should be reinforced to improve patient compliance and sunscreen efficacy. Habitual use of sunscreen is recommended with UV exposure, and concerns for vitamin D deficiency with sunscreen use should not supersede proper photoprotective behavior.

Photoprotection and xanthophyll‐cycle activity in three marine diatoms1

Light is one of the most important factors affecting marine phytoplankton growth, and its variability in time and space strongly influences algal performance and success. The hypothesis tested in this work is that the activity of the xanthophyll cycle and the development of nonphotochemical quenching could be considered a functional trait of algal diversity. If this hypothesis is true, a relationship must exist between fast‐activated pigment variations linked to photoprotective behavior and the ecology of the species. This assumption was tested on three diatoms: Skeletonema marinoi Sarno et Zingone, Thalassiosira rotula Meunier, and Chaetoceros socialis Lauder. These three diatoms occupy different ecological niches. Strains of these diatoms were subjected to five changes in irradiance. Xanthophyll‐cycle activity, quantum yield of fluorescence, and electron transport rate were the main parameters determined. There were marked interspecific differences in xanthophyll‐cycle activity, and these differences were dependent on the light history of the cells. Chaetoceros socialis responded efficiently to changing irradiance, which might relate to its dominance during the spring bloom in some coastal areas. In contrast, T. rotula responded with a slower photoprotection activation, which seems to reflect its more offshore ecological distribution. The photoresponse of S. marinoi (a late‐winter coastal species blooming in the Adriatic Sea) was light‐history dependent, becoming photoinhibited under high light when acclimated to low light, but capable of reaching a high photoprotection level when acclimated to moderate light. Our hypothesis on the photoprotection capacity as a functional trait in microalgae seems to be validated given the results of this study.

Ultraviolet absorbers for retarding wool photo-degradation: Sulphonated long-chain substituted 2-hydroxybenzophenones

A series of sulphonated 2-hydroxybenzophenones containing 4-alkyloxy substituents of varying chain length has been synthesised and applied to wool fabrics. The higher members of the series, especially those with n-hexadecyloxy or n-octadecyloxy substituents, protect wool from photo-yellowing and photo-tendering more effectively than do the lower members. The higher members have the additional advantages that they are absorbed almost quantitatively during application and are not removed during laundering. The greater level of photo-protection provided by the higher members is unlikely to be due to their preferential location near the fibre surface, because redistribution of the absorber uniformly throughout the fibre does not reduce the level of protection. Other reasons for the observed differences in photo-protective behaviour are discussed.

Letter: Streptokinase therapy and cavernous sinus thrombosis.

Background A high level of photoprotection is required by people with xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), a rare skin disease, to reduce skin cancer and other risks. However poor photoprotection is thought to be widespread. Purpose This study examines the influences on photoprotection behaviours in adults with XP. Design Inductive qualitative study with semistructured interviews. Analysis employed a framework approach. Setting National sample recruited through a specialist XP centre in London. Methods Semistructured interviews at patients’ homes. All transcripts were coded and themes charted for each participant. Comparisons within and across cases identified common themes and differing motivations and approaches to photoprotection. Credibility of interpretations assessed through patient/carer input and clinic adherence scores. Participants 25 adults (17 male, eight female) aged 16–63 years with diagnosed XP attending a specialist centre. 18 lived outside London. Results Awareness of risks of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and photoprotection was high. However, photoprotection behaviours varied according to perceived necessity and concerns. Three behavioural responses were identified: (1) ‘dominated’ by planning and routines to achieve a high level of photoprotection with significant activity restrictions and psychosocial impacts. (2) ‘resistant’ to photoprotection with priority given to avoiding an illness identity and enjoying a normal life. (3) Photoprotection’ integrated’ with an individual’s life with little psychosocial impact. These responses were influenced by illness, personal and contextual factors including age, life stage and social support. Only the ‘integrated’ group achieved an equilibrium between perceived ‘necessity’ and ‘concerns’. Conclusions The personal balance between perceived risks of UVR and social/psychological ‘concerns’ led to differing behavioural responses and contributes to an understanding of adaptation and normalisation in chronic illness. The study will also inform a series of individualised behavioural interventions to reduce measured UVR exposure among people with XP that are potentially applicable to other conditions with high risks of skin cancer.