Phlebotomy Practices Research Articles

Assessment of venous blood collection practices among medical laboratory workers in Edo State, Nigeria

Background: Phlebotomy is a complex process requiring knowledge and skill to perform safely. This study aimed at identifying deviations from best phlebotomy practices among laboratory workers involved in venous blood draws in Edo State, Nigeria. Methods: A total of 109 participants from public and private laboratories in Edo State, Nigeria were assessed as they performed venous draws on patients. Results: All participants identified patients by their full names only, and did not introduce themselves to patients before initiating venous draws. Only 9 (8.2%) participants obtained patients consent before venous draws. Glove use was significantly associated with participants [medical laboratory scientists: odd ratio (OR), 14.850; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.345, 65.916; P Conclusions: Marked deviations from best phlebotomy practices were observed among study participants. Phlebotomy training of laboratory workers in Edo State, Nigeria is advocated.

Evaluation of Phlebotomy Services in Clinical Laboratory Setting in Addis Ababa Public Hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Background: Phlebotomy is the system of drawing a blood sample for the use of laboratory testing and for blood transfusion. Professionals who are performing phlebotomy services called phlebotomists. It is a critical part of the pre analytical phase of laboratory testing and is the most neglected procedures in health care. About 70% of the quality of the test are affected during phlebotomy and other pre analytical services. However, little is known about the practice of phlebotomy services in developing countries like Ethiopia. Objectives: To assess the practice of phlebotomists and to identify the major sources of errors during venous blood collection in public hospitals in Addis Ababa. Methodology: Hospital based, cross sectional observational and follow-up study was conducted from March to May 30, 2014. The study followed 40 phlebotomists while each of them was collecting 5 different venous blood collections (giving a total of 200 phlebotomies). Well structured questionnaires and checklists were used to collect data. Data was entered on EPI-Data version 3.1 and statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics were employed and the Chi square test was used for comparing major errors observed. Result: Almost all laboratory phlebotomy sites had no Standard Oprating Procedures (SOPs) available in collection sites and most of collection sites were not well ventilated. The major errors identified were use of single glove for more than one client 139 of 200 (69.5%), inappropriate cleaning practice of vein puncture sites 180 of 200 (90%), collecting blood before the disinfectant alcohol dried 139 of 200 (69.5%), incorrect tube collection sequences 107 of 200 (53.5%), unnecessarily applying of tourniquets after blood started flowing in to the collection tubes and syringes 170 of 200 (85.0%) and applying tourniquets before locating and selecting appropriate site for venous blood collection 175 of 200 (87.5%). Conclusion and Recommendation: -Many errors were identified in the phlebotomy practice during the observational study. As the quality of blood specimen influences patient result: emphasis should be given on phlebotomy training to improve the practices for phlebotomists and ensure safety as well as quality during blood collections for laboratory analysis.

Hemolysis rates in blood samples: differences between blood collected by clinicians and nurses and the effect of phlebotomy training.

Hemolytic samples are one of the most challenging preanalytical issues in laboratory medicine. Even causes leading to hemolytic specimen are various, including phlebotomy practices. Respective educational interventions as well as the reduction of the number of people involved in blood collections are claimed to influence the sample quality for the better. In our hospital 70 junior doctors were in charge of routine phlebotomy until 2012, when this task was shifted to 874 nurses, including a preceding training in phlebotomy and preanalytics. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of this training effect and the increase of people involved on sample quality. The hemolysis index (HI) of 43,875 samples was measured before (n=21,512) and after (n=22,363) the switch of blood collection responsibilities. Differences in overall hemolysis rates and the amount of plasma samples with a concentration of free hemoglobin (fHb) above 0.5 g/L and 1 g/L were calculated. Overall HI as well as the percentage of samples with an fHb concentration >0.5 g/L decreased after the responsibility for phlebotomy changed. The rate of samples with an fHb concentration >1 g/L remained unchanged. Hemolysis rates were reduced upon passing phlebotomy tasks from untrained physicians on to a trained nursing staff. We therefore conclude that the number of people performing phlebotomy seems to play a minor role, compared to the effect of a standardized training. However, whether a reduction in the number of people involved in blood collection could lead to further improvement of sample quality, remains to be investigated in future studies.

Findings of Phlebotomy Practices in Kenya in 2010: Need for Action.

Phlebotomy, a commonly performed medical procedure in healthcare, is essential for disease diagnosis and patient management. However, poorly performed phlebotomy can compromise patient safety, healthcare worker (HCW) safety, and specimen quality. We carried out a study between June and July 2010 to assess knowledge, quality and safety of phlebotomy before implementation of a public-private partnership between Becton, Dickinson and Company and the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. This was a cross-sectional observational study in 8 healthcare facilities within 4 regions of Kenya. HCWs were observed conducting venous and capillary blood collections, and pre- and posttests were offered during HCW training. Of 283 blood samples obtained, 194 were venous draws conducted by 72 HCWs and 89 were capillary draws performed by 33 HCWs. Based on 12 preset quality-associated criteria, none of the 194 observed phlebotomies met the standard. In total, 91 HCWs were trained in phlebotomy. The mean knowledge increase between pre- and posttraining test was 41%, ranging from 39% to 45% (95% confidence interval, 29.3%-53.5%;P< .001). Inadequate knowledge and imperfect phlebotomy procedures were noted. This formed the basis for the safe phlebotomy partnership to address these deficiencies. To ensure sustainability, safe phlebotomy practices were integrated into preservice training.

Hospital-acquired Anemia in Critically Ill Dogs and Cats: A Multi-Institutional Study.

BackgroundHospital‐acquired anemia is commonly described in people but limited information currently is available regarding its prevalence in animals.Hypothesis/objectivesAssess the prevalence of hospital‐acquired anemia in hospitalized critically ill dogs and cats, and examine its relationship with phlebotomy practices, transfusion administration, and survival to discharge.AnimalsEight hundred and fifty‐one client‐owned animals (688 dogs and 163 cats).MethodsA multicenter, observational study was conducted in which packed cell volume (PCV) was recorded at the time of admission and on subsequent hospitalization days. Signalment, number of blood samples obtained, underlying disease, whether or not blood products were administered, duration of hospitalization, and survival to discharge were recorded.ResultsAdmission anemia prevalence was 32%, with overall prevalence during the hospitalization period of 56%. The last recorded PCV was significantly lower than the admission PCV for both dogs (admission PCV, 42% [range, 6–67%]; last recorded PCV, 34% [range, 4–64%], P < .0001) and cats (admission PCV, 31% [range, 6–55%]; last recorded PCV, 26% [range, 10–46%], P < .0001). Patients that developed anemia had significantly more blood samples obtained (nonanemic, 5 blood samples [range, 2–54]; anemic, 7 blood samples [range, 2–49], P < .0001). Hospitalized cats were significantly more likely to develop anemia compared to dogs (P < .0001), but anemic dogs were significantly less likely to survive to discharge (P = .0001). Surgical patients were at higher risk of developing hospital‐acquired anemia compared to medical patients (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.4–0.9; P = .01).Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceHospital‐acquired anemia occurred frequently, especially in surgical patients. Additional studies focused on the direct effect of phlebotomy practices on the likelihood of anemia development in hospitalized animals are warranted.

Development of anemia, phlebotomy practices, and blood transfusion requirements in 45 critically ill cats (2009-2011).

To describe the incidence of the development of anemia, the number of phlebotomies performed daily, the approximate volume of blood withdrawn, the transfusion requirements and their association with duration of hospitalization and survival to discharge in critically ill cats. Retrospective study from January 2009 to January 2011. University teaching hospital. Cats hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) for >48 hours. None. Medical records of cats hospitalized for >48 hours in the ICU were examined. Of the 45 cats included, 60% (27/45) were not anemic upon admission to the ICU. Of these, 74.1% (20/27) developed anemia during their ICU stay. Development of anemia was associated with a longer duration of hospitalization (P = 0.002) but not with survival (P = 0.46). Fourteen cats (31.1%; 14/45) received one or more packed red blood cell transfusions and had significantly longer ICU stays (P < 0.001). Transfusion requirements were not associated with survival (P = 0.66). The median number of phlebotomies per day for all cats in the ICU was 3 (range 1-6). This was significantly associated with the development of anemia (P = 0.0011) and higher transfusion requirements (P = 0.16) in the 14 cats that received a transfusion. The estimated volume phlebotomized was significantly (P < 0.001) greater in cats that required a transfusion (median volume 3.32 mL/kg/ICU stay) compared to cats that did not require a transfusion (median volume 1.11 mL/kg/ICU stay) but was not associated with survival to discharge (P = 0.84). Development of anemia necessitating blood transfusions is common in critically ill cats and leads to significantly longer duration of ICU hospitalization. Iatrogenic anemia from frequent phlebotomies is an important cause for increased transfusion requirement. Fewer phlebotomies and other blood conserving strategies in these patients may help reduce the incidence of anemia and decrease transfusion requirements, as well as result in shorter hospital stays.

Associations between workplace affiliation and phlebotomy practices regarding patient identification and test request handling practices in primary healthcare centres: a multilevel model approach.

BackgroundClinical practice guidelines aim to enhance patient safety by reducing inappropriate variations in practice. Despite considerable efforts to enhance the use of clinical practice guidelines, adherence is often suboptimal. We investigated to what extent workplace affiliation explains variation of self-reported adherence to venous blood specimen collection regarding patient identification and test request handling practices, taking into consideration other primary healthcare centre and individual phlebotomist characteristics.MethodsData were collected through a questionnaire survey of 164 phlebotomy staff from 25 primary healthcare centres in northern Sweden. To prevent the impact of a large-scale education intervention in 2008, only baseline data, collected over a 3-month period in 2006–2007, were used and subjected to descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic analyses.ResultsIn two patient identification outcomes, stable high median odds ratios (MOR) were found in both the empty model, and in the adjusted full model including both individual and workplace factors. Our findings suggest that variances among phlebotomy staff can be largely explained by primary healthcare centre affiliation also when individual and workplace demographic characteristics were taken in consideration. Analyses showed phlebotomy staff at medium and large primary healthcare centres to be more likely to adhere to guidelines than staff at small centres. Furthermore, staff employed shorter time at worksite to be more likely to adhere than staff employed longer. Finally, staff performing phlebotomy every week or less were more likely to adhere than staff performing phlebotomy on a daily basis.ConclusionWorkplace affiliation largely explains variances in self-reported adherence to venous blood specimen collection guidelines for patient identification and test request handling practices among phlebotomy staff. Characteristics of the workplace, as well as of the individual phlebotomist, need to be identified in order to design strategies to improve clinical practice in this and other areas.

Phlebotomy and quality in the African laboratory.

Phlebotomy, the act of drawing blood through venepuncture, is one of the most common medical procedures in healthcare, as well as being a basis for diagnosis and treatment. A review of the available research has highlighted the dearth of information on the phlebotomy practice in Africa. Several studies elsewhere have shown that the pre-analytical phase (patient preparation, specimen collection and identification, transportation, preparation for analysis and storage) is the most error-prone process in laboratory medicine. The validity of any laboratory test result hinges on specimen quality; thus, as the push for laboratory quality improvement in Africa gathers momentum, the practice of phlebotomy should be subjected to critical appraisal. This article offers several suggestions for the improvement of phlebotomy in Africa.

Hepatitis C testing for people who inject drugs in the United Kingdom: Why is uptake so low?

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) related morbidity and mortality will continue to rise unless HCV testing and treatment uptake increases. People who inject drugs constitute those at highest risk for HCV in the UK, yet over a third who access drug and alcohol services have never received an HCV test.Method: We conducted qualitative life history research with people who have injected drugs for over six years to explore the social conditions of long-term HCV avoidance. In order to ascertain previous HCV exposure, participants were required to have an HCV antibody test at a recruiting service. We concentrate here on analyses of participant accounts in relation to HCV testing, and specifically, barriers to uptake. Thirty-seven participants were interviewed two to three times over three months. Data were analyzed according to grounded theory principles.Results: Participants had injected an average of nine years before their first HCV test. Key themes in participant accounts included: concerns regarding the process of HCV testing, including phlebotomy practices; concerns regarding the impacts of HCV diagnosis, exacerbated by confusion regarding test results and HCV effects, and fears of concomitant HIV diagnosis; optimism that testing was unnecessary given HCV risk potentials; and institutional mistrust, often internalized as felt stigma, especially in hospital settings.Conclusions: To maximize HCV testing uptake among people who inject drugs, we emphasize the need for: testing at community-based drug services; on-site skilled and non-judgemental phlebotomists; the decoupling of HCV and HIV testing; and peer-supported testing interventions.

Personnel’s Experiences of Phlebotomy Practices after Participating in an Educational Intervention Programme

Background. Blood specimen collection is a common procedure in health care, and the results from specimen analysis have essential influence on clinical decisions. Errors in phlebotomy may lead to repeated sampling and delay in diagnosis and may jeopardise patient safety. This study aimed to describe the experiences of, and reflections on, phlebotomy practices of phlebotomy personnel working in primary health care after participating in an educational intervention programme (EIP). Methods. Thirty phlebotomists from ten primary health care centres participated. Their experiences were investigated through face-to-face interviews. Findings were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results. The participants perceived the EIP as having opened up opportunities to reflect on safety. The EIP had made them aware of risks in relation to identification procedures, distractions from the environment, lack of knowledge, and transfer of information. The EIP also resulted in improvements in clinical practice, such as a standardised way of working and increased accuracy. Some said that the training had reassured them to continue working as usual, while others continued as usual regardless of incorrect procedure. Conclusions. The findings show that EIP can stimulate reflections on phlebotomy practices in larger study groups. Increased knowledge of phlebotomy practices improves the opportunities to revise and maximise the quality and content of future EIPs. Educators and safety managers should reflect on and pay particular attention to the identification procedure, distractions from the environment, and transfer of information, when developing and implementing EIPs. The focus of phlebotomy training should not solely be on improving adherence to practice guidelines.

Reference range of hemolysis index in serum and lithium-heparin plasma measured with two analytical platforms in a population of unselected outpatients

BackgroundThe hemolysis index (HI) is now available in several laboratory analyzers, but doubts remain about the thresholds for suppressing test results, the degree of standardization among different instrumentations and the use of different reference ranges in different biological matrices. This study was hence planned to establish the reference ranges of HI in serum and lithium-heparin plasma in a population of unselected outpatients, using two analytical platforms. Materials and methodsWe analyzed the HI in serum and lithium-heparin samples collected from 135 unselected outpatients, and we also defined the relative reference ranges according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. Samples were collected in the morning by expert nurses, using straight needle venipuncture. The HI in serum and lithium-heparin plasma was assessed with Roche Cobas c501 and Siemens Dimension Vista 1500. ResultsThe median concentration of cell-free hemoglobin was significantly higher in serum than in lithium-heparin plasma when measured with Cobas c501, but not with Dimension Vista 1500. After categorizing values according to cell-free hemoglobin thresholds, the agreement between instruments was 0.75 (p<0.01) for serum and 0.95 (p<0.01) for lithium-heparin plasma. The upper limits calculated according to CLSI document C28-A3 were 0.22g/L for Roche Cobas c501 and 0.25g/L for Siemens Dimension Vista 1500 in serum, whereas they were 0.13g/L for Cobas c501 and 0.10g/L for Dimension Vista 1500 in lithium-heparin plasma. ConclusionsAccording to our data, different thresholds of cell-free hemoglobin should be used between serum and lithium-heparin plasma for monitoring phlebotomy practice.

Impact of a large-scale educational intervention program on venous blood specimen collection practices

BackgroundPhlebotomy performed with poor adherence to venous blood specimen collection (VBSC) guidelines jeopardizes patient safety and may lead to patient suffering and adverse events. A first questionnaire study demonstrated low compliance to VBSC guidelines, motivating an educational intervention of all phlebotomists within a county council. The aim was to evaluate the impact of a large-scale educational intervention program (EIP) on primary health care phlebotomists’ adherence to VBSC guidelines. We hypothesised that the EIP would improve phlebotomists’ VBSC practical performance.MethodsThe present study comprise primary health care centres (n = 61) from two county councils in northern Sweden. The final selected study group consisted of phlebotomists divided into an intervention group (n = 84) and a corresponding control group (n = 79). Both groups responded to a validated self-reported VBSC questionnaire twice. The EIP included three parts: guideline studies, an oral presentation, and an examination. Non-parametric statistics were used for comparison within and between the groups.ResultsEvaluating the EIP, we found significant improvements in the intervention group compared to the control group on self-reported questionnaire responses regarding information search (ES = 0.23-0.33, p < 0.001-0.003), and patient rest prior to phlebotomy (ES = 0.27, p = 0.004). Test request management, patient identity control, release of venous stasis, and test tube labelling had significantly improved in the intervention group but did not significantly differ from the control group (ES = 0.22- 0.49, p = < 0.001- 0.006). The control group showed no significant improvements at all (ES = 0–0.39, p = 0.016-0.961).ConclusionsThe present study demonstrated several significant improvements on phlebotomists’ adherence to VBSC practices. Still, guideline adherence improvement to several crucial phlebotomy practices is needed. We cannot conclude that the improvements are solely due to the EIP and suggest future efforts to improve VBSC. The program should provide time for reflections and discussions. Furthermore, a modular structure would allow directed educational intervention based on the specific VBSC guideline flaws existing at a specific unit. Such an approach is probably more effective at improving and sustaining adherence to VBSC guidelines than an EIP containing general pre-analytical practices.

Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust

Total quality in laboratory medicine should be defined as the guarantee that each activity throughout the total testing process is correctly performed, providing valuable medical decision-making and effective patient care. In the past decades, a 10-fold reduction in the analytical error rate has been achieved thanks to improvements in both reliability and standardization of analytical techniques, reagents, and instrumentation. Notable advances in information technology, quality control and quality assurance methods have also assured a valuable contribution for reducing diagnostic errors. Nevertheless, several lines of evidence still suggest that most errors in laboratory diagnostics fall outside the analytical phase, and the pre- and postanalytical steps have been found to be much more vulnerable. This collective paper, which is the logical continuum of the former already published in this journal 2 years ago, provides additional contribution to risk management in the preanalytical phase and is a synopsis of the lectures of the 2nd European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)-Becton Dickinson (BD) European Conference on Preanalytical Phase meeting entitled "Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust" (Zagreb, Croatia, 1-2 March 2013). The leading topics that will be discussed include quality indicators for preanalytical phase, phlebotomy practices for collection of blood gas analysis and pediatric samples, lipemia and blood collection tube interferences, preanalytical requirements of urinalysis, molecular biology hemostasis and platelet testing, as well as indications on best practices for safe blood collection. Auditing of the preanalytical phase by ISO assessors and external quality assessment for preanalytical phase are also discussed.

Nosocomial outbreak of hepatitis B virus infection involving two hospitals in the Republic of Ireland

The routes of nosocomial hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission have changed over the years. Initiatives to prevent transfusion-associated HBV and healthcare worker-to-patient transmission have had a positive impact on these transmission routes. Recent reports of outbreaks of nosocomial HBV have implicated breaches in standard precautions as important causes of HBV transmission. This report describes a nosocomial outbreak of HBV infection in the Republic of Ireland, which occurred between January 2005 and March 2006. The outbreak was detected following identification of a case of acute HBV infection in a patient whose only risk factor was a recent surgical procedure. The extensive multi-agency investigation that followed revealed that the patient was one of five cases of acute HBV infection and that four separate transmission events between infectious cases had occurred in two different hospitals over a 15-month period. A definitive cause for each transmission event was not identified, although lapses in adherence to standard precautions, safe injection and phlebotomy practices could not be ruled out. Two secondary cases of acute HBV infection in community contacts of two of the nosocomial cases were identified. Phylogenetic analysis proved a useful tool in confirming infection with a pre-core HBV mutant and viral transmission between the seven patients. Apatient notification exercise involving 1028 potentially exposed patients found no evidence of additional cases of nosocomial HBV infection. These findings highlight the importance of consistent application of standard precautions.

The quality of the extra-analytical phase of laboratory practice in some developing European countries and Mexico – a multicentric study

This cross-sectional multicentric survey study aimed to assess the quality of the extra-analytical phase of laboratory activities in some developing European countries and Mexico. We assessed the quality of the extra-analytical practices in participating laboratories regarding the: a) sample acceptance criteria; b) phlebotomy procedures; c) test results reporting and d) recording non-conformities. A survey was performed during the April-May 2009. A total of 15 clinical laboratories from the following countries were included: Bosnia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia and Ukraine. Questions were scored (scores from 1-4) and average scores was calculated for each category. The overall score for all respondents (n = 443) was 3.10 ± 0.33. The average score was 3.11 ± 0.56 for sample acceptance criteria, 2.76 ± 0.58 for phlebotomy and 3.34 ± 0.53, for test results reporting (F = 116.49; p < 0.001). Laboratory accreditation was associated with better practices and higher overall quality of the extra-analytical procedures (F = 16.62; p < 0.001). Moreover, the highest scores for sample acceptance criteria (F = 8.32; p < 0.001), phlebotomy procedures (F = 13.28; p < 0.001) and for reporting non-conformities (F = 33.62; p < 0.001) were observed for accredited laboratories or laboratories under preparation for accreditation. The overall quality of the extra-analytical practices in countries in this survey is not satisfactory. Phlebotomy practices are the most critical extra-analytical activity. Since laboratory accreditation was associated with better practices and higher overall quality of the extra-analytical procedures, we believe that the most significant improvement could be made by implementing the total quality management system and standardizing laboratory procedures.

Phage-Displayed Peptide-Q Dot Nanocrystal Combo for High-Sensitivity Bacterial Detection in Plasma.

Abstract 3153Poster Board III-90 IntroductionDespite improved phlebotomy practices, refrigeration of red cells, freezing of plasma and improved materials for transfusion product collection and storage, bacterial contamination of transfusion products is still a longstanding problem. Current bacterial detection tests relevant to transfusion medicine, especially for stored platelets have limitations with regard to time, specificity and sensitivity. There is a need for new and improved cost-effective high-affinity detection probes to fill this gap. In this study, using plasma spiked with Bacillus cereus 4342 and B. anthracis-Sterne as an experimental system, we identified peptides from a bacteriophage-displayed random peptide library that selectively bind and detect the Bacillus strains. By labeling the peptides with Q dot-liquid nanocrystals, the detection sensitivity of the peptides was further enhanced. MethodsA commercially available bacteriophage-displayed random peptide library was screened using B. cereus 4342 as bait, using appropriate controls under stringent conditions. The screening and subsequent sequencing of the phage DNA identified two phages each containing a coding sequence for 12-amino acid peptide that are selectively capable of binding to the Bacillus. Based on the nucleic acid sequence, the two synthetic peptides with biotin tag were prepared for detection assays and to enhance the detection sensitivity further, the peptides were labeled with streptavidin-conjugated fluorescent quantum-dots (Q dots). Fluorescence was measured either by a plate reader or using a fluorescence microscope. ResultsThe two synthetic peptides selectively bound to the Bacillus strains in both dot blot and ELISA assays. The membrane-based dot blot assay demonstrated an assay sensitivity of 103 colony forming units/ml (CFU/ml), whereas ELISA demonstrated a sensitivity of 102 CFU/ml detection limit. Fluorometry analysis of spiked plasma samples revealed that the two peptides were able to bind to B. cereus 4342 and B. anthracis Sterne and detect these bacteria in plasma at 102 CFU/ml concentrations. The peptide-Qdot combo even detected a single bacterium in fluorescence microscopy. ConclusionOverall, the results reported here validate the usefulness of affinity-selected recombinant filamentous phage-derived peptides in combination with Qdot-liquid nanocrystals as high sensitivity detection probes for bacteria in various platforms and settings relevant to the blood safety and transfusion medicine.The findings and conclusions in this abstract have not been formally disseminated by the Food and Drug Administration and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Anemia and blood transfusion practices in the critically ill: A prospective cohort review

Nearly 75% of critically ill patients develop anemia in the intensive care unit (ICU). Anemia can be treated with red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, although evidence suggests that lower hemoglobin levels are tolerated in the critically ill. Despite such recommendations, variation exists in clinical practice. A prospective cohort was assessed for anemia and RBC transfusion practices in 100 consecutive adults admitted to our General Systems ICU. The prevalence of anemia in this cohort was 98%. Mean blood loss via phlebotomy was 25+/-10.3 mL per patient per day. The RBC transfusion rate for the ICU stay was 40%, increasing to 70% in patients whose ICU stay was >7 days. The mean pretransfusion level of hemoglobin was 7.35+/-0.47 mg/dL for the total cohort, and 8.2+/-0.65 mg/dL for those with a history of cardiovascular disease. Anemia was common in this critically ill cohort, with hemoglobin levels continuing to drop with ICU stay. Pretransfusion hemoglobin levels were lower than reported by others, yet the RBC transfusion rate was comparable. There was no association between anemia and phlebotomy practices in our ICU.

Evaluation of institutional practices for prevention of phlebotomy-associated percutaneous injuries in hospital settings

To reduce the incidence of phlebotomy-related percutaneous injuries (PIs), factors that contribute to these injuries must be identified. This study examined institutional phlebotomy practices, policies, perceptions, and culture to identify facilitators and barriers that appear to have the greatest impact in preventing injuries. During site visits at study hospitals, observational data were collected during the performance of phlebotomy. In addition, interviews and focus groups were conducted with hospital personnel involved in phlebotomy procedures. Nine hospitals participated in the study. A total of 126 phlebotomy procedures were observed. Health care personnel chose devices with safety features for the majority of observed procedures (n = 122, 97%). Recommended phlebotomy practices for handling needles after use were observed in 42% to 92% of procedures. Adherence varied by type of device, occupation, and facility PI rate. In the 23 interviews and 9 focus groups, participants identified factors that facilitated PI prevention such as the availability and use of devices with safety mechanisms, adherence to recommended safe needle-handling practices, and institutional phlebotomy training. The quantitative and qualitative data indicate that a wide array of factors can affect phlebotomy-related practices and perceptions. Prevention of PIs may require comprehensive, multifaceted intervention efforts to improve the safety culture and reduce PIs and exposure to bloodborne pathogens in health care facilities.

Is suboptimal phlebotomy technique impacting on potassium results for primary care?

Pre-analytical problems causing pseudohyperkalaemia have been highlighted previously. These include transit time and temperature effects when sample collection points are geographically widely spread. Similarly, inappropriate phlebotomy technique (in particular, requesting patients to fist clench to facilitate venesection) is a documented cause of pseudohyperkalaemia, but its incidence may be impossible to establish. This study illustrates how primary care population serum potassium data altered when local phlebotomy clinics optimized their technique. The effect of improving phlebotomy was studied by plotting average monthly primary care population serum potassium data and average percentage of samples with hyperkalaemia (5.2 mmol/L or higher) against mean monthly temperature before and after changes in phlebotomy practice. Only samples from primary care were included between 2002 and 2005 inclusive. Primary care population serum potassium was inversely related to ambient temperature. Following the change in phlebotomy practice, the annual percentage of results above reference range (5.2 mmol/L or higher) was reduced from 9% to 6% and the number of results breaching the upper telephoning threshold (5.8 mmol/L or higher) fell from 0.9% to 0.5%. Ensuring that phlebotomists were trained to avoid facilitating venesection by requesting patients to hand grip (fist clench), was associated with lower mean serum potassium results for the primary care patient population and a reduced incidence of hyperkalaemia. It is likely that the contribution of patient fist clenching during phlebotomy to pseudohyperkalaemia has been underestimated.

Consider comprehensive blood management

The demand for banked blood is ever increasing, yet the supply is not. Healthcare providers—through judicious phlebotomy practices and other conservation techniques—can minimize patients' transfusion requirements and often eliminate them altogether.