The essays in this issue are animated by the conference “Human traffic: Past and present,” sponsored by the Center for African and African American Studies (CAAAR) at Duke University in the fall of 2011.1 At this conference, participants sought to engage the multiple dimensions embedded in the complex phenomenon of human trafficking, rethinking, and unthinking some of its more popular frames and tropes, such as its ubiquitous reference to victimization, coercion, criminality, and modern slavery. As participants noted in that gathering, discussions of human trafficking have for the most part been framed through the dimension of “human rights” where “the trafficked” are reduced to commodities in insidious networks of violence and criminality, and are often portrayed as the unsuspecting victims of these criminal elements. Thus, as one blurb advertising an earlier North Carolina conference on the topic declared: “[H]uman trafficking is one of the most profitable and fastest growing criminal enterprises in the world.” Likewise, activists generally define human trafficking as “the sale, transport and profit from human beings who are forced to work for others,” and this trade, widely considered to be a contemporary equivalent to slavery, takes place both transnationally and nationally. Tied to the rise of prostitution, women and children, who are estimated to comprise 80% of those trafficked, constitute vulnerable groups that are seen to be at higher risk than others. Like indentured servitude of the past, persons are persuaded to leave their present, usually debilitating, situations for what are perceived to be better futures. As participants to the conference observed, however, evidence suggests a certain willingness by persons involved in these activities to risk their lives to realize what they envision, or at least hope, to be a better position for themselves by gaining a foothold in other places besides their “originary” homes. It was also recognized, however, that children are for the most part without the capacities to judge the sorts of risks such movements entail, and therefore face a higher probability of exploitation and abuse. Notwithstanding these broad realities, many conferees contended there is a need to calibrate the experiences of those involved in human trafficking against and within other processes of displacements and movements that are motivated by a general search for an escape from unfreedoms, or states of unhomeliness, that processes like migration entail.
Read full abstract