Howarth (4) intercorrelated scores on Kline's three scales for oral optimism, oral pessimism, and anal character syndrome with those on a series of primary personality factor scales (3). The oral optimism scale was related to sociability, the pessimism scale to anxiety, and the anal character scale to superego and suspicion. At least two (and perhaps all three) of Kline's scales might relate to Eysenck's (1) superfactors, and Kline's Freudian explanations might be invalid in view of Eysenck's high heritability coefficients. To decide the matter more precisely Howarth in an'unpublished study correlated scores on the three scales of Kline's not only to scores on scales of the Howarth Personality Questionnaire but to scores on the three Eysenckian superfanors. This study established that at least one of Kline's scales (his oral optimism scale) does have this problem. Even if the one Kline scale relates with an Eysenck scale there is a question of the composition of that Eysenck scale; is it unitary? Howarth (2), for a total sample of 653 female and 666 male students, item-analyzed and item-factored Eysenck's scales. The Extraversion scale was far less homogeneous than the Neuroticism scale. Of the 24 former items several correlated more highly with the Neuroticism scale than with their own scale (e.g., Would you say you were fairly self-confident?) and correlated lower with their own scale (e.g., When people shout at you do you shout back?). Eysenck is well-known for the applications of the Extraversion scale and for stimulating hundreds of researches. The few thorough analyses of his scales are not going to change chis; however, one w~nders as to the efficacy of this research if it is based on such a heterogeneous collection of items. In the unpublished research referred to above, Howarth's (3) scale for sociability outperformed Eysendc's scale as a marker, and his anxiety scale performed as well as Eysenck's longer neuroticism scale. If of Eysenck's scales are covered by two of Howarth's scales . . . eighteen scales are left for more adequate psychological explanation (4, p. 1040). Bur, if extraversion is a questionable superfactor, what are its componena? Sociability appears to be one, impulsiveness another, dominance and jocularity others. Apart from impulsiveness the genetic-heritability aspects of these components have not been explored so that one or the other may be responsible for the Kline-Eysenck correlation between scores on oral optimism and Extraversion. While both scales originate from different assumptions, there is much room for exploration, for example, if all of Kline's items and Eysenck's items were combined, what factors might emerge? This writer has performed item analyses on all three of Kline's scales, and they are even less homogeneous than Eysenck's Extraversion scale. For anyone having a concept to operationalize measuring that concept as sharply as possible is a primary task.