ABSTRACT Hemispheric asymmetries are key characteristics of the neural implementation of verbal communication. Traditionally, the left hemisphere is considered dominant for phonology, literal semantics, and syntax, while a special role is allocated to the right hemisphere for higher-order language functions and discourse processing. More recent research has challenged this classical view, suggesting that discourse functions tend to engage both hemispheres, often with a left-sided dominance. However, studies contradict each other regarding the extent of right hemisphere recruitment during discourse processing, which may be influenced by various stimulus-related and context-dependent factors. Notably, virtually all conclusions drawn by these studies were obtained from group-aggregated data, which disregarded individual differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Meanwhile, individualized approaches in the language laterality literature that have recently gained traction were instrumental in reconsidering longstanding assumptions about the hemispheric organization of language and refining our knowledge thereof. Arguing that discourse processes have been underexplored in this context, the current review advocates for the adoption of an individual differences approach. This strategy may help reconcile the mixed findings in the literature and, ultimately, integrate discourse processing into comprehensive models of hemispheric language organization.
Read full abstract