Abstract AIMS: To compare direct chop and stop-and-chop phacoemulsification techniques in grade 3 and grade 4 cataract patients. DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial done for 1 year conducted in a tertiary care hospital on 100 eyes of 100 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After taking informed consent, patients with nuclear cataract grade 3 and grade 4 according to Lens Opacities Classification System III without any coexisting corneal pathology, glaucoma, and traumatic cataracts were enrolled in the study. They were randomly grouped into group 1 (n = 50) patients undergoing phacoemulsification by direct chop technique and group 2 (n = 50) patients undergoing phacoemulsification by stop-and-chop technique. They were compared on parameters of endothelial cell count, central corneal thickness (CCT), and best corrected visual acuity (VA; BCVA) they were followed up on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, and 28. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data are described in terms of mean and standard deviation, frequencies (number of cases), and relative frequencies (percentages) as appropriate. All analyses are completed using MS Excel. RESULT: The endothelial cell loss average at the end of 4 weeks postoperatively was higher in group 2 than in group 1 and this was statistically significant. The average CCT did not change between the two groups. The best corrected VA between the two groups was the same. CONCLUSIONS: The phaco chop techniques have evolved to have better endothelial cell counts postoperatively and minimize the use of ultrasound energy. This study over 1 year concludes that the direct chop technique of nucleotomy had better endothelial cell count postoperatively than the stop-and-chop method of nucleotomy. There is no statistically significant difference in CCT in both techniques.
Read full abstract