You have accessJournal of UrologySexual Function/Dysfunction/Andrology: Peyronie's Disease1 Apr 2015PD48-02 SUBCORONAL APPROACH TO INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION Aaron Weinberg, Christopher Deibert, Matthew Pagano, Paulo Egydio, and Robert Valenzuela Aaron WeinbergAaron Weinberg More articles by this author , Christopher DeibertChristopher Deibert More articles by this author , Matthew PaganoMatthew Pagano More articles by this author , Paulo EgydioPaulo Egydio More articles by this author , and Robert ValenzuelaRobert Valenzuela More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2759AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The surgical treatment for disorders of male sexual function requires specific exposure to safely and efficiently correct the underlying problem. Currently, subcoronal exposure is utilized for treatment of phimosis, Peyronie's Disease plaque (PDP) and semi-rigid penile prosthesis insertion. Infrapubic and scrotal incisions are used for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. However men who present with several disorders may require multiple procedures and surgical incisions. We report a prospective review of our surgical experience and outcomes with a single subcoronal incision for IPP placement with a modified no touch technique. This approach allows for access to the entire corporal shaft for multiple reconstructive procedures. METHODS 91 men had IPPs placed through our modified no touch technique, via a subcoronal incision. The penis was degloved to the level of the penoscrotal junction and the cremaster muscle was everted and secured to the drapes. This allowed scrotal and penile skin exclusion from the operative field. Following artificial erection the patient's corpora were inspected for PDP and other abnormalities; and subsequently repaired. Penoscrotal IPP models were placed in all cases with insertion proximal to the everted cremaster muscle (Figure 1). RESULTS Of the 91 men who had IPP placement, 22 had PDP which were treated, 35 men consented to circumcision, and 18 men who were found to have hypermobile glans after IPP placement received glanulopexies. Mean operative time was 54 (36-228) minutes. Three complications, specifically one partial necrosis of a suture line and two had contracture at the site of a PDP which required release; none were infectious. CONCLUSIONS Specialists in the surgical treatment of disorders of male sexual function can perform multiple procedures safely and easily through a modified no touch single subcoronal incision. IPP placement, circumcision, glanulopexy, management of PSP and correction of penile angulation can be accomplished through this exposure. This approach allows for access to the entire corporal shaft providing excellent visibility and allowing the surgeon to perform multiple penile reconstructive surgeries through a single incision. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e966 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Aaron Weinberg More articles by this author Christopher Deibert More articles by this author Matthew Pagano More articles by this author Paulo Egydio More articles by this author Robert Valenzuela More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...