Abstract Background: Fulvestrant downregulates breast tumor estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PgR) levels in a dose-dependent manner. Using an Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS), NEWEST (NCT00093002) reported that 4-wks' treatment with fulvestrant high-dose (HD, 500mg/month+500mg on Day 14 of Month 1) significantly reduced ER levels in primary breast tumors v approved-dose (AD, 250mg/month). However, no significant difference was detected between the two doses on PgR levels. To allow comparison with previous studies, a non-automated H-score assessment was performed and compared with ACIS.Methods: ER and PgR H-scores were derived by manual assessment of % tumor cells in each of 5 staining categories (negative, very weak, weak, moderate, strong) in the same sections scored by ACIS. This microscopic assessment was performed by 2 experienced observers blind to ACIS and clinical data. Mean % changes in H-scores were then calculated (table).Results: Both scoring methods showed a greater effect for fulvestrant HD v AD on ER expression at Wk 4, but H-score provided better dose discrimination. ACIS showed no difference between fulvestrant HD v AD on PgR expression at Wk 4, however, a significantly greater reduction in PgR expression was detected with fulvestrant HD using H-score.Wk 4Mean % change from baseline ACISH-score HDADHDADER-25.0%-13.5%-50.3%-13.7% n=60(n=63)(n=58)(n=60) p=0.0002 p<0.0001 PgR-22.7%-17.6%-80.5%-46.3% (n=43)(n=45)(n=31)(n=34) NS p=0.0018 Baseline mean H-score for HD and AD: 151.6 and 157.7 for ER; 103.8 and 122.9 for PgR.Conclusion: The choice of scoring method for determining ER and PgR expression in pharmacodynamic studies such as NEWEST is critical. Compared with H-scores, ACIS has a narrower dynamic range and reduced ability to discriminate fulvestrant HD v AD, particularly on PgR expression. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 1087.
Read full abstract