To the Editor: Besides the usual presentation of ephelides, we noticed in some fair-skinned patients the presence of pigmented macules of bony prominences (PMBP). Although most of them presented with facial ephelides and have red hair, these patients harbored a very distinctive clinical presentation, with pigmented macules suggestive of ephelides but restricted to bony prominences and sparing the classic photo-exposed skin. We conducted a multicentered observational study to better characterize this entity. Consecutive patients with red hair older than 3 years seen in 7 centers between November 2013 and June 2014 were included. Informed oral consent was obtained from all patients before entering the trial (institutional review board approval waived). Parental consent was obtained for those younger than 18 years old. Epidemiologic and clinical features of patients with and without PMBP were analyzed. When PMBP were present, photographs were taken and dermoscopy examination performed. One patient also had a skin biopsy specimen taken of a macule on his elbow. Fifty patients with phototype II to VI, older than 3 years and seen in the outpatient Department of Dermatology of the University Hospital of Nice, France, served as control subjects. For statistical analysis, patients with PMBP were compared with patients without pigmented macules. The χ2, exact Fisher, and Student t test were used when appropriate. In all, 38 patients were included and 17 (44.7%) had PMBP (Table I). Whereas ephelides were localized only in sun-exposed areas, with the heaviest concentration on face, upper aspect of the back, and back of forearm, PMBP were located mainly on the elbows (87.5%), knees (81.2%), and back of the hands (43.8%). Strikingly, lesions were restricted to bony prominences and spared the rest of the hands and limbs (Fig 1). One patient had macules on the buttocks, a region typically spared by ultraviolet light. The majority of patients had macules in more than 1 bony prominence (87.5%), with identical features in all sites: buff to light-brown macules of 1 to 3 mm. No triggering factor (including topical treatment) except repeated friction could be found. The group with PMBP had significantly fewer ephelides compared with the group without PMBP (P = .03, P = .04, and P = .01 for the lower aspect of neck, upper limbs, and other areas such as lower limbs and back, respectively). Dermoscopy showed light-brown macules with uniform pigmentation and “moth-eaten” edges without sign of melanocytic nevus. Histology showed a normal epidermis with some basal keratinocytes overloaded by melanin pigment without an increase in melanocytosis, some melanophages in the papillary dermis, and a discreet superficial nonspecific perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate. Half of the 6 other family members seen at the consultation had PMBP suggesting a familial predisposition.Table ICharacteristic of patients with red hair: Comparison of the groups with and without pigmented macules of bony prominencesWith PMBPWithout PMBPPAge, y, mean17.220.95.39Male to female ratio1.831.62.85Tanning.34 None5/15 (33.3%)8/21 (38.1%) Light8/15 (60%)13/21 (61.9%) Dark1/15 (6.7%)0/21 (0%)Eye color.66 Blue3/16 (18.8%)5/21 (23.8%) Green2/16 (12.5%)5/21 (23.8%) Brown11/16 (68.8%)11/21 (52.4%)Shade of hair.8 Venetian0/16 (0%)1/21 (4.8%) Ginger12/16 (76.5%)17/21 (80.95%) Auburn3/16 (17.6%)3/21 (14.3%) Mix1/16 (5.9%)0/21 (0%)Ephelides location Face15/16 (93.75%)15/19 (78.95%).35 Lower neck3/15 (20%)11/19 (57.9%).03∗Difference between both groups statistically significant (P < .05). Upper limbs5/15 (33.3%)13/19 (68.4%).04∗Difference between both groups statistically significant (P < .05). Others1/15 (6.67%)10/19 (52.6%).01∗Difference between both groups statistically significant (P < .05).Topical treatments0/12 (0%)8/20 (40%).03∗Difference between both groups statistically significant (P < .05).Sun exposure.54 Never3/10 (30%)3/19 (15.79%) Occasionally3/10 (30%)10/19 (52.6%) Often4/10 (40%)6/19 (31.58%) Always0/10 (0%)0/19 (0%)Photoprotection.56 Never1/10 (10%)0/19 (0%) Occasionally1/10 (10%)4/19 (21.05%) Regularly1/10 (10%)3/19 (15.79%) Always7/10 (70%)12/19 (63.16%)Parent skin type Father.27I-II0/7 (0%)5/16 (31.25%)III-IV7/7 (100%)11/16 (66.75%)V-VI0/7 (0%)0/16 (0%) Mother.67I-II5/9 (55.6%)7/16 (43.75%)III-IV4/9 (44.4%)9/16 (56.25%)V-VI0/9 (0%)0/16 (0%)PMBP, Pigmented macules of bony prominences.∗ Difference between both groups statistically significant (P < .05). Open table in a new tab PMBP, Pigmented macules of bony prominences. In the control group (mean age 14.48 years, male to female ratio: 1.08), 32 patients (64%) had phototype III or IV, 11 patients (22%) had phototype II, and 7 patients (14%) had phototype V or VI skin. None of them had PMBP, while 9 of them had ephelides (P < .0001). We describe a distinctive clinical presentation of pigmented macules in individuals with red hair localized on bony prominences. This clinical presentation is distinct from the usual presentation of ephelides. Repeated frictions in individuals with predisposed genetic background is suspected to be the causative factor, but further investigations are now required to better understand the pathophysiology and the potential prognostic value of such lesions. The authors are indebted to Alexandra Charlesworth for language editing.
Read full abstract