Owing to a shared common technological basis, monovalent K-ion battery (KIB) systems follow in the footsteps of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) with the aim to develop a broader portfolio of available battery technologies and to put them on a more sustainable material basis. For example, both cations intercalate into a graphite host structure, which can be used in combination with carbonate-based electrolytes as negative electrode. Especially in half cells, the degradation of graphite electrodes in KIBs is significantly accelerated in comparison to LIBs. Previous surface studies demonstrated that the formation of a durable and protective solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), that is paramount for long cycle life in alkali-ion batteries, is a major bottleneck for KIBs because of less benign SEI properties[1][2].Recently reported crosstalk phenomena in half cell configurations due to the highly reactive potassium counter electrode make the analysis of surface layers a particular challenge [2][3]. In this presentation, a detailed characterization of the SEI formation on graphite was performed in both half and full cell configurations by in-house and synchrotron-based photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) in order to demonstrate fundamental differences in surface layer composition under the influence of a reactive counter electrode. While it is generally acknowledged that PES results show differences in SEI composition and thickness between both configurations, our results clearly demonstrate that in case of KIBs the changes become severe. This challenges interpretations of SEI layer properties made in half cells, as they are distinctly different from those in full cells. More importantly, this also affects interpretations on the major electrolyte degradation pathways in these systems. Using PES depth profiling and complementing results with gas chromatography, as well as DFT calculations, delivers new insights on the irreversible processes in KIBs. Reference s : [1] Naylor, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 11 (2019) 45636–45645.[2] Allgayer et al., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 5 (2022) 1136–1148.[3] Hosaka et al., ACS Energy Lett. 6 (2021) 3643–3649.
Read full abstract