Photodynamic Therapy For Actinic Keratosis Research Articles

Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) and uses different light sources as well as photosensitizers. In addition, PDT is often combined with other physical therapies or drugs. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of different PDTs against AK lesions based on Complete Response (CR) by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using PDT for AK were screened and a Bayesian model was developed to perform an NMA of CR at 3 months after the first treatment. Twenty-six trials involving 2285 patients and 14 treatments were included. The treatments were broadly divided into mono-PDT and combination therapy. The photodynamic monotherapies included methyl 5-aminolevulinic acid (MAL)-daylight (DL)-PDT, MAL-light-emitting diode (LED)-PDT, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-LED-PDT, etc. Combination therapies included ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted MAL-LED-PDT, calcipotriol (CAL)-assisted MAL-LED-PDT, and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu)-assisted MAL-DL-PDT. The results of the NMA showed that there is a high probability that AFL-MAL-LED-PDT is the most effective treatment option, followed by CAL-MAL-LED-PDT and ALA-LED-PDT. The subgroup analysis showed that MAL-based PDT had better efficacy when using LED versus other light sources, while LED-based PDT was likely to have better efficacy when using ALA versus other photosensitizers. The results of this NMA suggest that AFL-MAL-LED-PDT may be the superior choice for achieving complete clearance of AK lesions. PDT using LED as the light source and ALA as the photosensitizer may be more effective for the treatment of AK. However, more RCTs are needed to verify the results of this analysis.

Effective treatment of actinic keratosis on the hands with red light photodynamic therapy using BF-200 ALA

BackgroundAcral actinic keratosis (AK) lesions are considered difficult to treat, and published data for photodynamic therapy (PDT) on these lesions is limited. Thus, we evaluated sustained efficacy, safety, and satisfaction after PDT for AK on the hands. MethodsWe analysed subgroup data for treatment on the hands from a randomised, double-blind, intra-individual phase III study. All participants previously underwent up to two field-directed red light PDTs with 10 % 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion gel (BF-200 ALA). Assessments included pain during PDT, clearance and recurrence rates, and satisfaction. Results24 participants treated on the hands were included; 21 participants were analysed. Complete clearance rates with BF-200 ALA were 90.9 % (lesion-based) and 76.2 % (per participant's side), both markedly higher than with vehicle. The lesion recurrence rate with BF-200 ALA was 29.0 %. Adverse events reflected the mode of action. Mean pain intensities were 4.8 ± 3.8 (BF-200 ALA) and 0.8 ± 2.1 (vehicle) on an 11-point numeric rating scale. Most participants (81.0 %) rated their satisfaction with BF-200 ALA as very good or good. ConclusionThis subgroup analysis indicates that PDT with BF-200 ALA provides a suitable treatment for AK lesions on the hands.

Therapeutic and fluorescence evaluation of 20% 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis

BackgroundActinic keratosis (AK) is a precancerous lesion that occurs in areas that are chronically exposed to sunlight and has the potential to develop into invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). We investigated the efficacy of 20 % 5-aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) with LED red light for the treatment of AK in Chinese patients by examining changes in dermoscopic features, histopathology and fluorescence after treatment. MethodsTwenty-eight patients with fourty-six AK lesions from March 2022 to September 2023 were treated with 20 % ALA, and 3 h later, they were irradiated with LED red light (80–100 mW/cm2) for 20 min. A session of 20 % ALA-PDT was performed once a week for three consecutive weeks, and the dermoscopic, histopathological, fluorescent and photoaging outcomes were measured one week after the treatment. ResultsOne week after ALA-PDT, complete remission (CR) was reached in 53.6 % of patients. The CR of Grade I AK lesions was 100 %, that of Grade II lesions was 71.4 %, and that of Grade III lesions was 38.1 %. There was a significant improvement in the dermoscopic features, epidermal thickness and fluorescence of the AK lesions. The presence of red fluorescence decreased, and there was an association between CR and post-PDT fluorescence intensity. ALA-PDT also exhibited efficacy in treating photoaging, including fine lines, sallowness, mottled pigmentation, erythema, and telangiectasias, and improved the global score for photoaging. There were no serious adverse effects during or after ALA-PDT, and 82.1 % of the patients were satisfied with the treatment. ConclusionAK lesions can be safely and effectively treated with 20 % ALA-PDT with LED red light, which also alleviates photoaging in Chinese patients, including those with multiple AKs. This study highlights the possibility that fluorescence could be used to diagnose AK with peripheral field cancerization and evaluate the efficacy of ALA-PDT.

Exploring Patient Pain Experiences during and after Conventional Red Light and Simulated Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Simulated daylight photodynamic therapy is a relatively new and potentially less painful alternative to conventional red light photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis. Qualitative research exploring patient experiences of pain and skin reactions during these treatments is scarce. To address this, semi-structured interviews were conducted of 10 patients aged 60-81 years with symmetrically distributed actinic keratoses 4 weeks after split-face treatment with conventional red light photodynamic therapy and simulated daylight photodynamic therapy. The participants were recruited from an ongoing clinical randomized trial. Interviews (median length 35 min) were conducted between June 2022 and January 2023, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed qualitatively using content analysis, as described by Graneheim and Lundman. Participants reported that conventional red light photodynamic therapy was very painful during illumination and transiently painful in the post-treatment period, while simulated daylight photodynamic therapy was almost painless during illumination and led to minor post-treatment pain. Also, skin reactions were more intense and longer-lasting with conventional red light photodynamic therapy than with simulated daylight photodynamic therapy. Most participants expressed a treatment preference for simulated daylight photodynamic therapy but had reservations about its unestablished long-term effectiveness. This study underscores the considerable pain associated with conventional red light photodynamic therapy, and the pivotal importance of shared decision-making when selecting the most appropriate treatment.

Modified Painless Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis in China

SignificanceAminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). However, the pain during illumination usually caused patient to discontinue PDT treatment and resulted lower efficacy. Previous study showed modified painless PDT (M-PDT) with short ALA incubation time and longer irradiation time can reduce pain and preserve the efficacy. If M-PDT worked in AK still need to investigate. ApproachA splie-face controlled clinical study was conducted. Eleven patients with facial AK received C-PDT (conventional PDT) on the left and M-PDT in the contralateral area. The left area was illuminated by a red LED light (a total light dose of 140 J/cm2) after applying the ALA cream for 3 hours; the other had illumination for a total light dose of 288 J/cm2 after applying the ALA cream for 0.5 hours. The primary endpoint was the lesion clearance rate at 1 month. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, the incidence of adverse events, and cosmetic outcomes. ResultsAt one month following 3 treatments, the lesion clearance rate of M-PDT was non-inferior to that of C-PDT (93.1% vs. 86.4%, respectively. The lesion clearance rate of M-PDT to reach 100% clearance earlier than C-PDT for grade I lesions and higher clearance rates for grade III lesions. Moreover, the pain score during illumination was significantly lower for M-PDT than for C-PDT (P < 0.01). Regarding photoaging, the Global Subjective Skin Aging Assessment (GS2A2) score showed that the total and atrophy scores of C-PDT and M-PDT were significantly improved, and M-PDT also reduced discoloration. There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between C-PDT and M-PDT. ConclusionsM-PDT is non-inferior to C-PDT in terms of efficacy for treating AK, resulting in much lower pain scores.

Pre-treatment with topical 5-fluorouracil increases the efficacy of daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses – A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundDaylight photodynamic therapy (dPDT) and topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are each effective treatments for thin grade I actinic keratosis (AKs), but less so for thicker grade II-III AKs. Prolonged topical treatment regimens can be associated with severe skin reactions and low compliance.This study compares the efficacy of sequential 4 % 5-FU and dPDT with dPDT monotherapy for multiple actinic keratoses. MethodsSixty patients with a total of 1547 AKs (grade I: 1278; grade II: 246; grade III: 23) were treated in two symmetrical areas (mean size 75 cm2) of the face or scalp, which were randomized to (i) 4% 5-FU creme twice daily for 7 days before a single dPDT procedure and (ii) dPDT monotherapy. Daylight exposure was either outdoor or indoor daylight. ResultsTwelve weeks after treatment 87 % of all AKs cleared after 5-FU+dPDT compared to 74 % after dPDT alone (p<0.0001). For grade II AKs, the lesion response rate increased from 55 % with dPDT monotherapy to 79 % after 5-FU+dPDT (p<0.0056). Moderate/severe erythema was seen in 88 % 5-FU+dPDT areas compared to 41 % of dPDT areas two days after dPDT. Twelve weeks after treatment 75 % of the patients were very satisfied with both treatments. ConclusionsSequential 5-FU and dPDT was more effective than dPDT monotherapy in the treatment of AKs, especially for grade II AKs. Local skin reactions were more pronounced after combination treatment, but no patients discontinued the treatment. The combination of 5-FU and dPDT is an effective treatment of large treatment areas with high compliance and satisfaction.

The impact of occlusive vs non-occlusive application of methyl aminolevulinate on the efficacy and tolerability of daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis

BackgroundConventional photodynamic therapy (c-PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratoses (AKs) and nonmelanoma skin cancer which exploits the photosensitizing properties of methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL). Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) is an alternative to c-PDT which does not require the application of MAL in occlusion and that is better tolerated by patients. The impact of occlusion on the efficacy of DL-PD has not been investigated by previous studies. ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and tolerability of occlusive and non-occlusive DL-PDT. MethodsWe conducted a prospective intraindividual left/right comparison study. AKs of the face or scalp were marked in two symmetrical treatment areas. The two target areas were randomly assigned to DL-PDT with occlusive and non-occlusive application of MAL. The efficacy and cosmetic outcome were determined by a “blinded” investigator. ResultsLesions in occluded areas showed a better response in the clearance rate of the lesions (65.5% vs 35.0 %, p < 0.001 %), and cosmetic outcome (P < 0.001). There was no difference in phototoxicity or pain between occluded and non-occluded areas. ConclusionThe occlusive application of MAL improves the efficacy of DL-PDT in clearing AKs and does not increase the incidence of side effects.

The use of photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis in comparison to cryotherapy and chemical peels

Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment of actinic keratosis. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA) and Methyl Aminolevulinate (MAL) are commonly applied. However, there is a need to establish the quality of life after PDT treatment and potential conversion to squamous cell carcinomas. The objectives of the review were to compare the efficiency of PDT, the long-term reoccurrence, and cosmesis in actinic keratosis patients. Relevant studies from the year 2000 onwards involving PDT in comparison to Cryotherapy (CT) and chemical peels were collated using a combination of terms and keywords. Conflicting results were obtained when analysing PDT in comparison to CT. A conclusion could not be deducted as to whether PDT was more, less, or equivalently effective to CT However, results obtained indicated that PDT was of greater benefit in comparison to chemical peels. Additionally, in all the studies, a conclusion was made that PDT was far superior in cosmesis in comparison to conventional therapies.

Is a 4 J/cm2 PpIX-Weighted Simulated Daylight (SDL-PDT) Dose Still Efficient for Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratosis?

Background: Several solutions are now proposed to provide indoor illumination with so-called artificial white light or simulated daylight (SDL-PDT), resulting in an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). However, the optimal PpIX-weighted light dose is still debated. Integrating the effective irradiance over the irradiation time yields the effective light dose, which is also known as the protoporphyrin IX-weighted light dose and is a key parameter for the efficacy of the treatment. Objectives: The paper aims to report the clinical outcomes of SDL-PDT when using the PpIX-weighted light dose of 4 J/cm2, in patients treated for AK lesions of the scalp or the face at our medical dermatology center (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT052036). Methods: A total of 30 patients (16 males, 14 females), with a mean age of 71.0 ± 10.2, with phototype 1 (16 patients) and phototype 2 (14 patients) with grade I-II AK were treated with a drug light interval (DLI) of 10 min and a light exposure of 35 min (Dermaris, Surgiris, Croix, France), corresponding to a PpIX-weighted light dose of 4 J/cm2. The primary endpoint was the cure rate of patients at six months post-treatment. Secondary endpoints included scores of pain, erythema, crusts, and discomfort during or/and post the treatment. Results: In total, 762 AK were treated. Six months following treatment, the cure rate of the patients was 77%. The median pain score was less than 1 out of 10 for most of the patients. Erythema was observed in all patients and lasted 3 days (±1.5 day). Crusts were seen in 28 patients. Discomfort was reported as mild or less in more than 97% of patients. Conclusions: The shortening of the PpIX-weighted light dose to 4 J/cm2, corresponding to an illumination duration of 35 min with the Dermaris, does not modify the efficacy of the SDL-PDT. This observation is in agreement with recent published data demonstrating that the light dose can be reduced. Furthermore, this clinical study confirmed that SDL-PDT is an effective and nearly painless treatment with minimal side effects for patients with AK lesions of the scalp.

Erosive Pustular Dermatosis of the Scalp Treated with Serial Debridement: Case Report

An 82-year-old man with a past medical history of numerous non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), including unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the right temple treated with radiation therapy and cemiplimab, presented with worsening erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp (EPDS). This had initially onset four years prior in the setting of 5-fluorouracil and photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses. He had failed topical ultra-potent steroids, tacrolimus, and dapsone as well as oral dapsone, doxycycline, and acitretin. The condition’s chronicity and radiation to the area likely exacerbated his EPDS. We pursued serial debridement, followed by clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment twice daily. The patient reported marked improvement with stable condition between treatments. Upon better control of his EPDS, a suspicious ulcerative lesion under a previously affected area was identified and biopsied, revealing atypical fibroxanthoma. EPDS is an inflammatory dermatosis characterized by pustules, erosions, and crusting, often caused by sun damage, local trauma, and topical medications. First-line treatment is topical corticosteroids. We show that serial debridement is effective for treating recalcitrant EPDS. We emphasize the importance of maintaining adequate control of EPDS to avoid masking suspicious lesions, as the patient demographic affected by EPDS is at high risk for NMSCs.

Ablative Fractional Laser Enhances Artificial or Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Field Cancerization: A Randomized and Investigator-initiated Half-side Comparative Study.

Artificial daylight photodynamic therapy is a near-painless treatment for actinic keratoses, which can be performed indoors using a controlled light dose. Daylight photodynamic therapy is approved only for treatment of grade I-II actinic keratoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether fractional laser pre-treatment improves the outcomes of daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses of all grades. In addition, the study compared the outcomes of artificial and natural daylight photodynamic therapy. This randomized single-blinded split-side comparative study included 60 patients with ≥ 2 actinic keratoses of the head. Fractional laser pre-treatment was assigned randomly for actinic keratoses on 1 side of the head and, subsequently, the entire treatment area was treated with artificial or natural daylight photodynamic therapy. Fractional laser-mediated daylight photodynamic therapy achieved significantly higher complete clearance (50.0% vs 30.3%, p = 0.04), partial clearance (78.6% vs 50.0%, p < 0.01) and lesion-specific clearance (86.2% vs 70.2%, p < 0.01) than daylight photodynamic therapy alone at the 6-month follow-up. No significant differences were found in the outcomes of artificial vs natural daylight photodynamic therapy or grade I lesions vs grade II-III lesions. Thus, fractional laser pre-treatment appears to significantly increase the efficacy of artificial and natural daylight photodynamic therapy, and to be suitable for treatment of actinic keratoses of all grades.

Clinical evaluation of a short illumination duration (1 hour) when performing photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis using the Dermaris light source

Clinical evaluation of a short illumination duration (1 hour) when performing photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis using the Dermaris light source

The efficacy of different pretreatments combined with photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Figure S1 Figure S2 Figure S3 Table S1 Table S2 Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Single-center real-world treatment outcomes of ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis.

Among various treatment modalities of actinic keratosis (AK), ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy (fractional PDT) has shown higher efficacy despite shorter incubation time. However, there are lack of real-world studies on the therapeutic response of ablative PDT for AK and the factors that can predict the therapeutic response. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of fractional PDT. One hundred fifty-six patients who were histologically diagnosed with AK and treated with fractional PDT were retrospectively reviewed. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare treatment session differences according to grades. In multivariate analysis, the grade 2 category tended to be more clinically nonresponders than the grade 1 (OR, 5.17; 95% CI, 1.011-26.439; p=.048) and the group treated four or more times with ablative fractional laser-assisted PDT were more likely to show no response compared with the single treatment session group (OR, 8.78; 95% CI, 1.355-56.874; p=.023). Treatment sessions were significantly lower in grade 1 (1.72 ± 0.63, mean ± SD) when compared to grades 2 and 3, respectively (2.17 ± 0.76; 2.60 ± 1.60, mean ± SD). Recurrence was highest in grade 2, and most of them occurred after 1 year. On average, two treatment sessions are sufficient for AK lesions, but the thicker the lesion, the more treatment sessions may be required. Although there are relatively smaller number of grade 3 patients were included, recurrence was more frequent in higher grade of AK category, which needs special attention to thicker lesions.

Methyl Aminolaevulinic Acid versus Aminolaevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratosis with Low Doses of Red-Light LED Illumination: Results of Long-Term Follow-Up.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment for multiple actinic keratosis (AK) has been found effective when lower doses of red light were used with methyl aminolaevulinic acid (MAL). The aim of this study was to compare the results of lower doses of red light conventional PDT (h-PDT, 16 J/cm2) with MAL and aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) in a long-term follow-up. Patients with more than five symmetrical AK on the scalp who were candidates for PDT were selected and divided randomly between MAL and ALA treatment and patients were followed at 3 and 12 months. The responses were assessed by counting the total AK and the AK per patient. Pain and adverse events were also compiled. A total of 46 patients were treated, 24 with MAL, and 22 with ALA. The two groups were comparable at baseline (p &gt; 0.005). No significant differences were found in the results of both treatments at 12 months, despite ALA exhibiting slightly better results at 3 months. No differences in pain and adverse events were assessed. Both ALA and MAL were effective when lower doses of red light were used in c-PDT. Long term efficacy was also documented. Further studies are necessary to determine the inferior point of red-light illumination without losing efficacy.

The Utilization of Nanoemulsified Aminolevulinic Acid in Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis

Actinic Keratosis (AK), the pre-malignant condition that precedes nonmelanoma skin malignancies, is still one of the most common dermatologic cases seen in the clinic. Despite the availability of numerous therapies, optimal treatment still needs to be explored. In recent years, photodynamic therapy has sparked interest in various diseases, including actinic keratosis. Hence, this review aims to highlight the role and efficacy of nanoemulsified aminolevulinic acid as a photodynamic therapy agent in the treatment of actinic keratosis. A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science based on the specified PICO. The present study assesses primary outcomes based on lesion response, cosmetic results, clearance rate, patient satisfaction, and lesion reccurence. The use of ALA-PDT has been shown to ameliorate AK manifestations by accelerating neocollagenesis, stimulating fibroblast synthesis, and eliciting death in target cells. As a result, we concluded that ALA-PDT is an effective therapy for AK, notably due to its high clearance rate, low recurrence rate, and lack of complications due to its non-invasive approach. However, before administering ALA-PDT to AK patients, contraindications and precautions must be addressed.

Fully home-based methyl aminolevulinate daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the face or scalp: A real life open study.

Methyl aminolevulinate daylight photodynamic therapy (MAL DL-PDT) is highly efficacious for the treatment of nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratosis (AK), even when partially performed at home. To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of MAL DL-PDT performed completely by the patient in real life conditions. An open prospective study was conducted in Spain among patients diagnosed with at least five AK lesions on the face or the scalp. Patients received instruction and information in infographic format to perform MAL DL-PDT at home. All had been treated with 30% urea daily for 7 days before the day of MAL DL-PDT. Meteorological conditions on the day of the treatment and adverse effects were recorded. Patients underwent follow-up, and a second session of home-based MAL DL-PDT if deemed necessary, 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial treatment session. The study population consisted of 22 patients (19 men and three women, mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 72.05 [6.96] years). A complete response was observed in 47.7% of AK lesions at 3months (p < 0.001) and 65.9% (n=199) at 12 months (p < 0.001). Olsen grade II lesions showed the highest rate of response (76.07% at 12 months). The mean (SD) actinic keratosis area and severity index score decreased significantly from 4.99 (2.43) at baseline to 2.33 (1.01) at 12 months (p=0.0234). Adverse effects were mild and expected. A majority of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the treatment instruction provided (90.9%) and the treatment outcome (72.7%). MAL DL-PDT can be applied at home like any other topical treatment for AK. Our results indicate good long-term effectiveness, a high level of patient satisfaction, and no significant side effects.

Counteracting Side-effects of Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses.

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are precursors of squamous cell carcinomas and early intervention is important. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is often first-choice treatment for widespread AKs. Classic PDT consists of: Superficial curettage, application of 5-aminolevulinic acid or methyl aminolevulinate, incubation and protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) accumulation under occlusion for 3 hours, followed by illumination with red light-emitting diode light (37 J/cm2). Classic PDT is effective in treating AKs, but side-effects include unpleasant pretreatment, severe pain during illumination, inflammation after treatment, and long waiting time in the clinic. This targeted mini review describes efforts to counteract side-effects and simplify the procedure considering the clinic capacity. Changes are only acceptable if treatment effect is maintained. We introduce the following procedure changes: (i) reducing pre-treatment pain, bleeding, and oozing by omitting curettage; (ii) long-term illumination for 2 hours during PpIX formation (already in use as daylight PDT) and shortening of incubation time from 3 hours to 30 minutes to minimize pain and inflammation risk. In addition, options of timing, incubation, and illumination indoors and outdoors are discussed, focusing on advantages and disadvantages for patients and clinics. We report several options to counteract side-effects of classic PDT.

611 Painless photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: Enhancement of innate and adaptive immune responses by 5-fluorouracil pretreatment in a murine model

Painless photodynamic therapy (pPDT) to treat actinic keratoses (AK) involves application of a photosensitizer followed by immediate exposure to light; this causes little-to-no pain, yet results in effective lesion clearance by inducing long-term immune responses. In this investigation, we show that pretreatment of AK lesions with 5-fluorouracil (5FU), a popular chemotherapeutic agent with immune-modulatory effects, causes significant enhancement of PDT-related immune responses in 5FU-treated lesions.

Hemodynamic changes during conventional and daylight photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses – a randomized controlled trial

Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). However, pain and hypertension are important side effects of conventional PDT (c-PDT). Several studies have demonstrated that daylight PDT (dl-PDT) is less painful while being as effective as c-PDT. Objective To observe the effect of c-PDT and dl-PDT on different hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation). Methods Fifty patients with AK on the head were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, controlled study and treated with c-PDT or dl-PDT in a 1:1 ratio. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at four different time points during treatment. Pain was quantified using a visual analog scale. AK was counted before treatment and after one month. Results C-PDT is associated with significantly more pain, a significant increase in blood pressure and a higher rate of patients with grade 3 hypertension. Whereas dl-PDT is almost painless and does not lead to any changes in hemodynamic parameters. For both treatments, a similar lesion response rate was found after one month. Conclusions dl-PDT has a better tolerability while being as effective as c-PDT and therefore may be the more favorable treatment option in certain patient groups.