Rapid speciation not only confers reproductive isolation in a few generations, but also has the consequence that the alleles of the derivative species are, at its outset, a limited sample of those of its progenitor. Therefore, when evidence from morphology, cytogenetical analysis of chromosome structure, geographical distributions and ecology combine to suggest that one species originated recently from another in a rapid series of events, both species are expected to possess in common a high proportion of their alleles detected by electrophoretic analysis of enzyme variation. I have used gel electrophoresis to examine the amount of genetic differentiation in two pairs of annual plant species that have been considered to have a recent parentoffspring relationship. In both cases, the parental species is widespread and outcrossing, and the derived species highly self-pollinating and found in only a single population. In a derived species of Stephanomeria, presently called Malheurensis, all the alleles but possibly one are also present in its progenitor (Gottlieb, 1973a). But numerous alleles in Clarkia franciscana are not present in its presumed progenitor (Gottlieb, 1973 b). Consequently, the electrophoretic evidence is concordant with the hypothesis of recent origin in the first case but not in the second. Various suggestions can be offered to explain the lack of concordance in C. franciscana but, because they deal with unobserved past events, they are not subject to disproof (Gottlieb, 1973b). The result is that the proposed mode of origin of C. franciscana (Lewis and Raven, 1958) is less certain than that for Malheurensis. Therefore, it became worthwhile to examine genetic differentiation between parent and derivative in another presumed case of recent rapid speciation. For this purpose, I selected an example in which both the derivative and parental species, although capable of self-fertilization, generally outcross: Clarkia lingulata and C. biloba. Clarkia lingulata is known from two sites in the Merced River Canyon, California, at the southern geographical periphery of the distribution of C. biloba. In external morphology, the two species differ only in the shape of the flower petal, but chromosomally they differ by a translocation, several paracentric inversions, and an extra chromosome in C. lingulata which is homologous to parts of two chromosomes of C. biloba (Lewis and Roberts, 1956; Lewis, 1962). Experimental study of the two species under uniform growth conditions failed to demonstrate any conditions of growth in which C. lingulata was better adapted than C. biloba (Lewis, 1969, 1973).
Read full abstract